The anatomical shape of the distal femur is an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening following one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge knee prosthesis.

PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening (AL) is the second most common reason for failure after one-stage septic knee revision. In this context, the goal of the study is to identify risk factors for AL following one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge implants. We aimed to answer the following research question: How does the anatomical shape of the distal femur represent an independent risk factor for AL following one-stage septic knee revision arthroplasty? METHODS: Patients, who had undergone re-revision surgery due to AL of the rotating hinge knee prosthesis after one-stage septic knee revision arthroplasty between January 2008 and December 2018, were included. For this purpose, 41 patients with AL after one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge implants and 37 controls without any revision surgery at latest follow-up were included in this study. Using standardized anteroposterior (AP) views of the knee in all patients, we measured the inner diameter of the femur 20 cm proximally from the joint line and at a point 2 cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. RESULTS: Among the vast majority of AL cases, we identified an isolated loosening of the femoral component. The AL group showd a high distribution of the Type C according to the Citak classification with 75.7%. Contrary to this, with 24.3% (p < 0.001) the amount of Type C cases was relatively low in the control group. Consequently, Type C configurations of the distal femur represent an independent risk factor for AL with an approximately sevenfold higher risk for AL compareed to Type A and Type B. CONCLUSIONS: The novel radiological classification system of the distal femur shows that the Type C subtype is an independent and main risk factor for AL after one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge knee implants.

Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the medial longitudinal foot arch in children is a controversial topic, as there are many different methods without a definite standard procedure. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate intraday and interrater reliability regarding dynamic arch index and static arch height, 2) explore the correlation between both arch indices, and 3) examine the variation of the medial longitudinal arch at two different times of the day. METHODS: Eighty-six children (mean ± SD age, 8.9 ± 1.9 years) participated in the study. Dynamic footprint data were captured with a pedobarographic platform. For static arch measurements, a specially constructed caliper was used to assess heel-to-toe length and dorsum height. A mixed model was established to determine reliability and variation. RESULTS: Reliability was found to be excellent for the static arch height index in sitting (intraday, 0.90; interrater, 0.80) and standing positions (0.88 and 0.85) and for the dynamic arch index (both 1.00). There was poor correlation between static and dynamic assessment of the medial longitudinal arch (standing dynamic arch index, r = -0.138; sitting dynamic arch index, r = -0.070). Static measurements were found to be significantly influenced by the time of day (P < .001), whereas the dynamic arch index was unchanged (P = .845). This study revealed some further important findings. The static arch height index is influenced by gender (P = .004), whereas dynamic arch index is influenced by side (P = .011) and body mass index (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic and static foot measurements are reliable for medial longitudinal foot arch assessment in children. The variation of static arch measurements during the day has to be kept in mind. For clinical purposes, static and dynamic arch data should be interpreted separately.