Prediction model based on radiomics and clinical features for preoperative lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer patients.

Background: We explored whether a model based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics features and clinicopathological factors can evaluate preoperative lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) with Lauren classification. Methods: Based on clinical and radiomic characteristics, we established three models: Clinical + Arterial phase_Radcore, Clinical + Venous phase_Radcore and a combined model. The relationship between Lauren classification and LVI was analyzed using a histogram. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 495 patients with GC. The areas under the curve of the combined model were 0.8629 and 0.8343 in the training and testing datasets, respectively. The combined model showed a superior performance to the other models. Conclusion: CECT-based radiomics models can effectively predict preoperative LVI in GC patients with Lauren classification.

A new nomogram for assessing complete response (CR) in gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients after chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Achieving complete response (CR) after first-line chemotherapy in gastric DLBCL patients often results in longer disease-free survival. We explored whether a model based on imaging features combined with clinicopathological factors could assess the CR to chemotherapy in patients with gastric DLBCL. METHODS: Univariate (P < 0.10) and multivariate (P < 0.05) analyses were used to identify factors associated with a CR to treatment. As a result, a system was developed to evaluate whether gastric DLBCL patients had a CR to chemotherapy. Evidence was found to support the model's ability to predict outcomes and demonstrate clinical value. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 108 people who had been diagnosed gastric DLBCL; 53 were in CR. Patients were divided at random into a 5:4 training/testing dataset split. ß2 microglobulin before and after chemotherapy and lesion length after chemotherapy were independent predictors of the CR of gastric DLBCL patients after chemotherapy. These factors were used in the predictive model construction. In the training dataset, the area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.929, the specificity was 0.806, and the sensitivity was 0.862. In the testing dataset, the model had an AUC of 0.957, specificity of 0.792, and sensitivity of 0.958. The AUC did not differ significantly between the training and testing dates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: A model constructed using imaging features combined with clinicopathological factors could effectively evaluate the CR to chemotherapy in gastric DLBCL patients. The predictive model can facilitate the monitoring of patients and be used to adjust individualised treatment plans.