Patients with dementia or frailty undergoing major limb amputation have poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Major lower limb amputation is a disfiguring operation associated with impaired mobility and high near-term mortality. Informed decision-making regarding amputation requires outcomes data. Despite the co-occurrence of both chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), there is sparse data on the outcomes of major limb amputation in this population and the impact of frailty. We sought to determine mortality, complications, readmissions, revisions, intensive interventions (eg, cardiopulmonary resuscitation), and other outcomes after amputation for CLTI in patients living with ADRD looking at the modifying effects of frailty. METHODS: We examined Medicare fee-for-service claims data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Patients with CLTI undergoing amputation at or proximal to the ankle were included. Along with demographic information, dementia status, and comorbid conditions, we measured frailty using a claims-based frailty index. We dichotomized dementia and frailty (pre-frail/robust = "non-frail" vs moderate/severe frailty = "frail") to create four groups: non-frail/non-ADRD, frail/non-ADRD, non-frail/ADRD, and frail/ADRD. We used linear and logistic regression via generalized estimating equations in addition to performing selected outcomes analyses with death as a competing risk to understand the association between dementia status, frailty status, and 1-year mortality as our primary outcome in addition to the postoperative outcomes outlined above. RESULTS: Among 46,930 patients undergoing major limb amputation, 11,465 (24.4%) had ADRD and 24,790 (52.8%) had frailty. Overall, 55.9% of amputations were below-knee. Selected outcomes among frail/ADRD patients undergoing amputation (n = 10,153) were: 55.3% 1-year mortality 29.6% readmissions at 30 days, and 32.3% amputation revision/reoperation within 1 year. Of all four groups, those in the frail/ADRD had the worst outcomes only for 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: First, patients with ADRD or moderate/severe frailty suffer an array of very poor outcomes after major limb amputation for CLTI, including high mortality, readmissions, revision, and risks of discharge to higher levels of care. Second, there is a complex relationship between outcome severity and ADRD/frailty status. Specifically, frailty is more often than ADRD associated with the poorest results for any given outcome. These data provide important outcomes data to help align decision-making with health care values and goals.

The Gender Gap in Surgical Literature: Are We Making Progress?

INTRODUCTION: The percentage of women in surgical leadership roles is not commensurate with percent of women in field of surgery. Citation indexes are used as proxy for scholarly impact and may serve as an indicator of women's progress in academic surgery. We aimed to evaluate gender disparities in authorship of surgery manuscripts in high-impact journals. METHODS: In this bibliometric analysis of original research articles from four high-impact surgical journals from 2008 to 2010 (period A) and 2018-2020 (period B), the gender of primary and senior authors was assigned by Genderize.io. Number of citations per article was identified via Web of Science. Number of citations by gender of authors was compared across time periods. RESULTS: Of the 3575 articles (Period A = 1915; Period B = 1660), 962 (26.9%) had women as primary authors and 590 (17.2%) as senior authors. Over time, significant increases in women primary and senior authorship were noted from 22.8% to 31.7% (P < 0.001) and 13.9% (254/11,915) to 21% (336/1660), respectively (P < 0.001). Articles written with women primary authors had fewer median (interquartile range) citations than those by men as primary author in period A (39 [17-69.5] versus 42 [20.0-84.0]; P = 0.005). Gender parity was noted in period B (9 [4-19] versus 9 [4-20] citations; P = 0.307). In period A, articles written by women as both primary and senior authors had approximately 25% fewer median citations compared with those by men (34 [17-62] versus 44 [21-86]); P < 0.011), and this reached parity in period B (9 [4-20] versus 9 [4-21]); P < 0.658). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, gender authorship and citations parity are improving in high-impact surgery journals.

Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis, Cognitive Function, and the Impact of Carotid Revascularization: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: The association between asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and impaired cognition, and the cognitive changes after revascularization remain active areas of interest in the field of carotid disease. This narrative review focuses on the association between carotid artery atherosclerosis and impaired cognitive function, proposed mechanisms, and the effects of carotid revascularization on cognition. METHODS: A critical review of the literature to identify studies evaluating carotid artery stenosis, cognition, and carotid revascularization was performed using PubMed to query the MEDLINE database through March 2023. RESULTS: Many studies demonstrate a link between carotid disease and cognitive impairment but direct evidence is lacking. Revascularization may offer cognitive benefits but the effect is likely subtle and affected by the choice of revascularization procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating cognitive outcomes into ongoing randomized controlled trials such as the nested CREST-H arm of the CREST-2 trial hold promise for offering new insight into the role of carotid artery stenosis and carotid revascularization on cognition.

National Institutes of Health funding among vascular surgeons is rare.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is an essential source of funding for vascular surgeons conducting research. NIH funding is frequently used to benchmark institutional and individual research productivity, help determine eligibility for academic promotion, and as a measure of scientific quality. We sought to appraise the current scope of NIH funding to vascular surgeons by appraising the characteristics of NIH-funded investigators and projects. In addition, we also sought to determine whether funded grants addressed recent Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) research priorities. METHODS: In April 2022, we queried the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database for active projects. We only included projects that had a vascular surgeon as a principal investigator. Grant characteristics were extracted from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results database. Principal investigator demographics and academic background information were identified by searching institution profiles. RESULTS: There were 55 active NIH awards given to 41 vascular surgeons. Only 1% (41/4037) of all vascular surgeons in the United States receive NIH funding. Funded vascular surgeons are an average of 16.3 years out of training; 37% (n = 15) are women. The majority of awards (58%; n = 32) were R01 grants. Among the active NIH-funded projects, 75% (n = 41) are basic or translational research projects, and 25% (n = 14) are clinical or health services research projects. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral arterial disease are the most commonly funded disease areas and together accounted for 54% (n = 30) of projects. Three SVS research priorities are not addressed by any of the current NIH-funded projects. CONCLUSIONS: NIH funding of vascular surgeons is rare and predominantly consists of basic or translational science projects focused on abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral arterial disease research. Women are well-represented among funded vascular surgeons. Although the majority of SVS research priorities receive NIH funding, three SVS research priorities are yet to be addressed by NIH-funded projects. Future efforts should focus on increasing the number of vascular surgeons receiving NIH grants and ensuring all SVS research priorities receive NIH funding.

Assessing the quality of reporting of studies using Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) has become an increasingly popular data source for retrospective observational vascular surgery studies. There are published guidelines on the reporting of data in such studies to promote transparency and rigor, but these have not been used to evaluate studies using VQI data. Our objective was to appraise the methodological reporting quality of studies using VQI data by evaluating their adherence to these guidelines. METHODS: The Society for Vascular Surgery VQI publication repository was queried for all articles published in 2020. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) statement and the Journal of American Medical Association-Surgical Section (JAMA-Surgery) checklist were utilized to assess the quality of each article's reporting. Five and three items from the RECORD statement and JAMA-Surgery checklist were excluded, respectively, because they were either inapplicable or nonassessable. Journal impact factor (IF) was queried for each article to elucidate any difference in reporting standards between high and low IF journals. RESULTS: Ninety studies were identified and analyzed. The median score on the RECORD checklist was 6 (of 8). The most commonly missed item was discussing data cleaning methods (93% missed). The median score on the JAMA-Surgery checklist was 3 (of 7). The most commonly missed items were the identification of competing risks (98% missed), the use of a flow chart to clearly define sample exclusion and inclusion criteria (84% missed), and the inclusion of a solid research question and hypothesis (81% missed). There were no differences in JAMA-Surgery checklist or RECORD statement median scores among studies published in low vs high IF journals. CONCLUSIONS: Studies using VQI data demonstrate a poor to moderate adherence to reporting standards. Key areas for improvement in research reporting include articulating a clear hypothesis, using flow charts to clearly define inclusion and exclusion criteria, identifying competing risks, and discussing data cleaning methods. Additionally, future efforts should center on creating tailored instruments to better guide reporting in studies using VQI data.

Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair conversion in octogenarians treated at a high-volume aorta center.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the dominant treatment strategy for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms but has been especially preferred for octogenarian (age ≥80 years) patients because of concerns surrounding comorbidity severity and physiologic frailty. However, EVAR failure resulting in subsequent open conversion (EVAR-c) has been increasingly reported in older patients, although a paucity of literature focusing on the outcomes in this subgroup is available. The purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate our experience with EVAR-c for octogenarians (age ≥80 years) compared with that for younger patients (age <80 years). METHODS: A retrospective review of all nonmycotic EVAR-c procedures (2002-2020) at a single high-volume academic hospital with a dedicated aorta center (available at: https://www.uf-health-aortic-disease-center) was performed. A total of 162 patients were categorized into octogenarian (age ≥80 years; n = 43) and nonoctogenarian (age <80 years; n = 119) cohorts and compared. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. The secondary end points included complications, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. Cox regression was used to determine the effects of selected covariates on mortality risk. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. RESULTS: No differences in the preadmission EVAR reintervention rates were present (octogenarians, 42%; nonoctogenarians, 43%; P = 1.00) although the interval to the first reintervention was longer for the octogenarians (41 months) than for the nonoctogenarians (15 months; P = .01). In addition, the time to EVAR-c was significantly longer for the octogenarian patients (61 months) than for the nonoctogenarian patients (39 months; P < .01). No difference in rupture presentation was evident (14% vs 10%; P = .6). However, elective EVAR-c occurred less frequently for octogenarians (42%) than for nonoctogenarians (59%; P = .07). The abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was significantly larger for elective octogenarian EVAR-c (7.8 ± 1.9 cm) than for nonoctogenarian EVAR-c (7.0 ± 1.5 cm; P = .02), and the presence of a type Ia endoleak was the most common indication overall (58%; n = 91). A trend toward greater 30-day mortality was evident for octogenarian patients (16%) compared with nonoctogenarian patients (7%; P = .06). Similarly, the 90-day mortality was greater for the octogenarian patients (26%) than for the nonoctogenarian patients (10%; P = .02). However, the incidence of any complication (56% vs 49%; P = .5), readmission rate (12% vs 6%; P = .3), unplanned reoperation rate (10% vs 5%; P = .5), and length of stay (11 days vs 9 days; P = .3) were not significantly different between the two groups. Age ≥80 years was predictive of short-term mortality after nonelective but not after elective surgery. However, increasing comorbidities, nonelective admission, and renal or mesenteric revascularization showed the strongest association with mortality risk. Survival at 1 and 3 years was not different between the two groups when comparing all patients after the first 90 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the unadjusted perioperative mortality was greater for octogenarian patients, the risk-adjusted elective outcomes were comparable to those for younger EVAR-c patients when treated at a high-volume aortic surgery center. This finding underscores the importance of appropriate patient selection and modulation of operative complexity when feasible to achieve optimal results. Providers caring for octogenarian patients with EVAR failure should consider timely elective referral to high-volume aorta centers to reduce resource usage and the frequency of nonelective presentations.

In-situ bypass is associated with superior infection-free survival compared with extra-anatomic bypass for the management of secondary aortic graft infections without enteric involvement.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal revascularization modality following complete resection of aortic graft infection (AGI) without enteric involvement remains unclear. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the revascularization approach associated with the lowest morbidity and mortality using real-world data in patients undergoing complete excision of AGI. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of AGI from 2002 to 2014 was performed using a standardized database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was infection-free survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients at 34 institutions from seven countries presented with AGI during the study period (median age, 68 years; 75% male). The initial aortic procedures that resulted in AGI were 172 surgical grafts (71%), 66 endografts (27%), and three unknown (2%). Of the patients, 172 (71%) underwent complete excision of infected aortic graft material followed by in situ (in-line) bypass (ISB), including antibiotic-treated prosthetic graft (35%), autogenous femoral vein (neo-aortoiliac surgery) (24%), and cryopreserved allograft (41%). Sixty-nine patients (29%) underwent extra-anatomic bypass (EAB). Overall median Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 5.8 years. Perioperative mortality was 16%. When stratified by ISB vs EAB, there was a significant difference in Kaplan-Meier estimated infection-free survival (2910 days; interquartile range, 391-3771 days vs 180 days; interquartile range, 27-3750 days; P < .001). There were otherwise no significant differences in presentation, comorbidities, or perioperative variables. Multivariable Cox regression showed lower infection-free survival among patients with EAB (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.6; P < .001), polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5; P = .001), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7; P = .02), as well as the protective effect of omental/muscle flap coverage (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.92; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: After complete resection of AGI, perioperative mortality is 16% and median overall survival is 5.8 years. EAB is associated with nearly a two and one-half-fold higher reinfection/mortality compared with ISB. Omental and/or muscle flap coverage of the repair appear protective.

Patient comprehension necessary for informed consent for vascular procedures is poor and related to frailty.

OBJECTIVE: Informed consent is an essential principle of high-quality health care. A core component of surgical informed consent is patient comprehension of basic information such as the diagnosis, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed surgery. We sought to assess informed consent among vascular surgery patients and the association between frailty, education, decisional conflict, and patient comprehension. METHODS: We tested patient comprehension of basic information required for informed consent with a procedure-specific questionnaire in 102 consecutive patients undergoing selected vascular surgery procedures. Two patients who underwent open aortic aneurysm repair were excluded because of small sample size. All patients underwent assessment using the decisional conflict scale and the Frail/Nondisabled questionnaire. Analyses were performed to determine relationships between being informed and frailty, education level, and decisional conflict score. Patients included in this cohort had a median age of 71 years, and 25%, 14%, 28%, and 33% underwent carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, dialysis access creation, and percutaneous lower extremity procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 14% of patients were classified as "informed" and correctly answered all questions. Procedure type (P = .001), consent obtained by the attending surgeon vs a trainee (P = .04), and frailty score (P = .005) were all associated with whether a patient was informed or not. However, after multivariable adjustment, only frailty score was independently associated with being informed (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.95; P = .03). The median decisional conflict scale score was 7.8, suggesting that patients feel well informed and supported in spite of poor understanding of procedural indications, risks, benefits, and alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, patients have a poor comprehension of basic information related to surgical informed consent. These findings have potential ethical and clinical implications, and additional work is required to best determine causes of poor comprehension and strategies to mitigate the same.

Association and interplay of surgeon and hospital volume with mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the modern era.

OBJECTIVE: Operative volume has been used as a marker of quality. Research from previous decades has suggested minimum open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair volume requirements for surgeons of 9 to 13 open AAA repairs annually and for hospitals of 18 open AAA repairs annually to purportedly achieve acceptable results. Given concerns regarding the decreased frequency of open repairs in the endovascular era, we examined the association of surgeon and hospital volume with the 30- and 90-day mortality in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry. METHODS: Patients who had undergone elective open AAA repair from 2013 to 2018 were identified in the VQI registry. We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of the association between the average hospital and surgeon volume and 30-day postoperative mortality using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Cross-level interactions were permitted, and random surgeon- and hospital-level intercepts were used to account for clustering. The mortality results were adjusted by standardizing to the observed distribution of relevant covariates in the overall cohort. The outcomes were compared to the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommended criteria of <5% perioperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3078 patients had undergone elective open AAA repair by 520 surgeons at 128 hospitals. The 30- and 90-day risks of postoperative mortality were 4.1% (n = 126) and 5.4% (n = 166), respectively. The mean surgeon volume and hospital volume both correlated inversely with the 30-day mortality. Averaged across all patients and hospitals, we found a 96% probability that surgeons who performed an average of four or more repairs per year achieved <5% 30-day mortality. Substantial interplay was present between surgeon volume and hospital volume. For example, at lower volume hospitals performing an average of five repairs annually, <5% 30-day mortality would be expected 69% of the time for surgeons performing an average of three operations annually. In contrast, at higher volume hospitals performing an average of 40 repairs annually, a <5% 30-day mortality would be expected 96% of the time for surgeons performing an average of three operations annually. As hospital volume increased, a diminishing difference occurred in 30-day mortality between lower and higher volume surgeons. Likewise, as surgeon volume increased, a diminishing difference was found in 30-day mortality between the lower and higher volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and hospitals in the VQI registry achieved mortality outcomes of <5% (Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines), with an average surgeon volume that was substantially lower compared with previous reports. Furthermore, when considering the development of minimal surgeon volume guidelines, it is important to contextualize the outcomes within the hospital volumes.

Contemporary management and outcomes of complex vascular surgical groin wound infections.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical groin wound infection (VS-GWI) has multiple causes and frequently is manifested as a limb- or life-threatening problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. For patients undergoing operative extirpation, in situ repair, extra-anatomic bypass, or ligation can be used; however, limited data exist describing comparative results of the different operative choices or conduit subtypes. Therefore, we sought to describe our experience with management of VS-GWI and to detail outcomes of the different strategies. METHODS: Patients (2003-2017) undergoing surgical treatment of VS-GWI (Szilagyi grade III) secondary to primary infectious arteritis or infected pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous intervention as well as previous prosthetic graft placement were reviewed. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALEs; major amputation, graft occlusion, or unplanned reintervention). Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine relative risk of end points; Kaplan-Meier methodology was employed to estimate freedom from outcomes. RESULTS: There were 149 patients (age, 65 ± 11 years; body mass index, 27 ± 6 kg/m2; 70% male; 32% diabetes) identified, of whom 120 (81%) had unilateral and 29 (19%) had bilateral VS-GWI. Indications included infected prosthetic bypass (88% [n = 131]; infrainguinal, 107; suprainguinal, 24) and primary infectious femoral artery complications (12% [n = 18]). A majority underwent single-stage operations (87% [n = 129]). In situ reconstruction occurred in 87% (n = 129); 9% (n = 13) underwent ligation, and 6% (n = 7) received extra-anatomic revascularization. Autogenous conduit was used most commonly (68% [n = 101/149]; 88% single stage), of which 81% (n = 80) were femoral vein. The remaining patients received cadaveric (15% [n = 23]; 87% single stage) or prosthetic (8% [n=12]; 67% single stage) grafts. Adjunctive myocutaneous flap was used in 37% (n = 54). Length of stay was 19 ± 15 days and 30-day mortality was 7% (n = 10), with no difference between conduit repair types. All femoral wounds healed (mean follow-up, 17 ± 11 months); however, 33% (n = 49) underwent reoperation (unplanned graft reintervention, 33%; graft occlusion, 16%; wound débridement, 15%; major amputation, 11%). Reinfection occurred in 17% (n = 27), with no difference between groups. MALE rate was 22% (n = 33; most were arterial reinterventions, 19%), with no difference in single-stage vs multistage, in situ vs extra-anatomic, or autogenous vs nonautogenous conduit strategies Predictors of MALE included younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.5; P = .02) and lower body mass index (<25 kg/m2; HR, 1.6 per BMI category; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02). Overall, 1- and 3-year freedom from MALE, AFS, and survival were as follows: MALE, 74% ± 5% and 63% ± 6%; AFS, 68% ± 4% and 58% ± 5%; survival, 78% ± 3% and 70% ± 4%. Autogenous conduit use was associated with better survival (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; 1-year: 83% ± 4% vs nonautogenous, 78% ± 4%; 3-year: 68% ± 8% vs 53% ± 9%; log-rank, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized approach to operative strategy and conduit choice leads to comparable outcomes in this challenging group of patients. VS-GWI can be safely managed with in situ, autogenous reconstruction in a majority of patients with acceptable mortality, excellent wound healing rates, and improved overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients experience reinfection and MALEs, the preponderance of which are arterial reintervention, mandating need for close follow-up and graft surveillance.

Current status of patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery.

A previously published review focused on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to vascular surgery but limited to arterial conditions. The objective of this project was to identify all available PROMs relevant to diseases treated by vascular surgeons and to evaluate vascular surgeon perceptions, barriers to widespread implementation, and concerns regarding PROMs. We provide an overview of what a PROM is and how they are developed, and summarize currently available PROMs specific to vascular surgeons. We also report results from a survey of 78 Society for Vascular Surgery members serving on committees within the Policy and Advocacy Council addressing the barriers and facilitators to using PROMs in clinical practice. Finally, we report the qualitative results of two focus groups conducted to assess granular perceptions of PROMS and preparedness of vascular surgeons for widespread implementation of PROMs. These focus groups identified a lack of awareness of existing PROMs, knowledge of how PROMs are developed and validated, and clarity around how PROMs should be used by the clinician as main subthemes for barriers to PROM implementation in clinical practice.

Treatment and Outcomes of Aortic Graft Infections Using a Decision Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare but devastating complication requiring both explant of the infected prosthesis and lower extremity revascularization. Despite a variety of methods to treat AGI, there is a paucity of evidence that describes comparative outcomes. Moreover, controversy exists surrounding what the optimal repair strategy is with limited descriptions of how these techniques should be employed in this complex group of patients. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to review our experience with AGI management while highlighting a practice philosophy that can achieve acceptable outcomes. METHODS: All AGI patients between 2002-2019 were reviewed. The primary end-point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end-points included complications, re-infection, unplanned re-operation and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate time to events. Cox regression models were employed to identify association between patient factors and operative strategy with survival. Subgroup analysis included outcome comparison among four different operative approaches(extra-anatomic bypass with aortic ligation [EAB] and in-situ reconstruction [ISR] using either NAIS, cryopreserved allograft [Cryo], or antibiotic-soaked prosthetic grafts [Other]). RESULTS: 142 patients (male-69%, mean age 67 ± 11 years) were reviewed. Median time to AGI presentation was 52 (IQR 16-128) months. ISR was performed in 70% (n = 99)[ISR: NAIS-49% (n = 49), Cryo, 33% (n = 33) and Other-23% (n = 23)]. EAB was used in 26% (n = 37), of which 57% (n = 21) were staged repairs[no reconstruction, 4%: intraoperative death-2, AGI removal without reconstruction-2]. A graft enteric erosion/fistula was identified in 39% (n = 55). Mean follow-up time was 14 ± 27 (median 2.2[IQR 0.1-16]) months. Overall, 30-day mortality was 21% and 69% (n = 98) experienced a complication. The most common complications were pulmonary (35%;n = 50), vascular (28%;n = 39), gastrointestinal (22%;n = 31) and renal (21%;n = 30). Freedom from re-infection at one and three years was 78 ± 5% and 73 ± 6% while freedom from unplanned re-operation was 50 ± 5% and 40 ± 6%, respectively. Corresponding one- and five-year freedom from all-cause mortality was 67 ± 4% and 53 ± 4%. When stratified by the four different repair strategies, unadjusted rates of postoperative complications and mortality were not different. However, EAB patients had more renal complications. All-cause mortality predictors included age (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.1; P = 0.003), CHF (HR 2.7, 1.3-5.7; P = 0.01), and graft enteric erosion/fistula (HR 2.2, 1.3-3.8;P = 0.005) while total graft excision was protective (HR 0.34, 0.2-0.7; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: AGI repair, regardless of operative strategy, results in significant early morbidity, and mortality. The need for unplanned re-operation is common; however, long-term survival is acceptable in appropriately selected patients. Re-infection risk mandates life-long surveillance and consideration of indefinite anti-microbial suppression in certain subgroups. Due to the complexity and intensity of care, all AGI should be treated, when possible, at centers performing high-volume aortic surgery.

Surgical Treatment of True Superior Mesenteric Artery Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms (SMAAs) are a rare clinical problem that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal surgical approach for both mycotic and degenerative SMAAs remains poorly defined. The study was designed to review our institutional experience and develop a treatment algorithm. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective review was performed to document presentation, treatment, and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical repair of SMAAs from 2003 to 2020. The primary end-point was 30-day mortality, and secondary end-points included complications, patency, freedom from reinfection, freedom from reintervention, and survival. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (mean age: 46 ± 16 yrs; 50% male; mean diameter 2.4 ± 2.0 cm) underwent treatment of mycotic (50%) or degenerative (50%) SMAAs. Abdominal pain (66%) was the most common presenting symptom, and the diagnosis was confirmed with CT arteriography. Endocarditis secondary to intravenous drug abuse was responsible for most (88%) of the mycotic SMAAs, with a majority (66%) having positive cultures and Streptococcus being the most common organism. The majority (61%) of patients underwent urgent or emergent repair with aneurysmectomy and interposition saphenous vein bypass being the most common treatment of mycotic SMAAs while aneurysmectomy and prosthetic bypass were used most frequently for degenerative aneurysms. The operative mortality rate was 6% with a major complication rate of 17% (n = 3 patients: respiratory failure/reintubation-1, pulmonary embolism-1, necrotizing pancreatitis/graft disruption and death-1). The single death occurred in a patient with a degenerative aneurysm that developed postoperative pancreatitis and multiple organ dysfunction. The mean clinical follow-up time was 25 ± 48 (95% CI 1-48) months. The estimated primary patency, freedom from reinfection, and freedom from reintervention were 93 ± 7 %, 94 ± 5%, and 94 ± 5%, respectively, at 1 year. The overall mean survival was 55 ± 51 (95% CI 30-80) months with an estimated survival at 3 years of 77 ± 10%. CONCLUSIONS: SMAAs associated with both degenerative and mycotic etiologies can be treated using a variety of surgical approaches with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Mycotic SMAAs should likely be repaired, regardless of size, while the indications for asymptomatic, degenerative aneurysms remain to be defined by further natural history studies.

Dementia is associated with increased mortality and poor patient-centered outcomes after vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Dementia has been associated with increased complications and mortality in orthopedics and other surgical specialties, but has received limited attention in vascular surgery. Therefore, we evaluated the association of dementia with surgical outcomes for elderly patients with Medicare who underwent a variety of open and percutaneous vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: We reviewed claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part A fee-for-service insurance from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011, who underwent inpatient vascular surgery. Only the first surgery during the first admission was considered for analysis. Traditional outcomes (30- and 90-day mortality, intensive care admission, complications, length of stay) and patient-centered outcomes (discharge to home, extended skilled nursing facility [SNF] stay, time at home) were adjusted for patient and procedure characteristics using multilevel linear or logistic regression as appropriate. All analyses were performed using SAS (v9.4, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). RESULTS: Our study included 210,918 patients undergoing vascular surgery, of whom 27,920 carried a diagnosis of dementia. The average age of the entire cohort was 75.74 years, and 55.43% were male. Patients with dementia were older and had higher rates of comorbidities compared with patients without a dementia diagnosis. The three most common defined classes of intervention excluding miscellaneous ones were cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial, and aortic cases, which jointly accounted for 53.15% of cases. Among all cases, 56.62% were open. Emergent/urgent cases were more frequent amongst those with dementia (60.66% vs 37.93%; P < .001). After adjustment, patients with dementia had increased odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; P < .0001) and 90-day mortality (OR, 1.63; P < .0001), extended SNF stay (OR, 3.47; P < .0001), and longer hospital length of stay (8.29 days vs 5.41 days; P < .001). They were less likely to be discharged home (OR, 0.31; P < .0001) and spent a lower fraction of time at home after discharge (63.29% vs 86.91%; P < .001). Intensive care admission and inpatient complications were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia is associated with poor traditional outcomes, including increased 30- and 90-day mortality and longer hospital lengths of stay in this large national patient sample. It is also associated with worse patient-centered outcomes, including substantially lower discharge rates to home, less time spent at home after discharge, and higher rates of extended stay in a SNF. These data should be used to counsel patients facing vascular surgery to provide goal-concordant care, particularly to patients with dementia.

Aberrant subclavian artery division and revascularization by a supraclavicular approach for definitive or staged treatment of dysphagia lusoria.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the optimal approach to treatment of dysphagia lusoria (DL), especially in the absence of a Kommerell diverticulum (KD). We leveraged our institutional experience to clarify the safety and efficacy of aberrant subclavian artery (aSA) division with revascularization by a supraclavicular approach alone in patients with DL. METHODS: We identified 10 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for DL at our institution between January 2007 and March 2019. Clinical and radiographic characteristics for all patients were collected. The primary outcome was improvement in dysphagia symptoms. Secondary outcomes included need for second-stage operation, postoperative complications, and long-term radiologic changes in the aSA remnant. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent initial division of the aSA followed by revascularization through a supraclavicular exposure, and three had simultaneous supraclavicular and transthoracic intervention. Median follow-up was 52 (range, 1-143) months. In the four patients without a KD, a supraclavicular approach alone resulted in improvement in dysphagia symptoms. Conversely, the three patients who had a KD did not have durable relief of dysphagia and required a second-stage transthoracic procedure. Postoperatively, one developed a pulmonary embolism after supraclavicular approach alone and two patients developed complications after transthoracic intervention: left recurrent laryngeal nerve neurapraxia and pleural effusion requiring thoracentesis in one, and thoracic duct injury requiring reoperation in the second. Among those who underwent a single-stage procedure by a supraclavicular approach alone, no patients had aneurysm progression, rupture, or dissection after median follow-up of 60 (range, 1-100) months. CONCLUSIONS: Division and revascularization of the aSA through a supraclavicular exposure in patients with DL result in durable symptomatic improvement in the majority of patients, particularly those without a concomitant KD. Patients with a KD may require a second-stage procedure to address the KD, but it appears safe to trial staged intervention rather than simultaneous operations to divide the aSA and to address the KD.

The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE: Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics-rather than repair type-as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorter 5-year survival. Patient and aneurysm characteristics rather than surgical repair type appear to be responsible for these differences. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality and major morbidity were comparable, making AFB an attractive alternative to endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with advanced iliac occlusive disease.

Risk prediction of 30-day mortality after lower extremity major amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Universal risk calculators may underestimate mortality risk, whereas purely observational administrative data may lack appropriate granularity to individualize risk. The purpose of this study was to create a simple risk prediction model to identify the factors associated with 30-day morality after lower extremity major amputation for ischemic vascular disease. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program national data set was queried from 2005 to 2015 to identify 14,890 patients undergoing elective above-knee or below-knee amputation for rest pain, tissue loss, or gangrene. The data set was divided into a two-thirds derivation set and one-third validation set for the purpose of creating a risk prediction model. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. Eight independent risk factors for mortality resulted from the model and were assigned whole number integer risk scores. Summary risk scores were collapsed into categories and defined as low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), high (8-10), and very high (>10). RESULTS: Mortality in the derivation data set was 4.6% (n = 453). By multivariable backward elimination, predictors of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence limits]) included preoperative do not resuscitate order (3.1 [2.3-4.0]), congestive heart failure (2.8 [2.1-3.6]), age >80 years (1.8 [1.4-2.2]), chronic renal insufficiency (2.1 [1.7-2.5]), above-knee amputation (1.8 [1.4-2.2]), dependent functional status (2.0 [1.6-2.5]), coronary artery disease (1.3 [1.1-1.6]), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.3 [1.0-1.6]); the final model held a C statistic of 0.74. In both the derivation and validation sets, 30-day mortality correlated with risk category. Among the defined categories in the derivation set, 30-day mortality rates were 2.3% for low-risk patients, 4.3% for moderate-risk patients, 7.5% for high-risk patients, and 17.5% for very-high-risk patients, with similar results for the validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model uses eight easily obtainable clinical metrics that allow early assessment of 30-day mortality risk of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation for ischemic indications. The internal validation of the risk score demonstrates the increased mortality with increasing risk category. Reliable expected mortality prediction is critically important for surgeons to make recommendations in accordance with a patient's or family's goals of care. These data may also be used to set realistic expectations for hospital-based quality initiatives and to provide guidance in preoperative medical optimization.

Strategies and outcomes for aortic endograft explantation.

BACKGROUND: Failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) requiring open conversion remains a major challenge. We analyzed indications for repair, operative strategies, and outcomes with a focus on iliac artery degeneration after endograft removal. METHODS: A prospective, institutional database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent explantation of a failed EVAR device. Demographics, reason for failure, operative details including extent of endograft removal, and complications/survival were examined. Postexplantation computed tomography imaging was evaluated for iliac artery degeneration. RESULTS: There were 32 patients who underwent explantation from 2002 to 2017. Six patients were treated emergently for rupture. The majority were elderly (average age, 76 ± 8.5 years), white (100%) men (91%) who had their EVAR graft inserted 45.5 months (range, 0.3-86 months) before open conversion, usually at an outside institution (75%). Explanted endografts included nine AneuRx (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn), nine Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz), four Endurant (Medtronic), three Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), three Powerlink/AFX (Endologix, Irvine, Calif), one Aorfix (Lombard Medical, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom), one Talent (Medtronic), and two unknown. Failure was due to endoleak in 91% (type I, 38%; type II, 28%; type III, 13%; type V, 13%), infection in 6%, and occlusion/kinking in 3%. A previous attempt at endovascular salvage of EVAR occurred in 12 (37.5%) patients. Operative approach was transabdominal in 69% and retroperitoneal in 31%. Initial aortic clamp position was supraceliac in 31%, suprarenal in 31%, and infrarenal in 38%. Most patients had complete removal of their endograft (n = 19 [59%]), with 22 (69%) having at least the iliac limbs removed. Grafts with suprarenal fixation were more likely to have the upper main body left in situ (67% vs 17%; P = .029). The 30-day mortality was 6.3% (3.8% elective, 16.7% ruptured), and 31% had a major complication. Of the 23 patients who had follow-up imaging, there was a trend for more iliac degeneration (>5 mm in growth) in those who had the iliac limbs removed (29.4% vs 0%; P = .184). Three patients with iliac limb removal required subsequent iliac endovascular intervention (two for rupture). Patients who presented with a rupture had a decreased 5-year overall survival (33%) compared with those who were converted electively (59%). CONCLUSIONS: Both complete and partial endograft explantation, although morbid procedures, can be performed safely. Postoperative imaging surveillance is important, especially if the endograft has been removed from the iliac arteries, as degeneration can occur.

Thirty-year trends in aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular intervention has supplanted open bypass as the most frequently used approach in patients with aortoiliac segment atherosclerosis. We sought to determine whether this trend together with changing demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AOD) have an association with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained institutional database, we identified patients who underwent ABFB for AOD from 1985 to 2015. Patients were divided into two cohorts: the historical cohort (HC) included patients who underwent ABFB for AOD from 1985 to 1999 and the contemporary cohort (CC) who underwent ABFB for AOD from 2000 to 2015. Medical and demographic data, procedural information, postoperative complications, and follow-up data were extracted. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate associations with the end point of primary patency. A similar analysis was performed for major adverse limb events (MALEs; the composite of above-ankle amputation, major reintervention, graft revision, or new bypass graft of the index limb) in the subset of patients with critical limb ischemia. RESULTS: There were a total of 359 cases: 226 in the HC and 133 in the CC. The CC had more women (56.4% vs 43.8%; P = .02), smokers (87.2% vs 67.7%; P = .001), and patients who failed prior aortoiliac endovascular intervention (17.3% vs 4.8%; P = .0001), but fewer patients with coronary artery disease (32.3% vs 47.3%; P = .005). Thirty-day mortality was less than 1% in both cohorts, but 10-year survival was higher in the CC (67.7% vs 52.6%; P = .02). Five-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were higher in the HC (93.3% vs 82.2%; P = .005; 93.8% vs 85.7%; P = .02; 97.5% vs 90.4%; P = .02, respectively). CC membership, decreasing age, prior aortic surgery, and decreasing graft diameter were significant independent predictors of loss of primary patency after adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 7.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.80-17.63; P < .0001; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; P < .0001; HR, 18.80; 95% CI, 5.94-59.58; P < .0001; and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02, respectively). Similarly, CC membership, prior aortic surgery, and decreasing graft diameter were significant independent predictors of MALE in the critical limb ischemia cohort after adjustment (HR, 21.13; 95% CI, 4.20-106.40; P = .0002; HR, 40.40; 95% CI, 3.23-505.61; P = .004; and HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.86; P = .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the pre-endovascular era, demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing ABFB for AOD in the CC have changed. Although long-term patency is slightly lower among patients in the CC during which a substantial subset of AOD patients are being treated primarily via the endovascular approach, durability remains excellent and limb salvage unchanged. After adjustment, the time period of index ABFB independently predicted primary patency and MALE, as did graft diameter and prior aortic surgery. These changing characteristics should be considered when counseling patients and benchmarking for reintervention rates and other outcomes.