Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(12): 5617-5627, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322314

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately two-thirds of adults are genetically predisposed to decreased lactase activity after weaning, putting them at risk of lactose intolerance. However, symptoms are a poor marker of lactose maldigestion. AIMS: We assessed association between self-reported lactose intolerance and intestinal lactase, lactose intake, and the small intestinal microbiome. METHODS: Patients 18-75 years presenting for upper endoscopy were recruited prospectively. Observational study participants completed a lactose intolerance symptom questionnaire and reported lactose intake. Post-bulbar biopsies were obtained to measure lactase activity and assess the small intestinal mucosal microbiome. We compared intestinal lactase between patients with and without lactose intolerance. We assessed associations between lactose intolerance symptoms and lactase and lactose intake. We examined associations of small bowel microbial composition with self-reported lactose intolerance and symptoms. RESULTS: Among 34 patients, 23 (68%) reported lactose intolerance. Those with lactose intolerance had higher total symptom scores, more frequent bowel urgency, and more bowel movements after consuming dairy. The proportion of individuals with abnormal lactase activity did not differ by lactose intolerance status. Median lactase levels were correlated with total lactose intolerance symptom scores (p = 0.038) and frequency of bowel urgency (p = 0.012). Daily lactose intake did not differ between groups. In 19 patients, we observed significant associations of small intestinal microbiome beta diversity with stool consistency after consuming dairy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal lactase is associated with lactose intolerance symptoms and bowel urgency in adults but does not distinguish the clinical phenotype entirely. Studying other contributing factors (microbiota, diet) may further clarify the pathophysiology of lactose intolerance.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Intolerância à Lactose , Humanos , Intolerância à Lactose/diagnóstico , Lactase/genética , Lactose , Intestinos
2.
Public Health Nutr ; : 1-9, 2020 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32744206

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between neighbourhood food environment perceptions and obesity among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) or Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) participants. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study conducted during SNAP-Ed or EFNEP programme participation in six states in the Midwest US between May 2016 and November 2017. SETTING: Community centres, food pantries and other SNAP-Ed or EFNEP recruitment locations. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 1743 low-income, adult nutrition education programme participants. RESULTS: Controlling for participant location and other demographic variables, those who perceived that a large selection of fruits and vegetables were available to them were 22 % less likely to be obese (adjusted odds ratio 0·78, 95 % CI 0·63, 0·97). In addition, participants who perceived the distance to the grocery store where they purchased most of their groceries to be greater than 5 miles were 1·36 times more likely to be overweight or obese than those who travelled shorter distances for their groceries. CONCLUSIONS: SNAP-Ed or EFNEP participants' weight status may be associated with their perceptions of their neighbourhood food environments. Programmes incorporating nutrition education and food access initiatives should attempt to better understand participant perceptions in order to address barriers in their efforts and to ensure that healthy food is accessible to low-income residents.

3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 114(3): E367-E375, 2017 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28049818

RESUMO

Directed modulation of the colonic bacteria to metabolize lactose effectively is a potentially useful approach to improve lactose digestion and tolerance. A randomized, double-blind, multisite placebo-controlled trial conducted in human subjects demonstrated that administration of a highly purified (>95%) short-chain galactooligosaccharide (GOS), designated "RP-G28," significantly improved clinical outcomes for lactose digestion and tolerance. In these individuals, stool samples were collected pretreatment (day 0), after GOS treatment (day 36), and 30 d after GOS feeding stopped and consumption of dairy products was encouraged (day 66). In this study, changes in the fecal microbiome were investigated using 16S rRNA amplicon pyrosequencing and high-throughput quantitative PCR. At day 36, bifidobacterial populations were increased in 27 of 30 of GOS subjects (90%), demonstrating a bifidogenic response in vivo. Relative abundance of lactose-fermenting Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Lactobacillus were significantly increased in response to GOS. When dairy was introduced into the diet, lactose-fermenting Roseburia species increased from day 36 to day 66. The results indicated a definitive change in the fecal microbiome of lactose-intolerant individuals, increasing the abundance of lactose-metabolizing bacteria that were responsive to dietary adaptation to GOS. This change correlated with clinical outcomes of improved lactose tolerance.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Lactose/metabolismo , Oligossacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Bifidobacterium/efeitos dos fármacos , Colo/metabolismo , Método Duplo-Cego , Faecalibacterium/efeitos dos fármacos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactobacillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , RNA Ribossômico 16S/metabolismo
4.
Public Health Nutr ; 21(5): 957-966, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29199629

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of policy, systems and environmental factors with improvement in household food security among low-income Indiana households with children after a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) direct nutrition education intervention. DESIGN: Household food security scores measured by the eighteen-item US Household Food Security Survey Module in a longitudinal randomized and controlled SNAP-Ed intervention study conducted from August 2013 to April 2015 were the response variable. Metrics to quantify environmental factors including classification of urban or rural county status; the number of SNAP-authorized stores, food pantries and recreational facilities; average fair market housing rental price; and natural amenity rank were collected from government websites and data sets covering the years 2012-2016 and used as covariates in mixed multiple linear regression modelling. SETTING: Thirty-seven Indiana counties, USA, 2012-2016. SUBJECTS: SNAP-Ed eligible adults from households with children (n 328). RESULTS: None of the environmental factors investigated were significantly associated with changes in household food security in this exploratory study. CONCLUSIONS: SNAP-Ed improves food security regardless of urban or rural location or the environmental factors investigated. Expansion of SNAP-Ed in rural areas may support food access among the low-income population and reduce the prevalence of food insecurity in rural compared with urban areas. Further investigation into policy, systems and environmental factors of the Social Ecological Model are warranted to better understand their relationship with direct SNAP-Ed and their impact on diet-related behaviours and food security.


Assuntos
Dieta , Assistência Alimentar , Abastecimento de Alimentos , Pobreza , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , População Rural , População Urbana , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Características da Família , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Habitação , Humanos , Indiana , Estilo de Vida , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Meio Social , Adulto Jovem
5.
Nutrients ; 16(12)2024 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38931316

RESUMO

Approximately 30% of milk protein is ß-casein. We aimed to determine whether lactose maldigesters who chronically consumed two cups of A1/A2 milk (containing 75% A1 ß-casein and 25% A2 ß-casein) would adapt to have fewer intolerance symptoms, lower serum inflammatory markers, and/or altered glutathione levels similar to those consuming A2 milk (containing 100% A2 ß-casein). A double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial was conducted. Sixteen confirmed lactose maldigesters consumed 250 mL of A1/A2 milk and A2 milk twice daily with meals for two weeks. At the end of the adaptation period on day 15, lactose maldigestion was measured after a challenge with the same milk used for adaptation (0.5 g of lactose per kg of body weight) with a hydrogen breath test. Fecal urgency was higher during the two-week consumption of A1/A2 milk compared to A2 milk (p = 0.04, n = 16). Bloating (p = 0.03, n = 16) and flatulence (p = 0.02, n = 16) were also higher on the 15th day with A1/A2 milk compared to A2 milk challenge. However, day-to-day symptoms, hydrogen, serum inflammatory markers, and antioxidant concentrations were not different after A1/A2 and A2 milk consumption adaptation periods. Adaptation over two weeks did not improve lactose digestion or tolerance of A1/A2 milk to match that of A2 milk.


Assuntos
Caseínas , Estudos Cross-Over , Intolerância à Lactose , Leite , Humanos , Caseínas/administração & dosagem , Leite/química , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Animais , Masculino , Lactose , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biomarcadores/sangue , Flatulência/etiologia , Testes Respiratórios , Adaptação Fisiológica
6.
Nutr J ; 12: 160, 2013 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24330605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lactose intolerance (LI) is a common medical problem with limited treatment options. The primary symptoms are abdominal pain, diarrhea, bloating, flatulence, and cramping. Limiting dairy foods to reduce symptoms contributes to low calcium intake and the risk for chronic disease. Adaptation of the colon bacteria to effectively metabolize lactose is a novel and potentially useful approach to improve lactose digestion and tolerance. RP-G28 is novel galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS) being investigated to improve lactose digestion and the symptoms of lactose intolerance in affected patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 2 sites in the United States. RP-G28 or placebo was administered to 85 patients with LI for 35 days. Post-treatment, subjects reintroduced dairy into their daily diets and were followed for 30 additional days to evaluate lactose digestion as measured by hydrogen production and symptom improvements via a patient-reported symptom assessment instrument. RESULTS: Lactose digestion and symptoms of LI trended toward improvement on RP-G28 at the end of treatment and 30 days post-treatment. A reduction in abdominal pain was also demonstrated in the study results. Fifty percent of RP-G28 subjects with abdominal pain at baseline reported no abdominal pain at the end of treatment and 30 days post treatment (p = 0.0190). RP-G28 subjects were also six times more likely to claim lactose tolerance post-treatment once dairy foods had been re-introduced into their diets (p = 0.0389). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy trends and favorable safety/tolerability findings suggest that RP-G28 appears to be a potentially useful approach for improving lactose digestion and LI symptoms. The concurrent reduction in abdominal pain and improved overall tolerance could be a meaningful benefit to lactose intolerant individuals.


Assuntos
Digestão , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Lactase/deficiência , Intolerância à Lactose/dietoterapia , Lactose/metabolismo , Oligossacarídeos/uso terapêutico , Prebióticos , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Colo/microbiologia , Laticínios/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiologia , Intolerância à Lactose/microbiologia , Intolerância à Lactose/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Oligossacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Oligossacarídeos/efeitos adversos , Prebióticos/efeitos adversos , Prebióticos/análise , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Trissacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Trissacarídeos/efeitos adversos , Trissacarídeos/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Nutrients ; 15(16)2023 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37630749

RESUMO

Supplementation with the probiotic Bifidobacterium and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) could improve gut health and benefit lactose intolerant individuals. A narrative review was conducted to identify human clinical trials that evaluated lactose digestion and/or tolerance in response to consumption of Bifidobacterium, GOS, or both. A total of 152 studies on Bifidobacterium and GOS or both were published between 1983 and 2022. Out of the 152 studies, 20 were human clinical trials conducted in lactose intolerant subjects; 8 studies were conducted with Bifidobacterium supplementation and 3 studies involved GOS supplementation. Five studies reported favorable outcomes of Bifidobacterium supplementation in managing lactose intolerance (LI). Similarly, three studies reported favorable outcomes with GOS supplementation. The other three studies reported neutral outcomes. In conclusion, most studies reported a favorable effect of Bifidobacterium and GOS on managing the symptoms of LI. No study has examined the effects of combined supplementation with Bifidobacterium and GOS in lactose intolerant subjects. Future research could examine if co-supplementation with Bifidobacterium and GOS is a more effective strategy to reduce the dairy discomfort in LI individuals.


Assuntos
Intolerância à Lactose , Lactose , Humanos , Bifidobacterium , Digestão , Tolerância Imunológica , Intolerância à Lactose/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto
8.
Nutrients ; 15(4)2023 Feb 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36839159

RESUMO

Lactose maldigesters report an increase in abdominal pain due to the consumption of milk containing a mixture of A1 and A2 ß-casein as compared to milk containing only A2 ß-casein. Gastric transit affects gastrointestinal symptoms and rapid transit has been associated with an increase in abdominal pain. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial in 10 lactose maldigesters. Subjects consumed each of the two types of milk: conventional milk containing 75% A1 ß-casein and 25% A2 ß-casein and A2 milk containing 100% A2 ß-casein. Magnetic resonance images were acquired, and abdominal pain was rated and recorded at 0, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min after milk consumption. The volume of milk in the stomach was calculated using FSL software. The volume of milk in the stomach after consuming milk with 75% A1 ß-casein and 25% A2 ß-casein was significantly lower at 30 (p = 0.01), 60 (p = 0.002) and 120 (p < 0.001) minutes as compared to milk with 100% A2 ß-casein in the 10 lactose maldigesters. The transit of New-World milk containing A1 and A2 ß-casein was more rapid as compared to Old-World milk containing only A2 ß-casein. This difference in transit may mediate symptoms of lactose intolerance.


Assuntos
Caseínas , Esvaziamento Gástrico , Intolerância à Lactose , Leite , Animais , Humanos , Dor Abdominal , Caseínas/química , Estudos Cross-Over , Lactose , Intolerância à Lactose/complicações , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Leite/química
9.
Am J Hum Biol ; 23(4): 470-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21495109

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between facultative skin pigmentation, which predicts circulating levels of plasma 25-hydroxymitamin D, and several measures of bone mass and structure in a cross sectional sample of adolescent females living in Hawaii. METHODS: Our sample was composed of adolescent females (n = 94) living in Hawaii where seasonal sun exposure is minimal, and who self-identified as either white (n = 16) or Asian (n = 78). Bone mineral content (BMC) of the total body, the lumbar spine and the hip, and cross sectional area (CSA) and section modulus (Z) at the proximal femur were quantified using DXA. Facultative skin pigmentation was measured at the forehead and non-facultative skin pigmentation was measured at the inner arm using a Chroma Meter CR-200b colorimeter. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between ethnic groups in terms of skin pigmentation. The difference between a* taken at the forehead and inner upper arm significantly predicted BMC at the lumbar spine, total hip, and total body. Other measures of skin pigmentation were not significant predictors of any other measure of skeletal integrity. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between facultative and non-facultative skin pigmentation for a* is a significant predictor BMC, but not bone structure. Our findings are limited by an inability to control for long term UVA and UVB exposure and lack of a measure of serum 25(OH)D status. Further research is needed to examine these questions, particularly in populations who live at high latitudes where a winter season limits vitamin D(3) synthesis.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Banho de Sol/estatística & dados numéricos , Raios Ultravioleta , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Absorciometria de Fóton , Adolescente , Asiático , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Carboidratos da Dieta/metabolismo , Feminino , Fêmur/fisiologia , Havaí , Articulação do Quadril/fisiologia , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiologia , Vitamina D/sangue , População Branca
10.
Nutr Rev ; 79(5): 599-614, 2021 04 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32447398

RESUMO

Consumption of yogurt and other fermented products is associated with improved health outcomes. Although dairy consumption is included in most dietary guidelines, there have been few specific recommendations for yogurt and cultured dairy products. A qualitative systematic review was conducted to determine the effect of consumption of fermented milk products on gastrointestinal and cardiovascular health, cancer risk, weight management, diabetes and metabolic health, and bone density using PRISMA guidelines. English language papers in PubMed were searched, with no date restrictions. In total, 1057 abstracts were screened, of which 602 were excluded owing to lack of appropriate controls, potential biases, and experimental design issues. The remaining 455 papers were independently reviewed by both authors and 108 studies were included in the final review. The authors met regularly to concur, through consensus, on relevance, methods, findings, quality, and conclusions. The included studies were published between 1979 and 2017. From the 108 included studies, 76 reported a favorable outcome of fermented milks on health and 67 of these were considered to be positive or neutral quality according to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Quality Criteria Checklist. Of the 32 remaining studies, the study outcomes were either not significant (28) or unfavorable (4), and most studies (18) were of neutral quality. A causal relationship exists between lactose digestion and tolerance and yogurt consumption, and consistent associations exist between fermented milk consumption and reduced risk of breast and colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes, improved weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular, bone, and gastrointestinal health. Further, an association exists between prostate cancer occurrence and dairy product consumption in general, with no difference between fermented and unfermented products. This article argues that yogurt and other fermented milk products provide favorable health outcomes beyond the milk from which these products are made and that consumption of these products should be encouraged as part of national dietary guidelines. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068953.


Assuntos
Produtos Fermentados do Leite , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Ingestão de Alimentos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Animais , Densidade Óssea , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactose , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Risco , Iogurte
11.
Gut Microbes ; 13(1): 1957536, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34365905

RESUMO

Background. Our recent publication (Chey et al., Nutrients 2020) showed that a 30-day administration of pure galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) significantly reduced symptoms and altered the fecal microbiome in patients with lactose intolerance (LI). Results. In this addendum, we performed an in-depth analysis of the fecal microbiome of the 377 LI patients randomized to one of two GOS doses (Low, 10-15 grams/day or High, 15-20 grams/day), or placebo in a multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons was done on GOS or placebo groups at weeks zero (baseline), four (end of treatment), nine, 16 and 22. Taxa impacted by treatment and subsequent dairy consumption included lactose-fermenting species of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus. Increased secondary fermentation microorganisms included Coprococcus and Ruminococcus species, Blautia producta, and Methanobrevibacterium. Finally, tertiary fermenters that use acetate to generate butyrate were also increased, including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia faecis, and C. eutactus. Conclusions. Results confirmed and expanded data on GOS microbiome modulation in LI individuals. Microbiome analysis at 16 and 22 weeks after treatment further suggested relatively long-term benefits when individuals continued consumption of dairy products.


Assuntos
Actinobacteria/isolamento & purificação , Clostridiales/isolamento & purificação , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Intolerância à Lactose/microbiologia , Oligossacarídeos/metabolismo , Prebióticos/administração & dosagem , Actinobacteria/classificação , Actinobacteria/genética , Clostridiales/classificação , Clostridiales/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Lactobacillus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Lactobacillus/metabolismo , Oligossacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Placebos/administração & dosagem , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
12.
Nutr J ; 9: 23, 2010 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20492702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in a variety of environmental samples. However, these protocols must be optimized prior to their application in order to enhance the quality and accuracy of downstream analyses. In this study, the relative efficacy of four commercial DNA extraction kits (Mobio Ultra Clean(R) Fecal DNA Isolation Kit, M; QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, Q; FastDNA SPIN Kit, FSp; FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil, FSo) were evaluated. Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed for its feasibility in detecting differences in human intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles. METHOD: Total DNA was extracted from varying weights of human fecal specimens using four different kits, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and DGGE separation of the amplicons. RESULTS: Regardless of kit, maximum DNA yield was obtained using 10 to 50 mg (wet wt) of fecal specimens and similar DGGE profiles were obtained. However, kits FSp and FSo extracted significantly larger amounts of DNA per g dry fecal specimens and produced more bands on their DGGE profiles than kits M and Q due to their use of bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking step. DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of human intestinal microbial community and enabled rapid comparative assessment of inter- and intra-subject differences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that extraction kits that incorporated bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking produced high quality DNA from human fecal specimens (10 to 50 mg, wet wt) that can be resolved as bacterial community fingerprints using PCR-DGGE technique. Subsequently, PCR-DGGE technique can be applied for studying variations in human intestinal microbial communities.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/análise , Fezes/microbiologia , Intestinos/microbiologia , Adulto , Bactérias/classificação , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Eletroforese/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnaturação de Ácido Nucleico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/análise , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos
13.
Am J Prev Med ; 58(6): 864-878, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32444004

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Rural communities face unique challenges including fewer healthcare providers and restricted access to nutritious foods, likely leading to poor health outcomes. Community health coalitions are groups of local organizations partnering to address local health needs. Employing such coalitions is one strategy for implementing policy-system-environment changes for improving rural health. However, their success is variable without standardized evaluation. In this review, rural community health coalitions were retrospectively assessed using the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model. Community health coalition-reported pathways through this model were explored using market basket analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: During Spring 2018, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for (coalition) AND (rural) AND (health) AND (effectiveness OR impact OR outcome OR logic model). Full-text, peer-reviewed, English articles meeting PICOS criteria (Population, rural communities; Intervention, presence of a community health coalition; Comparator, the coalition over time; Outcomes, logic model pathways) were reviewed. During Summer and Fall 2018, coalition-reported pathways were categorized according to logic model inputs and resources; internal and external activities; outputs; short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes; and impact. Market basket analysis was conducted during Winter 2018. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The 10 most frequently reported pathway items were partner diversity; organizational structures; implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions; funding; community engagement and outreach; university partners; holding regular meetings; having working groups and subcommittees; operating under or partnering with a regional research initiative; and conducting a community health and needs assessment. Half of community health coalitions reported 4 or more of the following: funding; partner diversity; university partners; organizational structures; community engagement and outreach; and implementing pilot studies, programs, and interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Many rural community health coalitions reported inputs and capacity building; few impacted health. Recommending common early phase logic model pathways may facilitate downstream success.


Assuntos
Fortalecimento Institucional , Coalizão em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Lógica , Saúde Pública , Saúde da População Rural , Participação da Comunidade , Comportamento Cooperativo , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos
14.
Nutrients ; 12(12)2020 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348621

RESUMO

Acute-feeding and multiple-day studies have demonstrated that milk containing A2 ß-casein only causes fewer symptoms of lactose intolerance (LI) than milk containing both A1 and A2 ß-caseins. We conducted a single-meal study to evaluate the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerance of milk containing different concentrations of A1 and A2 ß-casein proteins. This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in 25 LI subjects with maldigestion and an additional eight lactose maldigesters who did not meet the QLCSS criteria. Subjects received each of four types of milk (milk containing A2 ß-casein protein only, Jersey milk, conventional milk, and lactose-free milk) after overnight fasting. Symptoms of GI intolerance and breath hydrogen concentrations were analyzed for 6 h after ingestion of each type of milk. In an analysis of the 25 LI subjects, total symptom score for abdominal pain was lower following consumption of milk containing A2 ß-casein only, compared with conventional milk (p = 0.004). Post hoc analysis with lactose maldigesters revealed statistically significantly improved symptom scores (p = 0.04) and lower hydrogen production (p = 0.04) following consumption of milk containing A2 ß-casein only compared with conventional milk. Consumption of milk containing A2 ß-casein only is associated with fewer GI symptoms than consumption of conventional milk in lactose maldigesters.


Assuntos
Caseínas/efeitos adversos , Intolerância à Lactose/fisiopatologia , Leite/efeitos adversos , Leite/química , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Animais , Caseínas/química , Caseínas/metabolismo , Estudos Cross-Over , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Flatulência/etiologia , Flatulência/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Refeições , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leite/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem
15.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 95(7): 1499-1505, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32622451

RESUMO

Lactose intolerance is a common but poorly understood cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Contrary to popular belief, there is much more to its diagnosis beyond symptoms with exposure and management beyond milk- and dairy-product avoidance. In this article, we review definitions, genetic basis, pathogenesis, clinical signs, as well as diagnostic and management strategies.


Assuntos
Intolerância à Lactose , Laticínios/efeitos adversos , Laticínios/análise , Humanos , Intolerância à Lactose/diagnóstico , Intolerância à Lactose/genética , Intolerância à Lactose/fisiopatologia , Intolerância à Lactose/terapia
16.
Nutrients ; 12(4)2020 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290344

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Lactose intolerance (LI) is a global problem affecting more than half of the world's population. An ultra-purified, high-concentration galacto-oligosaccharide, RP-G28, is being developed as a treatment for patients with LI. The efficacy and safety of RP-G28 in reducing symptoms of lactose intolerance were assessed in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: In this multiclinical site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 377 patients with LI were randomized to one of two doses of orally administered RP-G28 or placebo for 30 days. A LI test and symptom assessment were performed at baseline and on day 31. The primary endpoint was a ≥4-point reduction or a score of zero on LI composite score on day 31. Voluntary milk and dairy intake and global outcome measures assessed patients' overall treatment satisfaction and quality of life before therapy and 30 days after therapy. This study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. Results: For the primary endpoint, 40% in the RP-G28 groups reported a ≥4-point reduction or no symptoms on LI symptom composite score compared to 26% with placebo (P = 0.016). Treatment with RP-G28 also led to significantly higher levels of milk and dairy intake and significant improvements in global assessments compared to placebo. RP-G28 but not placebo led to significant increases in five Bifidobacterium taxa. Conclusions: RP-G28 for 30 days significantly reduced symptoms and altered the fecal microbiome in patients with LI. Treatment with RP-G28 also improved milk/dairy consumption and quality of life and was safe and well tolerated.


Assuntos
Intolerância à Lactose/tratamento farmacológico , Oligossacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bifidobacterium , Laticínios , Método Duplo-Cego , Ingestão de Alimentos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Intolerância à Lactose/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
17.
Eval Program Plann ; 77: 101709, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568893

RESUMO

Community health coalitions (CHCs) are a promising approach for addressing disparities in rural health statistics. However, their effectiveness has been variable, and evaluation methods have been insufficient and inconsistent. Thus, we propose a mixed-methods evaluation framework and discuss pilot study findings. CHCs in our pilot study partnered with Purdue Extension. Extension links communities and land grant universities, providing programming and support for community-engaged research. We conducted social network analysis and effectiveness perception surveys in CHCs in 8 rural Indiana counties during summer 2017 and accessed county-level health statistics from 2015-16. We compared calculated variables (i.e., effectiveness survey k-means clusters, network measures, health status/outcomes) using Pearson's correlations. CHC members' positive perceptions of their leadership and functioning correlated with interconnectedness in their partnership networks, while more centralized partnership networks correlated with CHC members reporting problems in their coalitions. CHCs with highly rated leadership and functioning developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health and opioid outcomes. Likewise, CHCs reporting fewer problems for participation developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health, poor opioid outcomes, and more people without healthcare coverage. This pilot study provides a framework for iterative CHC evaluation. As the evidence grows, we will make recommendations for best practices that optimize CHC partnerships to improve local health in rural areas.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Indiana , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Rede Social , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
Nutrients ; 10(12)2018 Dec 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30544891

RESUMO

Research evaluating the relationship between lactose intolerance (LI) symptoms and age, gender and race is reviewed. An exhaustive search was conducted on the Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The evidence suggests that women, the elderly or specific racial groups are not more susceptible to LI, but rather dose, body size and genetic differences in lactase non-persistence (LNP) are the primary drivers of intolerance symptoms.


Assuntos
Intolerância à Lactose/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Sch Health ; 88(7): 481-492, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29864207

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Healthy, Huger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) presents challenges for foodservice directors (FSDs) in sourcing and preparing foods that meet nutrition standards. Concurrently, community health coalition members (CHCs) are engaging schools through community and school nutrition initiatives. We hypothesized significant differences in perceptions between FSDs and CHCs related to implementation of HHFKA such that FSDs would perceive greater foodservice challenges, while CHCs would be more supportive of community nutrition initiatives. METHODS: A perceptions survey was administered by email to 528 FSDs and 334 CHCs during summer 2016. Experience, education level, urban/rural differences, school demographics, and involvement between FSDs and CHCs were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 132 FSDs and 80 CHCs responded (29.5% FSDs, 24.7% CHCs). Overall perception of HHFKA foodservice challenge ranged between neutral (eg, neither challenging nor unchallenging) to somewhat challenging, and did not differ between groups. CHCs were significantly more supportive of community nutrition initiatives, while FSDs responded neutrally. CONCLUSIONS: FSDs awareness of CHCs desire for collaboration may increase FSDs support for broader school nutrition initiatives such as school gardens, farm to school, and student/community engagement. There is great potential for integrating student and community health programs through partnerships.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade/métodos , Serviços de Alimentação/normas , Almoço , Política Nutricional , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Conscientização , Comportamento Cooperativo , Escolaridade , Jardins , Humanos , Indiana , Colaboração Intersetorial , Percepção , Saúde Pública , Características de Residência , Instituições Acadêmicas/normas , Fatores Socioeconômicos
20.
Nutrients ; 10(3)2018 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29518042

RESUMO

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) program aims to improve nutritional intakes of low-income individuals (<185% poverty threshold). The objective of this study was to describe the compliance with Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) recommendations for fruits, vegetables, and whole grains among SNAP-Ed eligible (n = 3142) and ineligible (n = 3168) adult women (19-70 years) nationwide and SNAP-Ed participating women in Indiana (n = 2623), using the NHANES 2007-2012 and Indiana SNAP-Ed survey data, respectively. Sensitivity analysis further stratified women by race/ethnicity and by current SNAP participation (<130% poverty threshold). Nationally, lower-income women were less likely to meet the fruit (21% vs. 25%) and vegetable (11% vs. 19%) guidelines than higher-income women, but did not differ on whole grains, which were ~5% regardless of income. The income differences in fruit and vegetable intakes were driven by non-Hispanic whites. Fewer SNAP-Ed-eligible U.S. women met fruit (21% vs. 55%) and whole grain (4% vs. 18%) but did not differ for vegetable recommendations (11% vs. 9%) when compared to Indiana SNAP-Ed women. This same trend was observed among current SNAP participants. Different racial/ethnic group relationships with DGA compliance were found in Indiana compared to the nation. Nevertheless, most low-income women in the U.S. are at risk of not meeting DGA recommendations for fruits (79%), vegetables (89%), and whole grains (96%); SNAP-Ed participants in Indiana had higher compliance with DGA recommendations. Increased consumption of these three critical food groups would improve nutrient density, likely reduce calorie consumption by replacing high calorie choices, and improve fiber intakes.


Assuntos
Dieta/normas , Política Nutricional , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Pobreza , Adulto , Idoso , Dieta/economia , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Assistência Alimentar , Abastecimento de Alimentos , Frutas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nordazepam , Grãos Integrais , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA