Analysis of a decade of skin cancer prevention using a mobile unit in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: For the past 10 years, skin cancer has been the most frequent malignant neoplasm in Brazil and worldwide. Each year, there are more new cases of skin cancer than the combined incidence of cancers of the breast, prostate, lung and colon. There were an estimated 188 000 new cases of skin cancer in Brazil in 2016. The prevention department of Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH) runs some prevention programs for cancer such as breast, prostate, cervical, oral, colon and skin cancers. The skin cancer prevention program comprises educational activities and medical assistance conducted at the hospital and at a mobile unit (MU). The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of the MU as part of a skin cancer prevention program, 10 years after the implementation of this prevention program, using an MU in remote areas of Brazil. METHODS: The database of the BCH was used. These data refer to data collected by the BCH Prevention MU. A total of 45 872 patients with suspected skin cancer were evaluated at the MU from 2004 to 2013. Of these, 8954 surgical procedures (excisions and/or biopsy) were performed. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a significant number of skin cancer cases diagnosed and treated by the MU. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the MU positively contributes to the early diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer among populations residing in remote areas of Brazil.

Cell phone usefulness to improve the skin cancer screening: preliminary results and critical analysis of mobile app development.

INTRODUCTION: The high incidence of skin cancer in Brazil has resulted in an urgent need for more efficient methods of reducing the time between initial diagnosis and therapy. Such delays are significant in large countries like Brazil, where a considerable proportion of the population live in remote areas with limited access to specialized medical care. To address this problem the use of mobile phones as screening devices for suspicious skin lesions has been incorporated as long-distance teledermatology services. Digital photography is now a convenient ancillary option to minimize treatment delays caused by the distance between the specialist doctor and patients. The authors have developed a friendly mobile application and website to take high quality digital images of suspicious lesions, and to capture patient data easily and quickly to be analyzed by skin cancer professionals at another location. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a population of 39 individuals monitored by routine skin cancer screening by the Cancer Prevention Department at Barretos Cancer Hospital during 2016. All patients were evaluated in the dermatology clinic, where a differential diagnosis was made based on the clinical information and direct examination of suspicious lesions. A second dermatologist assessed the same clinical information and digital images of all lesions captured by teledermatology, and provided an independent diagnostic opinion on the likelihood of the lesions being benign or suggestive of malignancy. The diagnostic efficiencies of teledermatology and standard dermatology were then compared to the histopathological findings of each biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, and then statistical parameters of each approach were evaluated. RESULTS: The lesions studied in this comparison were mostly found on the face (69%), followed by upper limbs (15%), scalp (8%), trunk (6%) and lower limbs (2%). Final histopathological analyses of the biopsies in the study group showed that 71% of lesions were malignant, with 32% being squamous cell carcinoma and 68% being classified as basal cell carcinoma, and 29% were considered benign lesions. The overall sensitivities of teledermatology in comparison to face-to-face evaluation in the clinic were similar (clinic, 80.0%; teledermatology, 80.8%). Other comparisons including accuracy (clinic, 78.9%; teledermatology, 79.5%); specificity (clinic, 76.9%; teledermatology, 76.9%); positive predictive value (clinic, 87.0%; teledermatology, 87.5%); and negative predictive value (clinic, 66.7.0%; teledermatology, 66.7%) all showed equivalence. The inter-observer kappa value between face-to-face examination and teledermatology showed excellent agreement at 0.958. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings indicate that the cell phone application developed to aid the diagnosis of skin cancer showed great potential and reliability, and can therefore be considered as an ancillary option in countries like Brazil, with isolated communities that have limited access to dermatology clinics.

Digital photography in skin cancer screening by mobile units in remote areas of Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is one of the most common neoplasms in the world. Despite the low mortality rates, NMSC can still cause severe sequelae when diagnosed at advanced stages. Malignant melanoma, the third most common type of skin cancer, has more aggressive behavior and a worse prognosis. Teledermatology provides a new tool for monitoring skin cancer, especially in countries with a large area and unequal population distribution. This study sought to evaluate the performance of digital photography in skin cancer diagnosis in remote areas of Brazil. METHODS: A physician in a Mobile Prevention Unit (MPU) took four hundred sixteen digital images of suspicious lesions between April 2010 and July 2011. All of the photographs were electronically sent to two oncologists at Barretos Cancer Hospital who blindly evaluated the images and provided a diagnosis (benign or malignant). The absolute agreement rates between the diagnoses made by direct visual inspection (by the MPU physician) and through the use of digital imaging (by the two oncologists) were calculated. The oncologists' accuracy in predicting skin cancer using digital imaging was assessed by means of overall accuracy (correct classification rate), sensitivity, specificity and predictive value (positive and negative). A skin biopsy was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Oncologist #1 classified 59 lesions as benign with the digital images, while oncologist #2 classified 27 lesions as benign using the same images. The absolute agreement rates with direct visual inspection were 85.8% for oncologist #1 (95% CI: 77.1-95.2) and 93.5% for oncologist #2 (95% CI: 84.5-100.0). The overall accuracy of the two oncologists did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high sensitivity and PPV, Teledermatology seems to be a suitable tool for skin cancer screening by MPU in remote areas of Brazil.