Long-term Outcomes from the HORIZON Randomized Trial for a Schlemm's Canal Microstent in Combination Cataract and Glaucoma Surgery.

PURPOSE: To present the 5-year results of the HORIZON trial comparing cataract surgery (CS) combined with an intracanalicular microstent with CS alone. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, controlled randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma treated with 1 or more glaucoma medications, washed-out diurnal intraocular pressure (DIOP) of 22 to 34 mmHg, and no prior incisional glaucoma surgery. METHODS: Eyes were randomized 2:1 to receive a Hydrus Microstent (HMS; Ivantis, Inc) or no stent after successful CS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication use, repeat glaucoma surgery, visual acuity, visual field, procedure-related adverse events, and corneal endothelial cell counts. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-nine eyes were randomized to HMS treatment, and 187 eyes were randomized to CS only. Study groups were well matched for preoperative IOP, medication use, washed-out DIOP, and glaucoma severity. Five-year follow-up was completed in 80% of patients. At 5 years, the HMS group included a higher proportion of eyes with IOP of 18 mmHg or less without medications than the CS group (49.5% vs. 33.8%; P = 0.003), as well as a greater likelihood of IOP reduction of 20% or more without medications than the CS group (54.2% vs. 32.8%; P < 0.001). The number of glaucoma medications was 0.5 ± 0.9 in the HMS group and 0.9 ± 0.9 in the CS group (P < 0.001), and 66% of eyes in the HMS group were medication free compared with 46% in the CS group (P < 0.001). The cumulative risk of incisional glaucoma surgery was lower in the HMS group (2.4% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.027, log-rank test). No clinical or statistically significant differences were found in the rate of endothelial cell loss from 3 to 60 months between the HMS and CS alone groups (P = 0.261). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a Schlemm's canal microstent in conjunction with CS was safe, resulted in lowered IOP and medication use, and reduced the need for postoperative incisional glaucoma filtration surgery compared with CS after 5 years. Long-term presence of the implant did not affect the corneal endothelium adversely.

Three-Year Findings of the HORIZON Trial: A Schlemm Canal Microstent for Pressure Reduction in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract.

PURPOSE: To report 3-year outcomes of the HORIZON study comparing cataract surgery (CS) with Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis, Inc) implantation versus CS alone. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred fifty-six eyes from 556 patients with cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with 1 or more glaucoma medication, washed out diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) of 22 to 34 mmHg, and no prior incisional glaucoma surgery. METHODS: After phacoemulsification, eyes were randomized 2:1 to receive a Hydrus Microstent or no stent. Follow-up included comprehensive eye examinations through 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included IOP, medical therapy, reoperation rates, visual acuity, adverse events, and changes in corneal endothelial cell counts. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-nine eyes were randomized to microstent treatment and 187 to CS only. Preoperative IOP, medication use, washed-out diurnal IOP, and glaucoma severity did not differ between the two treatment groups. At 3 years, IOP was 16.7 ± 3.1 mmHg in the microstent group and 17.0 ± 3.4 mmHg in the CS group (P = 0.85). The number of glaucoma medications was 0.4 ± 0.8 in the microstent group and 0.8 ± 1.0 in the CS group (P < 0.001), and 73% of microstent group eyes were medication free compared with 48% in the CS group (P < 0.001). The microstent group included a higher proportion of eyes with IOP of 18 mmHg or less without medications compared with the CS group (56.2% vs. 34.6%; P < 0.001), as well as IOP reduction of at least 20%, 30%, or 40% compared with CS alone. The cumulative probability of incisional glaucoma surgery was lower in the microstent group (0.6% vs. 3.9%; hazard ratio, 0.156; 95% confidence interval, 0.031-0.773; P = 0.020). No difference was found in postoperative corneal endothelial cell loss between groups. No procedure- or device-related serious adverse events resulting in vision loss occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined CS and microstent placement for mild to moderate POAG is safe, more effective in lowering IOP with fewer medications, and less likely to result in further incisional glaucoma filtration surgery than CS alone at 3 years.

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Hydrus and iStent Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Implants for Standalone Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: The COMPARE Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of different microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two eyes from 152 patients aged 45 to 84 years with OAG, Shaffer angle grade III-IV, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/30 or better, and IOP 23 to 39 mmHg after washout of all hypotensive medications. Eyes with secondary glaucoma other than pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary glaucoma, angle closure, previous incisional glaucoma surgery, or any significant ocular pathology other than glaucoma were excluded. INTERVENTION: Study eyes were randomized 1:1 to standalone MIGS consisting of either 1 Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) or 2 iStent Trabecular Micro Bypass devices (Glaukos Inc, San Clemente, CA). Follow-up was performed 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Within-group and between-group differences in IOP and medications at 12 months and complete surgical success defined as freedom from repeat glaucoma surgery, IOP 18 mmHg or less, and no glaucoma medications. Safety measures included the frequency of surgical complications, changes in visual acuity, slit-lamp findings, and adverse events. RESULTS: Study groups were well matched for baseline demographics, glaucoma status, medication use, and baseline IOP. Twelve-month follow-up was completed in 148 of 152 randomized subjects (97.3%). At 12 months, the Hydrus had a greater rate of complete surgical success (P < 0.001) and reduced medication use (difference = -0.6 medications, P = 0.004). More Hydrus subjects were medication free at 12 months (difference = 22.6% P = 0.0057). Secondary glaucoma surgery was performed in 2 eyes in the 2-iStent group (3.9%) and in none of the Hydrus eyes. Two eyes in the Hydrus group and 1 in the 2-iStent group had BCVA loss of ≥2 lines. CONCLUSION: Standalone MIGS in OAG with the Hydrus resulted in a higher surgical success rate and fewer medications compared with the 2-iStent procedure. The 2 MIGS devices have similar safety profiles.

iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass stents with topical prostaglandin as standalone treatment for open-angle glaucoma: 4-year outcomes.

IMPORTANCE: Long-term data are needed regarding effective and safe glaucoma treatment modalities. BACKGROUND: This study evaluated 4-year outcomes of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation (iStent inject) combined with topical travoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, multi-surgeon study at a tertiary care ophthalmology centre. PARTICIPANTS: OAG subjects with preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) 18 to 30 mmHg on two medications and 22 to 38 mmHg post-washout. METHODS: Subjects (n = 53) underwent standalone iStent inject implantation and started travoprost on postoperative Day 1. Measures included IOP, medications, comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and testing, and adverse events (AEs). Annual medication washouts were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean medicated and unmedicated IOP; and proportions of eyes with IOP ≤18mmHg, ≤15 mmHg, or ≥20% reduced while on travoprost vs screening IOP on two medications. RESULTS: At 48 months postoperative, 85% of eyes reduced IOP ≥20% on travoprost vs screening IOP on 2 medications; 92% of eyes had IOP ≤18 mmHg on travoprost; and 83% had IOP ≤15 mmHg on travoprost. At Month 49 (post-washout), 90% of eyes reduced IOP ≥20% vs preoperative washout IOP. Throughout follow-up, mean IOP on travoprost was 11.9 to 13.0 mmHg (34%-40% reduced vs 19.7 mmHg on 2 medications preoperatively; P < .0001 throughout), and post-washout IOP was 16.5 to 17.7 mmHg (28%-34% reduced vs 24.9 mmHg preoperatively; P < .0001 throughout). Favourable safety included minimal AEs; stable visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio and visual fields; and no secondary surgeries. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Combining iStent inject implantation with topical prostaglandin produced significant and safe 4-year IOP and medication reductions in OAG.

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an ab interno implanted (iStent inject) Trabecular Micro-Bypass System (Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA) in combination with cataract surgery in subjects with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-masked, concurrently controlled, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes with mild to moderate POAG and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤24 mmHg on 1 to 3 medications, unmedicated diurnal IOP (DIOP) 21 to 36 mmHg, and cataract requiring surgery. METHODS: After uncomplicated cataract surgery, eyes were randomized 3:1 intraoperatively to ab interno implantation of iStent inject (Model G2-M-IS; treatment group, n = 387) or no stent implantation (control group, n = 118). Subjects were followed through 2 years postoperatively. Annual washout of ocular hypotensive medication was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness end points were ≥20% reduction from baseline in month 24 unmedicated DIOP and change in unmedicated month 24 DIOP from baseline. Safety measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), slit-lamp and fundus examinations, gonioscopy, pachymetry, specular microscopy, visual fields, complications, and adverse events. RESULTS: The groups were well balanced preoperatively, including medicated IOP (17.5 mmHg in both groups) and unmedicated DIOP (24.8±3.3 mmHg vs. 24.5±3.1 mmHg in the treatment and control groups, respectively, P = 0.33). At 24 months, 75.8% of treatment eyes versus 61.9% of control eyes experienced ≥20% reduction from baseline in unmedicated DIOP (P = 0.005), and mean reduction in unmedicated DIOP from baseline was greater in treatment eyes (7.0±4.0 mmHg) than in control eyes (5.4±3.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). Of the responders, 84% of treatment eyes and 67% of control eyes were not receiving ocular hypotensive medication at 23 months. Furthermore, 63.2% of treatment eyes versus 50.0% of control eyes had month 24 medication-free DIOP ≤18 mmHg (difference 13.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-23.4). The overall safety profile of the treatment group was favorable and similar to that in the control group throughout the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically and statistically greater reductions in IOP without medication were achieved after iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone, with excellent safety through 2 years.

A Schlemm Canal Microstent for Intraocular Pressure Reduction in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: The HORIZON Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cataract surgery with implantation of a Schlemm canal microstent with cataract surgery alone for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication use after 24 months. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, single-masked, randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with concomitant primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), visually significant cataract, and washed-out modified diurnal IOP (MDIOP) between 22 and 34 mmHg. METHODS: Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive a single Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) in the Schlemm canal or no stent after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Comprehensive eye examinations were conducted 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Medication washout and MDIOP measurement were repeated at 12 and 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary and secondary effectiveness end points were the proportion of subjects demonstrating a 20% or greater reduction in unmedicated MDIOP and change in mean MDIOP from baseline at 24 months, respectively. Hypotensive medication use was tracked throughout the course of follow-up. Safety measures included the frequency of surgical complications and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 369 eyes were randomized after phacoemulsification to Hydrus Microstent (HMS) and 187 to no microstent (NMS). At 24 months, unmedicated MDIOP was reduced by ≥20% in 77.3% of HMS group eyes and in 57.8% of NMS group eyes (difference = 19.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2%-27.8%, P < 0.001). The mean reduction in 24-month unmedicated MDIOP was -7.6±4.1 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation) in the HMS group and -5.3±3.9 mmHg in the NMS group (difference = -2.3 mmHg; 95% CI, -3.0 to -1.6; P < 0.001). The mean number of medications was reduced from 1.7±0.9 at baseline to 0.3±0.8 at 24 months in the HMS group and from 1.7±0.9 to 0.7±0.9 in the NMS group (difference = -0.4 medications; P < 0.001). There were no serious ocular adverse events related to the microstent, and no significant differences in safety parameters between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This 24-month multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated superior reduction in MDIOP and medication use among subjects with mild-to-moderate POAG who received a Schlemm canal microstent combined with phacoemulsification compared with phacoemulsification alone.

Implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents and topical travoprost in open-angle glaucoma not controlled on two preoperative medications: 18-month follow-up.

IMPORTANCE: Additional data are sought regarding treatment options for glaucoma, a major cause of global blindness. BACKGROUND: The study assessed outcomes following standalone implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents and postoperative topical prostaglandin in eyes with open-angle glaucoma not controlled on two preoperative medications. DESIGN: The study design is a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label study at a tertiary-care ophthalmology centre. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects had open-angle glaucoma with preoperative intraocular pressure of 18-30 mmHg on two medications, a medication washout phase, and post-washout intraocular pressure of 22-38 mmHg. All subjects (N = 53) have been followed for 18 months. METHODS: One day following implantation of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents, subjects started topical travoprost. Medication washout was repeated at month 12. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with intraocular pressure reduction ≥ 20% versus medicated baseline intraocular pressure with reduction of one medication at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, 91% of eyes achieved intraocular pressure reduction ≥ 20% with reduction of one medication. All eyes had intraocular pressure ≤ 18 mmHg with reduction of one medication, and 87% had intraocular pressure ≤ 15 mmHg. Mean intraocular pressure on one medication was ≤ 13.0 mmHg (≥ 34% reduction) through 18 months. Mean post-washout intraocular pressure at month 13 was 33% lower than preoperative unmedicated intraocular pressure. No adverse events occurred through 18 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In open-angle glaucoma eyes on two preoperative medications, treatment with two second-generation trabecular stents and one postoperative prostaglandin resulted in mean intraocular pressure ≤ 13 mmHg with reduction of one medication, with favourable safety. These findings show the utility of second-generation trabecular bypass with postoperative prostaglandin in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

A Randomized Trial of a Schlemm's Canal Microstent with Phacoemulsification for Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of the Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis, Inc, Irvine, CA) with concurrent cataract surgery (CS) for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eyes from 100 patients 21 to 80 years of age with OAG and cataract with IOP of 24 mmHg or less with 4 or fewer hypotensive medications and a washed-out diurnal IOP (DIOP) of 21 to 36 mmHg. METHODS: On the day of surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo CS with the microstent or CS alone. Postoperative follow-up was at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Washout of hypotensive medications was repeated at 12 and 24 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to treatment was defined as a 20% or more decrease in washed out DIOP at 12 and 24 months of follow-up compared with baseline. Mean DIOP at 12 and 24 months, the proportion of subjects requiring medications at follow-up, and the mean number of medications were analyzed. Safety measures included change in visual acuity, slit-lamp observations, and adverse events. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a 20% reduction in washed out DIOP was significantly higher in the Hydrus plus CS group at 24 months compared with the CS group (80% vs. 46%; P = 0.0008). Washed out mean DIOP in the Hydrus plus CS group was significantly lower at 24 months compared with the CS group (16.9±3.3 mmHg vs. 19.2±4.7 mmHg; P = 0.0093), and the proportion of patients using no hypotensive medications was significantly higher at 24 months in the Hydrus plus CS group (73% vs. 38%; P = 0.0008). There were no differences in follow-up visual acuity between groups. The only notable device-related adverse event was focal peripheral anterior synechiae (1-2 mm in length). Otherwise, adverse event frequency was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular pressure was clinically and statistically significantly lower at 2 years in the Hydrus plus CS group compared with the CS alone group, with no differences in safety.

Effects of a Schlemm canal scaffold on collector channel ostia in human anterior segments.

This study evaluates the morphologic effect of the implantation of two different sizes of the Hydrus microstent on the outer wall of Schlemm's canal (SC) and collector channel (CC) ostia. Twelve human eyes were dissected at the equator removing the iris, lens, ciliary body and vitreous. The cornea was excised with a corneal trephine exposing a direct view of the angle while leaving the trabecular meshwork (TM) intact. The Hydrus delivery system was used to deliver microstents of 8 mm and 15 mm in length into SC. Following delivery, the tissues were immediately immersed in fixative. After tissue fixation, the microstents were gently lifted out of SC through the TM leaving a small slit opening in the TM. The slit opening was widened by gently dissecting the entire TM. Control eyes underwent dissection before fixation by gently removing the TM exposing the outer wall of SC. The tissues were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The external wall of SC was imaged using SEM and were reviewed with particular attention focused on the distribution of irregular particulate matter (IPM), the shape of the CC ostia and the health of the SC endothelium. Three eyes received the 8 mm microstent, two the 15 mm microstent and 6 eyes served as controls. Five of the controls had reported histories of glaucoma while all other eyes were normal. All eyes showed evidence of removal of the trabecular meshwork revealing the external wall of SC. CCs were regularly visible in all eyes and were not obstructed, compressed or their margins disrupted. Nuclear profiles were oriented circumferentially in SC except at regions of CC ostia where they assumed a radial configuration oriented toward the lumen of the CC. The area of microstent contact with SC external wall was examined with SEM and a comparison made between the 8 and 15 mm microstent showing a smaller area of indentation with the 8 mm microstent. The indentations were generally free of particulate debris, were smooth and were devoid of nuclear profiles. In bridged areas adjacent to areas of microstent contact, CCs were identified, appearing patent and intact like those of the control eyes. The eyes receiving 8 mm and 15 mm Hydrus microstents both maintained CC ostia patency but a smaller area of external wall contact was evident from insertion of the 8 mm microstent.

Corneal endothelial safety profile in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare 5-year corneal endothelial safety of 3 minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices (iStent inject , Hydrus Microstent, CyPass Micro-Stent). SETTING: U.S. multicenter trials. DESIGN: Post hoc 5-year analysis from prospective randomized single-masked pivotal trials. METHODS: Mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma subjects received a MIGS implant with phacoemulsification (implant + phaco) or phaco alone (control). In addition, 5-year end points comparing the implant and control groups included proportion of eyes with significant endothelial cell loss (ECL) (>30% or ≥30% vs baseline) and mean endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS: Comparable proportions of eyes in the iStent inject + phaco and control groups had significant 60-month ECL (9.4% vs 6.3%, respectively, diff: 3.2%, 95% CI, -5.0% to 11.3%, P = .77). Hydrus (20.8% vs 10.6%, diff: 10.2%, 95% CI, 3.2% to 17.2%, P = .01) and CyPass (27.2% vs 10.0%, diff: 17.2%, 95% CI, 5.6% to 28.7%, P = .02) had more eyes with ECL vs controls (iStent inject 1.49X, Hydrus 1.96X, CyPass 2.72X vs controls). Mean ECD over 60 months for iStent inject was indistinguishable vs control, whereas greater ECL was observed primarily 3 months postoperative (Hydrus) or accelerated after 2 years (CyPass). No iStent inject or Hydrus subjects developed persistent corneal edema, whereas 7 CyPass-implanted eyes developed ECL-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Through 5 years postoperative, there were no differences in proportion of eyes with significant ECL or mean ECD between the iStent inject and control groups. There was greater 5-year ECL and lower ECD in the Hydrus and CyPass groups vs controls. The Hydrus ECL rate mirrored control after 3 months; the CyPass ECL rate accelerated vs control.

Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment.

Purpose: Compare estimated sensitivities of SITA-Standard to the RATA-Standard algorithm of the Radius virtual reality perimeter (VRP), and measure concordance in glaucoma staging. Methods: One hundred adult glaucoma patients-half with suspect or mild glaucoma, and half with moderate or severe-from five clinics performed four 24-2 visual field tests during a single visit, two with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and two with Radius, in randomized order: HRHR or RHRH. Only one eye was tested per participant. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction to compare distributions of estimated sensitivities across all 54 test locations over the 15 to 40 dB measurement range of the Radius. Weighted kappa measured concordance in glaucoma staging between two masked glaucoma experts using Medicare definitions of severity. Results: A total of 62 OD and 38 OS eyes were tested. Estimated sensitivities for SITA-Standard and RATA-Standard were not significantly different for OD, but were for OS-likely because of SITA-Standard OD and OS being significantly different in our sample, but not for RATA-Standard. Low agreement was observed between 15 to 22 dB. Concordance in glaucoma staging was high for both graders: kappa = 0.91 and kappa = 0.93. Average test duration was 298 seconds for RATA-Standard and 341 seconds for SITA-Standard. The correlation in mean deviation was 0.94. Conclusions: Estimated sensitivities of RATA-Standard are comparable to SITA-Standard between 23 to 40 dB with high concordance in glaucoma staging. Translational Relevance: Radius VRP is statistically noninferior to HFA when staging glaucoma using Medicare definitions.

Open-angle glaucoma and Fuchs dystrophy.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of moderate myopia, long-standing open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and Fuchs dystrophy in both eyes was referred for consultative care. She had prior trabeculectomy in 1984 and 1992 in the left and right eyes, respectively. She is 3 months post-Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in the left eye, now referred with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximum tolerated medical therapy. Current medical therapy for IOP consists of acetazolamide 250 mg by mouth 2 times a day, brimonidine 2 times a day in the left eye, dorzolamide 2 times a day in the left eye, and timolol 2 times a day in the left eye. The patient has a history of presumed steroid response; however, her corneal surgeon has requested that the steroid be continued for the next several months because of the recent DSEK. The IOP in the left eye has ranged from the mid-20s to mid-30s since DSEK. The right eye has consistently had pressure in the low teens and below for many years without topical antihypertensive medications. Examination revealed stable visual acuity at 20/30 and 20/40 in the right and left eyes, respectively, IOP was 12 mm Hg in the right eye and 25 mm Hg in the left eye by Goldman applanation, irregular but reactive pupils without afferent defect, and full confrontational visual fields. Slitlamp examination showed superior low avascular bleb, moderate-to-severe guttae, and posterior chamber IOL in the right eye. The left eye showed superior low diffuse bleb, clear DSEK graft, quiet chamber, superonasal iridectomy, and posterior chamber IOL with an open posterior capsule. The conjunctiva was moderately scarred but a repeat trabeculectomy or Xen Gel stent (Abbvie) appeared possible. The angles were wide open in each eye. Fundus examination was normal aside from myopic, anomalous-appearing nerves with an approximate cup-to-disc ratio of 0.90 in both eyes. Humphrey visual field showed nonspecific changes on the right and moderate nasal defect on the left eye, stable to previous examinations dating back to 2018 (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure1/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff and Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure2/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) revealed moderated thinning in both eyes that was also stable to prior examinations (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure3/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Her axial length measured 25.23 and 26.34 mm in the right and left eyes, respectively. Central corneal thickness was 553 µm in the right eye and 563 µm in the left eye before her DSEK procedure. What would be your approach to management of this patient's left eye, addressing the following: Rationale for your procedure of choice? Would you over-rule the corneal surgeon and stop the steroid in an attempt to obviate the need for glaucoma surgery? Does the age of onset of glaucoma affect your surgical decision making? Note that patient age at the time of trabeculectomy was 22 years. Are some procedures better suited for patients after DSEK surgery?

Difficult decisions, filtration surgery, and the heartbreak of the numerator.

A 70-year-old man had progressive and severe glaucoma in each eye. He was intolerant to dorzolamide, brimonidine, and netarsudil. Each eye had prior selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as well as phacoemulsification plus minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) 6 years before current presentation (iStent [Glaukos Corp.] in the right eye and Cypass [Alcon Laboratories, Inc.] in the left eye). Postoperative acuities were 20/20 and 20/25 in the right and left eyes, respectively. When his left eye progressed with loss of central acuity despite peak intraocular pressures (IOPs) in the middle to upper teens, neuro-ophthalmology consultation was obtained (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202401000-00017/figure1/v/2023-12-22T124801Z/r/image-tiff). That workup included magnetic resonance imaging scan and hematologic screening, but all results were negative, and the neuro-ophthalmic consultant concluded that the vision loss was likely on the basis of glaucoma. Accordingly, a trabeculectomy was performed in the left eye achieving consistent IOPs in the range of 7 to 10 mm Hg without medications, rending the left eye stable since the filtration surgery nearly 2 years previously. The right eye continued to progress both subjectively and objectively, and on recent examination, the IOP measured 20 mm Hg and 09 mm Hg in the right and left eyes, respectively (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202401000-00017/figure2/v/2023-12-22T124801Z/r/image-tiff). Medications included timolol and latanoprostene bunod in the right eye only. Central corneal thickness was 526 µm and 527 µm in the right and left eyes, respectively. The visual acuity now measured 20/25 in the right eye and 20/250 in the left eye. The vertical cup-to-disc ratio was 0.9 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. Gonioscopy revealed a wide open angle in each eye with a patent sclerostomy superiorly in the left eye. The conjunctiva and sclera were healthy and without scarring in the right eye. The bleb in the left eye was diffuse, lightly vascularized, and seidel negative. Axial length (AL) was 26.88 µm in the right eye and 26.77 µm in the left eye. The patient was in good health and was not anticoagulated. An extensive discussion ensued about the best course of action for the right eye. How would you proceed in managing definite progression in this individual's right eye, knowing that he had lost fixation in his left eye at similar pressures?

Challenging the "Topical Medications-First" Approach to Glaucoma: A Treatment Paradigm in Evolution.

Topical glaucoma medications are effective and safe, but they have numerous well-documented limitations that diminish their long-term utility and sustainability. These limitations can include high rates of nonadherence (with associated glaucoma progression), concerning side effects, inconsistent circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complex dosing regimens, difficulty with self-administration, costs, and decreased quality of life. Despite these limitations, topical medications traditionally have been first-line in the glaucoma treatment algorithm, as no other minimally invasive treatment alternatives existed. In recent years, however, novel interventional therapies-including sustained-release drug-delivery platforms, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery procedures-have made it possible to intervene earlier without relying on topical medications. As a result, the topical medication-first treatment approach is being reevaluated in an overall shift toward earlier more proactive interventions.

Extreme intraocular pressure and steroid-dependent iritis.

A 50-year-old ophthalmic technician was referred by her retina specialist for urgent consultation due to markedly elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) unresponsive to medical therapy. Her history included chronic polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and chronic uveitis requiring ongoing topical steroid therapy. She had a sub-Tenon injection of Kenalog (triamcinolone) 18 months prior to referral. Chronic topical anti-inflammatory therapy included nepafenac (Ilevro) and prednisolone acetate 2 times a day. Attempts to discontinue topical steroid resulted in worsening inflammation. The patient was referred when the IOP measured 44 mm Hg in the left eye despite aggressive medical therapy, including acetazolamide. The IOP improved slightly when loteprednol was substituted for prednisolone acetate. Current medications in the left eye include brimonidine 3 times a day, loteprednol 2 times a day, nepafenac 2 times a day, and fixed combination latanoprost + netarsudil at bedtime. Her only medication in the right eye was travoprost. She is intolerant to dorzolamide. She was also taking acetazolamide 500 mg 2 times a day. She was not taking any anticoagulants. Past surgical history included cataract surgery in each eye. She has not had laser trabeculoplasty in either eye. Examination revealed uncorrected visual acuity of J1+ in the right eye (near) and 20/30 in the left eye (mini-monovision). There was no afferent pupillary defect. There was mild band keratopathy in each eye while the central cornea was clear in both eyes without keratic precipitates. Here angles were open to gonioscopy without peripheral anterior synechia. There was mild to moderate flare in each eye with trace cells. The IOP was 17 mm Hg in the right eye and 31 mm Hg in the left. Central corneal thickness measured 560 µm and 559 µm in the right and left eye respectively. There was a well-positioned intraocular lens within each capsule with a patent posterior capsulotomy. There was mild vitreous syneresis but no vitreous cell. The cup to disc ratio was 0.5 in each eye with a symmetrical neural rim. The retina was flat without macular edema. Visual field was normal in both eyes (Figures 1 and 2). Optical coherence tomography of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is shown in Figure 3 and retinal ganglion cell layer is shown in Supplemental Figure 1 (http://links.lww.com/JRS/A756).JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure1/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure2/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202301000-00020/figure3/v/2022-12-26T045736Z/r/image-tiff Please comment on your management of this patient's left eye.

Long-Term Endothelial Safety Profile With iStent Inject in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To report 5-year postoperative safety data of iStent inject, including overall stability, endothelial cell density (ECD), and endothelial cell loss (ECL) in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). DESIGN: 5-year follow-up safety study of the prospective, randomized, single-masked, concurrently controlled, multicenter iStent inject pivotal trial. METHODS: In this 5-year follow-up safety study of the 2-year iStent inject pivotal randomized controlled trial, patients receiving iStent inject placement and phacoemulsification or phacoemulsification alone were studied for the incidence of clinically relevant complications associated with iStent inject placement and stability. Corneal endothelial endpoints were mean change in ECD from screening and proportion of patients with >30% ECL from screening, from analysis of central specular endothelial images by a central image analysis reading center at several time points through 60 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 505 original randomized patients, 227 elected to participate (iStent inject and phacoemulsification group, n = 178; phacoemulsification-alone control group, n = 49). No specific device-related adverse events or complications were reported through month 60. No significant differences were observed in mean ECD, mean percentage change in ECD, or proportion of eyes with >30% ECL between the iStent inject and control groups at any time point; mean percentage decrease in ECD at 60 months was 14.3% ± 13.4% in the iStent inject group and 14.8% ± 10.3% in the control group (P = .8112). The annualized rate of ECD change from 3 to 60 months was neither clinically nor statistically significant between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of iStent inject during phacoemulsification in patients with mild-to-moderate POAG did not produce any device-related complications or ECD safety concerns compared to phacoemulsification alone through 60 months.

Negative Pressure Application via a Multi-Pressure Dial to Lower IOP in Patients with Suspected Glaucoma or Open Angle Glaucoma.

PRCIS: The multi-pressure dial applies localized periocular negative pressure to safely and effectively lower IOP and represents the first non-invasive, non-pharmacologic device for IOP reduction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Multi-Pressure Dial (MPD) system, a device that applies periocular negative pressure to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). SETTING: 6 investigational sites, United States. DESIGN: Prospective, assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Subjects with suspected glaucoma, ocular hypertension (OHTN), and open angle glaucoma (OAG) with baseline IOP ≥13 mmHg and ≤32 mmHg were enrolled. One eye of each subject was randomized to receive negative pressure application; the fellow eye served as a control. The study eye negative pressure setting was programmed for 60% of the baseline IOP. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of study eyes versus control eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥20% at Day 90. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥25% at Day 90 as well as the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction ≥20% at Days 30 and 60. RESULTS: 116 eyes of 58 subjects completed the study. At the Day 90 visit, 89.7% ( n =52) of study eyes versus 3.4% ( n =2) of control eyes achieved an IOP reduction ≥20% ( P <0.001). At Day 90, 77.6% ( n =45) of study eyes achieved a ≥25% IOP reduction compared to 1.7% ( n =1) of control eyes ( P <0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events were lid (17.2% study eye, 7.8% control eye) and periorbital edema (14.1% study eye, 10.9% control eye). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates that the MPD safely and effectively lowers IOP in a group of patients that included glaucoma suspects, OHTN, and patients with OAG.

Managing primary open-angle glaucoma in the setting of suboptimal surgical outcomes in the fellow eye.

A 62-year-old woman with mild myopia presented to her local optometrist for a routine examination and was found to have intraocular pressure (IOP) of 30 mm Hg in both eyes and cupped nerves. She had a family history of glaucoma in her father. She was started on latanoprost in both eyes and was referred for a glaucoma evaluation. On initial evaluation, her IOP was 25 mm Hg in the right eye and 26 mm Hg in the left eye. Central corneal thickness measured 592 µm in the right eye and 581 µm in the left eye. Her angles were open to gonioscopy without any peripheral anterior synechia. She had 1+ nuclear sclerosis with a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 in the right eye and 20/30- in the left eye and uncorrected near visual acuity of J1+ in each eye. Her nerves were 0.85 mm in the right eye and 0.75 mm in the left eye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed retinal nerve fiber layer thinning and a dense superior arcuate scotoma into fixation in her right eye, and superior and inferior arcuate scotomas in her left eye (Figures 1 and 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202307000-00019/figure1/v/2023-06-26T195222Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202307000-00019/figure2/v/2023-06-26T195222Z/r/image-tiff, Supplemental Figures 1 and 2, available at http://links.lww.com/JRS/A882 and http://links.lww.com/JRS/A883). She was successively trialed on fixed combination brimonidine-timolol, dorzolamide, and netarsudil, in addition to her latanoprost, but her IOP remained in the mid- to upper 20s in both eyes. The addition of acetazolamide lowered the pressure to 19 mm Hg in both eyes, but she tolerated it poorly. Methazolamide was also attempted with similar side effects. We elected to perform left eye cataract surgery combined with 360-degree viscocanaloplasty and insertion of a Hydrus microstent (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Surgery was uncomplicated with IOP of 16 mm Hg on postoperative day 1 with no glaucoma medications. However, by postoperative week 3, IOP returned to 27 mm Hg, and despite restarting latanoprost-netarsudil and finishing her steroid taper, IOP remained at 27 mm Hg by postoperative week 6. Brimonidine-timolol was added back to her left eye regimen and at postoperative week 8, IOP had elevated to 45 mm Hg. Maximizing her therapy with the addition of topical dorzolamide and oral methazolamide brought her IOP back down to 30 mm Hg. At that point, the decision was made to proceed with trabeculectomy of the left eye. The trabeculectomy was uneventful. However, postoperative attempts to augment filtration were rendered less successful by extremely thick Tenon layer. At her most recent follow-up the pressure in the left eye was mid-teens with brimonidine-timolol and dorzolamide. Her right eye IOP is in the upper 20s on maximum topical therapy. Knowing her postoperative course in the left eye, how would you manage the right eye? In addition to currently available options, would you consider a supraciliary shunt such as the MINIject (iSTAR) if such a device were U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved?