Endoscopic healing is associated with a reduced risk of biologic treatment failure in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Increasing number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have received biologic treatment during the last decade. The association between endoscopic healing (EH) and biologic treatment failure remains understudied. Medical information of UC patients who started biologic treatment was retrospectively collected. EH was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Loss of response (LOR)-free drug continuation rate was compared between patients who achieved EH and those who did not using Kaplan-Meier estimator. Fifty-two patients received 53 biologic treatments and underwent follow-up colonoscopies within 2 years. Thirty-three patients achieved EH, all of which remained on the same treatment without LOR during the observational period. Twenty patients did not achieve EH, 8 of which ultimately discontinued the treatment due to LOR to biologic agents. Kaplan-Meier estimator found a significantly lower drug continuation rate in patients without EH (p < 0.001; log-rank test). A Cox regression analysis identified EH as an independent factor associated with a reduced risk of LOR-related biologic treatment failure irrespective of the types of biologic agents (Hazard Ratio = 0.0324, p < 0.001). EH within 2 years is associated with a reduced risk of LOR-related biologic treatment failure in patients with UC.

Recent steroid use and the relapse risk in ulcerative colitis patients with endoscopic healing.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic healing (EH) is a therapeutic target in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, even patients who have achieved EH relapse frequently. AIMS: To investigate the association between recent steroid use and relapse risk in UC patients with EH. METHODS: This multi-centre cohort study included 1212 UC patients with confirmed EH (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1). We excluded patients with current systemic steroid use or history of advanced therapy. We divided patients into a recent steroid group (last systemic steroid use within 1 year; n = 59) and a non-recent or steroid-naïve group (n = 1153). We followed the patients for 2 years to evaluate relapse, defined as induction of systemic steroids or advanced therapy. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of relapse. RESULTS: Relapse occurred in 28.8% of the recent steroid group and 5.6% of the non-recent/steroid-naïve group (multi-variable-adjusted OR 5.53 [95% CI 2.85-10.7]). The risk of relapse decreased with time since the last steroid use: 28.8% for less than 1 year after steroid therapy, 22.9% for 1 year, 16.0% for 2 years and 7.9% beyond 3 years, approaching 4.0% in steroid-naïve patients. (ptrend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even for patients with UC who achieved EH, the risk of relapse remains high following recent steroid therapy. Physicians need to consider the duration since last steroid use to stratify the relapse risk in UC patients with EH.