Depressive symptoms and smoking cessation after hospitalization for cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Although smoking cessation is essential for prevention of secondary cardiovascular disease (CVD), many smokers do not stop smoking after hospitalization. Mild depressive symptoms are common during hospitalization for CVD. We hypothesized that depressive symptoms measured during hospitalization for acute CVD would predict return to smoking after discharge from the hospital. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of data from a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of bupropion hydrochloride therapy in 245 smokers hospitalized for acute CVD. All subjects received smoking counseling in the hospital and for 12 weeks after discharge. Depressive symptoms were measured during hospitalization with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and smoking cessation was biochemically validated at 2-week, 12-week, and 1-year follow-up. The effect of depressive symptoms on smoking cessation was assessed using multiple logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of smokers had moderate to severe depressive symptoms (BDI >or= 16) during hospitalization. These smokers were more likely to resume smoking by 4 weeks after discharge (P= .007; incidence rate ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.78) than were smokers with lower BDI scores. Smokers with low BDI scores were more likely to remain abstinent than were those with high BDI scores at 3-month follow-up (37% vs 15%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.09) and 1-year follow-up (27% vs 10%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-10.82). We estimate that 27% of the effect of the BDI score on smoking cessation was mediated by nicotine withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe depressive symptoms during hospitalization for acute CVD are independently associated with rapid relapse to smoking after discharge and lower rates of smoking cessation at long-term follow-up. The relationship was mediated in part by the stronger nicotine withdrawal symptoms experienced by smokers with higher depressive symptoms.

Bupropion for smokers hospitalized with acute cardiovascular disease.

PURPOSE: Smoking cessation after myocardial infarction reduces cardiovascular mortality, but many smokers cannot quit despite state-of-the-art counseling intervention. Bupropion is effective for smoking cessation, but its safety and efficacy in hospitalized smokers with acute cardiovascular disease is unknown. METHODS: A five-hospital randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of sustained-release bupropion (300 mg) or placebo in 248 smokers admitted for acute cardiovascular disease, primarily myocardial infarction and unstable angina. All subjects had smoking counseling in the hospital and for 12 weeks after discharge. Cotinine-validated 7-day tobacco abstinence, cardiovascular mortality, and new cardiovascular events were assessed at 3 months (end-of-treatment) and 1 year. RESULTS: Validated tobacco abstinence rates in bupropion and placebo groups were 37.1% vs 26.8% (OR 1.61, 95% CI, 0.94-2.76; P=.08) at 3 months and 25.0% vs 21.3% (OR, 1.23, 95% CI, 0.68-2.23, P=.49) at 1 year. The adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for cigarettes per day, depression symptoms, prior bupropion use, hypertension, and length of stay, was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.06-3.40, P=.03) at 3 months and 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81-2.83) at 1 year. Bupropion and placebo groups did not differ in cardiovascular mortality at 1 year (0% vs 2%), in blood pressure at follow-up, or in cardiovascular events at end-of-treatment (16% vs 14%, incidence rate ratio [IRR]1.22 (95% CI: 0.64-2.33) or 1 year (26% vs 18%, IRR 1.56, 95% CI 0.91-2.69). CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion improved short-term but not long-term smoking cessation rates over intensive counseling and appeared to be safe in hospitalized smokers with acute cardiovascular disease.

Developing and implementing universal guidelines for oral patient presentation skills.

BACKGROUND: Oral case presentations are important for patient care and clinical education. Previously published attempts to improve oral presentation skills have been labor intensive and have focused primarily on medical students. DESCRIPTION: We created a multifaceted intervention to improve oral case presentations of medical students and internal medicine residents. Our intervention included a written handout with detailed instructions, pocket cards, model presentations, and multiple teaching sessions. The intervention was developed by consensus, supported by the department of medicine and endorsed by key faculty within the department. In addition to soliciting feedback from students and residents, we evaluated our intervention with prospectively acquired ratings of student oral case presentation skills recorded on a standardized evaluation for the internal medicine clerkship. EVALUATION: Students, residents, and faculty gave positive feedback, although they noted some practical obstacles to effective oral case presentations. After dissemination of the guidelines, 44% of students (42/96) were rated as "excellent" in oral presentation skills on standardized evaluations of the internal medicine clerkship, compared to 30% in the previous academic year (33/111; odds ratio [OR]=1.8, 95% confidence interval=1.04-3.3; p=.036). CONCLUSION: A multifaceted intervention improved medical student oral case presentation skills. Although participants noted barriers that need further attention, we demonstrated modest improvement in student performance.