Redness response phenotypes of allergic conjunctivitis in an allergen challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: There are few direct data concerning symptom dynamics of allergic conjunctivitis (AC) in an allergen challenge chamber (ACC). OBJECTIVE: To determine the AC dynamics on subsequent exposures to ragweed pollen (RW) in individuals with allergic rhinitis in an ACC. To determine whether consecutive exposures in an ACC have any persistent detrimental ocular physical effects. METHODS: Participants underwent 3 exposures to RW in an ACC. Ocular symptoms of itching and tearing were self-assessed. Ocular redness and lid swelling were assessed by trained ophthalmic technicians. Complete ophthalmic examinations (COEs) were performed by an ophthalmologist. RESULTS: A total of 188 of 201 participants (93%) developed an ocular redness score of 2 or more in each eye in ACC exposure 1. Reproducibility of redness occurred in approximately 70% of individuals completing ACC exposures 1 through 3. There were no significant changes between baseline COE and end of study COE. Phenotypes were identified by redness responses during and after exposure. Baseline total ocular symptom scores, at 24 hours after a priming exposure, were identified as late-phase reactions rather than enhanced sensitivity. CONCLUSION: When assessed by trained professionals, AC was present with a very high frequency in selected individuals allergic to RW monitored in an ACC. Intrasubject reproducibility of redness was consistent across 3 ACC allergen exposures. Phenotypes were identified as early-phase responses, protracted early-phase responses, dual responses, and late-phase responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02079649.

A combined analysis of two studies assessing the ocular comfort of antiallergy ophthalmic agents.

BACKGROUND: Many topical agents with similar efficacies are available for the treatment of ocular allergies. In addition to efficacy, comfort is an important criterion because it affects overall patient satisfaction, compliance, and in turn efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the comfort profiles of permirolast, ketorolac, cromolyn, and nedocromil ophthalmic solutions using combined results from 2 separate clinical trials. METHODS: Two clinical trials were conducted. Adults with asymptomatic eyes were included in the first study. In this single-center, 7-day, prospective, double-blind, single-dose, crossover, parallel-group study, subjects were randomized to be bilaterally dosed with pemirolast, cromolyn, or ketorolac at each of 3 visits. Study 2 was a single-center, 1-day, prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, contralateral, active-control study in which subjects received pemirolast in 1 eye and nedocromil in the contralateral eye. In both studies, subjects completed a pre- and postinstillation ocular comfort questionnaire: the primary variable was overall ocular discomfort, measured on a 4-point scale original to these studies (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Half-increments were permitted. Secondary variables included burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, tearing, and photophobia. RESULTS: Forty-five subjects (29 women, 16 men; mean [SD] age, 35.9 [12.6] years) were enrolled in study 1; 48 subjects (30 women, 18 men; mean [SD] age, 33.6 [10.2] years) were enrolled in study 2. In study 1, overall discomfort was significantly lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn (P = 0.001) or ketorolac (P < 0.001). In terms of overall discomfort, the number of subjects with a clinically significant increase (>/=1 unit) in score was significantly lower with pemirolast compared with ketorolac (P = 0.021). Burning/stinging and tearing were also significantly lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn (P < 0.001 and P = 0.014, respectively). Mean changes in score compared with preinstillation were consistently lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn for both burning/stinging (P < 0.001) and tearing (P = 0.014). In study 2, overall discomfort was significantly lower with pemirolast than with nedocromil (P < 0.001). The number of subjects with a clinically significant increase in overall discomfort score was significantly lower with pemirolast than with nedocromil (P = 0.007). No changes in ocular tolerability parameters were reported in either study. CONCLUSION: In these single-dose studies, pemirolast was found to be significantly more comfortable than cromolyn, ketorolac, or nedocromil.

Two mast cell stabilizers, pemirolast potassium 0.1% and nedocromil sodium 2%, in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a comparative study.

This randomized, double-masked, active-control, parallel-group trial compared the mast cell stabilizers pemirolast potassium 0.1% and nedocromil sodium 2% in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Pemirolast is currently indicated for four-times-daily administration, nedocromil, for twice-daily dosing. Both ophthalmic solutions were instilled bilaterally twice a day for 8 weeks. The study involved four office visits and two telephone contacts. Participants evaluated their symptoms daily in take-home diaries (itching was the primary efficacy variable) and completed questionnaires to assess comfort. Of a total enrollment of 80, 78 patients completed the study. No significant differences were found between pemirolast and nedocromil on any signs or symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis (redness, chemosis, itching, eyelid swelling). At each visit, pemirolast was rated significantly more comfortable than nedocromil. A significantly higher percentage of the pemirolast group experienced no signs or symptoms at work or school (58% vs 28%; P = .005). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. Twice-daily administration of pemirolast potassium was as efficacious and safe as twice-daily nedocromil sodium in the 8-week treatment of ragweed allergic conjunctivitis and was superior to nedocromil in comfort. Increased comfort with pemirolast may increase patient satisfaction and compliance with therapy.