Role of MRI in early follow-up of patients with solid organ injuries: How and why we do it?

Trauma represents one of the most common causes of death or permanent disability in the population below 50 years. At present, non-operative treatment is the commonly adopted strategy in hemodynamically stable patients with solid organ injuries, when there are not concomitant bowel and mesenteric injuries requiring a prompt surgical approach, but it may require multiple imaging follow-up examinations, especially in the case of major injuries. No data are available about magnetic resonance imaging utilization in the early follow-up of trauma patients with solid organ injuries, particularly in liver and spleen trauma. We report our preliminary experience in this field.

Emergency radiology.

US has a relevant role in the initial assessment of non-traumatic emergencies of the abdomen, sometimes being conclusive and some other times for selecting the patients for further imaging with CT. Injection of a contrast medium may give to the radiologist additional information to that obtained at baseline US and Doppler examination, since real-time, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) may allow observing findings in the abdomen not recognizable at baseline US or even at color Doppler imaging. Extravascular use of microbubbles may also be useful in clinical practice to rapidly solve a number of unclear aspects. CEUS has a number of distinct advantages in acute patients, including its quickness, low invasiveness, and its possible bedside use. The information based on contrast enhancement is useful for initial diagnosis, therapeutic decision making, and follow-up of the critically ill patients. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the possibilities and limitations of abdominal CEUS in the acute setting, with special emphasis on the detection and characterization of acute inflammatory processes, infarcts, and hemorrhages.

Acute Epiploic Appendagitis: A Nonsurgical Abdominal Pain.

Epiploic appendagitis is a relatively rare disease characterized by an inflammation of fat-filled serosal outpouchings of the large intestine, called epiploic appendices. Diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis is made challenging by the lack of pathognomonic clinical features and should therefore be considered as a potential diagnosis by exclusion first of all with appendicitis or diverticulitis which are the most important causes of lower abdominal pain. Currently, with the increasing use of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain, epiploic appendagitis can be diagnosed by characteristic diagnostic imaging features. We present a case of epiploic appendagitis with objective of increasing knowledge of this disease and its diagnostic imaging findings, in order to reduce harmful and unnecessary surgical interventions.

Association of splenic and renal infarctions in acute abdominal emergencies.

INTRODUCTION: Splenic and renal infarctions are usually related to vascular disease or haematologic abnormalities. Their association is infrequent and rarely observed in trauma. In this study, we analyze our data to look at the occurrence of renal and splenic infarctions based on CT findings in a period of 4 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging findings of 84 patients admitted to our Department of Diagnostic Imaging from June 1998 to December 2002, who underwent emergency abdominal spiral CT examination and in whom there was evidence of splenic and/or renal infarction. RESULTS: We found 40 cases of splenic infarction and 54 cases of renal infarction, associated in 10 patients. In 26 patients, there was also evidence of intestinal infarction. A traumatic origin was found in 19 cases; non-traumatic causes were found in 65 patients. Association between renal and splenic infarction in the same patient was related to trauma in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although renal and splenic infarctions are a common manifestation of cardiac thromboembolism, other systemic pathologies, infections or trauma may lead to this occurrence. Renal infarction may be clinically and/or surgically managed with success in most cases. There are potential complications in splenic infarction, such as development of pseudocysts, abscesses, hemorrhage, subcapsular haematoma or splenic rupture; splenectomy in these cases may be necessary. Some patients with splenic and/or renal infarction may be clinically asymptomatic. The high accuracy of CT examination is needed to allow a correct evaluation of infarcted organs.

Bleeding due to pelvic fractures in female patients: pictorial review of multidetector computed tomography imaging.

Pelvic bone fractures in female patients are a result of high-energy trauma and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Their classification is based on the mechanism of the traumatic impact force and the evaluation of stability or instability of pelvic ring fracture. Vascular hemorrhage is frequently associated with pelvic bone disruption and is the main cause of death in polytrauma female patients. At many trauma centers, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been considered the best modality in the trauma setting as it is also useful in characterizing multiple-body traumatic lesions. Specifically, MDCT angiography can lead to fast recognition of pelvic vascular injuries to triage patients with blunt pelvic trauma and to send those with ongoing arterial hemorrhage to appropriate emergent treatment. At contrast medium enhanced MDCT, extravasation of contrast material is an accurate finding of active bleeding and enables the interventional radiologist to selectively investigate the arteries most likely to be involved with prompt angiographic embolization. The potential sites of hemorrhage include the pelvic bone, the pelvic venous plexus, the major iliac veins, the major iliac arteries, and their peripheral branches. MDCT multiphase protocol can accurately differentiate arterial from venous hemorrhage. This article discusses the use of multiphase contrast medium enhanced MDCT in detecting and characterizing vascular pelvic injuries associated with pelvic fractures in trauma female patients.

Role of Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. Our experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the role CT in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2001 to May 2003, we studied 12 patients (7 males and 5 females; age range: 25-66 years, mean age: 43.5 years) with suspected oesophageal perforation due to motor-vehicle accidents (4 cases), stab wound (one case), post-intubation (2 cases), foreign body ingestion (2 cases) and spontaneous (3 cases). Five patients underwent standard chest and cervical radiography; two patients with suspected foreign body ingestion also underwent a gastrografin swallow study; all of the 12 patients underwent CT of the neck, chest and abdomen before and after intravenous, and in four cases oral, administration of contrast material. RESULTS: In 5 patients with cervical, thoracic and abdominal trauma, the CT examination showed the presence of pleuroparenchymal injury (pneumothorax, pleural effusion and subcutaneous emphysema) as well as findings suggestive of oesophageal perforation: peri-oesophageal air (5 cases), peri-oesophageal fluid (4 cases), oesophageal wall thickening (3 cases), oesophageal wall laceration (2 cases) with abnormal course of the nasogastric tube in one of them and extraluminal extravasation of oral contrast material (2 cases). In 2 patients with post-intubation complications, CT showed the presence of a small peri-oesophageal fluid collection containing small gas bubbles in one case, and a gross perioesophageal abscess-like collection in the second case. In the 2 patients with foreign body ingestion, the plain radiography associated with CT showed the presence of a thin metal object in the cervical region (fragment of a dental plate) and a small extraluminal extravasation of gastrografin in one case, whereas in the other case CT showed the presence of a foreign body (chicken bone) in the hypopharynx with oesophageal wall thickening and peri-oesophageal oedema. In the remaining three patients with suspected spontaneous oesophageal perforation, CT showed the presence of a intramural haematoma in one case, oesophageal fluid distension with gas and a small peri-oesophageal fluid effusion (Mallory-Weiss syndrome) in another, and oesophageal rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) in the last case. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that in patients with suspected traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation, standard cervical and chest radiography may suggest a suspected oesophageal perforation in only a small proportion of cases, whereas oral contrast oesophagography has a higher sensitivity. Through the careful analysis of suggestive and specific signs of oesophageal perforation, a correct CT examination enables an accurate and timely diagnosis which significantly affects prognosis and provides valuable indications for treatment.

[Pictorial essay: foreign body of the gastrointestinal tract in emergency radiology].

The ingestion of a foreign body is a relatively common gastrointestinal emergency that causes significant morbidity. Radiological procedures play a very important role in revealing the presence, the location and the nature of an ingested foreign body, thus enabling the best therapeutic approach. We present the radiological features of common and uncommon foreign bodies ingested or with transanal insertion, differentiated on the basis of the location in the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnostic pitfalls are also considered.

[Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of spiral CT in the diagnosis of closed loop obstruction complicated by intestinal ischemia].

PURPOSE: To assess the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value of spiral CT in the diagnosis of "closed-loop" obstruction complicated by intestinal ischaemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and January 2002, 120 patients with small intestine closed-loop obstruction who had undergone surgical laparotomy within 2-6 hours from abdominal and pelvic spiral CT were retrospectively reviewed. The CT scans were performed using 5-mm slice thickness, 1 s scan delay, 5 x 5-mm collimation and 1.5 pitch after administering i.v. iodinated contrast material (120 ml volume, 60 s scan delay, 2.5-3 ml/s rate) with an automatic injector. For the diagnosis of closed-loop obstruction the following CT findings were examined: identification of the transitional area, 'C', 'U' or 'beak' shape of the obstructed loops, radial distribution of the involved mesenteric vessels. For the diagnosis of loop ischaemia, the following findings were evaluated in addition to the CT signs described above: submucosal oedema, increased, reduced, or no enhancement of the loop walls, oedema of the mesenteric vessels, fluid within the loops or in the intraperitoneal spaces. RESULTS: 'U', 'C', 'beak' loop configuration with poor or no contrast enhancement of the obstructed loop walls, ascites, rotation and engorgement of mesenteric vessels enabled the diagnosis of 26 cases of closed-loop obstruction complicated by ischaemia, infarction. U- or C-shaped loops with radial distribution and/or rotation of mesenteric vessels towards the obstruction site suggested the correct diagnosis in 94 cases, but did not allow identification of ischaemia in 25 cases. The positive predictive value of spiral CT related to ischaemic loop complications was 100%; the negative predictive value was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT is a reliable imaging technique enabling the diagnosis of closed-loop obstruction with or without intestinal ischaemic complications. Any alterations detected in the trophic status of the loops or mesentery imply ischaemic complications requiring emergency surgery. On the contrary, if only CT signs of closed-loop obstruction are detected, the existence and/or development of ischaemia cannot be ruled out.