A Novel Macroglossia Severity Index for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE/ SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: We propose the first classification scheme for macroglossia in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS), the BWS Index of macroGlossia (BIG). METHODS: Patients with molecularly confirmed BWS seen from 2004-2023 were included to develop this system. Relationships among BIG scores, tongue reduction surgery, BWS clinical score, percent mosaicism, and polysomnography findings were examined. RESULTS: Patients were classified from BIG0 to BIG3. BIG0 includes those without macroglossia; BIG1 includes those with macroglossia not protruding beyond the teeth/alveolus; BIG2 includes those with tongue protrusion past the teeth/alveolus to the lips but that can be contained within the mouth; and BIG3 includes those with tongues that protrude beyond the teeth/alveolus and lips but that cannot be closed within the mouth. Of the 459 patients with molecularly confirmed BWS, 266 (58.0%) patients were scored. One hundred and eleven (41.7%) were BIG0, 44 (16.5%) were BIG1, 90 (33.8%) were BIG2, and 21 (7.9%) were BIG3. As scores increased, patients had an increased incidence of tongue reduction surgery (BIG0: 0% versus BIG1: 20.5% versus BIG2: 51.1% versus BIG3: 100%; r=0.66, P <0.01). Higher BIG scores were associated with elevated BWS clinical scores (r=0.68, P <0.01) and increased tissue mosaicism (r=0.50, P <0.01) as well as trends towards worse obstructive apnea-hypopnea indices (r=0.29, P =0.02) and lower SpO 2 nadirs (r=-0.29, P =0.02). CONCLUSION: In this large series of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome, increased BIG score correlates with undergoing tongue reduction surgery and increased phenotypic severity. Adoption of the BIG scoring system may facilitate communication and risk stratification across institutions.

Early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis changes the syndromic craniosynostosis treatment paradigm: long-term outcomes of a 23-year cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Early surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis varies widely between centers, with patients typically undergoing multiple intracranial procedures through childhood. This study evaluates the long-term impact of early posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) versus conventional treatment paradigms on the number and timing of subsequent craniofacial procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the longitudinal operative patterns of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated from 2000 to 2023 with greater than five years of follow-up. Outcomes of patients who underwent early PVDO and conventional vault reconstruction were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria (30 PVDO and 25 conventional). Age at initial vault surgery was similar between the PVDO and conventional cohorts (7.6 vs. 8.8 months), as were baseline craniometrics (p > 0.05). Multiple fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) procedures were performed in only 1/30 (3%) PVDO-treated patient versus 12/25 (48%) conventionally-treated patients (p < 0.001). Twelve (40%) PVDO-treated patients did not undergo FOA at all. Among patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes, fewer PVDO-treated patients required FOA prior to midface surgery (33% vs. 92%, p = 0.004) or repeat FOA (6% vs. 50%, p = 0.005) compared to conventionally-treated patients. Among patients with Muenke and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes, a similar proportion of patients required FOA in the PVDO and conventional cohorts (91% vs. 100%, p = 0.353), though no PVDO-treated patients required repeat FOA (0% vs. 44%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Early PVDO is associated with a reduction in the high burden of both FOA and, critically, revisionary frontal procedures which are commonly seen in conventionally-treated patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Long-term sequelae of normocephalic pansynostosis: a rare but insidious entity.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with normocephalic pansynostosis, who have a grossly normal head shape, are often overlooked early in life and present late with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) requiring timely cranial vault expansion. This study evaluates the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with normocephalic pansynostosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of primary pansynostosis who underwent vault reconstruction between 2000 and 2023. Clinical and treatment course after craniofacial interventions was followed in patients with normocephaly to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with primary pansynostosis were identified, of which eight (23.5%) had normocephaly and underwent initial vault expansion at a mean age of 5.0 ± 2.4 years. All eight patients (50.0% male) presented with symptoms of elevated ICP including headaches (50.0%), nausea and vomiting (50.0%), and developmental delay (62.5%) and/or signs of elevated ICP including papilledema (75.0%) and radiologic thumbprinting on head computed tomography scan (87.5%). Three of the four normocephalic patients who had over 7 years of postoperative follow-up developed subjective headaches, vision changes, or learning and behavioral issues in the long-term despite successful vault reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our longitudinal experience with this rare but insidious entity demonstrates the importance of timely intervention and frequent postoperative monitoring, which are critical to limiting long-term neurological sequelae. Multidisciplinary care by craniofacial surgery, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, and neuropsychology with follow-up into adolescence are recommended to assess for possible recurrence of elevated ICP secondary to cranio-cerebral disproportion.

Mystery of the Muenke midface: spheno-occipital synchondrosis fusion and craniofacial skeletal patterns.

PURPOSE: The spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) is an important site of endochondral ossification in the cranial base that closes prematurely in Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer syndromes, which contributes to varying degrees of midface hypoplasia. The facial dysmorphology of Muenke syndrome, in contrast, is less severe with low rates of midface hypoplasia. We thus evaluated the timing of SOS fusion and cephalometric landmarks in patients with Muenke syndrome compared to normal controls. METHODS: Patients with Muenke syndrome who had at least one fine-cut head computed tomography scan performed from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A case-control study was performed of patient scans and age- and sex-matched control scans. SOS fusion status was evaluated as open, partially closed, or closed. RESULTS: We included 28 patients and compared 77 patient scans with 77 control scans. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an insignificantly earlier timeline of SOS fusion in Muenke syndrome (p = 0.300). Mean sella-orbitale (SO) distance was shorter (44.0 ± 6.6 vs. 47.7 ± 6.7 mm, p < 0.001) and mean sella-nasion-Frankfort horizontal (SN-FH) angle was greater (12.1° ± 3.8° vs. 10.1° ± 3.2°, p < 0.001) in the Muenke group, whereas mean sella-nasion-A point (SNA) angle was similar and normal (81.1° ± 5.7° vs. 81.4° ± 4.7°, p = 0.762). CONCLUSION: Muenke syndrome is characterized by mild and often absent midfacial hypoplasia, with the exception of slight retropositioning of the infraorbital rim. Interestingly, SOS fusion patterns in these patients are not significantly different from age- and sex-matched controls despite an increased odds of fusion. It is possible that differences in timing of SOS fusion may manifest phenotypically at the infraorbital rim rather than at the maxilla.

A coddling of the sagittal suture: inequality in spring-assisted expansion.

PURPOSE: We examined differences in long-term morphometric outcomes of spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) for various forms of isolated nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of children who underwent SMC from 2011 to 2020 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Cephalic indices (CI), Whitaker grades, parietal bone thickness, and degree of suture fusion were assessed. Frontal bossing and vertex-nasion-opisthocranion (VNO) angles were compared to a normal control group. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects underwent surgery at age 3.6 ± 1.0 months with follow-up of 6.3 ± 1.8 years. Mean CI was 75.2 ± 4.1 at 5.9 ± 2.0 years postoperatively. Mean CI were 75.8 ± 4.1 (n = 32), 76.4 ± 4.0 (n = 22), and 77.1 ± 4.8 (n = 11) at 5, 7, and 9+ years postoperatively, respectively. Three (5.6%) required reoperation for persistent scaphocephalic cranial deformity. Fifty-one (94.4%) were Whitaker Grade I. On physical examination, 12 (22.2%) demonstrated craniofacial abnormalities. At long-term follow-up, there were no differences in frontal bossing angle (102.7 ± 5.2 degrees versus 100.7 ± 5.6 degrees, p = .052) and VNO angle (44.9 ± 3.3 degrees versus 43.9 ± 2.2 degrees, p = .063) between study and control groups. Younger age at surgery predicted a lower Whitaker grade, more normalized VNO angle, and greater change in CI during active expansion. Increased percentage fused of the posterior sagittal suture predicted a higher Whitaker grade, while decreased anterior fusion was associated with frontal bossing and temporal hollowing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, children undergoing spring-mediated cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis demonstrated maintenance of CI, favorable cosmetic outcomes, and a low reoperation rate at mid-term follow-up. Early intervention is associated with improved aesthetic outcomes, and regional fusion patterns may influence long-term craniofacial dysmorphology.

Vaulting further: cranial vault expansion for craniocerebral disproportion without primary craniosynostosis.

PURPOSE: Treatment of subjects with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) or shunted hydrocephalus with chronic shunt complications is challenging. What is the role for cranial vault expansion, particularly utilizing posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO), in these cases? This study assesses medium-term efficacy of cranial vault expansion in this unique patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent cranial vault expansion from 2008 to 2023 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Subjects who did not have a diagnosis of primary craniosynostosis were included in the study. Demographic information, medical history, and perioperative details were collected from medical records. Primary outcomes were the rate of CSF diversion procedures and resolution of presenting signs and symptoms. Secondary outcomes were perioperative and 90-day complications and reoperation requirement. RESULTS: Among 13 included subjects, nine (69.2%) patients had a primary diagnosis of shunted hydrocephalus and 4 (30.8%) patients had IIH. Twelve (92.3%) subjects underwent posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) and one (7.7%) underwent posterior vault remodeling (PVR). All 4 patients with IIH demonstrated symptomatic improvement following PVDO, including resolution of headaches, vomiting, and/or papilledema. Among 9 patients with shunted hydrocephalus, CSF diversion requirement decreased from 2.7 ± 1.6 procedures per year preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.8 per year following cranial vault expansion (p = 0.030). The mean postoperative follow-up was 4.1 ± 2.1 years and four (30.8%) patients experienced complications within 90 days of surgery, including infection (n = 2), CSF leak (n = 1), and elevated ICP requiring lumbar puncture (n = 1). Four (30.8%) patients underwent repeat cranial vault expansion for recurrence of ICP-related symptoms. At most recent follow-up, 7 of 9 patients with shunted hydrocephalus demonstrated symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Cranial vault expansion reduced intracranial hypertension-related symptomology as well as the rate of CSF diversion-related procedures in patients with refractory IIH and shunted hydrocephalus without craniosynostosis, and should be considered in those who have significant shunt morbidity.

Lacrimal Obstruction in Craniosynostosis: Anatomical and Genetic Risk Factors.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether patients with craniosynostosis exhibit higher rates of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) and to explore potential risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective review including all craniosynostosis patients treated at both the Divisions of Ophthalmology and Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Synostosis characteristics, lacrimal disorders, and genetic data were collected. Main outcome measures were the rate of NLDO and associations with anatomical and syndromic/genetic risk factors. RESULTS: The total of 767 participants had a mean age of 2.8 ± 3.8 years, 465 (60.6%) were males, 485 (63.2%) had no syndromic association; 631 (82.3%) had one major suture involved, 128 (17%) had involvement of 2 to 4 major sutures, and 429 (55.9%) underwent craniofacial surgery. Forty-eight (6.2%) patients had NLDO, which more prevalent in the genetic/syndromic group (11.0% vs. 3.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), with the highest prevalence observed in patients with Apert syndrome (n = 4, 30.8%). The genetic variants most associated with NLDO were EFNB1 (n = 1, 100%) and FGFR2 (n = 6, 19.4%). There was no association between NLDO and the number or types of sutures involved or a history of craniofacial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is more common in patients with craniosynostosis compared to the general population. Having a putative syndrome or a putative genetic variant and female sex were risk factors for NLDO. Ophthalmic evaluations for all craniosynostosis patients and careful assessments of any symptoms of tearing are recommended.

Severity of Mandibular Dysmorphology in Treacher Collins Syndrome for Stratification of Perioperative Airway Risk.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) and attendant airway dysmorphology may be predisposed to airway complications in the perioperative period. However, limited data correlates severity of mandibular hypoplasia and airway status. This study aims to improve risk stratification for perioperative airway insufficiency in TCS by using a previously proposed mandibular severity index. METHODS: Patient demographics, perioperative airway status, difficulty of intubation, and Cormack Lehane grade were collected and compared using a TCS mandibular hypoplasia severity grading scale in patients with TCS treated between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent 222 procedures with institutional mandibular severity gradings as follows: 23% Grade I, 31% Grade II, 39% Grade III, 8% Grade IV. Our severity index was associated with intubation difficulty ( P <0.001) and difficult airway status ( P <0.001), with 72% of difficult airways found in grade III and grade IV patients. Mandibular retrusion and ramal hypoplasia subscores were positively correlated with measures of airway severity ( P <0.001), whereas the gonial angle was negatively correlated ( P <0.001). Age was negatively correlated with difficult visualization for endotracheal intubation ( P =0.02) but had no association with difficult airway status ( P =0.2). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a positive correlation between severity of maxillomandibular dysmorphology and perioperative airway difficulty in TCS patients. Our findings suggest that severely affected patients require heightened vigilance throughout life, as difficult airways may not completely resolve with aging. Given the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with airway complications, proper identification and preparation for challenging airways is critical for TCS patients.

LeFort III Versus Monobloc Frontofacial Advancement: A Comparative Analysis of Soft Tissue Changes.

INTRODUCTION: The LeFort III and monobloc are commonly used midface advancement procedures for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis with well characterized postoperative skeletal changes. However, the differential effects of these procedures on facial soft tissues are less understood. The purpose of this study was to critically analyze and compare the effects of these 2 procedures on the overlying soft tissues of the face. METHODS: Frontal and lateral preoperative and postoperative photographs of patients undergoing monobloc or LeFort III were retrospectively analyzed using ImageJ to measure soft tissue landmarks. Measurements included height of facial thirds, nasal length and width, intercanthal distance, and palpebral fissure height and width. Facial convexity was quantified by calculating the angle between sellion (radix), subnasale, and pogonion on lateral photographs. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with an average age of 6.7 years (range 4.8-14.5) undergoing monobloc (n=12) and LeFort III (n=13) were identified retrospectively and analyzed preoperatively and 6.4±3.6 months postoperatively. Patients undergoing LeFort III had a greater average postoperative increase in facial convexity angle acuity (28.2°) than patients undergoing monobloc (17.8°, P =0.021). Patients in both groups experience postoperative increases in nasal width ( P <0.001) and decreases in palpebral fissure height ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both subcranial LeFort III advancements and monobloc frontofacial advancements resulted in significant changes in the soft tissues. Patients undergoing LeFort III procedures achieved greater acuity of the facial convexity angle, likely because the nasion is not advanced with the LeFort III segment.

Validating the Supraorbital Notch-Nasion-Supraorbital Notch Angle as a Marker for Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity.

OBJECTIVE: Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) can be difficult to differentiate from metopic ridge (MR) or normal frontal morphology. This study assess whether the supraorbital notch-nasion-supraorbital notch (SNS) angle can help identify MCS. METHODS: Records of 212 patients with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were examined. The SNS angles, surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings, and CranioRate metopic severity scores (MSSs) were compared with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden J-statistic and cross-validation of regression models assessed the ability of these measures to predict surgery. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were included, consisting of 78 MCS, 37 MR, and 97 controls. Both the mean SNS angle (MCS: 111.7 ± 10.7 degrees, MR: 126.0 ± 8.2 degrees, controls: 130.7 ± 8.8 degrees P < 0.001) and MSS (MCS: 5.9 ± 2.0, MR: 1.4 ± 1.9, controls: 0.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) were different among the cohorts. The mean SNS angle (111.5 ± 10.7 versus 129.1 ± 8.8, P < 0.001) was lower in those who had surgery and CranioRate score (5.9 ± 2.1 versus 0.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) was higher in those who underwent surgery. SNS angles were positively correlated with surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings ( r = 0.41, P < 0.05) and CranioRate MSS ( r = 0.54, P < 0.05). The ROC curve requiring high sensitivity revealed an SNS angle of 124.8 degrees predicted surgery with a sensitivity of 88.7% and a specificity of 71.3%. A ROC curve using the CranioRate MCC values ≥3.19 predicted surgery with 88.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: Orbital dysmorphology in patients with MCS is well captured by the supraorbital-nasion angle. Both the SNS angle and CranioRate MSS scores accurately predict surgical intervention.

Nasal Airway Volumes are More Asymmetric in Skeletally Mature Patients With Cleft lip and Palate Than Controls on 3-Dimensional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses nasal airway volumes in skeletally mature patients with CLP and healthy controls and examines the relationship among nasal volumes, cleft laterality, and facial asymmetry. METHODS: Computed tomography images from patients with CLP and controls were analyzed using Mimics Version 23.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Relationships among nasal airway volume, cleft laterality, and facial asymmetry were compared. RESULTS: The 89 patients in this study included 66 (74%) CLP and 23 (17%) controls. Nasal airway volumes in CLP were more asymmetric than controls (26.8±17.5% vs. 17.2±14.4%; P=0.015). In UCLP, the smaller nasal airway was on the cleft side 81% of the time (P<0.001). Maximum airway stenosis was on the cleft side 79% of the time (P<0.001), and maximum stenosis was on the same side as the smaller airway 89% of the time (P<0.001). There was a mild linear relationship between nasal airway asymmetry and maximum stenosis (r=0.247, P=0.023). On 3-dimensional image reconstruction, the septum often bowed convexly into the cleft-sided nasal airway with a caudal deviation towards the noncleft side. Nasal airway asymmetry was not associated with facial midline asymmetry (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The nasal airway is more asymmetric in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with the general population, with the area of maximum stenosis usually occurring on the cleft-sided airway. In patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, the septum often bows into the cleft side, reducing the size of that nasal airway. Nasal airway asymmetry did not correlate with facial asymmetry.

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Reveals High Rates of Suicidality in 602 Patients With Cleft and Craniofacial Conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about rates of suicidal ideation and behavior among youth with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) and other craniofacial conditions. METHODS: Records of patients ages 6 and older who were administered the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Lifetime Version during routine multidisciplinary cleft or craniofacial team visits between 2019 and 2023 were examined. Demographics information, C-SSRS data, and diagnoses were assessed with statistics including t tests, the Fisher exact test, and odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 1140 C-SSRS questionnaires across 602 (433 CLP and 169 craniofacial) patients with an average age of 11.2±3.7 years were included. Eighty-four (13.6%) patients endorsed lifetime suicidal ideation, 9 (1.5%) had at least one instance of suicidal behavior, 30 (5.0%) endorsed nonsuicidal self-injury, and 2 (0.3%) engaged in self-injurious behavior. Compared with CLP, those with other craniofacial conditions had similar odds of endorsing suicidal ideation and behavior ( P ≥0.05). Compared with those with isolated cleft palates, CLP had greater odds of endorsing suicidal ideation and behavior, though those differences were not significant ( P ≥0.05). Incidence of suicidality was unchanged before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic ( P ≥0.05). Dividing patients by sex or insurance type revealed no difference in suicidality ( P ≥0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with CLP and craniofacial conditions have a high incidence of suicidal ideation and behavior, though levels are similar between these groups. Suicidality in these patients was not negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Early identification of safety risks and psychosocial challenges through regular screening can facilitate connection with appropriate clinical interventions.

Genetic Heterogeneity, Craniofacial Surgical Burden, and Surgical Techniques in Patients With Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: While genotype correlates with phenotype in patients with many forms of syndromic craniosynostosis, the relationship between molecular diagnosis and craniofacial surgical history in patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) is more variable. This manuscript characterizes that relationship and evaluates operative trends in these patients over the past 3 decades. METHODS: Demographic information, molecular diagnosis, and craniofacial surgical history in patients born with SCS between 1989 and 2023 were compared with appropriate statistics, including t tests and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with SCS were included, and there was no difference in total craniofacial procedures among those with TWIST1 substitutions (2.1 ± 1.6), duplications (3.0 ± 4.2), insertions (3.5 ± 0.7), or deletions (2.4 ± 1.9; P = 0.97). Cranial expansion rates were also similar across all genetic diagnoses (P>0.05), and surgical incidence was similar across patients with unicoronal, bicoronal, and multisuture involvement (P > 0.05). Those with an initial fronto-orbital advancement had a lower incidence of secondary cranial vault procedures compared with those with an initial posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (29% versus 71%, P < 0.05), though this did not control for phenotypic severity. On average, total cranial vault surgical burden (1.35 ± 0.67 versus 1.75 ± 0.46) and cranial expansion surgical burden (1.40 ± 0.68 versus 1.88 ± 0.64) between the fronto-orbital advancement-first and posterior vault distraction osteogenesis-first cohorts were similar (P = 0.11, P = 0.17, respectively). CONCLUSION: While SCS is molecularly and phenotypically heterogeneous, genetic diagnosis does not appear associated with rates of craniofacial surgery. Additional prospective study of correlations between genotype, severity of craniofacial manifestations, and treatment algorithms is warranted; but, in the end, it may be that this highly variable form of syndromic craniosynostosis warrants tailored, expectant management.

Clinical Research Fellowship Fosters Mentorship, Teamwork, and Productivity: Our 11-Year Experience With a Craniofacial Research Fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the development and explores the academic impact of a cleft and craniofacial research fellowship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research and career outcomes from 3 cleft and craniofacial surgeons, 14 clinical fellows, and 25 research fellows between 2010 and 2023 were examined. Academic productivity was measured by the number of peer-reviewed publications indexed in PubMed and podium presentations at national/international meetings. Residency match statistics were recorded for eligible research fellows. RESULTS: Over this 14-year period (11 with research fellows), the team produced 500 publications in 96 peer-reviewed journals, with 153 (31%) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117 (23%) in the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, and 32 (6%) in The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Yearly publications increased from 15.3±7.6 per year (before fellowship) to 23.0±5.3 (with 1 fellow) to 38.3±12.9 (2 fellows) to 81.0±5.7 (3 fellows; P<0.001). There was a strong annual linear growth in publications since the beginning the research fellowship position (r=0.88, P<0.001). All (100%) clinical research fellows developed strong relationships with senior surgeons, and all who applied to plastic surgery residency matched a significantly higher success rate than the national average (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing a structured cleft and craniofacial clinical research fellowship was associated with a broad impact across all cleft and craniofacial team members, as reflected by increased academic output and high match rates among fellows. The fellowship also strengthens the talent pipeline into plastic surgery by fostering meaningful mentor/mentee relationships and provides a model that can be adopted in both surgical and nonsurgical fields.

Eyeing Risks: A Critical Analysis of the Use of Periorbital Steroids in Fronto-orbital Advancement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes associated with two techniques of periorbital steroid administration in bilateral fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). DESIGN: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two high volume, tertiary US craniofacial centers. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent FOA between 2012 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into three cohorts based on method of steroid administration. Groups GEL and INJ represent those who received steroids in the form of triamcinolone soaked gelfoam or direct injection of dilute triamcinolone to the frontal/periorbital region, respectively. Group NON did not receive any periorbital steroids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Peri-operative outcomes including hospital length of stay and complications were evaluated based on method of periorbital steroid administration. Variables predictive of infectious complications were assessed using stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve patients were included in our sample (INJ:249, GEL:87, NON:76). Patients in the INJ group had a higher ASA class (P < .001) while patients in the NON group were significantly more likely to be syndromic (P < .001) and have multisuture craniosynostosis (P < .001). Rate of infectious complications for each cohort were NON: 2.6%, INJ: 4.4%, and GEL: 10.3%. There was no significant difference between groups in hospital length of stay (P = .654) or rate of post-operative infectious complications (P = .061). Increased ASA class (P = .021), increased length of stay (P = .016), and increased intraoperative narcotics (P = .011) were independent predictors of infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a dose-dependent relationship between periorbital steroids and rate of postoperative infections, with key contributions from ASA class, hospital length of stay, and dose of intraoperative narcotics.

Incomes to Outcomes: A Global Assessment of Disparities in Cleft and Craniofacial Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Recent investigations focused on health equity have enumerated widespread disparities in cleft and craniofacial care. This review introduces a structured framework to aggregate findings and direct future research. DESIGN: Systematic review was performed to identify studies assessing health disparities based on race/ethnicity, payor type, income, geography, and education in cleft and craniofacial surgery in high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models for disparities described in three or more studies. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS: Patients with cleft lip/palate, craniosynostosis, craniofacial syndromes, and craniofacial trauma. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven articles were included (80% cleft, 20% craniofacial; 48% HIC-based). Studies in HICs predominantly described disparities (77%,) and in LMICs focused on reducing disparities (42%). Level II-IV evidence replicated delays in cleft repair, alveolar bone grafting, and cranial vault remodeling for non-White and publicly insured patients in HICs (Grades A-B). Grade B-D evidence from LMICs suggested efficacy of community-based speech therapy and remote patient navigation programs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Black patients underwent craniosynostosis surgery 2.8 months later than White patients (P < .001) and were less likely to undergo minimally-invasive surgery (OR 0.36, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in cleft and craniofacial surgical treatment are consistently identified with high-level evidence among non-White and publicly-insured families in HICs. Multiple tactics to facilitate patient access and adapt multi-disciplinary case in austere settings are reported from LMICs. Future efforts including those sharing tactics among HICs and LMICs hold promise to help mitigate barriers to care.

Crowdsourcing the Impact of Illustration in Cleft Surgery Education.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) assess layperson preferences for how surgical information is presented; (2) evaluate how the format of visual information relates to layperson comfort with undergoing surgery, perceptions of surgeon character traits, and beliefs about artistic skill impacting plastic surgery practice; and (3) identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with these outcomes. DESIGN: A survey was developed in which one of five standardized sets of information depicting a unilateral cleft lip repair was presented as (1) text alone, (2) quick sketches, (3) simple drawings, (4) detailed illustrations, or (5) photographs. SETTING: Online crowdsourcing platform. PARTICIPANTS: Raters aged 18 years and older from the United States. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): After viewing the surgical information, participants answered three sets of Likert scale questions. Ratings were averaged to produce three composite scores assessing (1) comfort with undergoing surgery (2) perceptions of surgeon character traits, and (3) beliefs about plastic surgery and artistry. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-nine participants were included. Surgeon character traits score was highest among participants who viewed detailed illustrations at 4.46 ± 0.59, followed by photographs at 4.43 ± 0.54, text alone at 4.28 ± 0.59, simple drawings at 4.17 ± 0.67, and quick sketches at 4.17 ± 0.71 (p = 0.0014). Participants who viewed detailed illustrations rated surgical comfort score and plastic surgery and artistry score highest, although differences did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Viewing detailed cleft lip repair illustrations was significantly associated with positive perceptions of surgeon character traits. Our data help to contextualize methods of communication and education valued by the public when seeking cleft care.

Sociodemographic Factors Predict Long-Term Attrition from Multidisciplinary Cleft Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Identify and describe factors associated with retention and attrition of patients during longitudinal follow-up at multidisciplinary cleft clinic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single, tertiary care center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients born between 1995 and 2007 with a diagnosis of cleft palate with or without cleft lip attending multidisciplinary cleft clinic. INTERVENTIONS: None tested, observational study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age at last clinical appointment with a multidisciplinary cleft team provider. Attrition was defined as absence of an outpatient appointment following 15 years of age. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-eight patients were included. The average age at last appointment across the entire cohort was 13.1 years (IQR 6.6-17.2). Patients who were Black (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.10-2.32, p = 0.014) and other races (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.22-2.98, p = 0.004) were more likely to be lost to follow-up compared to white patients. Publicly insured patients were more likely to experience attrition than those who were privately insured (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, p = 0.030). Estimated income was not significantly associated with length of follow-up (p = 0.259). Those whose residence was in the fourth quartile of driving distance from our center experienced loss to follow-up significantly more than those who lived the closest (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.50-2.78, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of follow-up attrition among patients with cleft lip and palate. Race, insurance status, and driving distance to our center were associated with attrition in a large, retrospective cohort of patients who have reached the age of cleft clinic graduation.

Psychosocial Status and Self-Perception in Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the psychosocial status of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) relates to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 8 to 29 years attending cleft team evaluations during a 1-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CLEFT-Q. RESULTS: Patients (N = 158) with isolated or syndromic CL/P and mean age 13.4 ± 3.0 years were included. Fifteen (9%) patients had siblings who also had CL/P. Of 104 patients who met with the team psychologist, psychosocial concerns were identified in 49 (47%) patients, including 25 (24%) with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or behavior concerns, 28 (27%) with anxiety, and 14 (13%) with depression or mood concerns. Younger age and having siblings with cleft were associated with better PROs, while psychosocial concerns were associated with worse PROs on Speech, Psychosocial, and Face Appearance scales. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perception of cleft outcomes is linked to psychosocial factors.

Long-term aesthetic and photogrammetric outcomes in non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is among the most common surgical approaches for unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS), although some data demonstrate failure to achieve long-term aesthetic normalcy, leading some to seek alternative treatment paradigms such as fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO). This study compares long-term aesthetic outcomes of patients with UCS treated with FOAR and FODO. METHODS: Twenty patients (four males) with non-syndromic UCS presenting to our institution and undergoing distraction were compared to a matched cohort of 20 patients (six males) undergoing FOAR. Clinical photographs and ImageJ were used to quantify periorbital anatomy including palpebral fissures, pupil-to-brow distance (PTB), and margin-reflex distance (MRD1) in pixels. Whitaker classification was blindly assigned by craniofacial surgeons. RESULTS: Photogrammetric analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated significantly improved postoperative symmetry in distraction patients for palpebral width (p = 0.020), MRD1 (p = 0.045), and canthal tilt (p = 0.010). Average Whitaker classification scores between FOAR (1.94) and distraction (1.79) cohorts were similar (p = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS: UCS patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in periorbital symmetry, with distraction patients demonstrating superior results in palpebral width and canthal tilt. FOAR and FODO patients achieved similar Whitaker classification scores. These cohorts will be followed until craniofacial maturity prior to making any definitive conclusions.