Maintenance of remission of ANCA vasculitis by rituximab based on B cell repopulation versus serological flare: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two long-term remission maintenance strategies for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of patients with ANCA vasculitis in remission after completing at least 2 years of fixed-schedule rituximab. In the B cell arm, rituximab was reinfused upon B cell repopulation; in the ANCA arm, rituximab was reinfused upon significant rise in ANCA level. Evaluations were conducted every 3 months. The primary endpoint was clinical relapse, defined as a modified BVAS/WG >0 by 36 months. Secondary endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs) and rituximab exposure. RESULTS: 115 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 4.1 years (IQR 2.5-5.0). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 4.1% (95% CI 1.0 to 15.6) of patients had a clinical relapse in the B cell arm, compared with 20.5% (95% CI 11.9 to 34.1) in the ANCA arm, at 3 years after study entry (log-rank p=0.045). Total SAEs, including infectious SAEs, and deaths did not differ. The number of SAEs due to COVID-19 was higher in the B cell arm (p=0.049). In the B cell arm, patients received a mean of 3.6 (SD 2.4) infusions (3.6 g) per person over the median study follow-up time of 4.1 years, compared with 0.5 (SD 1.4) infusions (0.5 g) per patient in the ANCA arm (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab dosed for B cell repopulation results in fewer clinical relapses than when dosed for a rise in ANCA level in maintenance of remission for ANCA vasculitis. Overall safety was equivalent; SAEs due to COVID-19 and rituximab exposure were higher with the B cell strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02749292.

Real-World Experience With Avacopan in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Introduction: Postmarketing data on outcomes of avacopan use in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are lacking. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 92 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV who received therapy with avacopan. The coprimary outcome measures were clinical remission at 26 and 52 weeks. We use descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression to assess outcomes and predictors of remission, respectively. Results: Of the 92 patients, 23% (n = 21) had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 10% on kidney replacement therapy at baseline. Among those with kidney involvement, mean (SD) enrollment eGFR was 33 (27) ml/min per 1.73 m2 with a mean (SD) change of +12 (25) and +20 (23) ml/min per 1.73 m2 at weeks 26 and 52, respectively. In addition to avacopan, 47% of patients received combination therapy of rituximab and low-dose cyclophosphamide, and 14% of patients received plasma exchange (PLEX). After induction, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to start avacopan was 3.6 (2.1-7.7) weeks, and the median time to discontinue prednisone after starting avacopan was 5.6 (3.3-9.5) weeks. Clinical remission was achieved in 90% of patients at week 26 and 84% of patients at week 52. Of the patients, 20% stopped avacopan due to adverse events, with the most common being elevated serum aminotransferases (4.3%). Conclusion: A high rate of remission and an acceptable safety profile were observed with the use of avacopan in the treatment of AAV in this postmarketing analysis, including the populations excluded from the ADVOCATE trial.

T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination are elevated in B cell deficiency and reduce risk of severe COVID-19.

Individuals with primary and pharmacologic B cell deficiencies have high rates of severe disease and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the immune responses and clinical outcomes after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and vaccination have yet to be fully defined. Here, we evaluate the cellular immune responses after both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients receiving the anti-CD20 therapy rituximab (RTX) and those with low B cell counts due to common variable immune deficiency (CVID) disease. Assessment of effector and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 revealed elevated reactivity and proliferative capacity after both infection and vaccination in B cell-deficient individuals, particularly within the CD8+ T cell compartment, in comparison with healthy controls. Evaluation of clinical outcomes demonstrates that vaccination of RTX-treated individuals was associated with about 4.8-fold reduced odds of moderate or severe COVID-19 in the absence of vaccine-induced antibodies. Analysis of T cell differentiation demonstrates that RTX administration increases the relative frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells, potentially by depletion of CD8+CD20dim T cells, which are primarily of an effector memory or terminal effector memory (TEMRA) phenotype. However, this also leads to a reduction in preexisting antiviral T cell immunity. Collectively, these data indicate that individuals with B cell deficiencies have enhanced T cell immunity after both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination that potentially accounts for reduced hospitalization and severe disease from subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A20/TNFAIP3 Increases ENOS Expression in an ERK5/KLF2-Dependent Manner to Support Endothelial Cell Health in the Face of Inflammation.

Rationale: Decreased expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in response to inflammatory and metabolic insults is the hallmark of endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction that preludes the development of atherosclerosis and hypertension. We previously reported the atheroprotective properties of the ubiquitin-editing and anti-inflammatory protein A20, also known as TNFAIP3, in part through interrupting nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and interferon signaling in EC and protecting these cells from apoptosis. However, A20's effect on eNOS expression and function remains unknown. In this study, we evaluated the impact of A20 overexpression or knockdown on eNOS expression in EC, at baseline and after tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment, used to mimic inflammation. Methods and Results: A20 overexpression in human coronary artery EC (HCAEC) significantly increased basal eNOS mRNA (qPCR) and protein (western blot) levels and prevented their downregulation by TNF. Conversely, siRNA-induced A20 knockdown decreased eNOS mRNA levels, identifying A20 as a physiologic regulator of eNOS expression. By reporter assays, using deletion and point mutants of the human eNOS promoter, and knockdown of eNOS transcriptional regulators, we demonstrated that A20-mediated increase of eNOS was transcriptional and relied on increased expression of the transcription factor Krüppel-like factor (KLF2), and upstream of KLF2, on activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5). Accordingly, ERK5 knockdown or inhibition significantly abrogated A20's ability to increase KLF2 and eNOS expression. In addition, A20 overexpression in HCAEC increased eNOS phosphorylation at Ser-1177, which is key for the function of this enzyme. Conclusions: This is the first report demonstrating that overexpression of A20 in EC increases eNOS transcription in an ERK5/KLF2-dependent manner and promotes eNOS activating phosphorylation. This effect withstands eNOS downregulation by TNF, preventing EC dysfunction in the face of inflammation. This novel function of A20 further qualifies its therapeutic promise to prevent/treat atherosclerosis.