Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiology ; 34(5): 700-711, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37255240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People using electricity-dependent durable medical equipment (DME) may be vulnerable to health effects from wildfire smoke, residence near wildfires, or residence in evacuation zones. To our knowledge, no studies have examined their healthcare utilization during wildfires. METHODS: We obtained 2016-2020 counts of residential Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient visits made by DME-using Kaiser Permanente Southern California members 45+. We linked counts to daily ZCTA-level wildfire particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and wildfire boundary and evacuation data from the 2018 Woolsey and 2019 Getty wildfires. We estimated the association of lagged (up to 7 days) wildfire PM 2.5 and residence near a fire or in an evacuation zone and healthcare visit frequency with negative binomial and difference-in-differences models. RESULTS: Among 236,732 DME users, 10 µg/m 3 increases in wildfire PM 2.5 concentration were associated with the reduced rate (RR = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99) of all-cause outpatient visits 1 day after exposure and increased rate on 4 of 5 subsequent days (RR range 1.03-1.12). Woolsey Fire proximity (<20 km) was associated with reduced all-cause outpatient visits, whereas evacuation and proximity were associated with increased inpatient cardiorespiratory visits (proximity RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.99, 2.12, evacuation RR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.00, 2.96). Neither Getty Fire proximity nor evacuation was associated with healthcare visit frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that wildfire smoke or proximity interrupts DME users' routine outpatient care, via sheltering in place. However, wildfire exposures were also associated with increased urgent healthcare utilization in this vulnerable group.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Incêndios Florestais , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Equipamentos Médicos Duráveis , Hospitalização , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/análise , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , California/epidemiologia
2.
One Earth ; 7(6): 1044-1055, 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036466

RESUMO

The western United States is home to most of the nation's oil and gas production and, increasingly, wildfires. We examined historical threats of wildfires for oil and gas wells, the extent to which wildfires are projected to threaten wells as climate change progresses, and exposure of human populations to these wells. From 1984-2019, we found that cumulatively 102,882 wells were located in wildfire burn areas, and 348,853 people were exposed (resided ≤ 1 km). During this period, we observed a five-fold increase in the number of wells in wildfire burn areas and a doubling of the population within 1 km of these wells. These trends are projected to increase by late century, likely threatening human health. Approximately 2.9 million people reside within 1 km of wells in areas with high wildfire risk, and Asian, Black, Hispanic, and Native American people have disproportionately high exposure to wildfire-threatened wells.

3.
J Thorac Oncol ; 13(7): 946-957, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578108

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To maximize the benefits of computed tomographic screening for lung cancer, optimal treatment for small, early lung cancers is needed. Limiting the extent of surgery spares lung tissue, preserves pulmonary function, and decreases operative time, complications, and morbidities. It also increases the likelihood of resecting future new primary lung cancers. The goal is to assess alternative treatments in a timely manner. METHODS: The focus sessions with patients and physicians separately highlighted the need to consider their perceptions. Literature reviews and analyses of treatment results using large databases were performed to formulate critical questions about long-term treatment outcomes, recurrence, and quality of life of alternative treatments. Based on these analyses, the investigators developed a prospective multi-institutional cohort study, the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research for Treatment, to compare treatments for stage I NSCLC. HIPAA compliant institutional review board approval was obtained and we performed a feasibility study of the first 206 surgical patients. RESULTS: Lobectomy was performed in 89 (43.2%) patients, and sublobar resection was performed in 117 (56.7%) patients. Mediastinal lymph node resection was performed in 173 (84.0%) patients, 8 had N1 and 3 N2 lymph node metastases. Patients stated that both the surgeon's opinion (93%) and the patient's own opinion (93%) were extremely important, followed by the patients' view that the chosen procedure would provide the best quality of life (90%). CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to obtain pre- and postsurgical information from patients and surgeons. We anticipate statistically meaningful results about treatment alternatives in 3 to 5 years.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA