Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac adapt-to-position workflow.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Newer technologies allow for daily treatment adaptation, providing the ability to account for setup variations and organ motion but comes at the cost of increasing the treatment workflow complexity. One such technology is the adapt-to-position (ATP) workflow on the Unity MR-Linac. Prospective risk assessment of a new workflow allows clinics to catch errors before they occur, especially for processes that include novel and unfamiliar steps. METHODS: As part of a quality management program, failure modes and effects analysis was performed on the ATP treatment workflow following the recommendations of AAPM's Task Group 100. A multidisciplinary team was formed to identify and evaluate failure modes for all the steps taken during a daily treatment workflow. Failure modes of high severity and overall score were isolated and addressed. RESULTS: Mitigations were determined for high-ranking failure modes and implemented into the clinic. High-ranking failure modes existed in all steps of the workflow. Failure modes were then rescored to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigations. CONCLUSION: Failure modes and effects analysis on the Unity MR-Linac highlighted areas in the ATP workflow that could be prone to failures and allowed our clinic to change the process to be more robust.

Integration of an Independent Monitor Unit Check for High-Magnetic-Field MR-Guided Radiation Therapy System.

Purpose: Commercial independent monitor unit (IMU) check systems for high-magnetic-field MR-guided radiation therapy (RT) systems are lacking. We investigated the feasibility of adopting an existing treatment planning system (TPS) as an IMU check for online adaptive radiotherapy using 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac. Methods: The 7-MV flattening filter free (FFF) beam and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) models of a 1.5-T Elekta Unity MR-Linac within Monte Carlo-based Monaco TPS were used to generate an optimized beam model in Eclipse TPS. The MLC dosimetric leaf gap of the beam in Eclipse was determined by matching the dose distribution of Eclipse-generated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans using the Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) algorithm to Monaco plans. The plans were automatically adjusted for different source-to-axis distances (SADs) between the two systems. For IMU check, the treatment plans developed in Monaco were transferred to Eclipse to recalculate the dose using AAA. A plug-in within Eclipse was created to perform a 2D gamma analysis of the AAA and Monte Carlo dose distribution on a beam's eye view parallel plane. Monaco dose distribution was shifted laterally by 2 mm during gamma analysis to account for the impact of magnetic field on electron trajectories. Eclipse doses for posterior beams were corrected for both the Unity couch and the posterior MR coil attenuation. Thirteen patients, each with 4-5 fractions for a variety of tumor sites (pancreas, rectum, and prostate), were tested. Results: After thorough commissioning, the method was implemented as part of the standard clinical workflow. A total of 62 online plans, each with approximately 15 beams, were evaluated. The average per-beam gamma (3%/3 mm) pass rate for plans was 97.9% (range, 95.9% to 98.8%). The average pass rate per beam for all 932 beams used in these plans was 97.9% ± 1.9%, with the lowest per-beam gamma pass rate at 88.4%. The time for the process was within 3.2 ± 0.9 min. Conclusion: The use of a second planning system provides an efficient way to perform IMU checks with clinically acceptable accuracy for online adaptive plans on Unity MR-Linac. This is essential for meeting the safety requirements for second checks as outlined in American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG) reports 114 and 219.