Serum anion gap revisited: a verified reference interval for contemporary use.

BACKGROUND: The anion gap (AG) is often used to evaluate acid-base disorders. The reference interval for normal AG is used to differentiate between raised (gap) or normal AG (non-gap) acidosis. Historically accepted AG values may not be valid with the evolution of modern analytical techniques and the reference interval requires revalidation. AIMS: To determine the reference interval for AG based on current laboratory techniques. METHODS: During a health-screening exercise, 284 participants with no major illnesses volunteered surplus blood for analysis. The samples were tested in an internationally accredited clinical laboratory. AG was calculated by [Na+ ] - [Cl- ] - [HCO3 - ] and AGK by [Na+ ] + [K+ ] - [Cl- ] - [HCO3 - ]. The reference interval was determined at 2.5th-97.5th percentiles. Analysis was further undertaken for a subcohort of 156 individuals with no suboptimal health indicators. RESULTS: Median age was 35 years, body mass index 23.4 kg/m2 and the glomerular filtration rate was 106 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Median AG was 13 mmol/L and the reference interval for normal AG is 10-18 mmol/L with a 99% level of confidence. Statistically significant differences in AG were detected for sex, race, obesity and serum albumin, but the difference was 1 mmol/L between subgroups. The reference interval was the same for the sub-cohort of 156 individuals. Median AGK was 17.7 mmol/L and reference interval was 14.6-22.5 mmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: The AG reference interval of 10-18 mmol/L is valid for laboratories with similar reference intervals for electrolytes. Lower values expected with current laboratory techniques were not observed. The median AG of 13 mmol/L may be used to differentiate gap acidosis, non-gap acidosis or mixed acid-base disorders.

Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and intervention using a single Ikari left guiding catheter for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) has been widely adopted in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients but there is limited literature on the use of a single catheter for both diagnostic angiography and intervention. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of TRI with a single Ikari left (IL) guiding catheter in STEMI patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 362 consecutive STEMI patients from August 2007 to December 2008. We assessed the feasibility of TRI with a single IL and compared this strategy with conventional transfemoral intervention (TFI) on the following outcomes: (1) door to perfusion time, (2) total procedural duration, (3) total fluoroscopy duration, and (4) major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: TRI was attempted in 185 patients. There were no failed radial cannulations. Overall success rate of primary TRI with a single IL was 96.9% and there were only 2 failures that required conversion to TFI. Compared to TFI, TRI with IL tended to a shorter median door to perfusion time, 90 (IQR 76.0 - 119.5) versus 98 (IQR 80.8 - 120.5) minutes (P = 0.07) and a shorter median procedure duration of 34 (IQR 27.0 - 45.0) versus 37 (IQR 28.0 - 49.3) minutes (P = 0.06). The median fluoroscopy duration was longer in the TRI group. MACE were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In experienced centers, TRI with a single IL catheter for STEMI is a feasible and effective approach and outcomes are comparable to conventional TFI.

Limited knowledge of chronic kidney disease among primary care patients--a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Kidney disease is the 9th leading cause of death in Singapore. While preventive effects have focused on early detection and education, little is known about the knowledge level of chronic kidney disease (CKD) locally. We seek to evaluate the knowledge of CKD among primary care patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 1520 patients from 3 primary care centers. Those with existing CKD or on dialysis were excluded. Knowledge was assessed based on 7 questions on CKD in the self-administered questionnaire. One point was given for each correct answer with a maximum of 7 points. RESULTS: 1435 completed all 7 questions on CKD. Mean age was 48.9 ± 5.0 (SD) years. 50.9% were male. 62.3% had a secondary and below education and 52.4% had a monthly household income of ≤ $2000. 43.7% had chronic diseases. Mean score was 3.44 ± 1.53 (out of a maximum of 7). Median score was 4. In multivariate logistic regression, being older {>60 years [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.50, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.32-0.79]; 40-60 years (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43,0.89)}, less educated [up to primary education (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.49)], having a lower monthly household income [

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There are concerns that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the outcomes of patients with COVID-19. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients who were on ACEIs/ARBs as compared to those not on ACEIs/ARBs. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2020 to identify all studies that evaluated the use of ACEIs/ARBs and reported the in-hospital mortality outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Nine non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The primary outcome studied was the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients who were on ACEIs/ARBs compared with those not on ACEIs/ARBs. RESULTS: Of the 8,313 patients in the nine studies, 7,622 (91.7%) were from studies with all-comers, while 691 (8.3%) were from studies involving only patients with hypertension. 577 (14.6%) in-hospital deaths were observed out of a total of 3,949 patients with an outcome in the nine studies. Overall, no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital mortality between patients on ACEIs/ARBs and those not on ACEIs/ARBs (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.50; p = 0.73). Further sensitivity analysis in the hypertension group and the all-comers group showed similar results (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.58-1.32; p = 0.53 and OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.00-3.43; p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: We observed that ACEIs/ARBs had no significant impact on the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients and can be used safely in patients with indications.

Effect of multidisciplinary intensive targeted care in improving diabetes mellitus outcomes: a randomized controlled pilot study - the Integrated Diabetes Education, Awareness and Lifestyle modification in Singapore (IDEALS) Program.

BACKGROUND: There is a global pandemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), especially in Asia. Singapore has a prevalence of T2DM at 10.5%, which is higher than the world average of 8.8%. Multiple studies have shown that multidisciplinary, team-based, coordinated care has been associated with improved measures of quality care and reduced healthcare utilization. Patients with poor glycemic control and nephropathy are at the highest risk of developing cardiovascular complications and renal failure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of intensive multidisciplinary diabetes mellitus care with patient empowerment versus routine clinical care on the rate of progression of micro and macrovascular complications and peripheral atherosclerotic burden, as measured by changes in femoral intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with persistently elevated HbA1c and nephropathy. METHODS: The study is a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two study arms - intensive diabetes mellitus care versus routine clinical care. Patients in the intensive arm will receive care from a multidisciplinary team consisting of an endocrinologist, diabetes nurse educator, dietitian, renal pharmacist and medical social worker for counselling. In addition, patients will be provided with tools for self-care empowerment such as glucometers, blood pressure monitors and android tablets to facilitate care, monitoring and education. Patients in the routine clinical care arm will receive standard clinical care. Follow up (FU) will be for 3 years. Primary outcomes include cardiovascular events, rate of progression of nephropathy and development of end-stage renal disease. Secondary endpoints include the proportions of patients with documented improved control of cardiovascular risk factors (HbA1c, blood pressure, low density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C), reduction in body weight), frequency of hypoglycemia, hospitalization days and changes in femoral IMT. We will also examine the prevalence of peripheral atherosclerosis and the predictive value and usability of lower extremity arterial ultrasound to predict cardio-cerebrovascular events, amputation and peripheral intervention. DISCUSSION: Diabetes mellitus carries significant healthcare costs. Patients with poor glycemic control and nephropathy are at highest risk of developing cardiovascular complications and renal failure. Intensive diabetes mellitus care with patient empowerment may lead to sustained glycemic control, reduction of clinical complications and progression of nephropathy, and incidence of cardiovascular complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03413215 . Registered on 29 January 2019.

Osteogenic sarcoma in children and young adults.

INTRODUCTION: More than 80% of children with osteogenic sarcoma (OS) relapse and 35% to 40% of them die within the first 2 years after diagnosis due to relapse. We investigated the incidence, treatment modalities used and the outcome of patients with OS treated in Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with OS treated in Department of Paediatrics KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) and National University Hospital (NUH) between January 1994 and June 2011 were reviewed. Chemotherapy was as per the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) and as per the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre's (MSKCC) T12 protocols. Overall and event-free (EFS) 5-year survivals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 66 patients with OS, 19 (29%) of them presented with metastatic OS. The median age of diagnosis was 12.1 years with 5-year overall survival of 61.7% (95% CI, 48.1 to 75.3). The 5-year overall survival for those with non-metastatic and metastatic OS was 73.1% (95% CI, 58.1 to 88.1) and 34.7% (95% CI, 8.7 to 60.7, P=0.007) respectively. The 5-year overall survival for those treated as per the MSKCC T12 and EOI was 72.4% (95% CI, 52.6 to 92.2) and 54.3% (95% CI, 36.3 to 72.3, P=0.087) respectively. After controlling for confounding factors, patients with non-metastatic OS had higher 5-year EFS (HR, 0.228, 95% CI, 0.096 to 0.541, P=0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.294, 95% CI, 0.121 to 0.713, P=0.007) compared to those with metastatic OS. Non-metastatic OS patients treated as per EOI regimen had lower 5-year EFS (HR, 2.397, 95% CI, 1.012 to 6.678, P=0.047) compared to those treated per MSKCC T12 regimen. CONCLUSION: Multidrug combination chemotherapy including high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and a multidisciplinary team approach introduced in 2003 in Singapore is well tolerated and can be safely delivered. The survival benefit between the 2 regimens still needs to be explored.

Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: To validate EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaires and to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of women with breast cancer in Singapore during their first 4 years of post-diagnosis and treatments. METHODS: A quantitative and cross-descriptive sectional study. All of 170 subjects were recruited in a Singapore tertiary cancer center. The European Organization for Research and Treatment-QOL questionnaire and breast cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23) were used to measure the HRQOL among women with breast cancer. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS Version 18. The reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires was examined using Cronbach's alpha test. EORTC QLQ-C30 was validated against EuroQol Group's 5-domain questionnaires (EQ5D) by examining its concurrent validity using Pearson Product Moment Correlation to calculate the total scores. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient results for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ BR-23 were 0.846 and 0.873 respectively which suggested relatively good internal consistency. The correlation between EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ5D QOL instruments demonstrated a modest linear relationship (r=0.597; P<0.001) that indicated a moderately strong correlation between the two measures. The study showed that Singaporean women with breast cancer had enjoyed high levels of HRQOL during their first 4 years of survivorship but they had significant concern over the financial impact of breast cancer. One of the key findings was younger women had experienced more physical and psychosocial concerns than older women. CONCLUSION: The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires are feasible and promising instruments to measure the levels of HRQOL in Singaporean women with breast cancer in future studies.

Borderline viability--neonatal outcomes of infants in Singapore over a period of 18 years (1990 - 2007).

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the trends and predictors of mortality and morbidity in infants of gestational age (GA) <27 weeks from 1990 to 2007. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of infant deliveries between 1990 and 2007 in the largest perinatal centre in Singapore. This is a study of infants born at <27 weeks in 2 Epochs (Epoch 1 (E1):1990 to 1998, Epoch 2 (E2):1999 to 2007) using logistic regression models to identify factors associated with mortality and composite morbidity. The main outcomes that were measured were the trends and predictors of mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight out of 615 (66.3%) live born infants at 22 to 26 weeks survived to discharge. Survival improved with increasing GA from 22% (13/59) at 23 weeks to 87% (192/221) at 26 weeks (P <0.01). Survival rates were not different between E1 and E2, (61.5% vs 68.8%). In logistic regression analysis, higher survival was independently associated with increasing GA and birthweight, while airleaks, severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) contributed to increased mortality. Rates of major neonatal morbidities were bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (45%), sepsis (35%), severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (31%), severe IVH/ periventricular leucomalacie (PVL) (19%) and NEC (10%). Although composite morbidity comprising any of the above was not significantly different between the 2 Epochs (75% vs 73%) a decreasing trend was seen with increasing GA (P <0.001). Composite morbidity/ mortality was significantly lower at 26 weeks (58%) compared to earlier gestations (P <0.001, OR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.48) and independently associated with decreasing GA and birth weight, male sex, hypotension, presence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and airleaks. CONCLUSION: Increasing survival and decreasing composite morbidity was seen with each increasing week in gestation with marked improvement seen at 26 weeks. Current data enables perinatal care decisions and parental counselling.

The health-related quality of life of junior doctors.

INTRODUCTION: It is reported that junior doctors experience a large amount of work related stress and fatigue which has detrimental effects on their well-being and patient safety. We seek to determine the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) of junior doctors using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and compare their HR-QoL with that of populations of norms and senior doctors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SF-36v2 (Singapore version) was self-administered to a convenience sample of 213 doctors from a large tertiary teaching hospital. Junior doctors were defined as those less than 30 years of age (48%). Adjusted normative values were derived from the SF-36 Norms for the Singapore General Population Calculator for all 8 scales. The mean score differences between junior doctors and their adjusted normative values as well as that for senior doctors were computed and contrasted. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-fi ve doctors fully responded. Their mean age was 33.6 years (SD 8.1). Also, 45% were female and 88% were Chinese. Junior doctors had lower scores than senior doctors in all scales except Physical Functioning. After adjustment for gender and race, junior doctors had statistically significant lower Mental Health scores than senior doctors (P = 0.01). Compared with the normative population, junior doctors scored lower in all domains except for Physical Functioning. For Vitality, the difference is - 14.9. CONCLUSION: Junior doctors have poorer mental health scores compared to senior doctors. Also, the lower vitality scores suggest that junior doctors are more likely to be fatigued than their normative population. More studies and efforts will be needed to identify factors that affect the quality of life in junior doctors and to evaluate the most appropriate measures to improve the efficiency of their work.