Evaluation of 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity of an aloe vera inner leaf gel beverage.

Despite its popularity along with many proposed therapeutic applications, the safety profile of Aloe vera gel beverages remains unsettled. The putative toxicology concern has focused on the hydroxyanthraquinone derivatives (HADs) found in the latex portion of the Aloe leaf. Despite harvesting and processing designed to eliminate or significantly reduce these compounds, certain HADs, such as aloin, may be present and have been associated with carcinogenicity in non-decolorized whole leaf extract containing approximately 6400 ppm aloin A and 71 ppm aloin-emodin. Sprague Dawley rats had free access to drinking water or a commercially and widely available Aloe vera gel beverage (Forever Living Products) prepared from the inner leaves of Aloe barbadensis Miller containing 3.43 ppm total aloin for 90 days. Under the conditions of the study and based on the toxicological endpoints evaluated, there were no adverse test substance-related findings, including altered thyroid hormones. No histologic differences or histopathological changes were detected in the multiple tissues and organs examined. The Ki-67 proliferation assay demonstrated no increased cell proliferation in the liver, lungs, kidneys, or urinary bladder, which might have been attributed to the dietary administration of the Aloe vera gel beverage via drinking water for 90 days. These data lend increasing confidence regarding the safety of appropriately processed Aloe vera gel beverages, such as the beverage tested in this study.

Toxicological assessment of dihydroergotamine after chronic inhalation in dogs.

The objective was to determine the respiratory toxicity of MAP0004, orally inhaled dihydroergotamine (DHE), via inhalation for six months. Forty beagle dogs (twenty females, twenty males) were treated by nose-only inhalation for 182 days. Groups 2 through 5 received MAP0004 (mean doses: 0.045, 0.154, 0.44, 0.825 mg/kg); Group 1 received vehicle only. Groups 1 through 4 received single thirty-minute exposures, whereas Group 5 was exposed twice daily for thirty minutes. Toxicity was assessed from clinical observations, objective evaluations, and clinical and anatomical pathology. Systemic effects were scabbing of ear tips in Groups 3, 4, and 5 and excessive salivation and emesis, observed in Group 5. No changes were observed in the lungs in any dose group. Minimal treatment-related microscopic changes were observed in the respiratory nasal epithelium only in Group 5. No plexiform, vascular media, or fibroproliferative changes in any heart valves were observed in any group. Expected systemic pharmacologic effects were observed only at MAP0004 target doses ≥ 0.224 mg/kg (achieved doses > 0.154 mg/kg), which was more than five times the maximum daily intravenous (IV) human clinical dose of DHE, and more than twenty times the systemic equivalent dose of MAP0004. The no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was the achieved inhaled dose of 0.045 mg/kg, or four times the human clinical dose of MAP0004.

Toxicological evaluation of smokeless tobacco: 2-year chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity feeding study in Wistar Han rats.

UNLABELLED: A comprehensive 2-year oral chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study was conducted with smokeless tobacco using modern toxicological test methods and well-accepted standards. The study included a 1-year interim subgroup to assess toxicity at that intermediate time point. Test groups consisted of a tobacco blend (B) used in snus, and an aqueous tobacco extract of that tobacco blend (E) administered at 0.2, 2, or 5 mg nicotine/kg body weight/day via dosed feed to male and female Wistar Han rats. The dosages were selected to simulate potential exposure in humans ingesting smokeless tobacco or an aqueous extract of smokeless tobacco (the latter intended to simulate a snus extract, to enable bridging these data to snus epidemiology data). The following endpoints were evaluated: clinical observations, body weights, feed consumption (FC), ophthalmic exams, toxicokinetics, clinical pathology, gross pathology, and histopathology. During the 2-year study, clear treatment-related, dose-responsive effects included: (1) increases in plasma nicotine and cotinine (indicating that animals were appropriately exposed to levels relevant to human exposure) and (2) decreases in body weights with some alterations in FC. At the 2-year time point, two tumor types (in the highest B doses) displayed statistically significantly increased incidence trends vs. CONTROLS: (1) uterine carcinoma in females and (2) epididymal mesothelioma in males. Three tumor types displayed statistically significantly decreased incidence trends: (1) mammary gland adenomas in females, (2) skin basal cell carcinomas in females, and (3) thyroid follicular cell adenomas in males. These increases (and decreases) in tumor trends were interpreted as not being treatment-related because: (1) there were no preneoplastic or related non-neoplastic histopathological findings in the treated rats at the 1-year or 2-year time points to suggest that any of these neoplastic findings were treatment-related and (2) the tumor morphologies and incidences were generally within the expected range of historical controls for Wistar Han rats. Findings from this study indicate that chronic exposure of male and female Wistar Han rats to either a tobacco blend used in snus, or a tobacco extract of that blend does not lead to increased toxicity or carcinogenicity, based on the specified outcomes measured.

The views of U.S. medical school deans toward academic primary care.

PURPOSE: To understand the views of U.S. medical school deans about their primary care faculties. METHOD: In 2000, the authors mailed a questionnaire containing 43 multipart items to deans of 130 U.S. allopathic medical schools. The questionnaire assessed the deans' attitudes about and evaluation of primary care at their school and their school's efforts to strengthen it. Deans were asked to compare family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics with nonprimary care clinical departments at their schools. RESULTS: Of the 83 (64%) deans who responded, 82% reported their school had departments or divisions of family medicine, general internal medicine, and general pediatrics. Deans rated general internal medicine and general pediatrics higher than nonprimary care faculty on clinical expertise and productivity (p < .001) and family medicine equivalent to nonprimary care faculty. Deans rated all three primary care faculties superior to nonprimary care faculty for teaching skills (p < .001) and programs (p < .05), but lower than nonprimary care disciplines for research productivity (p < .01) and revenues (p < .001). They rated family medicine and general pediatrics lower for research skills (p < .001), but 73% of deans stated research was equally important for primary care and nonprimary care departments. Deans considered overall financial resources to be equivalent for primary care and nonprimary care departments, but 77% of deans felt primary care departments or divisions needed financial support from the medical school to survive. Most deans attempted to strengthen primary care by changing the curriculum to promote primary care and by providing financial support. CONCLUSIONS: Deans ranked primary care faculty high on clinical and teaching measures. Although they considered research to be an important activity for primary care faculty, they evaluated it low relative to nonprimary care departments.