RESUMO
Basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms (BAAs) constitute a major surgical challenge, due to the depth of the target anatomy and narrowness of field, the close relationship with thalamoperforating arteries, and difficulty in obtaining proximal control. Moreover, to treat these aneurysms may be especially technically demanding when situated in a low-lying basilar apex configuration. The most used approaches to treat BAA are the subtemporal approach and the pterional approach. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are very well known. Variations of these approaches were created attempting to overcome the limitations imposed by the limited deep operative area. They have not been able to improve the working space in the depths of the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns. The transcavernous approach was devised as a means of enlarging the area of exposure around the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns. It involves the removal of the anterior clinoid process, cutting distal and proximal dural rings, opening the cavernous sinus, and drilling varied extension of dorsum sellae and clivus. The senior author (EdO) has used a pretemporal approach to deal with BAAs. The authors have added a transcavernous approach in a pretemporal perspective to treat low-lying, complex, or giant basilar artery aneurysms. In this paper, the authors detail its anatomical principles and technical nuances and present the clinical experience with using this technique.