The effect of a low-level psychological intervention (PM+) on post-migration living difficulties - Results from two studies in Switzerland and in the Netherlands.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: After arriving in host countries, most refugees are confronted with numerous post-migration stressors (e.g., separation from family, discrimination, and employment difficulties). Post-migration living difficulties (PMLDs) significantly contribute to the development and persistence of mental disorders. Effective treatment approaches focusing on reducing post-migration stress are urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of a brief psychological intervention, Problem Management Plus (PM+), on PMLDs among Syrian refugees in two European countries. METHODS: We merged data from two single-blind feasibility trials with Syrian refugees experiencing elevated levels of psychological distress and impaired functioning in Switzerland (N = 59) and the Netherlands (N = 60). Participants were randomised to receive either five sessions of PM+ or an enhanced care-as-usual control condition. PMLDs were assessed at baseline and 3 months after the intervention. To estimate treatment effect on PMLD, linear mixed model analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three months after the intervention, participants in the PM+ condition reported significantly fewer PMLDs compared to the control condition. Further analyses at item-level showed that interpersonal and family related PMLDs, such as "worries about family back home" significantly improved over time in the PM+ condition. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests that brief psychological interventions have the potential to reduce PMLDs in refugees and asylum seekers. The reduction of post-migration stress in turn may subsequently lead to an overall reduction in psychological distress. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: BASEC Nr. 2017-0117 (Swiss trial) and NL61361.029.17, 7 September 2017 (Dutch trial).

Scaling-up problem management plus for refugees in Switzerland - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Refugees are at an increased risk of developing symptoms of mental disorders but face various structural and socio-cultural barriers to accessing mental health care. The SPIRIT project (Scaling-up Psychological Interventions in Refugees In SwiTzerland) seeks to promote the resilience of refugees and improve their access to mental health care. For this purpose, Problem Management Plus (PM+), an evidence-based low-intensity psychological intervention delivered by trained non-specialist "helpers", is being scaled-up in Switzerland. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing the process of the large-scale implementation of PM + for refugees in Switzerland and to develop recommendations to guide the implementation process. METHODS: 22 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants (Syrian refugees who previously participated in PM+, PM + helpers, health professionals working with refugees and decision-makers from the migration, integration, social, and health sectors). The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, combining an inductive and deductive approach. RESULTS: The data revealed three major themes, which might have an impact for the longer-term implementation of PM + in Switzerland. First, preconditions for successful integration in the health system prior to scaling-up such as sustainable funding or the introduction of a stepped care approach. Second, the requirements for the PM + intervention supporting scale-up such as quality control during PM + delivery, PM + modality, time and setting when PM + is offered or the views on task sharing. Third, the perceived benefits of scaling-up PM + in Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that PM + must be scaled-up within a stepped care approach, including a functioning triage system and sustainable funding. Rather than selecting one modality or setting, it seemed preferable to offer a variety of formats and settings to achieve maximum reach and benefits. A successful scale-up of PM + in Switzerland might have various benefits. Communicating them to policy-makers and health providers, might enhance their acceptability of the intervention and their willingness to adopt PM + in regulatory structure and promote it.

Problems after flight: understanding and comparing Syrians' perspectives in the Middle East and Europe.

BACKGROUND: Syrian refugees and asylum seekers (SRAs) face multiple stressors after flight, which may vary due to different geographic, economic, cultural and socio-political contexts in the host countries. Past research has recognised the importance of participants' own perspectives. The aims of this multi-country study were to identify and compare self-reported problems of SRAs between various settings. METHODS: A semi-structured client-generated outcome measurement was used to collect data among adult SRAs in Jordan (N = 61), Turkey (N = 46) and Switzerland (N = 57) between September 2018 and November 2019. Answers were analysed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: Over half of the participants reported practical problems with an emphasis on camp-related problems (Jordan), finances (Turkey), employment (Jordan and Switzerland) and government regulations (Switzerland), followed by psychological, and social issues. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of local contextual factors on wellbeing. The findings emphasise that planning preventative procedures and mental health care services for SRAs need to consider local challenges affecting the population in specific countries.

Barriers to access to outpatient mental health care for refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland: the therapist's view.

BACKGROUND: More than 120,000 refugees and asylum seekers are currently living in Switzerland. The prevalence of mental disorders among this population is significantly higher than that in the general population. While effective treatment options and cross-cultural, specialized treatment centers exist, they tend to be overloaded by their target populations. General outpatient primary health care providers might be able to compensate for the lack of specialized treatment slots. To date, however, it is unknown how often and under what conditions (e.g., length of waiting lists) refugees and asylum seekers are treated outside of specialized centers and whether there are barriers that prevent providers in outpatient settings from treating more patients in this subgroup. The present study aimed to assess the challenges and barriers faced by psychiatrists and psychotherapists working in outpatient settings in Switzerland in treating refugees and asylum seekers to determine the potential capacity of this group to provide mental health care. METHODS: An online survey was conducted during the winter of 2017/2018. The survey was constructed in three official languages and took 10-15 min to complete. Spearman's correlations, Mann-Whitney U-Tests, and Chi-squared tests were conducted to analyze the data. RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-seven (N = 867) psychotherapists and psychiatrists working in outpatient settings completed the survey: 43% of them reported having treated between 1 and 9 refugees or asylum seekers in the past 12 months, and a further 13% reported treating 10 or more. Interpreters were used for almost every other patient with a refugee or asylum-seeker background. At the same time, the funding of interpreters, as well as the funding of treatment in general, were reported to be the biggest hurdles to treating more refugees and asylum seekers. CONCLUSIONS: Given the low number of patients rejected for capacity reasons (between 2 and 5%) and the median waiting times for the admission of new patients ranging between 2 and 3 weeks, outpatient primary mental health care providers might treat more refugees and asylum seekers and relieve specialized treatment centers. However, barriers such as lack of funding of interpreters seem to hinder them. Appropriate steps by the authorities are needed to improve the current situation.

Emotional Reactivity, Emotion Regulation Capacity, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Traumatized Refugees: An Experimental Investigation.

Refugees who suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often react with strong emotions when confronted with trauma reminders. In this study, we aimed to investigate the associations between low emotion regulation capacity (as indexed by low heart rate variability [HRV]), probable PTSD diagnosis, and fear and anger reaction and recovery to trauma-related stimuli. Participants were 81 trauma-exposed refugees (probable PTSD, n = 23; trauma-exposed controls, n = 58). The experiment comprised three 5-min phases: a resting phase (baseline); an exposition phase, during which participants were exposed to trauma-related images (stimulus); and another resting phase (recovery). We assessed HRV at baseline, and fear and anger were rated at the end of each phase. Linear mixed model analyses were used to investigate the associations between baseline HRV and probable DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis in influencing anger and fear responses both immediately after viewing trauma-related stimuli and at the end of the recovery phase. Compared to controls, participants with probable PTSD showed a greater increase in fear from baseline to stimulus presentation, d = 0.606. Compared to participants with low emotion regulation capacity, participants with high emotion regulation capacity showed a smaller reduction in anger from stimulus presentation to recovery, d = 0.548. Our findings indicated that following exposure to trauma-related stimuli, probable PTSD diagnosis predicted increased fear reactivity, and low emotion regulation capacity predicted decreased anger recovery. Impaired anger recovery following trauma reminders in the context of low emotion regulation capacity might contribute to the increased levels of anger found in postconflict samples.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Reactividad Emocional, Capacidad de Regulación Emocional y trastorno por Estrés Postraumático en Refugiados Traumatizados: Una Investigación Experimental REACTIVIDAD EMOCIONAL, REGULACION EMOCIONAL Y TEPT Los refugiados que sufren de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) a menudo reaccionan con emociones fuertes cuando se enfrentan a recordatorios de trauma. El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar las asociaciones entre la baja capacidad de regulación emocional (según la variabilidad de la frecuencia cardíaca [HRV en su sigla en inglés]), el diagnóstico probable de TEPT y la reacción de miedo e ira, y la recuperación ante estímulos relacionados-al-trauma. Los participantes fueron 81 refugiados expuestos a traumas (TEPT probable, n = 23; controles expuestos a traumas, n = 58). El experimento estuvo compuesto por tres fases de 5 minutos: una fase de reposo (línea base); una fase de exposición, durante la cual los participantes fueron expuestos a imágenes relacionadas-al-trauma (estímulo); y otra fase de reposo (recuperación). Se evaluó la HRV al inicio, y el miedo y la ira se evaluaron al final de cada fase. Se utilizaron análisis de modelos lineales mixtos para investigar las asociaciones entre la HRV basal y el diagnóstico probable de TEPT DSM-5 para influir en las respuestas de ira y miedo, inmediatamente después de ver los estímulos relacionados-al-trauma y al final de la fase de recuperación. En comparación con los controles, los participantes con TEPT probable mostraron un mayor incremento en miedo desde la línea base hasta la presentación del estímulo, d = 0.606. En comparación a los participantes con baja capacidad de regulación emocional, los participantes con alta capacidad de regulación emocional mostraron una menor reducción en ira desde la presentación del estímulo a la recuperación, d = 0.548. Nuestros hallazgos indican que el diagnóstico de TEPT probable predice un aumento de la reactividad al miedo y una baja capacidad de regulación emocional predice una disminución de la recuperación de ira tras la exposición a estímulos relacionados-al-trauma. Nuestros hallazgos indican que el diagnóstico de TEPT probable predice un aumento de la reactividad al miedo y una baja capacidad de regulación emocional predice una disminución de la recuperación de ira después de la exposición a estímulos relacionados-al-trauma. La recuperación de ira deteriorada seguida a los recuerdos traumáticos en el contexto de una baja capacidad de regulación emocional podría contribuir al aumento de los niveles de ira que se encuentran en las muestras posteriores al conflicto.

The impact of enhancing perceived self-efficacy in torture survivors.

BACKGROUND: Perceived self-efficacy (SE) is an important factor underlying psychological well-being. Refugees suffer many experiences that can compromise SE. This study tested the impact of enhancing perceived SE on coping with trauma reminders and distress tolerance in tortured refugees. METHODS: Torture survivors (N = 40) were administered a positive SE induction in which they retrieved mastery-related autobiographical memories, or a non-SE (NSE) induction, and then viewed trauma-related images. Participants rated their distress following presentation of each image. Participants then completed a frustration-inducing mirror-tracing task to index distress tolerance. RESULTS: Participants in the SE condition reported less distress and negative affect, and improved coping in relation to viewing the trauma-related images than those in the NSE condition. The SE induction also led to greater persistence with the mirror-tracing task than the NSE induction. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide initial evidence that promoting SE in tortured refugees can assist with managing distress from trauma reminders, and promoting greater distress tolerance. Enhancing perceived SE in tortured refugees may increase their capacity to tolerate distress during therapy, and may be a useful means to improve treatment response.

The Association of Post-traumatic and Postmigration Stress with Pain and Other Somatic Symptoms: An Explorative Analysis in Traumatized Refugees and Asylum Seekers.

Objective: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and somatic symptoms, such as pain, are frequently seen in refugees. Their relationship is poorly understood, and the treatment of these comorbid conditions can be very challenging. The current cross-sectional study examined pain and other somatic symptoms and their relationship with trauma history, PTSD symptom clusters, and current living difficulties among treatment-seeking refugees. Methods: One hundred thirty-four treatment-seeking traumatized refugees (78% male, mean age = 42 years) were assessed regarding lifetime traumatic experiences, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, overall pain and somatic symptoms, and postmigration living difficulties. Results: An exploratory factor analysis of the 12 somatic symptoms revealed two distinct factors: somatic symptoms related to bodily dysfunction ("weakness") and somatic symptoms related to increased sympathetic activity ("arousal"). DSM-5 PTSD Criteria D "alterations in cognitions and mood" and E "alterations in arousal and reactivity" were primarily related to "weakness," while PTSD Criterion E "alterations in arousal and reactivity" and postmigration living difficulties were associated with "arousal." Overall pain was associated primarily with living difficulties and PTSD Criterion D and Criterion E. Conclusions: Results indicate that somatic symptoms are of considerable concern among traumatized refugees and that different patterns of somatic symptoms are associated with different clusters of PTSD symptoms. The findings contribute to the better understanding of the symptom presentation of traumatized people who are experiencing somatization and potentially inform treatment directions and highlight the importance of screening for PTSD in refugees presenting with pain and somatic symptoms.

Comorbidity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Tortured, Treatment-Seeking Refugees.

Comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression is common in refugee groups; however, little is known about the predictors and correlates of comorbidity in treatment-seeking refugees. Participants in this study were 134 refugees resettled in Switzerland. Most participants were from Turkey, Iran, and Sri Lanka, and 92.7% had been exposed to torture. Self-report measures were implemented to assess PTSD, depression, mental and physical health-related quality of life (QoL), as well as pre- and postmigration experiences. Findings indicated that approximately half the sample met criteria for PTSD and depression, 33.6% met criteria for depression only, and only 2.2% met criteria for PTSD only. Several variables emerged as predictors of comorbidity in contrast to no diagnosis: female gender, odds ratio (OR) = 0.17; age, OR = 0.93; time in Switzerland, OR = 1.16; and trauma exposure, OR = 1.19. Postmigration stress was also associated with greater likelihood of comorbidity compared with no diagnosis, OR = 1.32, and a single diagnosis, OR = 1.14. Further, dual diagnosis was associated with significantly poorer mental health-related and physical health-related QoL (mental health-related QoL: dual diagnosis vs. single diagnosis, d = -0.52 and dual diagnosis vs. no diagnosis, d = -1.30; physical health-related QoL: dual diagnosis vs. single diagnosis, d = -0.73 and dual diagnosis vs. no diagnosis: d = -1.04). Findings indicated that comorbidity was highly prevalent in this sample of treatment-seeking refugees and was associated with a substantial impairment burden. Psychological interventions for refugees should consider the dual impact of PTSD and depression symptoms to optimally decrease distress and improve QoL in this vulnerable group.

Attachment style and interpersonal trauma in refugees.

BACKGROUND: Refugees can suffer many experiences that threaten their trust in others. Although models of refugee mental health have postulated that attachment securities may be damaged by refugee experiences, this has yet to be empirically tested. This study aimed to understand the relationship between the nature of traumatic experiences sustained by refugees and attachment styles. METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, treatment-seeking refugees (N = 134) were assessed for traumatic exposure using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Attachment style was assessed using the Experiences in Close Relationship Scale. RESULTS: Whereas gender and severity of interpersonal traumatic events predicted avoidant attachment style (accounting for 11% of the variance), neither these factors nor non-interpersonal trauma predicted anxious attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to interpersonal traumatic events, including torture, is associated with enduring avoidant attachment tendencies in refugees. This finding accords with attachment theories that prior adverse interpersonal experiences can undermine secure attachment systems, and may promote avoidance of attachment seeking. This finding may point to an important process maintaining poor psychological health in refugees affected by interpersonal trauma.

A Comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Traumatized Refugees.

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence rate and factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on the diagnostic criteria of the fourth and fifth editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, , ) in traumatized refugees. There were 134 adult treatment-seeking, severely and multiply traumatized patients from various refugee backgrounds were assessed in their mother tongue using a computerized set of questionnaires consisting of a trauma list, the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale, and the new PTSD items that had been suggested by the DSM-5 Task Force of the American Psychiatric Association. Using DSM-IV, 60.4% of participants met diagnostic criteria for PTSD; using DSM-5, only 49.3% fulfilled all criteria (p < .001). Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 items showed good and comparable model fits. Furthermore, classification functions in the DSM-5 were satisfactory. The new Cluster D symptoms showed relatively high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power. The DSM-5 symptom structure appears to be applicable to traumatized refugees. Negative alterations in cognitions and mood may be especially useful for clinicians, not only to determine the extent to which an individual refugee is likely to meet criteria for PTSD, but also in providing targets for clinical intervention.

[What do Interpreters Understand as their Role in a Medical Consultation and How do they Carry it out in Reality?]. / Wie verstehen Dolmetscher ihre Rolle in medizinischen Konsultationen und wie verhalten sie sich konkret in der Praxis?

OBJECTIVES: In the literature the role of an interpreter in the clinical setting is not yet clearly defined. The aim of the study is to explore, which role the interpreters assign to themselves and which role they actually take in the clinical setting. METHODS: In the quantitative part of the study, the interpreters evaluated their role in the clinical encounter through a questionnaire, whereas in the qualitative part the interpreters' role was assessed by analysing videotapes of the clinical encounters. RESULTS: 373 questionnaires and 19 videotapes were collated and analysed. According to the results of the questionnaire interpreters seem to prefer a neutral role in the clinical encounter. This was in contrast to what was observed in practice, as seen in the videotapes. In reality, they take in an active role while interpreting. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that medical professionals and interpreters discuss their roles and expectations before every clinical consultation.

Efficacy of a brief psychological intervention to reduce distress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a sharp increase in mental health problems among healthcare workers (HCWs). Accessible interventions for HCWs are needed to reduce distress during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of a brief psychological intervention (RECHARGE) delivered by videoconferencing to reduce psychological distress in HCWs. METHOD: This single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial enrolled HCWs in Switzerland who screened positive for psychological distress. Participants were randomly allocated to RECHARGE, that taught behavioral strategies or active treatment as usual (ATAU). Primary outcome was the total score on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) measured at baseline, post-intervention, 2-month (primary outcome time point), and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included worry, anxiety and depression, burnout, traumatic stress, moral injury distress, and work performance. RESULTS: Between August 2020 and May 2021, 160 HCWs were enrolled in the study (RECHARGE = 82, ATAU = 78). Relative to ATAU, at 2 months RECHARGE led to a greater reduction in psychological distress (mean difference = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI .28, .34], p = .02; effect size = .37), and greater reductions in worry, burnout, and moral injury distress. These effects were not maintained at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides initial evidence that a brief psychological intervention delivered via videoconferencing results in significant reductions in mental health problems arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Booster sessions or digital tools may be needed to maintain the initial gains achieved by RECHARGE. This intervention may have utility in improving the mental health of HCWs both during pandemics and everyday stressors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Feasibility and acceptability of Problem Management Plus (PM+) among Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland: a mixed-method pilot randomized controlled trial.

Background: Syrian refugees in Switzerland face several barriers in accessing mental health care. Cost-effective psychological interventions are urgently needed to meet the mental health needs of refugees. Problem Management Plus (PM+) is an evidence-based, psychological intervention delivered by trained non-specialist 'helpers'. Objective: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of PM+ among Syrian refugees in Switzerland. Methods: We conducted a single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with Syrian refugees impaired by psychological distress (K10 > 15 and WHODAS 2.0 > 16). Participants were randomized to PM+ or Enhanced Treatment As Usual (ETAU). Participants were assessed at baseline, and 1 week and 3 months after the intervention, and completed measures indexing mental health problems and health care usage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with different stakeholders. Results: N = 59 individuals were randomized into PM+ (n = 31) or ETAU (n = 28). N = 18 stakeholders were interviewed about facilitators and barriers for the implementation of PM+. Retention rates in the trial (67.8%) and mean intervention attendance (M = 3.94 sessions, SD = 1.97) were high. No severe events related to the study were reported. These findings indicate that the trial procedures and PM+ were feasible, acceptable and safe. Conclusions: The findings support the conduct of a definitive RCT and show that PM+ might have the potential to be scaled-up in Switzerland. The importance, as well as the challenges, of implementing and scaling-up PM+ in high-income countries, such as Switzerland, are discussed.

Antecedentes: Los refugiados Sirios en Suiza enfrentan varias barreras para acceder a la atención en salud mental. Se necesitan con urgencia intervenciones psicológicas costo-efectivas, para satisfacer las necesidades de salud mental de los refugiados. Enfrentar Problemas Plus (PM + por sus siglas en inglés) es una intervención psicológica basada en la evidencia proporcionada por 'ayudantes' capacitados no especializados.Objetivo: Evaluar la viabilidad y aceptabilidad de PM + entre los refugiados sirios en Suiza.Métodos: Realizamos un ensayo controlado aleatorizado (ECA) piloto simple y ciego con refugiados sirios afectados por angustia psicológica (K10 > 15 y WHODAS 2.0 > 16). Los participantes fueron asignados al azar a PM + o Tratamiento usual mejorado (TUM). Los participantes fueron evaluados al inicio del estudio, 1 semana, y 3 meses después de la intervención, y completaron instrumentos que referencian problemas de salud mental y el uso de la atención médica. Se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas con diferentes partes relevantes.Resultados:N = 59 individuos fueron asignados al azar a PM + (n = 31) o TUM (n = 28). N = 18 partes relevantes fueron entrevistados sobre facilitadores y barreras para la implementación de PM +. Las tasas de retención en el ensayo (67,8%) y la asistencia media a la intervención (M = 3,94 sesiones, DE = 1,97) fueron altas. No se informaron eventos graves relacionados con el estudio. Estos hallazgos indican que los procedimientos del ensayo y PM + fueron factibles, aceptables y seguros.Conclusiones: Los hallazgos apoyan la realización de un ECA definitivo y muestran que PM + podría tener el potencial de ampliarse en Suiza. Se discute la importancia, así como los desafíos, de implementar y ampliar PM + en países de altos ingresos, como Suiza.

Mapping the availability of translated versions of posttraumatic stress disorder screening questionnaires for adults: A scoping review.

Background: The most used questionnaires for PTSD screening in adults were developed in English. Although many of these questionnaires were translated into other languages, the procedures used to translate them and to evaluate their reliability and validity have not been consistently documented. This comprehensive scoping review aimed to compile the currently available translated and evaluated questionnaires used for PTSD screening, and highlight important gaps in the literature.Objective: This review aimed to map the availability of translated and evaluated screening questionnaires for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for adults.Methods: All peer-reviewed studies in which a PTSD screening questionnaire for adults was translated, and which reported at least one result of a qualitative and /or quantitative evaluation procedure were included. The literature was searched using Embase, MEDLINE, and APA PsycInfo, citation searches and contributions from study team members. There were no restrictions regarding the target languages of the translations. Data on the translation procedure, the qualitative evaluation, the quantitative evaluation (dimensionality of the questionnaire, reliability, and performance), and open access were extracted.Results: A total of 866 studies were screened, of which 126 were included. Collectively, 128 translations of 12 different questionnaires were found. Out of these, 105 (83.3%) studies used a forward and backward translation procedure, 120 (95.2%) assessed the reliability of the translated questionnaire, 60 (47.6%) the dimensionality, 49 (38.9%) the performance, and 42 (33.3%) used qualitative evaluation procedures. Thirty-four questionnaires (27.0%) were either freely available or accessible on request.Conclusions: The analyses conducted and the description of the methods and results varied substantially, making a quality assessment impractical. Translations into languages spoken in middle- or low-income countries were underrepresented. In addition, only a small proportion of all translated questionnaires were available. Given the need for freely accessible translations, an online repository was developed.HIGHLIGHTS We mapped the availability of translated PTSD screening questionnaires.The quality of the translation and validation processes is very heterogenous.We created a repository for translated, validated PTSD screening questionnaires.

Scalable psychological interventions for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: STRENGTHS study protocol for a prospective individual participant data meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization's (WHO) scalable psychological interventions, such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) and Step-by-Step (SbS) are designed to be cost-effective non-specialist delivered interventions to reduce symptoms of common mental disorders, such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The STRENGTHS consortium aims to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of the individual format of PM+ and its group version (gPM+), as well as of the digital SbS intervention among Syrian refugees in seven countries in Europe and the Middle East. This is a study protocol for a prospective individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate (1) overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and (2) treatment moderators of PM+, gPM+ and SbS with Syrian refugees. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Five pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and seven fully powered RCTs conducted within STRENGTHS will be combined into one IPD meta-analytic dataset. The RCTs include Syrian refugees of 18 years and above with elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10>15)) and impaired daily functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0>16)). Participants are randomised into the intervention or care as usual control group, and complete follow-up assessments at 1-week, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are symptoms of depression and anxiety (25-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist). Secondary outcomes include daily functioning (WHODAS 2.0), PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) and self-identified problems (PSYCHLOPS). We will conduct a one-stage IPD meta-analysis using linear mixed models. Quality of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach, and the economic evaluation approach will be assessed using the CHEC-list. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local ethical approval has been obtained for each RCT. This IPD meta-analysis does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.

[CME/Answers: Traumatized Refugees in Family Practice - A Quick Reference Guide]. / CME/Antworten: Traumatisierte Geflüchtete in der Hausarztpraxis ­ ein Kurzleitfaden.

CME/Answers: Traumatized Refugees in Family Practice - A Quick Reference Guide Abstract. Traumatic experiences, flight and life in exile do not constitute an illness per se, but are associated with an increased risk of mental illness. In view of the lack of specialized treatment units, the general practitioner's office often remains the only place of treatment for traumatized refugees. Particularly challenging is the combination of complex complaints, multidimensional psychosocial stress factors and difficult treatment conditions which face managerial and organizational limitations in the dense daily practice routine. In this article, recommendations for working with this heterogeneous group of patients are discussed.

[CME: Traumatized Refugees in Family Practice - A Quick Reference Guide]. / CME: Traumatisierte Geflüchtete in der Hausarztpraxis ­ ein Kurzleitfaden.

CME: Traumatized Refugees in Family Practice - A Quick Reference Guide Abstract. Traumatic experiences, flight and life in exile do not constitute an illness per se, but are associated with an increased risk of mental illness. In view of the lack of specialized treatment units, the general practitioner's office often remains the only place of treatment for traumatized refugees. Particularly challenging is the combination of complex complaints, multidimensional psychosocial stress factors and difficult treatment conditions which face managerial and organizational limitations in the dense daily practice routine. In this article, recommendations for working with this heterogeneous group of patients are discussed.

An exploratory study of embitterment in traumatized refugees.

BACKGROUND: Refugees and asylum seekers are frequently exposed to violence, human rights violations and unstable living conditions before, during, and after their displacement. Elevated prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders in forcibly displaced persons are well documented. However, less is known about other problems related to common refugee experiences, such as embitterment, moral injury, and diminished self-efficacy, and how they are related to trauma exposure and post-migration living difficulties. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of 71 refugees and asylum seekers in treatment were examined regarding exposure to potentially traumatic events, post-migration living difficulties, moral injury appraisals, self-efficacy, and embitterment. RESULTS: Elevated levels of embitterment were reported by 68% of participants. The regression analysis revealed that greater moral injury appraisals and low levels of self-efficacy were significantly associated with higher levels of embitterment. CONCLUSION: The results provide first insights into embitterment and associated factors in refugee populations. Furthermore, they highlight the significance of moral transgressions and low levels of self-efficacy emerging from displacement and traumatic experiences for the development of mental health problems in a clinical sample of refugees. The findings have implications for future research, policy development and clinical practice.

A network analysis of postmigration living difficulties in refugees and asylum seekers.

Background: The prevalence of mental disorders among asylum seekers and refugees is elevated compared to the general population. The importance of post-migration living difficulties (PMLDs), stressors faced after displacement, has recently been recognized due to research demonstrating their moderating role of on mental health outcomes. Traditionally, PMLDs were investigated as count variables or latent variables, disregarding plausible interrelationships among them. Objectives: To use network analysis to investigate the associations among PMLDs. Methods: Based on a cross-sectional measurement of seventeen PMLDs in a clinical sample of traumatized asylum seekers and refugees (N = 151), a partial correlation network was estimated, and its characteristics assessed. Results: The network consisted of 71 of the 120 possible edges. The strongest edge was found between 'Communication difficulties' and 'Discrimination'. 'Loneliness, boredom, or isolation' had highest predictability. Conclusion: Our finding of an association between communication difficulties and discrimination has been documented before and is of importance given the known negative impact of discrimination on mental and physical health outcomes. The high predictability of isolation is indicative of multiple associations with other PMLDs and highlights its importance among the investigated population. Our results are limited by the cross-sectional nature of our study and the relatively modest sample size.

Antecedentes: la prevalencia de trastornos mentales entre los solicitantes de asilo y los refugiados es elevada en comparación con la población general. La importancia de las dificultades de vida, posteriores a la migración (PMLD, por sus siglas en inglés), factores estresantes que se enfrentan después del desplazamiento, ha sido reconocida recientemente debido a investigaciones que demuestran su papel moderador en los resultados de salud mental. Tradicionalmente, los PMLD se investigaban como variables de recuento o variables latentes, sin tener en cuenta las posibles interrelaciones entre ellas.Objetivos: Utilizar el análisis de redes para investigar las asociaciones entre PMLD.Métodos: a partir de una medición transversal de diecisiete PMLDs en una muestra clínica de solicitantes de asilo y refugiados traumatizados (N = 151), se estimó una red de correlación parcial y se evaluaron sus características.Resultados: La red constaba de 71 de las 120 posibles aristas. La arista más fuerte se encontró entre 'Dificultades de comunicación' y 'Discriminación'. 'La soledad, el aburrimiento o el aislamiento' tenían la máxima predictibilidad.Conclusión: Nuestro hallazgo de una asociación entre las dificultades de comunicación y la discriminación ha sido documentado anteriormente y es de importancia dado el conocido impacto negativo de la discriminación en los resultados de salud física y mental. La alta predictibilidad del aislamiento es indicativa de múltiples asociaciones con otros PMLDs y destaca su importancia entre la población investigada. Nuestros resultados están limitados por la naturaleza transversal de nuestro estudio y el tamaño de muestra relativamente modesto.