Impact of age on the prognosis of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and aborted cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prognostic impact of age on patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) and aborted cardiac arrest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present registry-based, monocentric cohort study included all consecutive patients presenting at the University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM) between 2002 and 2016 with ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and aborted cardiac arrest. Middle-aged (40-60 years old) were compared to older patients (> 60 years old). Furthermore, age was analyzed as a continuous variable. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. The secondary endpoints were cardiac death at 24 h, all-cause mortality at index hospitalization, all-cause mortality after index hospitalization and the composite endpoint at 2.5 years of cardiac death at 24 h, recurrent VTA, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment. RESULTS: A total of 2259 consecutive patients were included (28% middle-aged, 72% older). Older patients were more often associated with all-cause mortality at 2.5 years (27% vs. 50%; hazard ratio, HR = 2.137; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.809-2.523, p = 0.001) and the secondary endpoints. Even patient age as a continuous variable was independently associated with mortality at 2.5 years in all types of VTA. Adverse prognosis in older patients was demonstrated by multivariate Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), systolic left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF) < 35%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and cardiogenic shock worsened the prognosis for both age groups, whereas acute myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) and the presence of an ICD improved prognosis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that increasing age is associated with increased mortality in VTA patients. Compared to the middle-aged, older patients were associated with higher all-cause mortality at 2.5 years and the secondary endpoints.

Cardiac disease and prognosis associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in young adults and adults.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates cardiac diseases and prognosis in young adults and adults presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA). METHODS: The present longitudinal, observational, registry-based, monocentric cohort study includes all consecutive patients 45 years old or younger presenting with VTA at admission from 2002 to 2016. Rates of coronary angiography, coronary artery disease (CAD) and need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiac diseases associated with VTA, and differences in long-term prognostic endpoints for young adults (20-34 years old) were analyzed and compared to those of adults (35-45 years old), for whom multivariable risk prediction models were developed. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed according to age and type of VTA. RESULTS: A total of 259 consecutive patients were included in the study (36% young adults and 64% adults). At admission, 38% of young adults had VTA due to CAD that required PCI. Furthermore, VTA in young adults was commonly idiopathic (27%), or had underlying channelopathies (18%), primary cardiomyopathies (13%) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 11%). In adults, VTA was mostly associated with AMI (28%), though the rate of idiopathy was still high (20%). A total 41% of all patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), for whom AMI (STEMI 17%, NSTEMI 24%) was most frequently observed. Irrespective of the type of VTA, all-cause mortality was similar for young adults and adults. In young adults, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% (HR = 33.590) was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite high rates of idiopathic ventricular tachyarrhythmias, CAD and AMI are common causes of VTA and CPR in adults 45 years old and younger. Young adults and adults had comparable survival at index hospitalization and after 2.5 years irrespective of the type of VTA. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02982473.

Clinical outcome of out-of-hospital vs. in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Limited data regarding the prognostic impact of ventricular tachyarrhythmias related to out-of-hospital (OHCA) compared to in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is available. A large retrospective single-center observational registry with all patients admitted due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias was used including all consecutive patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) on admission from 2002 to 2016. Survivors discharged after OHCA were compared to those after IHCA using multivariable Cox regression models and propensity-score matching for evaluation of the primary endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 6 months and cardiac rehospitalization at 2.5 years. From 2.422 consecutive patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, a total of 524 patients survived cardiac arrest and were discharged from hospital (OHCA 62%; IHCA 38%). In about 50% of all cases, acute myocardial infarction was the underlying disease leading to ventricular tachyarrhythmias with consecutive aborted cardiac arrest. Survivors of IHCA were associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality compared to OHCA even after multivariable adjustment (28% vs. 16%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 1.623; 95% CI 1.002-2.629; p = 0.049) and after propensity-score matching (28% vs. 19%; log rank p = 0.045). Rates of cardiac rehospitalization rates at 2.5 years were equally distributed between OHCA and IHCA survivors. In patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, survivors of IHCA were associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality at 2.5 years compared to OHCA survivors.

No impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on long-term recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients with systolic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Data regarding the outcome of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with MRA is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive ICD recipients with systolic HF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%) and index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with MRA were compared to patients without (non-MRA). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied for the evaluation of the primary endpoint defined as first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at five years. Secondary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 366 ICD recipients with systolic HF were included, 20% treated with MRA (spironolactone: 65%; eplerenone: 35%) and 80% without. At five years, treatment with MRA was not associated with the primary endpoint of first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias [47% vs. 48%, log-rank p = 0.732; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.067; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.736-1.546; p = 0.732]. Accordingly, risk of first appropriate ICD therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality were not affected by the presence of MRA therapy. Finally, patients with spironolactone and eplerenone had comparable risk of first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (50% vs. 45%; p = 0.255; HR = 2.263; 95% CI 0.495-10.341; p = 0.292). CONCLUSION: Treatment with MRA was not associated with recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICD therapies at five years.

Electrical storm reveals worse prognosis compared to myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients.

Both acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI-VTA) and electrical storm (ES) represent life-threatening clinical conditions. However, a direct comparison of both sub-groups regarding prognostic endpoints has never been investigated. All consecutive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with ES apart from AMI (ES) were compared to patients with AMI accompanied by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI-VTA). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years, secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 3 years. A total of 198 consecutive ICD recipients were included (AMI-VTA: 56%; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): 22%; non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) 78%; ES: 44%). ES patients were older and had higher rates of severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%. ES was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 3 years (37% vs. 19%; p = 0.001; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.242; 95% CI 2.291-3.894; p = 0.004) and with increased risk of first cardiac rehospitalization (44% vs. 12%; p = 0.001; HR = 4.694; 95% CI 2.498-8.823; p = 0.001). This worse prognosis of ES compared to AMI-VTA was still evident after multivariable adjustment (long-term all-cause mortality: HR = 2.504; 95% CI 1.093-5.739; p = 0.030; first cardiac rehospitalization: HR = 2.887; 95% CI 1.240-6.720; p = 0.014). In contrast, the rates of MACE (40% vs. 32%; p = 0.326) were comparable in both groups. At long-term follow-up of 3 years, ES was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization compared to patients with AMI-VTA.

Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Data regarding recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients according to LVEF is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used, including all consecutive ICD recipients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. Patients with LVEF <35% were compared to patients with LVEF ≥35%. The primary end point was first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary end points were ICD-related therapies, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Cox regression, Kaplan Meier, and propensity score matching analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 528 consecutive ICD recipients were included (51% with LVEF ≥35% and 49% with LVEF <35%). LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (40 vs. 49%, log rank p = 0.014; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.381; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.066-1.788; p = 0.034), mainly attributed to recurrent sustained VT in primary preventive ICD recipients. Accordingly, LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from first appropriate ICD therapies (28 vs. 41%, log rank p = 0.001; HR = 1.810; 95% CI 1.185-2.766; p = 0.001). Finally, LVEF <35% was associated with a higher rate of rehospitalization (23 vs. 34%; p = 0.005) and all-cause mortality at 5 years (13 vs. 29%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate device therapies, rehospitalization and all-cause mortality secondary to index ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Hypokalemia but not Hyperkalemia is Associated with Recurrences of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in ICD Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Only few data evaluating the prognostic impact of blood-derived potassium levels (K) on arrhythmic endpoints in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is available. Therefore, this study evaluates the prognostic impact of potassium levels on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in consecutive ICD recipients. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission from 2002 to 2016 at one institution. Patients were divided into three subgroups: hypokalemia (i.e., K < 3.3 mmol/L), normokalemia (i.e., K 3.3 - 4.5 mmol/L), and hyperkalemia (i.e., K > 4.5 mmol/L). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied for the evaluation of the primary endpoint of first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at one year. Secondary endpoints comprised of first appropriate ICD therapy, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality at one year. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty ICD recipients with a median potassium level of 4.23 mmol/L were included (67%: normokalemia, 27%: hyperkalemia, and 6%: hypokalemia). Whereas hyperkalemia was not associated with increasing risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, hypokalemia was associated with decreasing freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (HR = 2.135; 95% CI 1.158 - 3.937; p = 0.015), even after mul-tivariable adjustment (HR = 2.577; 95% CI 1.236 - 5.372; p = 0.012). Higher risk of recurrences was especially attributed to higher rates of electrical storm in the presence of hypokalemia (15% vs. 3 - 4%). Negative impact of hypokalemia was mainly attributed to secondary preventive ICD (HR = 2.637; 95% CI 1.325 - 5.248; p = 0.006). Moreover, hypokalemia was associated with increasing risk of appropriate ICD therapies (HR = 1.920; 95% CI 0.912 - 4.042; statistical trend: p = 0.086), which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment. In contrast, risk of first cardiac rehospitalization and all-cause mortality were not affected by potassium levels. CONCLUSIONS: In consecutive ICD recipients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias at index, hypokalemia - but not hyperkalemia - was associated with increasing risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies.

Non-ischemic compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy is associated with increasing recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICD-related therapies.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the impact of ischemic (ICMP) compared to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients. BACKGROUND: Data comparing recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive ICD recipients with first episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. Patients with ICMP were compared to patients with NICMP. The primary prognostic endpoint was first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at one year. Secondary endpoints comprised ICD-related therapies, rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at one year. Statistics Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 387 consecutive ICD recipients were included retrospectively (ICMP: 82%, NICMP: 18%). At one year of follow-up, freedom from first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was lower in NICMP (81% vs. 71%, log-rank p = 0.063; HR = 1.760; 95% CI 0.985-3.002; p = 0.080), mainly attributed to higher rates of sustained VT (20% versus 12%, p = 0.054). Accordingly, freedom from first appropriate device therapies was lower in NICMP (74% vs. 85%, log rank p = 0.004; HR = 1.951; 95% CI 1.121-3.397; p = 0.028), especially in patients with sustained VT or VF at index. Both groups revealed comparable rates of rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at one year. CONCLUSION: NICMP was associated with higher rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies compared to ICMP at one year of follow-up, whereas rates of rehospitalization and all-cause mortality were comparable. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: This study retrospectively compared the impact of cardiomyopathy types (ICMP versus NICMP) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 387 ICD recipients. Freedom from first episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and first appropriate device therapies were lower in patients with NICMP compared to ICMP.

Prognostic Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Receptor Blockers on Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapies.

This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Using a large retrospective registry including consecutive ICD recipients with documented episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016, those patients treated with ACEi/ARB were compared with patients without. The primary prognostic endpoint was the first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies at 5 years. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied within the entire cohort, and thereafter, Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed in propensity-matched subgroups. A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients were included (81% treated with ACEi/ARB and 19% without). Although ACEi/ARB was associated with no differences in overall recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ACEi/ARB was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapy within multivariable Cox regressions (hazard ratio = 0.666; P = 0.043), especially in patients with index episodes of VF, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, coronary artery disease, secondary preventive ICD, and glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m. In the propensity-matched subgroup, ACEi/ARB still prolonged freedom from appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio = 0.380; 95% confidence interval 0.193-0.747; P = 0.005). In conclusion, ACEi/ARB therapy was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapies.

Prognostic Impact of Atrial Fibrillation in Electrical Storm.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with electrical storm (ES) is rare. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of AF in patients with ES on mortality, rehospitalization, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrence of ES (ES-R). METHODS: All consecutive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients presenting with ES were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with AF were compared to non-AF patients. The primary prognostic endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates, MACE and ES-R. RESULTS: A total of 87 ES patients with ICD were included and followed up to 2.5 years; 43% suffered from AF. The presence of AF was associated with increased all-cause mortality (47 vs. 29%, log-rank p = 0.052; hazard ratio [HR] 1.969, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.981-3.952, p = 0.057), which was no longer present after multivariable adjustment for age, diabetes and dilated cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, AF was associated with increased rates of overall rehospitalization (61 vs. 31%, log-rank p = 0.013; HR 2.381, 95% CI 1.247-4.547, p = 0.009), especially due to AF (14 vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and acute heart failure (AHF) (28 vs. 10%, p = 0.018; HR 3.754, 95% CI 1.277-11.038, p = 0.016). Notably, AF was not associated with differences in MACE (55 vs. 37%, log rank p = 0.339) and ES-R (28 vs. 25%, log rank p = 0.704). CONCLUSION: In ES patients, presence of AF was univariably associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. Furthermore, AF was multivariably associated with overall rehospitalization, especially due to AF and AHF.

Digitalis Therapy and Risk of Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and ICD Therapies in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the impact of treatment with digitalis on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: The data regarding outcomes of digitalis therapy in ICD recipients are limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used, including consecutive ICD recipients with episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia between 2002 and 2016. Patients treated with digitalis were compared to patients without digitalis treatment. The primary prognostic outcome was first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 394 ICD recipients with AF and/or HF was included (26% with digitalis treatment and 74% without). Digitalis treatment was associated with decreased freedom from recurrent ventricular tachy-arrhythmias (HR = 1.423; 95% CI 1.047-1.934; p = 0.023). Accordingly, digitalis treatment was associated with decreased freedom from appropriate ICD therapies (HR = 1.622; 95% CI 1.166-2.256; p = 0.004) and, moreover, higher rates of rehospitalization (38 vs. 21%; p = 0.001) and all-cause mortality (33 vs. 20%; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Among ICD recipients suffering from AF and HF, treatment with digitalis was associated with increased rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICD therapies. However, the endpoints may also have been driven by interactions between digitalis, AF, and HF.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients.

The study sought to assess the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients. Data regarding the outcome of patients with CKD in ICD recipients is limited. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive ICD recipients surviving episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. CKD patients were compared to non-CKD patients. The primary endpoint was the first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were ICD-related therapies, rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching were applied. A total of 585 consecutive patients were included (non-CKD: 57%, CKD: 43%). CKD had higher rates of the primary endpoint of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias compared to non-CKD patients (50% vs. 40%; log rank p = 0.008; HR = 1.398; 95% CI 1.087-1.770; p = 0.009), which was irrespective of a primary or secondary preventive ICD and mainly attributed to recurrent VF (11% vs. 5%; p = 0.007) and electrical storm (ES) (10% vs. 5%; p = 0.010). Accordingly, CKD patients had higher rates of the secondary endpoint of appropriate ICD therapies (41% vs. 30%; log rank p = 0.002; HR = 1.532; 95% CI 1.163-2.018; p = 0.002), mainly attributed to appropriate ICD shocks (19% vs. 11%; p = 0.005). After multivariable Cox regression CKD was associated with a 1.4-fold higher risk of appropriate device therapies (HR = 1.353; 95% CI 1.001-1.825; p = 0.049), but not with first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (p = 0.177). Irrespective of propensity score matching, CKD was associated with increasing all-cause mortality at 5 years (p = 0.001). The presence of CKD is associated with increased rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate device therapies, mainly attributed to appropriate shock, and all-cause mortality in ICD recipients at 5 years.

Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the impact of statin therapy on survival in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. BACKGROUND: Data regarding the outcome of patients with statin therapy presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. Patients with statin were compared to patients without statin therapy (non-statin). The primary prognostic endpoint was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied in propensity-score matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 424 matched patients was included. The rates of VT and VF were similar in both groups (VT: statin 71% vs. non-statin 68%; VF: statin 29% vs. 32%; p = 0.460). Statin therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up (mortality rates 16% versus 33%; log rank, p = 0.001; HR = 0.438; 95% CI 0.290-0.663; p = 0.001), irrespective of the underlying type of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35%, presence of an activated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiogenic shock or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). CONCLUSION: Statin therapy is independently associated with lower long-term mortality in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02982473 , 11/29/2016, Retrospectively registered.

Male sex increases mortality in ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are still associated with poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, it is important to stratify high-risk patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias for their individual risk of future outcomes. AIM: To assess the impact of male sex on survival in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: All consecutive patients surviving ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) on admission from 2002 to 2016 were included and stratified according to sex differences by propensity score matching. The primary prognostic end-point was all-cause mortality at 30 months. Secondary end-points were all-cause mortality at 30 days, at index hospitalisation, after discharge, the composite of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies, and finally rehospitalisation related to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. RESULTS: A total of 784 (392 males and 392 females) matched patients was included. The rate of VT and VF was similar in both groups (VT: male 65% vs female 62%; VF: male 35% vs female 38%). Male sex was independently associated with the primary end-point of all-cause mortality at 30 months (31% vs 23%; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.432; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.089-1.883; P = 0.010) as well as with the secondary end-point of all-cause mortality at index hospitalisation (mortality rate 31% vs 23%; log-rank P = 0.010; HR = 1.432; 95% CI 1.089-1.883; P = 0.010; mortality rate 10% vs 15%; HR = 1.685; 95% CI 1.117-2.542; P = 0.013). No differences in further secondary end-points were found. Sex differences of the primary end-point were predominantly observed in patients with VT at index (mortality rate 28% versus 20%; HR = 1.512; 95% CI 1.040-2.189; P = 0.028), without an ICD and with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥35% (log-rank values, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Males presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission were associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 months and all-cause mortality at index hospitalisation.

Impact of Different Pharmacotherapies on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Electrical Storm.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the long-term prognostic impact of different pharmacotherapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB), statins, and amiodarone in patients with electrical storm (ES). BACKGROUND: Data regarding the outcome of patients with ES is limited. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ES from 2002 to 2016 were included. Patients on ACEi/ARB were compared to patients without ACEi/ARB, respectively, for statin and amiodarone therapy. The primary prognostic endpoint was all-cause mortality at 4 years. Secondary endpoints comprised ES recurrences, rehospitalization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 4 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 84 consecutive patients surviving episodes of ES was included. Beta-blocker was given in 95%, ACEi/ARB in 80%, statin in 60%, and amiodarone in 54%. ACEi/ARB patients were associated with improved all-cause mortality at 4 years (mortality rate 34 vs. 65%, log rank p = 0.018; HR 0.428; 95% CI 0.208-0.881; p = 0.021), as well as improved freedom from MACE. In contrast, statin and amiodarone therapy had no impact on long-term outcomes in ES patients. CONCLUSION: ACEi/ARB therapy is associated with improved survival and MACE in patients with ES, whereas statins and amiodarone therapy had no impact on long-term prognostic endpoints.

Type 2 diabetes is independently associated with all-cause mortality secondary to ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of type 2 diabetes in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission. BACKGROUND: Data regarding the prognostic outcome of diabetics presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) on admission from 2002 to 2016. Patients with type 2 diabetes (diabetics) were compared to non-diabetics applying multivariable Cox regression models and propensity-score matching for evaluation of the primary prognostic endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 2 years. Secondary prognostic endpoints were cardiac death at 24 h, in-hospital death at index, all-cause mortality at 30 days, all-cause mortality in patients surviving index hospitalization at 2 years (i.e. "after discharge") and rehospitalization due to recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 2 years. RESULTS: In 2411 unmatched high-risk patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, diabetes was present in 25% compared to non-diabetics (75%). Rates of VT (57% vs. 56%) and VF (43% vs. 44%) were comparable in both groups. Multivariable Cox regression models revealed diabetics associated with the primary endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 2 years (HR = 1.513; p = 0.001), which was still proven after propensity score matching (46% vs. 33%, log rank p = 0.001; HR = 1.525; p = 0.001). The rates of secondary endpoints were higher for in-hospital death at index, all-cause mortality at 30 days, as well as after discharge, but not for cardiac death at 24 h or rehospitalization due to recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: Presence of type 2 diabetes is independently associated with an increase of all-cause mortality in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission.

Beta-Blockers and ACE Inhibitors Are Associated with Improved Survival Secondary to Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the impact of treatment with beta-blocker (BB) or ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) on secondary survival in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia. BACKGROUND: Data regarding outcome of patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia treated with BB and ACEi/ARB is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation from 2002 to 2016 on admission. Applying propensity-score matching for harmonization, the impact of "BB" and "ACEi/ARB" was comparatively evaluated. The primary prognostic outcome was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 972 matched patients were included. Both patients with BB (long-term mortality rate 18 versus 27%; log rank p = 0.041; HR = 0.661; 95% CI = 0.443-0.986; p = 0.043) and with ACEi/ARB (long-term mortality rate 13 versus 23%; log rank p = 0.004; HR = 0.544; 95% CI = 0.359-0.824; p = 0.004) revealed better secondary survival compared to patients without after presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia on admission. The prognostic benefit of BB was comparable to ACEi/ARB (long-term mortality rate 21 versus 26%; log rank p = 0.539). CONCLUSION: BB and ACEi/ARB were associated with improved secondary survival in patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmia on admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02982473.

Prognostic impact of age and gender on patients with electrical storm.

BACKGROUND: Electrical storm (ES) is a severe and life-threatening heart rhythm disorder. Age and male gender have been identified as independent risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. However, data regarding the prognostic impact of age and gender on ES patients is limited. METHODS: The present study included retrospectively consecutive patients presenting with ES from 2002 to 2016. Patients 67 years old or older were compared to patients younger than 67, males were also compared to females. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to find the optimum age cut-off value. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates, ES recurrences, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years. RESULTS: Eighty-seven ES patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were included. Age ≥ 67 years was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 3 years (48% vs. 20%, hazard ratio = 3.046; 95% confidence interval 1.316-7.051; p = 0.008; log-rank p = 0.006). MACE, in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates, and ES recurrences were not affected by age. Even after multivariate adjustment, age ≥ 67 years was associated with increased long-term mortality at 3 years, besides left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%. In contrast, gender was not associated with primary and secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients 67 years old and older presenting with ES are associated with poor long-term prognosis. Increased long-term mortality was still evident after multivariate adjustment. In contrast, gender was not associated with primary and secondary endpoints.

Distribution and prognostic impact of coronary artery disease and nonischemic cardiomyopathies in patients with electrical storm.

BACKGROUND: he distribution and prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) in ES are still under debate. METHODS: Consecutive ES patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Three analyses were applied to characterize ES patients: (a) ES patients without CAD (non-CAD), (b) ES patients with CAD (CAD), and (c) diagnostic findings assessed by coronary angiography (CA) at the time of ES (immediate CA). CAD was compared with non-CAD ES patients, and progressive CAD was compared with stable CAD ES patients. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. Secondary endpoints were the composite endpoint of first recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies, and recurrence of ES (ES-R) at 2.5 years. RESULTS: Within a total of 87 consecutive ES patients. CAD was present in more than two-thirds (67%). However, only 52% patients underwent immediate CA at the time of ES. Here, 84% had CAD, of which 39% revealed progressive CAD with the need of target vessel revascularization (TVR) or cardiac transplantation ( n = 1). At long-term follow-up, neither the presence (or absence) of CAD (41% vs. 34%; log rank P = 0.708) nor of progressive CAD (33% vs. 26%; log rank P = 0.372) was associated with all-cause mortality at 2.5 years, and further secondary endpoints including the composite of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias plus appropriate ICD therapies, or ES-R. CONCLUSION: In ES patients, CAD was more common than non-CAD-related cardiac diseases, accompanied by an underinvestigated rate of CA despite increasing rates of progressive CAD. CAD had no prognostic impact in ES.

Chronic kidney disease impairs prognosis in electrical storm.

BACKGROUND: The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with electrical storm (ES). ES represents a life-threatening heart rhythm disorder. In particular, CKD patients are at risk of suffering from ES. However, data regarding the prognostic impact of CKD on long-term mortality in ES patients is limited. METHODS: All consecutive ES patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with CKD (MDRD-GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) were compared to patients without CKD. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, cardiac rehospitalization, recurrences of electrical storm (ES-R), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 70 consecutive ES patients were included. CKD was present in 43% of ES patients with a median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 43.3 ml/min/1.73 m2. CKD was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 3 years (63% vs. 20%; p = 0.001; HR = 4.293; 95% CI 1.874-9.836; p = 0.001) and MACE (57% vs. 30%; p = 0.025; HR = 3.597; 95% CI 1.679-7.708; p = 0.001). In contrast, first cardiac rehospitalization (43% vs. 45%; log-rank p = 0.889) and ES-R (30% vs. 20%; log-rank p = 0.334) were not affected by CKD. Even after multivariable adjustment, CKD was still associated with increased long-term mortality (HR = 2.397; 95% CI 1.012-5.697; p = 0.047), as well as with the secondary endpoint MACE (HR = 2.520; 95% CI 1.109-5.727; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ES, the presence of CKD was associated with increased long-term mortality and MACE.