Marginal zone lymphomas: a consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance.

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are a rare, indolent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with different diagnostic, genetic and clinical features and therapeutic implications. The most common is extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, followed by splenic MZL and nodal MZL. Patients with MZL generally have good outcomes with long survival rates but frequently have a relapsing/remitting course requiring several lines of therapy. The heterogeneous presentation and relapsing course present the clinician with several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This position statement presents evidence-based recommendations in the setting of Australia and New Zealand.

Australian data on the utilisation and duration on treatment of ibrutinib with a proton pump inhibitor in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

In Australia, over half of patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with ibrutinib use concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). High gastric pH reduces the bioavailability of some Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There was no difference in duration on ibrutinib with or without concomitant PPI (unadjusted P = 0.61; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-2.02, P = 0.411). PPI use does not affect ibrutinib treatment persistence.

Evolution of eligibility criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma randomised controlled trials over 30 years.

Eligibility criteria for randomised control trials (RCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be becoming increasingly strict. In this analysis, 42 first-line phase III RCTs enrolling DLBCL patients since 1990 were identified from PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov. Changes in 31 individual eligibility criteria were assessed using three pre-defined eras [(1) 1993-2005; (2) 2006-2013; and (3) 2014-2020]. The presence of 15/31 criteria increased significantly over time, and the total number of criteria per study also increased over time [median Era 1: 14·5, interquartile range (IQR) 12·6-16·4; Era 2: 21, 18·8-23·3; Era 3: 23, 21-25; P < 0·001]. When each trial's eligibility criteria were applied to 215 consecutive patients from an institutional database treated between 2010 and 2020, a median of 57% (IQR 47-70) of patients were hypothetically eligible for trial enrolment. The median percentage of patients eligible was 68% (56-91), 54% (37-81) and 47% (38-82) for Era 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P = 0·004). Phase III front-line DLBCL trial criteria have become increasingly restrictive over the last three decades, resulting in a diminishing proportion of trial-eligible patients, with less than 50% of our patients eligible for modern-era studies. This potentially impacts generalisability of recent trial results and will likely limit recruitment to ongoing studies.

An update of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In the last decade, the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has shifted away from chemoimmunotherapy toward targeted novel agents such as small molecule inhibitors and antibodies. Here, we give an overview of the pharmacology of venetoclax and obinutuzumab and the evidence from early phase to Phase III trials that have shaped how they are used in the treatment of CLL. Venetoclax, an oral anti-apoptotic BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with a CD20 antibody has shown superiority to chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory CLL. Obinutuzumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has been safely combined with novel agents including venetoclax and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and has shown superiority over rituximab when combined with chlorambucil.

Illness severity in community-onset invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection and the presence of virulence genes.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether particular clones causing invasive community-onset methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (cMRSA/cMSSA) infection differ in virulence. METHODS: Invasive cMRSA and cMSSA cases were prospectively identified. Principal component analysis was used to derive an illness severity score (ISS) from clinical data, including 30-day mortality, requirement for intensive hospital support, the presence of bloodstream infection, and hospital length of stay. The mean ISS for each S. aureus clone (based on MLST) was compared with its DNA microarray-based genotype. RESULTS: Fifty-seven cMRSA and 50 cMSSA infections were analyzed. Ten clones caused 82 (77%) of these infections and had an ISS calculated. The enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) and the collagen adhesin (cna) gene were found in 4 of the 5 highest-ranked clones (ST47-MSSA, ST30-MRSA-IV[2B], ST45-MSSA, and ST22-MRSA-IV[2B]) compared with none and 1 of the lowest 5 ranked clones, respectively. cMSSA clones caused more severe infection than cMRSA clones. The lukF/lukS Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes did not directly correlate with the ISS, being present in the second, fourth, and 10th most virulent clones. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical severity of invasive cMRSA and cMSSA infection is likely to be attributable to the isolates' entire genotype rather than a single putative virulence determinant such as PVL.

Evaluating the Efficacy, Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Oral Busulfan in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

Background: Oral busulfan and intravenous cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) are common myeloablative preparations used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Herein, we investigated the safety of (Bu/Cy) administration during HSCT. Methods: Patients administered Bu/Cy for allogeneic HSCT at Royal Perth Hospital and Fiona Stanley Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed for inclusion in the study. We performed busulfan pharmacokinetic (PK) testing for a subset of patients and allometric scaling modeling to assess the best method of busulfan dosing in patients at extremes of weight. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in the clinical outcome analysis. The median follow-up period was 32 months (range, 9-114 months). The three-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI), 51%-75%), and transplant-related mortality was 4% at 6 months (95% CI, 1-7%), with a low rate of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome of the liver being observed. In addition, relapse was 38% (95% CI, 30%-44%) at 3 years. The PK information of 15 patients receiving busulfan was available after oral dosing. The average per-dose busulfan exposure was 1,350 µmol.min/L (range, 878-1,717 µmol.min/L), and the within target range was 1,000-1,500 µmol.min/L in 73% of patients. Of the size measures investigated, ideal and adjusted body weight (ABW40) provided the best fit. No association was observed between busulfan exposure, toxicity, and relapse. Conclusions: Overall, Bu/Cy administration appeared safe when dosed in relation to weight, showing a low early transplant-related mortality rate following adequate busulfan exposure in majority of the cases. Body size measures, such as ideal body weight or ABW40, are likely more suitable for use during busulfan dosing, particularly at high extremes of the body mass index classification.

Targeted Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

The last decade has seen a significant leap in our understanding of the wide range of genetic lesions underpinning acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Next generation sequencing has led to the identification of driver mutations with significant implications on prognosis and has defined entities such as BCR-ABL-like ALL, where targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and JAK inhibitors may play a role in its treatment. In Philadelphia positive ALL, the introduction of TKIs into frontline treatment regimens has already transformed patient outcomes. In B-ALL, agents targeting surface receptors CD19, CD20 and CD22, including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T cell engagers, antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have shown significant activity but come with unique toxicities and have implications for how treatment is sequenced. Advances in T-ALL have lagged behind those seen in B-ALL. However, agents such as nelarabine, bortezomib and CAR T cell therapy targeting T cell antigens have been examined with promising results seen. As our understanding of disease biology in ALL grows, as does our ability to target pathways such as apoptosis, through BH3 mimetics, chemokines and epigenetic regulators. This review aims to highlight a range of available and emerging targeted therapeutics in ALL, to explore their mechanisms of action and to discuss the current evidence for their use.

Bispecific Antibodies: A Review of Development, Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity in B-Cell Lymphomas.

The treatment landscape of B-cell lymphomas is evolving with the advent of novel agents including immune and cellular therapies. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are molecules that recognise two different antigens and are used to engage effector cells, such as T-cells, to kill malignant B-cells. Several bispecific antibodies have entered early phase clinical development since the approval of the CD19/CD3 bispecific antibody, blinatumomab, for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Novel bsAbs include CD20/CD3 antibodies that are being investigated in both aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma with encouraging overall response rates including complete remissions. These results are seen even in heavily pre-treated patient populations such as those who have relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Potential toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity and tumour flare, with a number of strategies existing to mitigate these risks. Here, we review the development of bsAbs, their mechanism of action and the different types of bsAbs and how they differ in structure. We will present the currently available data from clinical trials regarding response rates, progression free survival and outcomes across a range of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Finally, we will discuss the key toxicities of bsAbs, their rates and management of these adverse events.