Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minerva Med ; 104(4): 421-9, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24008604

RESUMO

AIM: Aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorders (ILR) of two successive generations for the assessment of syncope. METHODS: Data on patients who had undergone ILR implantation for unexplained syncope in four Italian public hospitals were retrospectively acquired from the Medtronic Clinical Service database. After implantation, routine follow-up examinations were performed every 90 days, while urgent examinations were carried out in the event of syncope recurrence. RESULTS: The following findings were regarded as diagnostic: ECG documentation of a syncope recurrence; documentation of any of the arrhythmias listed by the current guidelines as diagnostic findings even if asymptomatic. Between November 2002 and March 2010, 107 patients received an ILR (40 Medtronic Reveal® Plus; 67 Medtronic Reveal® DX/XT) and underwent at least one follow-up examination. Diagnoses were made in 7 (17.5%) and 24 (35.8%) (P=0.043) patients, with a median time of 228 and 65 days, respectively. Three (42.9%) and 21 (87.5%) (P=0.029) diagnoses were based on automatically detected events, while adverse outcomes occurred in 6 and in 1 (P=0.01) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the new-generation device offer a higher diagnostic yield, mainly as a result of its improved automatic detection function, and is associated with fewer adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Eletrodos Implantados , Síncope/diagnóstico , Idoso , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicações , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síncope/etiologia , Síncope/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo
2.
ESMO Open ; 7(4): 100536, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849879

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have completely reshaped the treatment of many malignancies, with remarkable improvements in survival outcomes. In ovarian cancer (OC), however, this emerging class of drugs has not yet found a favorable use due to results from phase I and II studies, which have not suggested a substantial antitumoral activity of these agents when administered as monotherapy. Robust preclinical data seem to suggest that the combination ICIs with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) may result in a synergistic activity; furthermore, data from phase II clinical studies, evaluating this combination, have shown encouraging outcomes especially for those OC patients not suitable for platinum retreatment. While waiting for ongoing phase III clinical trial results, which will clarify the role of ICIs in combination with PARPis in the newly diagnosed OC, this review aims to summarize the preclinical data and clinical evidence available to date.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA