Placental size at gestational week 36: Comparisons between ongoing pregnancies and deliveries.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare placental size and placental size relative to fetal size (ratio) in ongoing pregnancies examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at gestational week 36 with placental size among all deliveries at gestational week 36 during the same time period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ongoing unselected singleton pregnancies (n = 89) were examined by MRI at median gestational week 36+5 days during 2017-2018, and placental and fetal volumes (cm3 ) were calculated. The placental size and ratio in ongoing pregnancies were compared with placental size and ratio among all deliveries in Norway at gestational week 36 (median gestational week 36+4 days) during 2016-2019 (n = 5582). For comparison of size, we converted volume (cm3 ) in ongoing pregnancies into grams as: cm3 × 1.05 (density of placental and fetal tissue). RESULTS: In ongoing pregnancies, median placental size was 873 (interquartile range [IQR] 265) grams and median size of all delivered placentas was 613 (IQR 290) grams. Placental size was smaller among the delivered placentas independent of delivery mode: 760 (IQR 387) grams among elective cesarean deliveries (n = 465) and 590 (IQR 189) grams among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor (n = 2478). Median ratio in ongoing pregnancies was higher than among deliveries: 0.31 (IQR 0.08) vs 0.21 (IQR 0.08). The ratio was higher in ongoing pregnancies independent of delivery mode: 0.24 (IQR 0.17) among elective cesarean deliveries vs 0.21 (IQR 0.05) among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor. CONCLUSIONS: The placenta is larger in ongoing pregnancies than among deliveries. This finding suggests that placental size decreases during labor and delivery, possibly by transfer of blood to the fetus. Our finding also suggests that reference values of placental size based on delivered placentas are not valid for ongoing pregnancies.

Placental volume in gestational week 27 measured by three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. We lack valid ultrasound methods for placental size measurements. Our aim was therefore to compare three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measurements of placental volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We measured placental volume by 3D ultrasound and MRI in 100 unselected pregnancies at 27 weeks of gestation (25+4 -28+4  weeks). The 3D ultrasound acquisitions were analyzed offline, and the placental outline was manually traced using the virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) 30° rotational technique. The MRI examinations included a T2-weighted gradient echo sequence in the sagittal plane, with 5-mm slices through the entire uterus. The placental outline was manually traced in each slice. The correlation between 3D ultrasound and MRI placental volumes was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis was applied to visualize systematic bias and limits of agreement, in which the ratio MRI placental volume/3D ultrasound placental volume was plotted against the average of the two methods. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient between 3D ultrasound and MRI measurements was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.63). In general, 3D ultrasound measured smaller placental volumes (median 373 cm3 , interquartile range 309-434 cm3 ) than MRI (median 507 cm3 , interquartile range 429-595 cm3 ) and the systematic bias was 1.44. The 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were wide (0.68-2.21). CONCLUSIONS: We found poor to moderate correlation between 3D ultrasound and MRI placental volume measurements. Generally, 3D ultrasound measured smaller placental volumes than MRI, suggesting that 3D ultrasound failed to visualize the entire placenta. Our findings may hopefully contribute to the improvement of ultrasound methods for placental measurements.

Offspring birthweight and placental weight in immigrant women from conflict-zone countries; does length of residence in the host country matter? A population study in Norway.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to estimate differences in offspring birthweight and placental weight between Norwegian women and immigrants in Norway from countries with armed conflicts. We also studied whether length of residence in Norway was associated with offspring birthweight and placental weight. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included in our study all singleton births in Norway at gestational week 28 or beyond during the years 1999-2014, to mothers who were born in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq (total immigrants n = 18 817), or Norway (n = 668 439). Data were obtained from The Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Central Person Registry of Norway. We estimated the differences between Norwegian and immigrant women in mean offspring birthweight and mean placental weight by applying linear regression analyses. Adjustments were made for maternal age, parity, year of delivery, gestational age at delivery, preeclampsia, and diabetes. RESULTS: The immigrant women had 206 g (95% CI 199 to 213 g) lower mean offspring birthweight and 16 g (95% CI 14 to 18 g) lower mean placental weight than Norwegian women. Immigrant women with ≥5 years of residence in Norway had higher offspring birthweight (40 g) and higher placental weight (17 g) than immigrant women with <5 years of residence. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant mothers from Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq gave birth to infants and placentas with lower weight than Norwegian women. However, the difference between Norwegian women and immigrant women was reduced by length of residence in Norway.

Two-dimensional (2D) placental ultrasound measurements - The correlation with placental volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

INTRODUCTION: Information about placental size in ongoing pregnancies may aid the identification of pregnancies with increased risk of adverse outcome. Placental volume can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, this method is not universally available in antenatal care. Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. Therefore, we studied whether simple two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound placental measurements were correlated with placental volume measured by MRI. METHODS: We examined a convenience sample of 104 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 27, using both ultrasound and MRI. The ultrasound measurements included placental length, width and thickness. Placental volume was measured using MRI. The correlation between each 2D placental ultrasound measurement and placental volume was estimated by applying Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Mean placental length was 17.2 cm (SD 2.1 cm), mean width was 14.7 cm (SD 2.1 cm), and mean thickness was 3.2 cm (SD 0.6 cm). Mean placental volume was 536 cm3 (SD 137 cm3). The 2D ultrasound measurements showed poor correlation with placental volume (placental length; r = 0.27, width; r = 0.37, and thickness r = 0.13). DISCUSSION: Simple 2D ultrasound measurements of the placenta were poorly correlated with placental volume and cannot be used as proximate measures of placental volume. Our finding may be explained by the large variation between pregnancies in intrauterine placental shape.

Placental size at gestational week 27 and 37: The associations with pulsatility index in the uterine and the fetal-placental arteries.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal growth restriction is known to be related to decreased fetal and placental blood flow. It is not known, however, whether placental size is related to fetal and placental blood flow. We studied the correlations of intrauterine placental volume and placental-fetal-ratio with pulsatility index (PI) in the uterine arteries, fetal middle cerebral artery, and umbilical artery. METHODS: We followed a convenience sample of 104 singleton pregnancies, and we measured placental and fetal volumes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at gestational week 27 and 37 (n = 89). Pulsatility index (PI) was measured using Doppler ultrasound. We calculated cerebroplacental ratio as fetal middle cerebral artery PI/umbilical artery PI and placental-fetal-ratio as placental volume (cm3)/fetal volume (cm3). RESULTS: At gestational week 27, placental volume was negatively correlated with uterine artery PI (r = -0.237, p = 0.015, Pearson's correlation coefficient), and positively correlated with fetal middle cerebral artery PI (r = 0.247, p = 0.012) and cerebroplacental ratio (r = 0.208, p = 0.035). Corresponding correlations for placental-fetal-ratio were -0.273 (p = 0.005), 0.233 (p = 0.018) and 0.183 (p = 0.064). Umbilical artery PI was not correlated with placental volume. At gestational week 37, we found weaker and no significant correlations between placental volume and the pulsatility indices. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that placental size is correlated with placental and fetal blood flow at gestational week 27.