Can the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing flap reconstruction following soft tissue sarcoma resection?

INTRODUCTION: The ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator is an open-access on-line tool that estimates the risk of adverse post-operative outcomes for a wide range of surgical procedures. Wide surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often requires complex reconstructive procedures that can be associated with relatively high rates of complications. This study evaluates the ability of this calculator to identify patients with STS at risk for post-operative complications following flap reconstruction. METHODS: Clinical details of 265 patients who underwent flap reconstruction following STS resection were entered into the online calculator. The predicted rates of complications were compared to the observed rates. The calculator model was validated using measures of prediction and discrimination. RESULTS: The mean predicted rate of any complication was 15.35 ± 5.6% which differed significantly from the observed rate of 32.5% (P = 0.009). The c-statistic was relatively low at 0.626 indicating poor discrimination between patients who are at risk of complications and those who are not. The Brier's score of 0.242 was significantly different from 0 (P < 0.001) indicating poor correlation between the predicted and actual probability of complications. CONCLUSION: The ACS-NSQIP universal risk calculator did not maintain its predictive value in patients undergoing flap reconstruction following STS resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:570-575. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Risk factors for postoperative wound complications after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Advancements in imaging, surgical, and radiation techniques have made resection of larger and more extensive extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS) possible but with the potential for high complication rates. This study summarizes complication and reoperation rates associated with resection of ESTS and reviews predictors for wound complications. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on ESTS in adults was undertaken from the four databases MEDLINE, Embase, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT). Meta-analyses of the complications, reoperations, and risk factors were performed. RESULTS: In the twenty-one studies included, there was an overall wound complication rate of 30.2% (95% CI 26.56-33.47) and a reoperation rate of 13.37% (95% CI 10.21-16.52) in 5628 patients. Individual studies reported that older patient age, obesity, smoking, diabetes, large tumor size, tumor site, and preoperative radiotherapy were associated with adverse outcomes. Tumors of the lower limb, diabetes, smoking, obesity, and radiation were identified as independent predictors of wound complications in meta-analysis. A high level of heterogeneity between studies limited pooled analysis for many variables. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advancements in the treatment of ESTS, postoperative complication rates remain high. Awareness of the risk factors for wound complications, especially those that may be modifiable, is essential to decrease postoperative morbidities in these patients to improve treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Identification of predictors for wound complications following preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: In extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been used in addition to limb-sparing surgery (LSS). This study aims to identify predictors for major wound complication (MWC) development following EBRT and LSS in ESTS. METHODS: This retrospective study includes ESTS patients treated with EBRT and LSS between 2005 and 2017. Two groups were formed; Group I included preoperatively irradiated patients, whereas Group II included patients who underwent postoperative EBRT. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to create a prediction model for MWC development. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included, 58 patients (45.7%) in Group I and 69 patients (54.3%) in Group II. Some differences in baseline characteristics were found between the groups, e.g. in tumor size and grade, histological subtype and total RT dose. Twenty-three patients (39.7%) in Group I and 14 patients (20.3%) in Group II developed a MWC (p = 0.02). Preoperative EBRT was identified as independent predictor for MWC development, OR 2.75 (95%CI 1.21-6.26), p = 0.02. Furthermore, a trend towards an increased MWC risk was shown for patients' age (OR 1.02 (0.99-1.04)), delayed wound closure (OR 3.20 (0.64-16.02)) and negative surgical margins (OR 2.26 (0.72-7.11)). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.68 (0.57-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: This study corroborates the increased MWC risk following preoperative EBRT in ESTS. It remains important to carefully weigh the MWC risk against the expected long-term functional outcome, and to consider the liberal use of primary plastic surgical reconstructions in an individualized multidisciplinary tumor board prior to treatment.

Flap reconstruction does not increase complication rates following surgical resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction plays an essential role in the surgical management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) for many patients. But flaps increase the duration and complexity of the surgery and their contribution to overall morbidity is unclear. This study directly compares the complication rates in patients with ESTS undergoing either flap reconstruction or primary wound closure and explores contributing factors. METHODS: Eight hundred and ninety-seven patients who underwent ESTS resection followed by primary closure (631) or flap reconstruction (266) were included in this study. Data on patient, tumour and treatment variables and post-operative medical and surgical complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of complications. RESULTS: Post-operative complications occurred in 33% of patients. Flap patients were significantly older, had more advanced disease and were more likely to require neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in complication rates following flap reconstruction compared to primary closure on multivariate analysis (38 vs 30.9% OR 1.12, CI 0.77-1.64, p = 0.53). Pre-operative radiation and distal lower extremity tumour location were significant risk factors in patients who underwent primary wound closure but not in those who had flap reconstruction. Patients with comorbidities, increased BMI and systemic disease were at increased risk of complications following flap reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Flap reconstruction is not associated with increased post-operative complications following ESTS resection. Flaps may mitigate the effects of some risk factors in selected patients.

Flap choice does not affect complication rates or functional outcomes following extremity soft tissue sarcoma reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Flap reconstruction plays an essential role in facilitating limb preservation in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). However, the effect of flap choice on the rates of postoperative complications and functional outcomes has not been clearly established. This study directly compares the outcomes of free and pedicled flap reconstructions in patients with ESTS. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-six patients who underwent flap reconstruction following ESTS resection were included. Associations between flap type and complications were determined using logistic regression analyses. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scales (MSTS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between complication rates in the pedicled and free flap groups (32% vs. 38%, p = 0.38). In the lower limb, pedicled flaps had complication rates similar to those of free flaps on univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56-2.26, p = 0.75). Conversely, in the upper limb, pedicled flaps were associated with fewer complications on univariate analysis (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.11-0.86, p = 0.03), but this was not significant on multivariate analysis (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.13-1.59, p = 0.22). Obesity was a strong predictor of complications in the upper limb group on multivariate analysis (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2, OR = 7.01, 95% CI = 1.28-38.51, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in functional outcomes between both flap groups in either upper or lower limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications and functional outcomes for patients undergoing free and pedicled flaps are similar in ESTS reconstruction. Selecting the most suitable reconstructive option in each individual case is paramount to preserving function while minimizing postoperative morbidity.