Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 46(12): 2163-2167, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36008680

RESUMO

Despite its cardiometabolic benefits, bariatric surgery has historically been underused in patients with obesity and diabetes, but contemporary data are lacking. Among 1,520,182 patients evaluated from 2013 to 2019 within a multicenter, longitudinal, US registry of outpatients with diabetes, we found that 462,033 (30%) met eligibility for bariatric surgery. After a median follow-up of 854 days, 6310/384,859 patients (1.6%) underwent primary bariatric surgery, with a slight increase over time (0.38% per year [2013] to 0.68% per year [2018]). Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were more likely to be female (63% vs. 56%), white (87% vs. 82%), have higher body mass indices (42.1 ± 6.9 vs. 40.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2), and depression (23% vs. 14%; p < 0.001 for all). Over a median (IQR) follow-up after surgery of 722 days (364-993), patients who underwent bariatric surgery had lost an average of 11.8 ± 18.5 kg (23% of excess body weight), 10.2% were on fewer glucose-lowering medications, and 8.4% were on fewer antihypertensives. Despite bariatric surgery being safer and more accessible over the past two decades, less than one in fifty eligible patients with diabetes receive this therapy.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Redução de Peso , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Psychosom Res ; 140: 110313, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279876

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess association of chronic self-perceived stress with health status outcomes of patients with peripheral artery disease. METHODS: The PORTRAIT study is a prospective registry that enrolled 1275 patients with symptoms of peripheral artery disease across 16-sites in US, Netherlands, and Australia from June 2011 to December 2015. Demographics, comorbidities and diagnostic information was abstracted from chart review. Self-perceived stress was assessed using the 4-item perceived stress scale at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up. Scores range from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating greater stress. Sum scores were calculated at each time point and averaged to quantify average exposure to stress from enrollment through 6 months. Disease-specific health status were assessed at baseline and 12-months using the peripheral artery disease questionnaire summary score. RESULTS: The mean age of the analytical cohort (n = 1060) was 67.7 ± 9.3 years, 37.1% were females, and 82.3% were white. Comorbidities were highly prevalent with 80.9% having hypertension, 32.6% having diabetes, and 36.4% being smokers. In models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, disease severity and socioeconomic status, having a higher average stress score was associated with poorer recovery (from baseline) in peripheral artery disease questionnaire summary score at 12-months (-1.4 points per +1-point increase in averaged 4-point perceived stress score, 95% CI -2.1, -0.6 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with peripheral artery disease, experiencing higher chronic stress throughout the 6-months following their diagnosis, was independently associated with poorer recovery in 12-month disease-specific health status outcomes. (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01419080).


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Doença Arterial Periférica/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA