Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Trauma Patients With Rib Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Patients with blunt chest trauma with multiple rib fractures (RF) may require tracheostomy. The goal was to compare early (≤7 d) versus late (>7 d) tracheostomy patients and to analyze clinical outcomes, to determine which timing is more beneficial. METHODS: This retrospective review included 124 patients with RF admitted to trauma ICU at two level 1 trauma centers who underwent tracheostomy. Analyzed variables included age, gender, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale, number of ribs fractured, total fractures of the ribs, prevalence of bilateral RF, flail chest, maxillofacial injuries, cervical vertebrae trauma, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), coinjuries, epidural analgesia, surgical stabilization of RF, failure to extubate, hospital LOS, intensive care unit LOS (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, and timing and type of tracheostomy. RESULTS: Mean number of RF in all tracheostomized patients with blunt chest trauma was 5.2 and 85% of patients had pulmonary co-injuries. Mean tracheostomy timing was 9.9 d. Early tracheostomy (ET) was correlated with statistically significant reduction in ICULOS and duration of mechanical ventilation. The dominant cause of mortality in all groups was TBI and it was more pronounced in the ET patients. Most deaths were encountered between 3 and 5 wk after admission. ET was more often performed in the operating room with an open technique, whereas late tracheostomy was more often implemented with percutaneous technique at bedside. CONCLUSIONS: ET could be beneficial in chest trauma patients with multiple RF as it reduces ICULOS and ventilation requirements. Mortality benefits are not correlated with tracheostomy timing.

Two surgical pathways for isolated hip fractures: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures (HF) are common among the aging population, and surgery within 48 h is recommended. Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways, either trauma or medicine admitting services. AIM: To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway (TP) vs medical pathway (MP). METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures (AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31) who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP. To ensure comparability between groups, 66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age, sex, HF type, HF surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiology score. The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis, group characteristics, and bivariate correlation comparisons with the χ² test and t-test. RESULTS: After propensity matching, the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old, 62% of both groups were females, the main HF type was intertrochanteric (TP 52% vs MP 62%), open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery (TP 68% vs MP 71%), and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP. The majority of patients in TP and MP (71% vs 74%) were geriatric (≥ 65-years-old). Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups (77% vs 97%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use (49% vs 41%), admission day of the week, or insurance status. The incidence of comorbidities was equal (94% for both) with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups (71% vs 73%). The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP, with the most common consultation being cardiology in both (44% and 36%). HF displacement occurred more among TP patients (76% vs 39%, P = 0.000). Time to surgery was not statistically different (23 h in both), but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP (59 min vs 41 min, P = 0.000). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different (5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both). There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality (3% vs 0%). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP. The focus should be on the patient's health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.

The timing and value of early postoperative computed tomography after head surgery in traumatic brain injury patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the timing of the early postoperative computed tomography (CT) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, and compare CT and neurological examination (NE) findings. METHODS: Retrospective analysis included 353 TBI patients admitted to two level 1 trauma centers (2016-2020) who underwent head surgery and postoperative CT within 24 h. Analyzed variables: age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Abbreviated Injury Scale head (AISh), comorbidities, CT and NE findings and timing, head surgery type, and mortality. RESULTS: Patients mean age was 61.9 years, ISS 25.1, GCS 11.0, AISh 4.7. Postoperatively, mean time to first positive CT was 6.1 h and to first positive NE was 13.2 h. Positive CT alone was more accurate in identifying need for 2nd head surgery than positive NE alone (21.8 % vs 6.0 %, p = 0.04). There was no difference between patients with CT done earlier than 6 h compared to patients with CT done after 6 h in mortality (26.1 % vs 22.0 %, p = 0.4) or 2nd surgery rate (12.2 % vs 12.2 %, p = 1.0). Reversal of postoperative CT findings occurred in 1/6 of patients and was more common when CT was done earlier than 6 h compared to CT done later (25.7 % vs 0.8 %, p < 0.001). Early CT within 1 h rarely leads to the change of management but often is followed by another CT within 12 h. CONCLUSION: In TBI patients postoperative CT was more effective than NE in predicting a need for 2nd head surgery. Postoperative head CT at 6 h is recommended to allow timely detection of intracranial deterioration, reduce the number of CTs and reversal findings as it does not increase 2nd surgery rates and mortality.

Tracheostomy in trauma patients with rib fractures.

PURPOSE: Patients with rib fractures (RF) may require prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy. Indications for tracheostomy in trauma patients with RF remain debatable. The goal was to delineate characteristics of patients who underwent tracheostomy due to thoracic versus extra-thoracic causes, such as maxillofacial-mandibular injury (MFM), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and cervical vertebrae trauma (CVT), and to analyze clinical outcomes. The predictive values of chest trauma scoring systems for tracheostomy were also evaluated. We hypothesized that tracheostomized patients were more severely injured with more ribs fractured and had more pulmonary co-injuries. METHODS: Retrospective review included 471 patients with RF admitted to two Level 1 trauma centers. Patients with tracheostomy (n = 124, 26.3%) were compared to patients with endotracheal intubation (n = 347, 73.7%). Analyzed variables included age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale, number of ribs fractured, total fractures of ribs, prevalence of bilateral rib fractures, flail chest, clavicle fractures, MFM, TBI, CVT, co-injuries, comorbidities, RF treatment options, hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit LOS (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV). RESULTS: Tracheostomized compared to intubated patients had statistically higher ISS, more ribs fractured, total fractures of the ribs, bilateral and clavicle fractures, MFM, spine, chest, and orthopedic co-injuries and longer HLOS, ICULOS and DMV. Tracheostomy for thoracic reasons was performed in 64 patients (51.6%) and for extra-thoracic reasons in 60 patients (48.4%). Mean tracheostomy timing was 9.9 days and was significantly shorter in the extra-thoracic compared to the thoracic group (8.0 versus 11.6 days, p < 0.001). All chest trauma scoring system values were significantly higher in tracheostomized patients. Predictive values of scoring systems for tracheostomy increased in patients with thoracic trauma only. CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of mechanically ventilated patients with RF required tracheostomy. Tracheostomized compared to intubated patients were more severely injured with more ribs fractured and were intubated longer. An increased amount of RF was associated with an increase in tracheostomies, especially for thoracic reasons.