Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews.
PLoS Biol;
21(8): e3002238, 2023 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37643173
2.
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.
Nature;
576(7786): 210-212, 2019 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31827288
3.
Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data.
BMJ Open;
11(7): e050270, 2021 07 21.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34290071
4.
Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project.
F1000Res;
9: 415, 2020.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33024548
5.
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.
mBio;
10(3)2019 06 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31164459
6.
Correction for Strinzel et al., "Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis".
mBio;
13(3): e0130522, 2022 Jun 28.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35604093
7.
Erratum for Strinzel et al., "Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis".
mBio;
12(1)2021 Jan 05.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33402542