Dual modality feeders: a group of human milk feeders with unique practices and needs.

OBJECTIVE: Dual modality feeding (DMF) - feeding human milk interchangeably from the breast and from a bottle - comes with unique practical, emotional and relational challenges, as well as support needs. Yet, there is little research that explores the experiences of individuals who use DMF in the Canadian context. The aim of this study is to explore the practices, challenges, reasons and enablers of DMF. DESIGN: Repeat, semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted at 8 weeks and 22 weeks postpartum. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a critical feminist lens. SETTING: Nova Scotia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Ten DMF mothers. RESULTS: DMF practices were influenced by a mix of social and material circumstances, including breast-feeding challenges, the involvement of support persons, finances and access to lactation support. Individuals who predominantly fed at the breast expressed milk strategically to mitigate transitory breast-feeding challenges, for convenience under specific circumstances, and to share feeding responsibilities with other caregivers for personal and practical reasons. Individuals who mainly bottle-fed did so due to long-term breast-feeding challenges or a need to return to employment. Enablers of successful DMF were consistent between the two groups and included practical, personal and relational aspects. CONCLUSIONS: DMF is a unique practice compared to feeding human milk solely from the breast or bottle. Despite the potential growing prevalence of DMF, it is currently understudied and inadequately addressed in existing support programmes in Nova Scotia. Tailored programming and public messaging are needed to support DMF families.

Mental health challenges, treatment experiences, and care needs of post-secondary students: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Post-secondary students frequently experience high rates of mental health challenges. However, they present meagre rates of treatment-seeking behaviours. This elevated prevalence of mental health problems, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, can lead to distress, poor academic performance, and lower job prospects following the completion of education. To address the needs of this population, it is important to understand students' perceptions of mental health and the barriers preventing or limiting their access to care. METHODS: A broad-scoping online survey was publicly distributed to post-secondary students, collecting demographic, sociocultural, economic, and educational information while assessing various components of mental health. RESULTS: In total, 448 students across post-secondary institutions in Ontario, Canada, responded to the survey. Over a third (n = 170; 38.6%) of respondents reported a formal mental health diagnosis. Depression and generalized anxiety disorder were the most commonly reported diagnoses. Most respondents felt that post-secondary students did not have good mental health (n = 253; 60.5%) and had inadequate coping strategies (n = 261; 62.4%). The most frequently reported barriers to care were financial (n = 214; 50.5%), long wait times (n = 202; 47.6%), insufficient resources (n = 165; 38.9%), time constraints (n = 148; 34.9%), stigma (n = 133; 31.4%), cultural barriers (n = 108; 25.5%), and past negative experiences with mental health care (n = 86; 20.3%). The majority of students felt their post-secondary institution needed to increase awareness (n = 231; 56.5%) and mental health resources (n = 306; 73.2%). Most viewed in-person therapy and online care with a therapist as more helpful than self-guided online care. However, there was uncertainty about the helpfulness and accessibility of different forms of treatment, including online interventions. The qualitative findings highlighted the need for personal strategies, mental health education and awareness, and institutional support and services. CONCLUSIONS: Various barriers to care, perceived lack of resources, and low knowledge of available interventions may contribute to compromised mental health in post-secondary students. The survey findings indicate that upstream approaches such as integrating mental health education for students may address the varying needs of this critical population. Therapist-involved online mental health interventions may be a promising solution to address accessibility issues.

The Relationship Between Pre-Pregnancy Attempts to Lose Weight and Gestational Weight Gain: An Exploratory Primary Care Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to explore the association between weight cycling in the 6 months prior to pregnancy and gestational weight gain concordance with the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines for weight gain in pregnancy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Participants were women aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy who had a prenatal appointment between April 1 and August 31, 2019. Eligible women completed a questionnaire that assessed their pre-pregnancy attempts to lose weight, measured with a modified version of the Weight Cycling subscale within the Revised Restraint Scale. After delivery, participants' last recorded gestational weight before delivery, and corresponding gestational ages were obtained from prenatal records. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five pregnant women consented to participate in the study (a 95.6% response rate). Of them, 5 were excluded; therefore, 190 participants were included in the analysis. One-third of participants had attempted to lose weight in the 6 months before pregnancy. Logistic regression showed that for every one-unit increase in Weight Cycling score, the odds of excess gestational weight gain increased by a factor of 1.32. CONCLUSION: Women's pre-conceptual efforts to enter pregnancy at a lower BMI should be approached in a manner that avoids pre-pregnancy weight cycling.

Maternal health outcomes for incarcerated women: A scoping review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To inform a systematic synthesis of what is known about the maternal health outcomes of incarcerated women, this scoping review uses a theoretical framework of intersectional feminism. BACKGROUND: Despite rising imprisonment of women, there is a lack of research, from a feminist perspective, on perinatal health outcomes among incarcerated women. DESIGN: Systematic scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. METHODS: In consultation with a medical research librarian, key databases and journals were searched for English and French-language articles published up to February 2018. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts to identify articles for full-text review. Study quality was appraised using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The study adheres to PRISMA-EQUATOR guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-five studies met the preset criteria and were reviewed in full text. In addition, 13 studies met consensus for inclusion. Method, setting, participants, sample, relevant outcomes and relevant findings were extracted from each study for synthesis. Included studies had varied methods and were published from 1989-2014. Participants included women imprisoned during the perinatal period up to six months postpartum. All studies were conducted in carceral contexts, with 12 based in the USA and one in Australia. Outcomes of interest included breastfeeding, operative deliveries, gestational complications, depression, stress, experiences, bonding and sterilisation. CONCLUSION: The research on maternal health outcomes pertaining to incarcerated women is limited. There is a need for in-depth examination of breastfeeding with this population. Researchers need to examine the prevalence and impact of carceral force, such as shackling, solitary confinement, strip-searching and restraints in pregnancy. There is a need for research that asks what health outcomes matter to the women themselves. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Providers must be conscious of intersecting layers of discrimination and trauma incarcerated women experience and its impact on maternal health in the perinatal period and advocate for women.

Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Pain in Pregnancy and Postpartum.

OBJECTIVE: A clinically relevant number of patients report pain 1 year after vaginal delivery or Caesarean delivery. Study objectives were to identify the incidence of peripartum pain; determine whether pre-existing pain, pregnancy pain, or pain 2 weeks postpartum predicts pain at 3 months; and to identify whether delivery mode, epidural analgesia use, or delivery complications predict non-genito-pelvic pain postpartum. METHODS: Primiparous women at 30 to 36 weeks GA with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy were recruited from a large perinatal clinic. Participants completed questionnaires on sociodemographics and non-genito-pelvic pain. Questionnaires were completed in the perinatal clinic and then electronically 2 weeks and 3 months postpartum. RESULTS: Of the 133 women included, 50 patients (38%) had a chronic pain condition or pain prior to pregnancy, whereas 73 patients (55%) reported pain in pregnancy. Pain was present 2 weeks postpartum in 57 patients (43%) and 3 months postpartum in 33 patients (25%). Patients with pre-existing pain were more likely to experience pain 2 weeks postpartum (P = 0.006), and patients with pain 2 weeks postpartum were more likely to have pain 3 months postpartum (P = 0.005). Women who had a Caesarean delivery (P < 0.001) were more likely to have non-genito-pelvic pain at 2 weeks but not 3 months postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Women with pain 2 weeks postpartum were significantly more likely to have pain at 3 months. Further investigation is required to determine whether pre-existing pain, pain in pregnancy, or pain at 2 weeks postpartum can adequately predict the likelihood of chronic pain.

Systematic Review of Knowledge Translation Strategies to Promote Research Uptake in Child Health Settings.

UNLABELLED: Strategies to assist evidence-based decision-making for healthcare professionals are crucial to ensure high quality patient care and outcomes. The goal of this systematic review was to identify and synthesize the evidence on knowledge translation interventions aimed at putting explicit research evidence into child health practice. METHODS: A comprehensive search of thirteen electronic databases was conducted, restricted by date (1985-2011) and language (English). Articles were included if: 1) studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials (CCT), or controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies; 2) target population was child health professionals; 3) interventions implemented research in child health practice; and 4) outcomes were measured at the professional/process, patient, or economic level. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Study data were aggregated and analyzed using evidence tables. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (13 RCT, 2 CCT, 6 CBA) were included. The studies employed single (n=9) and multiple interventions (n=12). The methodological quality of the included studies was largely moderate (n=8) or weak (n=11). Of the studies with moderate to strong methodological quality ratings, three demonstrated consistent, positive effect(s) on the primary outcome(s); effective knowledge translation interventions were two single, non-educational interventions and one multiple, educational intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary systematic review in child health setting identified effective knowledge translation strategies assessed by the most rigorous research designs. Given the overall poor quality of the research literature, specific recommendations were made to improve knowledge translation efforts in child health.

Implementing a Fetal Health Surveillance Guideline in Clinical Practice: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Action Learning.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of an Action Learning intervention on nurses' use of a fetal health surveillance (FHS) guideline during labor of women who were low risk on admission for delivery. METHODS: Using a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, nurses were randomized to Action Learning (n = 44) or Usual Care (n = 45). Low-risk women were assigned to either an Action Learning nurse (n = 122) or a Usual Care nurse (n = 148). Data on practices during an episode of care (nurses' FHS practices from admission through to delivery in low-risk women) were collected at three trial time points: 1 month prior, during 6 months, and 1 month following. Guideline adherence, women's perception of birth experience, and enablers and inhibitors to intermittent auscultation (IA) were collected. Multivariate logistic regression determined the variables (chosen by the nurses) that predicted Action Learning nurses' adherence to FHS practices. FINDINGS: Statistically significant change was not evident between nurses' rate of FHS practices in the Action Learning group compared with Usual Care (Δ6.8%, odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.83). Postpartum, women reported high satisfaction with no significant difference by study group. Two labor events, epidural and narcotic analgesia, most influenced guideline appropriate care (p = .000, OR -4.04; p = .000, OR = 2.89) within the experimental group. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Despite lack of between-group significant changes in FHS practices, Action Learning nurses, who chose areas of practice that presented obstacles to their guideline adherence ability (epidurals and narcotics), significantly changed their FHS practices. Researchers need to consider whether practice is long-standing acceptance of the evidence by healthcare providers, and the provider's intentions for implementation effectiveness when choosing an implementation strategy. Supportive nurses, Doppler availability, and clear policies support adherence to an IA guideline. Deimplementation of ineffective practice is warranted.

Prevalence and predictors of genito-pelvic pain in pregnancy and postpartum: the prospective impact of fear avoidance.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited knowledge regarding the symptom profile of genito-pelvic pain in pregnancy and postpartum, and potential psychosocial predictors of this pain. Prior studies have reported a positive association between prepregnancy pain and postpartum genito-pelvic pain. Greater fear avoidance has been associated with increased genital pain intensity in women, unrelated to childbirth. This relationship has not been examined prospectively in a postpartum population. AIMS: The study aims were to examine the symptom profile of genito-pelvic pain during pregnancy and at 3 months postpartum, and the impact of prepregnancy nongenito-pelvic pain and fear avoidance in pregnancy on genito-pelvic pain at 3 months postpartum. METHODS: First-time expectant mothers (N = 150) completed measures of fear avoidance (pain-related anxiety, catastrophizing, hypervigilance to pain), prepregnancy nongenito-pelvic pain, childbirth-related risk factors (e.g., episiotomy), and breastfeeding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Those reporting genito-pelvic pain in pregnancy and/or at 3 months postpartum answered questions about the onset (prepregnancy, during pregnancy, postpartum) and location (genital, pelvic, or both) of the pain and rated the intensity and unpleasantness of the pain on numerical rating scales. RESULTS: Of 150 women, 49% reported genito-pelvic pain in pregnancy. The pain resolved for 59% of women, persisted for 41%, and 7% of women reported a new onset of genito-pelvic pain after childbirth. Prepregnancy nongenito-pelvic pain was associated with an increased likelihood of postpartum onset of genito-pelvic pain. Greater pain-related anxiety was associated with greater average genito-pelvic pain intensity at 3 months postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that about half of women may develop genito-pelvic pain during pregnancy, which will persist for about a third, and a subset will develop this pain after childbirth. Prior recurrent nongenito-pelvic pain may enhance the risk of developing genito-pelvic pain postpartum, while greater pain-related anxiety in pregnancy may increase the risk for greater intensity of postpartum genito-pelvic pain.

Characteristics of breastfeeding newborns in the first month of life with in utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medication exposure: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the characteristics of breastfeeding newborns in the first month of life who have been exposed in utero to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medications. INTRODUCTION: SSRIs are the most commonly prescribed antidepressant medication in pregnancy. Up to 30% of newborns who are prenatally exposed to SSRIs demonstrate withdrawal signs. Poor neonatal adaptation syndrome represents a constellation of signs observed in these newborns. Little information has been studied regarding breastfeeding, as it relates to the impact of in utero SSRI exposure on the newborn. Parents have many questions regarding the safety of taking medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding. It is important for health care providers to collate evidence-based information and facilitate shared decision-making. We aim to identify the approaches researchers have used to investigate in utero SSRI exposure among breastfed newborns to determine knowledge gaps. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Primary peer-reviewed studies will be considered for inclusion according to the following criteria: newborns, 31 days of age or less, with in utero SSRI exposure in any trimester of pregnancy, who were breastfed or received breast-milk feedings. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, LactMed, the Maternity and Infant Care Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases will be searched. JBI methodology will be used. Abstracts will be assessed for eligibility and full texts will be retrieved if they meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will independently extract the data from identified studies using a data extraction form and the results will be summarized descriptively and in tabular format. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework osf.io/2bt39.

Experiences of women who have planned unassisted home births in high-resource countries: a qualitative systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to identify, appraise, and synthesize the qualitative evidence about the experiences of women in high-resource countries who have planned unassisted home births. INTRODUCTION: Unassisted birth occurs when a woman chooses to give birth without the assistance of health care providers. These births are planned and usually occur in a woman's home. It is difficult to know the prevalence of unassisted birth because it occurs at the margins of health care systems, making data difficult to collect. Based on its lack of visibility in society, we assume that unassisted birth is not a common birth choice. Women who choose planned unassisted birth may face stigma for their decision and their experience of birth, which challenge accepted norms. Synthesizing qualitative evidence about women's experiences of planned unassisted birth can improve our understanding about women's birthing values and provide important clues about aspects of birthing care that may be missing in mainstream birthing services. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies that explored the experiences of women who had planned unassisted home births without the support of health care providers in high-resource countries were included. Unassisted home births were defined as those that were planned not to be assisted by health care professionals. Study designs that focused on qualitative data were eligible for inclusion. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest), and Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest) were searched in 2022. Studies published in English since the databases' inception were considered for inclusion. A search of relevant websites for unpublished and gray literature was also undertaken in 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of papers identified for inclusion. Qualitative research findings were extracted from papers that met the inclusion criteria and critical appraisal standard. Findings were extracted and categorized based on similarity of meaning. The categories were synthesized to create 2 synthesized findings, and the ConQul approach was used to grade the findings to establish confidence in the synthesized findings. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review. All the studies used interviews for data collection; other methods included surveys, email correspondence, posts on internet discussion boards and forums, and websites. The total sample size for interviews was 103 participants. Total survey sample size for surveys was 87 participants. Total sample size for email correspondence was 5. Internet data sources included more than 100,000 individual and forum posts and 127 birth stories. A total of 17 findings were extracted and grouped into 4 categories. The 4 categories were then synthesized into 2 synthesized findings: i) navigating tensions within self, and between self and systems, and ii) integrating and transcending physical experiences of birth. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to better understand the experiences of women who have planned unassisted births. Improving understanding and increasing the awareness of planned unassisted birth are necessary steps for promoting inclusive, relational, and person-centered birthing experiences for everyone. Reflection about the differences between planned unassisted births and mainstream births may support needed reorientations of perinatal services. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019125242. SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT: A French-language version of the abstract of this review is available [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A9 ].

Postnatal experiences of South Asian immigrant women in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review is to gain an understanding of the postnatal experiences of South Asian immigrant women in 4 English-speaking countries: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. INTRODUCTION: The postnatal period is an important time in the lives of women and their families. Major changes take place during this time as a woman's body gradually returns to its pre-pregnancy state. The postnatal period is also a time for women to adapt and transition into their new role as a mother. Immigrant women experience many challenges in accessing quality postnatal care in comparison to non-migrant populations. South Asian immigrant women, specifically, encounter unique postnatal experiences and face a myriad of hardships in accessing proper postnatal care. The presence of cultural factors and traditional norms largely influence postnatal experiences of South Asian immigrant women. Cultural factors include, but are not limited to, relationships with family and in-laws, gender-specific roles, newborn gender, mental health stigma, language barriers, acculturative stress, and expression of depression. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Qualitative studies in English reporting postnatal experiences of South Asian immigrant women published after January 2000 will be considered for this review. Research designs may include, but are not limited to, feminist research, exploratory descriptive design, or ethnography. Gray literature will be limited to theses and dissertations only. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, EthOS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses will be searched. Disagreement resolution, data extraction, and meta-aggregation will be completed through discussion between 2 reviewers. Studies will be critically appraised and assigned a level of credibility. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022354306.

Postpartum experiences of women, birthing people, and their families during COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to explore and understand the postpartum experiences of birthing people and their families during COVID-19. INTRODUCTION: Positive postpartum experiences are formative for the long-term health and well-being of parents and babies. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the transition to parenthood and existing postpartum challenges through evolving policies and practices, including visiting limitations, masking requirements, and reduced accessibility of supports. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on the postpartum experiences of women, birthing people (people who give birth but may not identify as women), and their families through the synthesis of qualitative evidence can help inform public health and government directives in comparable future contexts. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies including women, birthing people, and their families who experienced postpartum during the COVID-19 pandemic will be considered. This review will include studies published after January 2020 that explore postpartum experiences up to 1 year following birth. We will examine qualitative data, including, but not limited to, research designs such as phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory, feminist research, and action research. METHODS: The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), and LitCovid. PsyArXiv and Google Scholar will be searched for gray literature. Studies will be assessed and appraised independently by 2 reviewers and disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Data extraction will be completed by 2 reviewers. The JBI tools and resources will be used for assessing confidence and meta-aggregation, including the creation of categories and synthesized findings. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022364030.

Asymptomatic surveillance testing for COVID-19 in health care professional students: lessons learned from a low prevalence setting.

The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely impacted the training of health care professional students because of concerns of potential asymptomatic transmission to colleagues and vulnerable patients. From May 27th, 2020, to June 23rd 2021; at a time when B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.617.2 (delta) were the dominant circulating variants, PCR testing was conducted on 1,237 nasopharyngeal swabs collected from 454 asymptomatic health care professional students as they returned to their studies from across Canada to Kingston, ON, a low prevalence area during that period for COVID-19. Despite 46.7% of COVID-19 infections occurring in the 18-29 age group in Kingston, severe-acute-respiratory coronavirus-2 was not detected in any of the samples suggesting that negligible asymptomatic infection occurred in this group and that PCR testing in this setting may not be warranted as a screening tool.

Experiences of birthing care during COVID-19: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to explore and understand the birthing care experiences of midwives, nurses, women, and birthing people during COVID-19. INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had implications for providing and receiving birthing care globally. In addition to navigating fears of contracting COVID-19, health care providers and families have had to adapt to changing policies and clinical practices in response to varying recommendations and evidence. These changes, including restrictive visitor policies and mandated mask-wearing, influenced the experience of birthing care. Synthesizing qualitative evidence about the birthing experiences of midwives, nurses, women, and birthing people (people who give birth but who do not identify as women) during COVID-19 can provide important information for policies and decision-making for future global pandemics. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies including licensed midwives, licensed nurses, women, and birthing people who provided or received birthing care during the COVID-19 pandemic will be considered. Studies published from January 2020 onward will be included. The review will consider all studies that present qualitative data, including, but not limited to, research designs such as phenomenology, ethnography, grounded theory, feminist research, and action research. METHODS: The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and LitCovid. MedArchiv, PsyArXiv, and Google Scholar will be searched for gray literature. Studies will be assessed independently by two reviewers. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Data extraction will be completed by two reviewers. The JBI tools and resources will be used for meta-aggregation, including the creation of categories and synthesized findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021292832.

Patient Preferences for Outcomes Associated With Labor Epidural Analgesia.

Purpose Patient preferences for labor epidural analgesia (LEA) have been incompletely evaluated. This study aimed to determine the importance of various LEA outcomes to both antenatal and postpartum patients. Methods This was a cross-sectional study approved by the institutional ethics board. Questionnaires were distributed to two separate and distinct cohorts screened for eligibility: pregnant patients at an antenatal visit and postpartum patients during childbirth admission. A list of common LEA outcomes was compiled using research published in leading anesthesia journals. Participants ranked the outcomes according to perceived importance. They assigned each a number from 1 to 10 (priority ranking; 1 indicated the highest priority outcome and 10 the least). They were also asked to 'spend' $100 towards the outcomes (relative value scale), allocating more money to outcomes more important to them. Results Two hundred twenty questionnaires were completed (105 antenatal, 115 postpartum). 'Achieving desired pain relief' was the most important outcome for both cohorts. It was valued more by the postpartum cohort (Median $50 (25 - 60) vs $30 (18 - 50)). 'Overall satisfaction with the pain management,' 'experiencing a short time to achieve pain relief,' and 'experiencing a short duration of labor' received more money than avoiding various LEA-related side effects. The postpartum cohort ranked 'experiencing a short time to achieve pain relief' as more important than the antenatal cohort (Median 5 (3 - 7) vs 3 (2 - 5)). Conclusions Achieving the desired pain relief was the highest LEA outcome preference for both antenatal and postpartum patients. Avoiding side effects was less important relative to pain-related outcomes.

Feasibility of Virtual Simulation-Based Diabetes Foot Care Education in Patients with Diabetes in Ethiopia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a rapidly growing global public health problem; the number of adults with diabetes is expected to increase from 424.9 million in 2017 to 628.6 million in 2045. Approximately 80% of diabetic patients live in low- and middle-income countries where access to care may be limited. For example, in Ethiopia, diabetes care is often rudimentary, and formal, structured diabetes education is almost non-existent. One potential solution to the lack of diabetes management education for patients could be virtual simulation-based diabetes education incorporating the contextual realities of patients in Ethiopia. Despite its great potential to improve glycemic control, delay diabetes-related complications and reduce mortality associated with diabetes, the feasibility of virtual simulation-based diabetes self-management education has not been studied in low- and middle-income settings. Objective: The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility of a virtual simulation-based Diabetes Foot Care Education (DFCE) program among adult patients with diabetes in Ethiopia. Methods: A randomized controlled feasibility study including participants from University of Gondar Referral Hospital (UoGRH) will be conducted. A sample of 40 participants will be recruited, of which 20 participants will receive the virtual simulation-based education program, and the other 20 participants will continue with their usual diabetes care. After the education program, a questionnaire and structured interview will be used to explore the feasibility (acceptability, practicality) and the potential impact of virtual simulation-based DFCE intervention in patients with diabetes. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25 using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, paired sample t-test, and factorial ANOVA at significance levels of less than 0.05. Discussion: Our study seeks to understand the perceived usefullness and usability of virtual simulation-based diabetes foot care education on behavioural (diabetes foot-care knowledge, foot self-care practices, and foot self-care efficacy). Furthermore, the study will provide insight to assist in the development of technologically assisted and contextually designed DFCE programs. Trial Registration Number: NCT04841291 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier).

Health care providers' experiences caring for women living with obesity during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This review will examine qualitative evidence about the experiences of health care providers who provide care to women living with obesity during the perinatal period to support evidence-informed approaches to care. INTRODUCTION: As the number of women living with obesity increases, health care providers are interacting more with this population during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Qualitative studies about this topic show that health care providers often face challenges that prevent the provision of quality care. A qualitative systematic review of the experiences of health care providers caring for women living with obesity throughout the perinatal period is important to identify and address current gaps in the delivery of perinatal health care services. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All studies with settings where licensed health care providers care for women living with obesity during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum will be considered. Studies published in English from 1995 onward will be included. The review will consider both mixed methods and qualitative studies such as phenomenology, grounded theory, and participatory action research. METHODS: The following databases will be searched: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest). The ProQuest Digital Dissertations database will be searched for unpublished studies. Two independent reviewers will assess each study. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Data will be extracted by 2 trained independent reviewers. JBI resources for meta-aggregation will be used and data will be categorized and synthesized accordingly.

Trajectories of Dyspareunia From Pregnancy to 24 Months Postpartum.

OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct trajectories of dyspareunia in primiparous women and examine biopsychosocial risk factors of these trajectories. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort of 582 first-time mothers. Participants completed validated measures of dyspareunia at 20-24 (baseline) and 32-36 weeks of gestation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postpartum. Risk factors were assessed at baseline and 3 months postpartum, with labor and delivery characteristics collected by medical record review. Latent class growth analysis was conducted to identify homogeneous subgroups with distinct trajectories of dyspareunia. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regressions examined whether predictors were associated with these trajectories. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of dyspareunia ranged from 31.4% at 3 months postpartum to 11.9% at 24 months. We identified two distinct classes of dyspareunia with 21% of women in the class with moderate dyspareunia and 79% in the class with minimal dyspareunia, with pain decreasing in both groups until 12 months postpartum and little change thereafter. Biomedical factors-prior chronic pain (including preexisting dyspareunia), labor epidural analgesia, induction, episiotomy, perineal laceration, mode of delivery, breastfeeding, and whether the woman had a new pregnancy during the postpartum period-did not significantly predict dyspareunia class. Greater fatigue (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% CI 1.05-1.60) and depressive symptoms (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14) in pregnancy and fatigue (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.04-1.56) and pain catastrophizing (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.05-1.16) at 3 months postpartum increased the odds for the moderate relative to the minimal pain trajectory in univariable models. In a multivariable model, pain catastrophizing at 3 months postpartum (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.15) was associated with the moderate relative to the minimal pain trajectory. CONCLUSION: We identified two distinct trajectories of dyspareunia across pregnancy and postpartum. One in five nulliparous women experienced moderate dyspareunia. Pain catastrophizing at 3 months postpartum was associated with experiencing moderate relative to minimal levels of dyspareunia.

A Web-Based Health Application to Translate Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Primary Care (PortfolioDiet.app): Quality Improvement and Usability Testing Study.

BACKGROUND: The Portfolio Diet, or Dietary Portfolio, is a therapeutic dietary pattern that combines cholesterol-lowering foods to manage dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. To translate the Portfolio Diet for primary care, we developed the PortfolioDiet.app as a patient and physician educational and engagement tool for PCs and smartphones. The PortfolioDiet.app is currently being used as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (usual care) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care. To enhance the adoption of this tool, it is important to ensure that the PortfolioDiet.app meets the needs of its target end users. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this project is to undertake user testing to inform modifications to the PortfolioDiet.app as part of ongoing engagement in quality improvement (QI). METHODS: We undertook a 2-phase QI project from February 2021 to September 2021. We recruited users by convenience sampling. Users included patients, family physicians, and dietitians, as well as nutrition and medical students. For both phases, users were asked to use the PortfolioDiet.app daily for 7 days. In phase 1, a mixed-form questionnaire was administered to evaluate the users' perceived acceptability, knowledge acquisition, and engagement with the PortfolioDiet.app. The questionnaire collected both quantitative and qualitative data, including 2 open-ended questions. The responses were used to inform modifications to the PortfolioDiet.app. In phase 2, the System Usability Scale was used to assess the usability of the updated PortfolioDiet.app, with a score higher than 70 being considered acceptable. RESULTS: A total of 30 and 19 users were recruited for phase 1 and phase 2, respectively. In phase 1, the PortfolioDiet.app increased users' perceived knowledge of the Portfolio Diet and influenced their perceived food choices. Limitations identified by users included challenges navigating to resources and profile settings, limited information on plant sterols, inaccuracies in points, timed-logout frustration, request for step-by-step pop-up windows, and request for a mobile app version; when looking at positive feedback, the recipe section was the most commonly praised feature. Between the project phases, 6 modifications were made to the PortfolioDiet.app to incorporate and address user feedback. At phase 2, the average System Usability Scale score was 85.39 (SD 11.47), with 100 being the best possible. CONCLUSIONS: By undertaking user testing of the PortfolioDiet.app, its limitations and strengths were able to be identified, informing modifications to the application, which resulted in a clinical tool that better meets users' needs. The PortfolioDiet.app educates users on the Portfolio Diet and is considered acceptable by users. Although further refinements to the PortfolioDiet.app will continue to be made before its evaluation in a clinical trial, the result of this QI project is an improved clinical tool.

Women's experiences of living with obesity during pregnancy, birthing, and postpartum: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to explore and understand women's experiences of living with obesity during the perinatal period to support evidence-informed approaches to care. INTRODUCTION: The rising incidence of maternal obesity is a serious global health problem. Qualitative studies exploring the viewpoints of pregnant women living with obesity have shown that some women report negative experiences associated with pregnancy, with some instances of current care management practices being perceived as confronting, judgmental, and generally unhelpful. Synthesizing qualitative findings about the experiences of pregnant and postpartum women who live with obesity can provide important insights into the general needs of this population and current gaps in health care practice. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All settings in which women who live with obesity during their pregnancies and receive health care for pregnancy, birthing, and postpartum care will be considered. Studies published from 1995 onward will be included. The review will consider all studies that present qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research. METHODS: The following databases will be searched for this review: CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), PsycINFO (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), and Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses will be searched for unpublished studies. Each study will be assessed by two independent reviewers. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The JBI resources for meta-aggregation will be used to create categories and synthesized findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020214762.