RESUMO
(1) Background: Despite the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination, rare cases of acute hepatitis developing after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine or the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been reported. The aim of the study is to describe a case series of patients who experienced the onset of acute hepatitis, with or without autoimmune features, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection and to hypothesize a genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis. (2) Methods: A group of patients with acute onset hepatitis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection were evaluated in our hepatology outpatient clinic, where they underwent biochemical and autoimmune tests. Hepatitis A (HAV), B (HBV), and C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections were excluded. Patients with a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or drug-induced liver injury (DILI) underwent HLA typing and histological testing. (3) Results: Five patients experienced new-onset AIH after COVID-19 vaccination, one of which developed mild symptoms after vaccination that strongly worsened during subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection. One patient had AIH relapse after COVID-19 vaccination while on maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. All of them had HLA DRB1 alleles known to confer susceptibility to AIH (HLA DRB1*03,*07,*13,*14), and in three of them, HLA DRB1*11 was also detected. Two patients developed acute hepatitis without autoimmune hallmarks which resolved spontaneously, both positive for HLA DRB1*11. (4) Conclusions: An association between AIH and COVID-19 vaccine or infection can be hypothesized in individuals with a genetic predisposition. In patients without autoimmune features and spontaneous improvement of hypertransaminasemia, the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is probable. Further studies are needed to determine the presence of an actual association and identify a possible role of HLA DRB1*11 in the pathogenesis of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV2 vaccination or infection.
RESUMO
As much as 16-17% European and American patients on renal replacement therapy do not have a conclusive diagnosis of the cause of their renal failure. This may have important implications on the types of morbidity they can develop in case of systemic diseases with extrarenal involvement, or recurrent renal diseases in transplanted patients. A better knowledge of the underlying disease can have important prognostic and therapeutic repercussions. In this study we evaluated the rate of uremic patients who can benefit from a genomic diagnostic approach. Patients liable to a future genomic diagnostic study were selected based on two criteria: (i) age of dialysis entry less or equal to 55 years, and (ii) presence of a non-conclusive diagnosis. Based on the data extracted from the REGDIAL registry, we analyzed 534 patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. We identified 300 patients with age of entry into replacement therapy <55 years (56.2% of the overall study population). Among these, we identified 107 patients with missing or inconclusive diagnosis, which was equal to 20% of the overall population. Of these patients, 32.8% reported a positive family history of kidney disease. This study confirms that a significant proportion of patients on renal replacement therapy do not have an etiological diagnosis and may be subject to a genomic evaluation. With the increasing availability of genomic sequencing technology and the falling of related costs, nephrologists will be increasingly inclined to incorporate clinical genetic testing into their diagnostic armamentarium. There is therefore a need for in-depth, multicenter studies aimed at developing evidence-based guidelines, clear indications and at confirming the usefulness of genetic testing in nephrology.