Does IPSS-R downstaging before transplantation improve the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms?

ABSTRACT: In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, lowering IPSS-R scores by therapeutic intervention before transplantation may seem beneficial. However, there is no evidence, to date, to support this approach. In a retrospective analysis, a total of 1482 patients with MDS with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R score at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation transplant registry and analyzed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R score at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R score before transplant, and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R score change in untreated patients and moderately superior in patients treated with chemotherapy with improved IPSS-R score at transplant. Improved IPSS-R score after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R score progressed after chemotherapy, HMAs, or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R score downstaging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMAs or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in patients with MDS scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision-making for both doctors and patients.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia in Switzerland in the face of rapid development of effective drugs.

AIM: Until the year 2000, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was the standard treatment for young and fit chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. CML was the main indication for allogeneic HCT. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors changed the treatment of CML patients dramatically. Allogeneic HCT was rapidly replaced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for CML, and the indication shifted to the treatment of non-responders, patients intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients whose CML is transforming to the accelerated phase and blast crisis. This paper describes changes in the use of transplantation technology for CML patients in the face of rapid drug development. METHODS: All patients receiving a transplant for CML between 1997 and 2021 in Switzerland were included in the study. For the purpose of this analysis, time periods were analysed in quinquennia, 1997-2001 (Q1), 2002-2006 (Q2), 2007-2011 (Q3), 2012-2016 (Q4) and 2017-2021 (Q5), as the observation period spanned 25 years. RESULTS: Overall, 239 patients received a transplant. These included 96 in Q1, 56 in Q2, 25 in Q3, 34 in Q4 and 28 in Q5. Patient characteristics changed over time: recent patients were older and had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation because of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the proportions of patients receiving transplants during an early versus advanced disease stage differed little. Transplant technology changed, as well. Patients received intensive conditioning regimens less often due to higher age and more commonly had peripheral blood as opposed to bone marrow transplants. However, the type of stem cell donor selected did not differ. In a univariable analysis, there were no significant differences in survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence or incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease among the five quinquennia. In a multivariable analysis, older age, donors other than HLA-identical siblings and more advanced disease stage, but not the quinquennium, were associated with higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors haematopoietic cell transplantation has been used less frequently to treat CML. Patients in recent cohorts received transplants at an older age and later in the disease course; despite these higher risks, the outcome of allogeneic HCT has not worsened over time but has not improved, either. As the outcome is worse in advanced phases, it is important to conduct transplants before disease progression. Therefore, patients with advanced disease should be monitored closely and receive transplants in time.

Mutational patterns in therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia subgroups: one step closer to unveiling the genetic odyssey.

There is increasing evidence that therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (trALL) resulting from chemo- and/or radiotherapy represents a distinct entity. However, apart from KMT2A rearrangements, which have been repeatedly reported in this subgroup, the relevance of other aberrations remains controversial due to divergent study results and sparse molecular analyses. Within our ALL patient cohort, 15% (n = 19/131) met the criteria for trALL with a high proportion of Ph + and KMT2A rearrangements. On the molecular level, the most frequently observed mutation was KMT2D, followed by CDKN2A, KRAS and DNMT3A. No TP53 mutation was detected. Outcome was particularly poor in Ph + trALL compared to Ph+ de novo ALL, which seemed to be mitigated by allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our findings further define trALL as a distinct entity but highlight the need for further molecular genome sequencing of somatic and germline variants to advance our understanding of trALL.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in de novo core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: data from the EBMT.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) represents 12-15% of all AML cases. Although CBF positivity infers a survival advantage, overall survival (OS) remains dismal. Treatment is with cytarabine/anthracycline-based chemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is reserved for relapse or for patients having not achieved MRD-negativity at high risk for relapse. The role of SCT in first complete remission (CR1) remains controversial and is considered in high risk conditions. In this retrospective, multi-national, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-based study, we identified 1901 patients with de novo CBF-AML who received an allo-SCT or autologous transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. 65.5% harbored t(8;21) and 34.4% inv(16). In this group, the majority (77%) were treated with allo-SCT in CR1. In multivariate analysis, treatment with allo-SCT was an independent and significant, negative predictor of NRM and OS (HR 4.26, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.67, p = 0.003) and among patients treated with allo-SCT, those treated with MSD had the best outcomes, comparable to those treated with ASCT. There was no interaction between the type of transplant and MRD status at time of SCT. In both, MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, NRM was worse in the allo-SCT group (MRD-: 12.9% vs 5.2%, p = 0.007; MRD+: 10.6% vs 0%, p = 0.004). We therefore demonstrated that consolidation in CR1 with allo-SCT results in worse outcomes than ASCT. Whether consolidation with ASCT yields better outcomes than chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy in combination with Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin is yet to be investigated.