A new technique for minimally invasive irreversible electroporation of tumors in the head and body of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Palliative irreversible electroporation of pancreatic adenocarcinomas is rapidly gaining in interest since a large proportion of these patients cannot be radically resected. METHODS: This is a description of a minimally invasive approach to irreversible electroporation of pancreatic tumors using computer-assisted navigation, laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound to correctly guide electrodes into the tissue. RESULTS: The procedure is presented. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive irreversible electroporation of pancreatic tumors through computer-assisted navigation of needles during laparoscopy is a feasible and accurate approach.

Change in tissue resistance after irreversible electroporation in liver tumors as an indicator of treatment success - A multi-center analysis with long term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: A nationwide multicenter study was performed to examine whether there is a correlation between decrease in tissue resistance and time to local tumor recurrence after irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). METHODS: All patients treated with IRE for liver tumors in Sweden from 2011 until 2018 were included. Patient characteristics and recurrence patterns were obtained from medical records and radiological imaging. All procedural data from the IRE hardware at the three hospitals performing IRE were retrieved. The resistance during each pulse and the change during each treatment were calculated. The electrode pair with the smallest decrease in tissue resistance was used and compared with the time to LTP. RESULTS: 149 patients with 206 tumors were treated. Exclusion due to missing and inaccurate data resulted in 124 patients with 170 tumors for the analyses. In a multivariable Cox regression model, a smaller decrease in tissue resistance and larger tumor size were associated with shorter time to local tumor recurrence for CRCLM, but not for HCC. CONCLUSION: There was an association between a decrease in tissue resistance and time to local tumor recurrence for CRCLM. The decrease in resistance, in combination with a rise in current, may be the parameters the interventionist should use during IRE to decide if the treatment is successful.

Irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer liver metastases: A nationwide multicenter study with short- and long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: A nationwide multicenter study was performed to examine short- and long-term effects of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). IRE is an alternative method when thermal ablation is contraindicated because of risk for serious thermal complications. METHODS: All consecutive patients in Sweden treated with IRE because of HCC or CRCLM, were included between 2011 and 2018. We evaluated medical records and radiological imaging to obtain information regarding patient-, tumor-, and treatment characteristics. We also assessed local tumor progression, and survival. RESULTS: In total 206 tumors in 149 patients were treated with IRE. Eighty-seven patients (58.4%) had colorectal cancer liver metastases, and 62 patients (41.6%) had hepatocellular carcinoma. Median tumor size was 20 mm (i.q.r. 14-26 mm). Median overall survival for CRCLM and HCC, were 27.0 months (95% CI 22.2-31.8 months), and 35.0 months (95% CI 13.8-56.2 months), respectively. Median follow-up time was 58 months (95% CI 50.6-65.4). Local ablation success at six and twelve months for HCC was 58.3% and 40.3%, and for CRCLM 37.7% and 25.4%. The median time to local tumor progression (LTP) for HCC was 21.0 months (95% CI: 9.5-32.5 months), and for CRCLM 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.5-7.5 months). At 30-day follow-up, 15.4% (n = 23) of patients suffered from a complication rated as Clavien-Dindo grade 1-3a. Three patients (2.0%) had grade 3b-5 with one death in a thromboembolic event. CONCLUSION: IRE is a safe ablation modality for patients with liver tumors that are located in such a way that other treatment options are unsuitable.

Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy of multiple electrode placements in IRE treatment of liver tumours using a stereotactic CT-based navigation system. METHOD: Analysing data from all IRE treatments of liver tumours at one institution until 31 December 2018. Comparing planned with validated electrode placement. Analysing lateral and angular errors and parallelism between electrode pairs RESULTS: Eighty-four tumours were treated in 60 patients. Forty-six per cent were hepatocellular carcinoma, and 36% were colorectal liver metastases. The tumours were located in all segments of the liver. Data were complete from 51 treatments. Two hundred and six electrodes and 336 electrode pairs were analysed. The median lateral and angular error, comparing planned and validated electrode placement, was 3.6 mm (range 0.2-13.6 mm) and 3.1° (range 0°-16.1°). All electrodes with a lateral error >10 mm were either re-positioned or excluded before treatment. The median angle between the electrode pairs was 3.8° (range 0.3°-17.2°). There were no electrode placement-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of a stereotactic CT-based system for navigation of electrode placement in IRE treatment of liver tumours is safe, accurate and user friendly.

Stereotactic navigation versus ultrasound guidance in placing IRE applicators in a liver phantom.

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of stereotactic CT-guided navigation and ultrasound guided navigation for placing electrodes in Irreversible electroporation in a liver phantom. A liver phantom with multiple tumours was used and interventionists placed four IRE electrodes around each tumour guided either by stereotactic CT-guided navigation or ultrasound. The goal was to place them in a perfect 20 × 20 mm square with parallel electrodes. After each treatment, a CT-scan was performed. The accuracy in pairwise electrode distance, pairwise parallelism and time per tumour was analysed. Eight interventionists placed four electrodes around 55 tumours, 25 with ultrasound and 30 with stereotactic CT-guided navigation. 330 electrode pairs were analysed, 150 with ultrasound and 180 with stereotactic CT-navigation. The absolute median deviation from the optimal distance was 1.3 mm (range 0.0 to 11.3 mm) in the stereotactic CT-navigation group versus 7.1 mm (range 0.3 to 18.1 mm) in the Ultrasound group (p < 0.001). The mean angle between electrodes in each pair was 2.7 degrees (95% CI 2.4 to 3.1 degrees) in the stereotactic CT-navigation group and 5.5 degrees (95% CI 5.0 to 6.1 degrees) in the Ultrasound group (p < 0.001). The mean time for placing the electrodes was 15:11 min (95% CI 13:05 to 17:18 min) in the stereotactic CT-navigation group and 6:40 min (95% CI 5:28 to 7:52 min) in the Ultrasound group. The use of stereotactic CT-navigation in placing IRE-electrodes in a liver phantom is more accurate, but more time consuming, compared to ultrasound guidance.

Initial experience with irreversible electroporation of liver tumours.

INTRODUCTION: Thermal ablation of liver tumours is an established technique used in selected patients with relatively small tumours that can be ablated with margin. Thermal ablation methods are not advisable near larger bile ducts that are sensitive to thermal injury causing strictures and severe morbidity. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has the possibility to treat these tumours without harming the bile tree. The method is relatively new and has been proven to be feasible and safe with promising oncological results. METHODS: 50 treatments were performed on 42 patients that were not resectable or treatable by thermal ablation (12 women and 30 men) with 59 tumours in total. 51% were colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) and 34% were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). 70% of the treatments were performed using stereotactic CT-guidance for needle placement. RESULTS: 81% of the treatments were performed with initial success. All patients with missed ablations were re-treated. Local recurrence rate at 3 months was 3% and 37% at one year. The complication rate was low with 2 patients having major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3b-5) and without 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: IRE is safe for treating tumours not suitable for thermal ablation with 63% of patients being without local recurrence after one year in a group of patients with tumours deemed unresectable. IRE has a role in the treatment of unresectable liver tumours close to heat-sensitive structures not suitable for thermal ablation.Level of Evidence: Level 4, Case Series.

1000 consecutive ablation sessions in the era of computer assisted image guidance - Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: Ablation therapies for tumours are becoming more used as ablation modalities evolve and targeting solutions are getting better. There is an increasing body of long-term results challenging resection and proving lower morbidities and costs. The aim of this paper is to share the experiences from a high-volume centre in introducing computer assisted targeting solutions and efficient ablation modalities like microwave generators and irreversible electroporation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One thousand consecutive treatments in one high-volume centre were evaluated retrospectively from prospectively collected data. RESULTS: The purpose of this paper is to present the benefits of going into computer assisted targeting techniques and microwave technology; pitfalls and overview of outcomes. The main target organ was the liver and the main indications were ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases. With the assistance of computer assisted targeting the local recurrence rate within 6 months has dropped from 30 to near 10%. The survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases is not worse if the tumour can be retreated after a local recurrence. Multiple colorectal liver metastases can be treated successfully. DISCUSSION: The incorporation of computer assisted targeting technologies for ultrasound-, ct guided- and laparoscopic tumour ablation has been very successful and without a noticeable learning curve. The same is true for switching from radiofrequency energies to microwave generators and irreversible electroporation. CONCLUSION: It is well worthwhile upgrading ablation and targeting technologies to achieve excellent and reproducible results and minimizing operator dependency.