Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(40): 1450-1456, 2020 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33031361

RESUMO

During the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, reports of a new multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) have been increasing in Europe and the United States (1-3). Clinical features in children have varied but predominantly include shock, cardiac dysfunction, abdominal pain, and elevated inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 (1). Since June 2020, several case reports have described a similar syndrome in adults; this review describes in detail nine patients reported to CDC, seven from published case reports, and summarizes the findings in 11 patients described in three case series in peer-reviewed journals (4-6). These 27 patients had cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and neurologic symptoms without severe respiratory illness and concurrently received positive test results for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or antibody assays indicating recent infection. Reports of these patients highlight the recognition of an illness referred to here as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A), the heterogeneity of clinical signs and symptoms, and the role for antibody testing in identifying similar cases among adults. Clinicians and health departments should consider MIS-A in adults with compatible signs and symptoms. These patients might not have positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antigen test results, and antibody testing might be needed to confirm previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because of the temporal association between MIS-A and SARS-CoV-2 infections, interventions that prevent COVID-19 might prevent MIS-A. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis and long-term effects of this newly described condition.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/virologia , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arthroplast Today ; 18: 173-180, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36387330

RESUMO

Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) at the trunnion-bore junction of a total hip arthroplasty may cause adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) with inflammatory reaction and tissue necrosis. Complications, including acute infection, continued pain, and instability, are therefore common after a revision surgery for MACC. We now present 2 cases of late hematogenous bacterial infection years after revision for MACC and ALTR, a previously unreported outcome in this population. We hypothesize that MACC-induced tissue necrosis does not heal over time, and some patients with metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty treated for ALTR are at long-term risk of hematogenous bacterial infection.

3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(9): 3406-8, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21752984
4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(12): ofaa541, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33364258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The value of positive follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in streptococcal bacteremia has not been well defined. Therefore, we explored the frequency of and risk factors for positive FUBC in a retrospective cohort of patients with streptococcal bacteremia. METHODS: Adults ≥18 years of age, admitted with at least 1 positive blood culture for Streptococcus spp between 2013 and 2018 followed by at least 1 FUBC, were potentially eligible. Positive FUBCs were defined as cultures positive for the same streptococcal species drawn >24 hours after the index culture. We excluded patients with polymicrobial bacteremia. We compared the characteristics of patients with and without a positive FUBC. RESULTS: In our single-center cohort, we identified 590 patients with streptococcal bacteremia, and 314 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients had FUBC with Streptococcus spp (3.2%), 4 (1.3%) had a contaminant identified, and 3 (1.0%) had a new pathogen isolated. Endocarditis (5 of 10 [50.0%] vs 35 of 304 [11.5%]), epidural abscess (2 of 10 [20%] vs 4 of 304 [1.3%]), and discitis or vertebral osteomyelitis (3 of 10 [30.0%] vs 14 of 304 [4.6%]) were associated with positive FUBC. Patients with positive FUBC had a longer median length of stay (12.9 vs 7.1 days, P = .004) and longer duration of antibiotic treatment (14.9 vs 43.2 days, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up blood cultures among patients with streptococcal BSI are rarely positive. Clinicians could consider limiting follow-up blood cultures in patients at low risk for deep-seated streptococcal infections, persistent bacteremia, or endovascular infection.

5.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(5): 687-692, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29284155

RESUMO

Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections (EB-BSIs) are a common manifestation of Gram-negative sepsis and are initially managed with empirical intravenous antibiotics. Upon stabilisation and source control, patients are often transitioned to an oral agent. Fluoroquinolones (FQs) plays a prominent role in stepdown therapy for severe infections owing to favourable pharmacokinetic parameters; however, serious adverse events (AEs) have been documented with their use. A total of 224 adults with EB-BSI initiated on empirical intravenous antibiotics with stepdown to oral ß-lactam (BLM) (n = 84) or FQ (n = 140) were studied to compare clinical success and identify risk factors for treatment failure. Subgroups of early versus late oral stepdown and short versus extended duration of therapy (DOT) were assessed. Stepdown therapy with oral BLM was non-inferior to oral FQ (86.9% vs. 87.1%; mean difference 0.2%, 97.5% CI -10.3 to 10.7). Microbiological success (94.0% vs. 97.9%; P > 0.05) and 30-day re-admission (14.3% vs. 14.3%; P > 0.05) were similar. Patients were more likely to complete their BLM course without an AE compared with FQs (91.7% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.049). Clinical success was comparable between early and late stepdown (86.7% vs. 87.5%; P > 0.05) and short versus extended DOT (88.2% vs. 86.7%; P > 0.05). Negative predictors of clinical success identified by logistic regression were complicated diabetes (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.83) and urinary abnormality (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.94). These findings suggest that oral BLMs were non-inferior to FQs as stepdown therapy for EB-BSI, with less AEs.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/administração & dosagem , beta-Lactamas/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Idoso , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 24(7): 896-908, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15303453

RESUMO

Each year, approximately 2 million people in the United States contract an infection during a hospital stay. An increasing percentage of these institutionally acquired infections are attributed to antimicrobial-resistant organisms. At the same time, studies and surveys suggest that as much as half of all antimicrobial use is inappropriate. Recommendations for preventing and reducing antimicrobial resistance in hospitals stress the importance of improving antimicrobial use, referred to as antimicrobial stewardship, at the institutional level. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have served as wake-up calls to both clinicians and health care administrators. We review the more recent literature concerning the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs on costs, outcomes, and resistance and summarize important considerations for implementation of these programs.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Sociedades Farmacêuticas , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA