Dual time point imaging for F18-FDG-PET/CT does not improve the accuracy of nodal staging in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the diagnostic performance of dual time point imaging (DTPI) for pre-therapeutic lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 47 patients with NSCLC who had undergone DTPI by PET (early + delayed) using F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). PET raw data were reconstructed iteratively (point spread function + time-of-flight). LN uptake in PET was assessed visually (four-step score) and semi-quantitatively (SUVmax, SUVmean, ratios LN/primary, LN/liver, and LN/mediastinal blood pool). DTPI analyses included retention indices (RIs), Δ-ratios and changes in visual score. Histology or cytology served as standards of reference. Accuracy was determined based on ROC analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 155 LNs were malignant. DTPI accuracy was low for all measures (visual assessment, 24.5%; RI SUVmax, 68.4%; RI SUVmean, 65.8%; Δ-ratios, 63.9-76.1%) and significantly inferior to early PET. Accuracies of early (range, 86.5-92.9%) and delayed PET (range, 85.2-92.9%) were comparable. At early PET, accuracy of the visual score (92.9%) was similar or superior to semi-quantitative analyses (range, 86.5-92.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Using a modern PET/CT device and novel image reconstruction, neither additional delayed PET nor DTPI analyses improved the accuracy of PET-based LN staging. Dedicated visual assessment criteria performed very well. KEY POINTS: • DTPI did not improve accuracy of PET-based LN staging in NSCLC. • Analyzed SUV ratios were not superior to LN SUVmax or SUVmean. • A four-step visual score may allow highly accurate, standardized LN assessment.

Standardized visual reading of F18-FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer scheduled for preoperative thoracic lymph node staging.

OBJECTIVES: Routine visual assessment of positron emission tomography (PET) for thoracic lymph node (LN) staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by a lack of reliable assessment criteria. This study evaluates the accuracy and inter-rater agreement of a standardized approach with unified windowing and a PET-based visual score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included pretherapeutic FDG-PET data of 86 patients with NSCLC. After standardized windowing (threshold: 2×liver SUVmean) the LN uptake was assessed visually by three independent readers with varying levels of experience using a 4-step score (1, LN uptake≤mediastinal blood pool structures (MBPS); 2, MBPS3). The inexperienced (n=1), advanced (n=1), and expert readers (n=1) achieved similar accuracies of 93.5%, 91.4% and 92.1%, respectively (P>0.05 each). Cohen's κ ranged from 0.92 to 0.96 and Fleiss' κ was 0.93. ROC-analyses showed no significant differences between attendant readers within any subgroup (AUC, 0.92-0.96). CONCLUSION: Applying unified windowing, the introduced PET-score achieved highly accurate and robust LN assessment. This approach may shorten learning curves of inexperienced readers, facilitate multicenter trials, and improve comparability of future studies.