RESUMO
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the quantitative evaluation of anticipatory postural adjustments using smartphones. [Participants and Methods] The study included 10 young control participants who underwent a one-legged stance with an accelerometer and a smartphone that were simultaneously attached to their lower back (L5). Acceleration was measured as the mediolateral component of the lumbar movement toward the stance side. The peak value of the time (peak latency) and the amount of displacement (peak magnitude) in the stance side direction of the lumbar acceleration were analyzed as anticipatory postural adjustment features. Intra-rater reliability was calculated for both accelerometer and smartphone measurements, while inter-rater reliability was calculated for smartphone measurements by two examiners. Validity was determined for both accelerometer and smartphone measurements. [Results] In this study, the intra-rater reliability of the peak latency and peak magnitude in accelerometer and smartphone measurements was confirmed, as was the inter-rater reliability in smartphone measurements. The intra-rater reliability was confirmed through re-testing, while the validity of the accelerometer and smartphone measurements was also confirmed. [Conclusion] The findings of this study suggest that the use of smartphones to measure anticipatory postural adjustments is highly reliable and valid, making it a useful clinical balance index. The method is simple and can be used for continuous patient monitoring.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Using smartphones, we aimed to clarify the characteristics of anticipatory postural adjustments (APA) in older adults and examine the relationship between cognitive and balance functions. METHODS: The study participants were 10 young and 13 older adults. An accelerometer built into a smartphone was attached to the lower back (L5) of the participant, and acceleration in the mediolateral direction was measured using a one-leg stance (OLS). As APA features, we analyzed the time to the peak value in the stance direction (peak latency [PL]) and the amount of displacement to the peak value in the stance direction (peak magnitude [PM]). Additionally, the measured PL was divided by PM for each group to obtain the APA ratio (APAr). We investigated the relationship between the APAr and Mini-BESTest subitems. RESULTS: Older adults showed delayed PL and decreased PM levels (p < 0.01). While in the Mini-BESTest sub-items, deductions were most common in the order of dual-task and single-leg standing, and most participants with low APAr scores were degraded in APA of sub-items. The correlation was observed between APAr and both TUG and dual-task cost (DTC) (r= -0.56, r= -0.67). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the APAr value was 1.71 in the older age group. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults showed delayed PL and decreased PM, and APAr was associated with cognitive and locomotor functions. By evaluating the APAr at the initiation of movement, it may be possible to distinguish the APA of the older adluts from the possible to the impossible of OLS movement.