COVID-19 Computed tomography patterns in renal replacement therapy patients.

INTRODUCTION: Lung diseases are common in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), making differential diagnosis with COVID-19 a challenge. This study describes pulmonary chest tomography (CT) findings in hospitalized ESKD patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. METHODS: ESKD individuals referred to emergency department older than 18 years with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 were recruited. Epidemiological baseline clinical information was extracted from electronic health records. Pulmonary CT was classified as typical, indeterminate, atypical or negative. We then compared the CT findings of positive and negative COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: We recruited 109 patients (62.3% COVID-19-positive) between March and December 2020, mean age 60 ± 12.5 years, 43% female. The most common etiology of ESKD was diabetes. Median time on dialysis was 36 months, interquartile range = 12-84. The most common pulmonary lesion on CT was ground glass opacities. Typical CT pattern was more common in COVID-19 patients (40 (61%) vs 0 (0%) in non-COVID-19 patients, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 60.61% (40/66) and specificity was 100% (40/40). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% and 62.3%, respectively. Atypical CT pattern was more frequent in COVID-19-negative patients (9 (14%) vs 24 (56%) in COVID-19-positive, p < 0.001), while the indeterminate pattern was similar in both groups (13 (20%) vs 6 (14%), p = 0.606), and negative pattern was more common in COVID-19-negative patients (4 (6%) vs 12 (28%), p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized ESKD patients on RRT, atypical chest CT pattern cannot adequately rule out the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Diagnostic disclosure of Alzheimer's disease in Brazil: a national survey of specialized physicians.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) can bring financial and emotional consequences to patients and caregivers. Whether or not the diagnosis should be disclosed to patients is a matter of debate amongst physicians and can be influenced by culture and experience. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current practice of physicians who attend and treat patients with dementia in Brazil regarding the disclosure of dementia diagnosis and compare the practice with what has been performed 15 years ago in the country. METHODS: Data were evaluated using an electronic questionnaire. The questions used to carry out this research were similar to the questions of the study carried out 15 years ago 9. The form was sent to the Brazilian Academy of Neurology, the Brazilian Association of Geriatrics and Gerontology, and the Brazilian Association of Psychiatry, which forwarded it to their members. Analyses were conducted through non-parametric statistical tests, with a post-hoc assessment. RESULTS: 397 physicians responded to the survey, of which 231 are neurologists, 124 geriatricians, 29 psychiatrists and 13 from other specialties. The mean age was 45.2 years. The majority (66.7%) of the physicians reveal the diagnosis of AD always or usually. The youngest group of neurologists were more likely to disclose the diagnosis than the oldest group with a significant difference between them. In comparison to the 2008 Brazilian study, the percentage of physicians who always or usually disclose the diagnosis has risen by 22%. On the other hand, 12.3% of the physicians rarely or never disclose the diagnosis, in comparison to 25,3% in 2008. The main reasons for not disclosing the diagnosis concern the patients' mental health. CONCLUSION: Advances in dementia knowledge and biomarkers availability probably explain the increase in the rate of disclosure. The main challenge is to reconcile the autonomy of affected individuals, mental health issues after the diagnosis and the family member's opinion.

ANTECEDENTES: O diagnóstico da doença de Alzheimer (DA) pode trazer consequências financeiras e emocionais para pacientes e cuidadores. Revelar ou não o diagnóstico aos pacientes é uma questão de debate entre os médicos e pode ser influenciada pela cultura e experiência. OBJETIVO: Investigar a prática atual dos médicos que atendem e tratam pacientes com demência no Brasil quanto à revelação do diagnóstico de demência e comparar a prática com a qual era feita há 15 anos no país. MéTODOS:: Os dados foram avaliados por meio de um questionário eletrônico. As perguntas usadas para realização dessa pesquisa foram similares às perguntas do estudo realizado há 15 anos 9. O formulário foi enviado à Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, à Associação Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, e à Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, as quais o encaminharam aos seus membros. As análises foram realizadas por meio de testes estatísticos não paramétricos, com avaliação post-hoc. RESULTADOS: 397 médicos responderam à pesquisa, sendo 231 neurologistas, 124 geriatras, 29 psiquiatras e 13 de outras especialidades. A média de idade foi de 45,2 anos (standard deviation-SD = 11.6 years). A maioria (66,7%) dos médicos revela o diagnóstico de DA sempre ou habitualmente. O grupo mais jovem de neurologistas foi mais propenso a revelar o diagnóstico do que o mais velho, com diferença significativa entre eles. Em comparação com o estudo brasileiro de 2008, o percentual de médicos que sempre ou usualmente revelam o diagnóstico aumentou em 22%. Em contrapartida, 12,3% dos médicos raramente ou nunca o divulgam, em comparação a 25,3% em 2008. Os principais motivos para não o revelar dizem respeito à saúde mental dos pacientes. CONCLUSãO:: Avanços no conhecimento da demência e disponibilidade de biomarcadores provavelmente explicam o aumento na taxa de divulgação. O principal desafio é conciliar a autonomia dos indivíduos afetados, problemas de saúde mental após o diagnóstico e opinião do familiar.

COVID-19 Computed tomography patterns in renal replacement therapy patients / Padrões de tomografia computadorizada da COVID-19 em pacientes em terapia renal substitutiva

ABSTRACT Introduction: Lung diseases are common in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), making differential diagnosis with COVID-19 a challenge. This study describes pulmonary chest tomography (CT) findings in hospitalized ESKD patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) with clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Methods: ESKD individuals referred to emergency department older than 18 years with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 were recruited. Epidemiological baseline clinical information was extracted from electronic health records. Pulmonary CT was classified as typical, indeterminate, atypical or negative. We then compared the CT findings of positive and negative COVID-19 patients. Results: We recruited 109 patients (62.3% COVID-19-positive) between March and December 2020, mean age 60 ± 12.5 years, 43% female. The most common etiology of ESKD was diabetes. Median time on dialysis was 36 months, interquartile range = 12-84. The most common pulmonary lesion on CT was ground glass opacities. Typical CT pattern was more common in COVID-19 patients (40 (61%) vs 0 (0%) in non-COVID-19 patients, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 60.61% (40/66) and specificity was 100% (40/40). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% and 62.3%, respectively. Atypical CT pattern was more frequent in COVID-19-negative patients (9 (14%) vs 24 (56%) in COVID-19-positive, p < 0.001), while the indeterminate pattern was similar in both groups (13 (20%) vs 6 (14%), p = 0.606), and negative pattern was more common in COVID-19-negative patients (4 (6%) vs 12 (28%), p = 0.002). Conclusions: In hospitalized ESKD patients on RRT, atypical chest CT pattern cannot adequately rule out the diagnosis of COVID-19.

RESUMO Introdução: Doenças pulmonares são comuns em pacientes com doença renal em estágio terminal (DRET), dificultando o diagnóstico diferencial com COVID-19. Este estudo descreve achados de tomografia computadorizada de tórax (TC) em pacientes com DRET em terapia renal substitutiva (TRS) hospitalizados com suspeita de COVID-19. Métodos: Indivíduos maiores de 18 anos com DRET, encaminhados ao pronto-socorro com suspeita de COVID-19 foram incluídos. Dados clínicos e epidemiológicos foram extraídos de registros eletrônicos de saúde. A TC foi classificada como típica, indeterminada, atípica, negativa. Comparamos achados tomográficos de pacientes com COVID-19 positivos e negativos. Resultados: Recrutamos 109 pacientes (62,3% COVID-19-positivos) entre março e dezembro de 2020, idade média de 60 ± 12,5 anos, 43% mulheres. A etiologia mais comum da DRET foi diabetes. Tempo médio em diálise foi 36 meses, intervalo interquartil = 12-84. A lesão pulmonar mais comum foi opacidades em vidro fosco. O padrão típico de TC foi mais comum em pacientes com COVID-19 (40 (61%) vs. 0 (0%) em pacientes sem COVID-19, p < 0,001). Sensibilidade 60,61% (40/66), especificidade 100% (40/40). Valores preditivos positivos e negativos foram 100% e 62,3%, respectivamente. Padrão atípico de TC foi mais frequente em pacientes COVID-19-negativos (9 (14%) vs. 24 (56%) em COVID-19-positivos, p < 0,001), enquanto padrão indeterminado foi semelhante em ambos os grupos (13 (20%) vs. 6 (14%), p = 0,606), e padrão negativo foi mais comum em pacientes COVID-19-negativos (4 (6%) vs. 12 (28%), p = 0,002). Conclusões: Em pacientes com DRET em TRS hospitalizados, um padrão atípico de TC de tórax não pode excluir adequadamente o diagnóstico de COVID-19.

Diagnostic disclosure of Alzheimer's disease in Brazil: a national survey of specialized physicians / Revelação do diagnóstico da doença de Alzheimer no Brasil: prática corrente de médicos que atendem pacientes com demência

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) can bring financial and emotional consequences to patients and caregivers. Whether or not the diagnosis should be disclosed to patients is a matter of debate amongst physicians and can be influenced by culture and experience. Objective: To investigate the current practice of physicians who attend and treat patients with dementia in Brazil regarding the disclosure of dementia diagnosis and compare the practice with what has been performed 15 years ago in the country. Methods: Data were evaluated using an electronic questionnaire. The questions used to carry out this research were similar to the questions of the study carried out 15 years ago 9. The form was sent to the Brazilian Academy of Neurology, the Brazilian Association of Geriatrics and Gerontology, and the Brazilian Association of Psychiatry, which forwarded it to their members. Analyses were conducted through non-parametric statistical tests, with a post-hoc assessment. Results: 397 physicians responded to the survey, of which 231 are neurologists, 124 geriatricians, 29 psychiatrists and 13 from other specialties. The mean age was 45.2 years. The majority (66.7%) of the physicians reveal the diagnosis of AD always or usually. The youngest group of neurologists were more likely to disclose the diagnosis than the oldest group with a significant difference between them. In comparison to the 2008 Brazilian study, the percentage of physicians who always or usually disclose the diagnosis has risen by 22%. On the other hand, 12.3% of the physicians rarely or never disclose the diagnosis, in comparison to 25,3% in 2008. The main reasons for not disclosing the diagnosis concern the patients' mental health. Conclusion: Advances in dementia knowledge and biomarkers availability probably explain the increase in the rate of disclosure. The main challenge is to reconcile the autonomy of affected individuals, mental health issues after the diagnosis and the family member's opinion.

Resumo Antecedentes: O diagnóstico da doença de Alzheimer (DA) pode trazer consequências financeiras e emocionais para pacientes e cuidadores. Revelar ou não o diagnóstico aos pacientes é uma questão de debate entre os médicos e pode ser influenciada pela cultura e experiência. Objetivo: Investigar a prática atual dos médicos que atendem e tratam pacientes com demência no Brasil quanto à revelação do diagnóstico de demência e comparar a prática com a qual era feita há 15 anos no país. Métodos: Os dados foram avaliados por meio de um questionário eletrônico. As perguntas usadas para realização dessa pesquisa foram similares às perguntas do estudo realizado há 15 anos 9. O formulário foi enviado à Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, à Associação Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, e à Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria, as quais o encaminharam aos seus membros. As análises foram realizadas por meio de testes estatísticos não paramétricos, com avaliação post-hoc. Resultados: 397 médicos responderam à pesquisa, sendo 231 neurologistas, 124 geriatras, 29 psiquiatras e 13 de outras especialidades. A média de idade foi de 45,2 anos (standard deviation-SD = 11.6 years). A maioria (66,7%) dos médicos revela o diagnóstico de DA sempre ou habitualmente. O grupo mais jovem de neurologistas foi mais propenso a revelar o diagnóstico do que o mais velho, com diferença significativa entre eles. Em comparação com o estudo brasileiro de 2008, o percentual de médicos que sempre ou usualmente revelam o diagnóstico aumentou em 22%. Em contrapartida, 12,3% dos médicos raramente ou nunca o divulgam, em comparação a 25,3% em 2008. Os principais motivos para não o revelar dizem respeito à saúde mental dos pacientes. Conclusão: Avanços no conhecimento da demência e disponibilidade de biomarcadores provavelmente explicam o aumento na taxa de divulgação. O principal desafio é conciliar a autonomia dos indivíduos afetados, problemas de saúde mental após o diagnóstico e opinião do familiar.