RESUMO
Over 2.5 million gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) every year. Procedures are carried out with local anaesthetic r with sedation. Sedation is commonly used for gastrointestinal endoscopy, but the type and amount of sedation administered is influenced by the complexity and nature of the procedure and patient factors. The elective and emergency nature of endoscopy procedures and local resources also have a significant impact on the delivery of sedation. In the UK, the vast majority of sedated procedures are carried out using benzodiazepines, with or without opiates, whereas deeper sedation using propofol or general anaesthetic requires the involvement of an anaesthetic team. Patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy need to have good understanding of the options for sedation, including the option for no sedation and alternatives, balancing the intended aims of the procedure and reducing the risk of complications. These guidelines were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Endoscopy Committee with input from major stakeholders, to provide a detailed update, incorporating recent advances in sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.This guideline covers aspects from pre-assessment of the elective 'well' patient to patients with significant comorbidity requiring emergency procedures. Types of sedation are discussed, procedure and room requirements and the recovery period, providing guidance to enhance safety and minimise complications. These guidelines are intended to inform practising clinicians and all staff involved in the delivery of gastrointestinal endoscopy with an expectation that this guideline will be revised in 5-years' time.
Assuntos
Gastroenterologia , Propofol , Humanos , Sedação Consciente , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , BenzodiazepinasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This national analysis aimed to calculate the diagnostic yield from gastroscopy for common symptoms, guiding improved resource utilisation. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted of diagnostic gastroscopies between 1 March 2019 and 29 February 2020 using the UK National Endoscopy Database. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used, incorporating random (endoscopist) and fixed (symptoms, age and sex) effects on two dependent variables (endoscopic cancer; Barrett's oesophagus (BO) diagnosis). Adjusted positive predictive values (aPPVs) were calculated. RESULTS: 382 370 diagnostic gastroscopies were analysed; 30.4% were performed in patients aged <50 and 57.7% on female patients. The overall unadjusted PPV for cancer was 1.0% (males 1.7%; females 0.6%, p<0.01). Other major pathology was found in 9.1% of procedures, whereas 89.9% reported only normal findings or minor pathology (92.5% in females; 94.6% in patients <50).Highest cancer aPPVs were reached in the over 50s (1.3%), in those with dysphagia (3.0%) or weight loss plus another symptom (1.4%). Cancer aPPVs for all other symptoms were below 1%, and for those under 50, remained below 1% regardless of symptom. Overall, 73.7% of gastroscopies were carried out in patient groups where aPPV cancer was <1%.The overall unadjusted PPV for BO was 4.1% (males 6.1%; females 2.7%, p<0.01). The aPPV for BO for reflux was 5.8% and ranged from 3.2% to 4.0% for other symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer yield was highest in elderly male patients, and those over 50 with dysphagia. Three-quarters of all gastroscopies were performed on patients whose cancer risk was <1%, suggesting inefficient resource utilisation.
Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett , Bases de Dados Factuais , Gastroscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Gastroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Idoso , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnósticoRESUMO
Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Esofagoscopia/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Progressão da Doença , Fatores de Risco , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/terapia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify LNM risk and outcomes following treatment of early esophago-gastric (EG) adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND: The standard of care for early T1N0 EG cancer is endoscopic resection (ER). Radical surgical resection is recommended for patients perceived to be at risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Current models to select organ-preserving vs. surgical treatment are inconsistent. METHODS: CONGRESS is a UK-based multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical or pathological T1N0 EG adenocarcinoma from 2015-2022 were included. Outcomes and rates of LNM were assessed. Cox regression was performed to assess the impact of prognostic and treatment factors on overall survival. RESULTS: 1,601 patients from 26 centres were included, with median follow-up 32 months(IQR 14-53). 1285/1612(80.3%) underwent ER, 497/1601(31.0%) underwent surgery. Overall rate of LNM was 13.5%. On ER staging, tumour depth (T1bsm2-3 17.6% vs. T1a 7.1%), lymphovascular invasion (17.2% vs. 12.6%), or signet cells (28.6% vs. 13.0%) were associated with LNM. In multivariable regression analysis, these were not significantly associated with LNM rates or survival. Adjusting for demographic and tumour variables, surgery after ER was associated with significant survival benefit, HR 0.33(0.15-0.77),P=0.010. CONCLUSION: This large multicentre dataset suggests that early EG adenocarcinoma is associated with significant risk of LNM. This data is representative of current real clinical practice with ER-based staging, and suggests previously held beliefs regarding reliability of predictive factors for LNM may need to be reconsidered. Further research to identify patients who may benefit from organ-preserving vs. surgical treatment is urgently required.
RESUMO
Background & Study Aims The study investigates the application of Duty of Candour (DoC) legislation in the context of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs). DoC mandates transparent disclosure of notifiable safety incidents to patients in the English National Health Service, including those leading to severe or moderate harm. This study aims to analyse the application of DoC in PCCRCs, improve understanding of the legislation and identify challenges in its implementation. Patients & Methods A national audit of PCCRCs was conducted between September 2021 to May 2022. PCCRCs were identified using linked administrative datasets and root-cause analyses were performed using a structured template. 1,724 PCCRCs were included. 'Avoidability' and harm categorised into specific levels, with guidance provided to improve consistency in judgments. Results 16% of PCCRCs resulted in major harm or death, of which 27%(75) were at least probably avoidable. Hospitals deemed DoC discharge necessary in only 53% of these cases. When including moderate harm, 11% of all PCCRCs would trigger DoC discharge, yet this was deemed necessary in only 41% of these cases. Conclusions There is inconsistent application of DoC in PCCRC cases. Challenges include determining 'avoidability' and harm, particularly when there is a delay in diagnosis. Clearer guidance and definitions of harm are needed to improve adherence to regulations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) is an important key performance indicator for endoscopy quality. We examined variation in PEUGIC rates among endoscopy providers in England and explored associated factors. METHODS: The was a population-based, retrospective, case-control study, examining data from National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service and Hospital Episode Statistics databases for esophageal and gastric cancers diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 in England. PEUGIC were cancers diagnosed 6 to 36 months after an endoscopy that did not diagnose cancer. Associated factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The national PEUGIC rate was 8.5%, varying from 5% to 13% among endoscopy providers. Factors associated with PEUGIC included: female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 [95%CI 1.23-1.36]); younger age (age >80 years, OR 0.52 [0.48-0.56], compared with ≤60 years); increasing comorbidity (Charlson score >4, OR 5.06 [4.45-5.76]); history of esophageal ulcer (OR 3.30 [3.11-3.50]), Barrett's esophagus (OR 3.21 [3.02-3.42]), esophageal stricture (OR 1.28 [1.20-1.37]), or gastric ulcer (OR 1.55 [1.44-1.66]); squamous cell carcinoma (OR 1.50 [1.39-1.61]); and UK national endoscopy accreditation status - providers requiring improvement (OR 1.10 [1.01-1.20]), providers never assessed (OR 1.24 [1.04-1.47]). CONCLUSION: PEUGIC rates varied threefold among endoscopy providers, suggesting unwarranted differences in endoscopy quality. PEUGIC was associated with endoscopy findings known to be associated with upper gastrointestinal cancer and a lack of national endoscopy provider accreditation. PEUGIC variations suggest an opportunity to raise performance standards to detect upper gastrointestinal cancers earlier and improve outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for overall survival after esophagectomy using pre/postoperative clinical data and machine learning. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with esophageal cancer, accurately predicting long-term survival after esophagectomy is challenging. This study investigated survival prediction after esophagectomy using a RandomSurvival Forest (RSF) model derived from routine data from a large, well-curated, national dataset. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2018 in England and Wales who underwent an esophagectomy were included. Prediction models for overall survival were developed using the RSF method and Cox regression from 41 patient and disease characteristics. Calibration and discrimination (time-dependent area under the curve) were validated internally using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: The study analyzed 6399 patients, with 2625 deaths during follow-up. Median follow-up was 41 months. Overall survival was 47.1% at 5 years. The final RSF model included 14 variables and had excellent discrimination with a 5-year time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve of 83.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.6%-84.9%], compared to 82.3% (95% CI 81.1%-83.3%) for the Cox model. The most important variables were lymph node involvement, pT stage, circumferential resection margin involvement (tumor at < 1 mm from cut edge) and age. There was a wide range of survival estimates even within TNM staging groups, with quintiles of prediction within Stage 3b ranging from 12.2% to 44.7% survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An RSF model for long-term survival after esophagectomy exhibited excellent discrimination and well-calibrated predictions. At a patient level, it provides more accuracy than TNM staging alone and could help in the delivery of tailored treatment and follow-up.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA) captures patient data from diagnosis to end of primary treatment for all patients with oesophagogastric (OG) cancer in England and Wales. This study assessed changes in patient characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes for OG cancer surgery for the period 2012-2020, and examined which factors may have led to changes in clinical outcomes over this time. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with OG cancer between April 2012 and March 2020 were included. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics, disease site, type, and stage, patterns of care, and outcomes over time. The treatment variables of unit case volume, surgical approach, and neoadjuvant therapy were included. Regression models were used to examine associations between surgical outcomes (duration of stay and mortality), and patient and treatment variables. RESULTS: In total, 83 393 patients diagnosed with OG cancer during the study period were included. Patient demographics and cancer stage at diagnosis showed little change over time. Altogether, 17 650 patients underwent surgery as part of radical treatment. These patients had increasingly more advanced cancers, and a greater likelihood of pre-existing comorbidity in more recent years. Significant decreases in mortality rates and duration of stay were noted, along with improvements in oncological outcomes (nodal yields and margin positivity rates). Following adjustment for patient and treatment variables, increasing audit year and trust volume were associated, respectively, with improved postoperative outcomes: lower 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.93 (95 per cent c.i. 0.88 to 0.98) and OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99-0.99)) and lower 90-day mortality (OR 0.94 (95 per cent c.i. 0.91 to 0.98) and OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99-0.99)), and a reduction in duration of postoperative stay (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.98 (95 per cent c.i. 0.97 to 0.98) and IRR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99 to 0.99)). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of OG cancer surgery have improved over time, despite little evidence of improvements in early diagnosis. The underlying drivers for improvements in outcome are multifactorial.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , País de Gales/epidemiologia , Cárdia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , EsofagectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND : Missing upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) at endoscopy may prevent curative treatment. We have developed a root cause analysis system for potentially missed UGICs at endoscopy (post-endoscopy UGIC [PEUGIC]) to establish the most plausible explanations. METHODS : The electronic records of patients with UGIC at two National Health Service providers were examined. PEUGICs were defined as UGICs diagnosed 6-36 months after an endoscopy that did not diagnose cancer. An algorithm based on the World Endoscopy Organization post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer algorithm was developed to categorize and identify potentially avoidable PEUGICs. RESULTS : Of 1327 UGICs studied, 89 (6.7â%) were PEUGICs (patient median [IQR] age at endoscopy 73.5 (63.5-81.0); 60.7â% men). Of the PEUGICs, 40â% were diagnosed in patients with Barrett's esophagus. PEUGICs were categorized as: A - lesion detected, adequate assessment and decision-making, but PEUGIC occurred (16.9â%); B - lesion detected, inadequate assessment or decision-making (34.8â%); C - possible missed lesion, endoscopy and decision-making adequate (8.9â%); D - possible missed lesion, endoscopy or decision-making inadequate (33.7â%); E - deviated from management pathway but appropriate (5.6â%); F - deviated inappropriately from management pathway (3.4â%). The majority of PEUGICs (71â%) were potentially avoidable and in 45â% the cancer outcome could have been different if it had been diagnosed on the initial endoscopy. There was a negative correlation between endoscopists' mean annual number of endoscopies and the technically attributable PEUGIC rate (correlation coefficient -0.57; Pâ=â0.004). CONCLUSION : Missed opportunities to avoid PEUGIC were identified in 71â% of cases. Root cause analysis can standardize future investigation of PEUGIC and guide quality improvement efforts.
Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Análise de Causa Fundamental , Medicina Estatal , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/etiologiaRESUMO
AIM: Surgery is required for most patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and further surgery may be necessary if medical treatment fails to control disease activity. The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of, and factors associated with, further surgery following a first resection for Crohn's disease. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics from England were examined to identify patients with CD and a first recorded bowel resection between 2007 and 2016. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for further resectional surgery within 5 years. Prevalence-adjusted surgical rates for index CD surgery over the study period were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 19 207 patients (median age 39 years, interquartile range 27-53 years; 55% women) with CD underwent a first recorded resection during the study period. 3141 (16%) underwent a further operation during the study period. The median time to further surgery was 2.4 (interquartile range 1.2-4.6) years. 3% of CD patients had further surgery within 1 year, 14% by 5 years and 23% by 10 years. Older age (≥58), index laparoscopic surgery and index elective surgery (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.54-0.77; 0.77, 0.67-0.88; and 0.77, 0.69-0.85; respectively) were associated with a reduced risk of further surgery by 5 years. Prior surgery for perianal disease (1.60, 1.37-1.87), an extraintestinal manifestation of CD (1.51, 1.22-1.86) and index surgery in a high-volume centre for CD surgery (1.20, 1.02-1.40) were associated with an increased risk of further surgery by 5 years. A 25% relative and 0.3% absolute reduction in prevalence-adjusted index surgery rates for CD was observed over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Further surgery following an index operation is common in CD. This risk was particularly seen in patients with perianal disease, extraintestinal manifestations and those who underwent index surgery in a high-volume centre.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Inglaterra/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE. METHODS: The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance. RESULTS: Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS: These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.
Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica , Gastroenterologia , Adulto , Criança , Consenso , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Perioperative chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGAC) with a substantial survival benefit over surgery alone. However, the postoperative part of these regimens is given in less than half of patients, reflecting uncertainty among clinicians about its benefit and poor postoperative patient fitness. This study estimated the effect of postoperative chemotherapy after surgery for OGAC using a large population-based data set. METHODS: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction or stomach diagnosed between 2012 and 2018, who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, were identified from a national-level audit in England and Wales. Postoperative therapy was defined as the receipt of systemic chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery. The effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy compared with observation was estimated using inverse propensity treatment weighting. RESULTS: Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 1593 of 4139 patients (38.5 per cent) included in the study. Almost all patients received platinum-based triplet regimens (4004 patients, 96.7 per cent), with FLOT used in 3.3 per cent. Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy were younger, with a lower ASA grade, and were less likely to have surgical complications, with similar tumour characteristics. After weighting, the median survival time after postoperative chemotherapy was 62.7 months compared with 50.4 months without chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.77 to 0.94; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that postoperative chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with OGAC treated with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Junção Esofagogástrica , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: PEG has been associated with poor case selection and high mortality. We examined indications, 30-day mortality, and 7-day adverse events in a national cohort undergoing PEG tube insertion. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing their first PEG tube insertion from 2007 to 2019 were identified in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Indications and adverse events were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision codes. Multivariable logistic regression modeling examined factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Of 87,682 patients identified, 58% were men and median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 57-79). The number of patients with dementia or stroke as the indication for PEG fell from 2007 to 2019 (dementia, from 147 to 28 [P < .001]; stroke, from 2851 to 1781 [P < .001]). The median interval from stroke admission to PEG tube insertion increased from 21 (interquartile range, 12-36) to 28 (interquartile range, 13-45) days (P < .001). Aspiration pneumonia within 7 days of PEG fell from 10.2% to 8.6% (P = .04). Thirty-day mortality fell from 13.2% to 5.3% (P < .001), with associated factors of increasing age (≥82 years quintile odds ratio [OR], 4.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.01-4.92), PEG tube insertion during emergency admission (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.97-2.25), Charlson comorbidity score ≥5 (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.53-1.82), and dementia (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.71). Female sex (OR, .81; 95% CI, .77-.85), least-deprived quintile (OR, .88; 95% CI, .81-.95), and more recent years of PEG tube insertion (2019; OR, .44; 95% CI, .39-.51) were negatively associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day mortality after PEG tube insertion has fallen 60% over 13 years. Dementia or stroke as an indication for PEG fell, and the time interval from stroke to PEG tube insertion increased. These findings may be attributable to improved patient selection and timing for PEG tube insertion.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Demência , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nutrição Enteral , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
BACKGROUND : Data are limited regarding pancreatic cancer diagnosed following a pancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) that does not diagnose pancreatic cancer. We have studied the frequency of, and factors associated with, post-EUS pancreatic cancer (PEPC) and 1-year mortality. METHODS : Between 2010 and 2017, patients with pancreatic cancer and a preceding pancreaticobiliary EUS were identified in a national cohort using Hospital Episode Statistics. Patients with a pancreaticobiliary EUS 6-18 months before a later pancreatic cancer diagnosis were the PEPC cases; controls were those with pancreatic cancer diagnosed within 6 months of pancreaticobiliary EUS. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the factors associated with PEPC and a Cox regression model examined factors associated with 1-year cumulative mortality. RESULTS : 9363 pancreatic cancer patients were studied; 93.5â% identified as controls (men 53.2â%; median age 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-75]); 6.5â% as PEPC cases (men 58.2â%; median age 69 [IQR 61-77]). PEPC was associated with older age (≥â75 years compared with <â65 years, odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95â%CI 1.15-1.76), increasing co-morbidity (Charlson co-morbidity score >â5, OR 1.90, 95â%CI 1.49-2.43), chronic pancreatitis (OR 3.13, 95â%CI 2.50-3.92), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.58, 95â%CI 1.31-1.90). Metal biliary stents (OR 0.57, 95â%CI 0.38-0.86) and EUS-FNA (OR 0.49, 95â%CI 0.41-0.58) were inversely associated with PEPC. PEPC was associated with a higher cumulative mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio 1.12, 95â%CI 1.02-1.24), with only 14â% of PEPC patients (95â%CI 12â%-17â%) having a surgical resection, compared with 21â% (95â%CI 20â%-22â%) of controls. CONCLUSIONS : PEPC occurred in 6.5â% of patients and was associated with chronic pancreatitis, older age, more co-morbidities, and specifically diabetes mellitus. PEPC was associated with a worse prognosis and lower surgical resection rates.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatite Crônica , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico , Endossonografia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Case reports describe individuals with achalasia features subsequently diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (an atopic disorder). We have examined associations between achalasia and atopic and autoimmune conditions. METHODS: This is a UK cohort study of 2,593 subjects with achalasia matched to 10,402 controls. RESULTS: At diagnosis, achalasia was associated with autoimmune conditions (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.90) and atopic conditions (1.40; 1.00-1.95) in those aged younger than 40 years. DISSCUSSION: Our findings support an autoimmune etiology in achalasia but also suggest a possible atopic etiology in younger subjects.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Acalasia Esofágica/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency with significant mortality. Despite developments in endoscopic and clinical management, only minor improvements in outcomes have been reported. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with non-malignant UGIB emergency admissions in England between 2003 and 2015, using Hospital Episode Statistics. Multilevel logistic regression analysis examined the associations with mortality. RESULTS: 242 796 patients with an UGIB admission were identified (58.8â% men; median age 70 [interquartile range (IQR) 53â-â81]). Between 2003 and 2015, falls occurred in both 30-day mortality (7.5â% to 7.0â%; Pâ<â0.001) and age-standardized mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95â% confidence interval [CI] 0.69â-â0.80; Pâ<â0.001), including from variceal bleeding (OR 0.63, 95â%CI 0.45â-â0.87; Pâ<â0.005). Increasing co-morbidity (Charlson score >â5, OR 2.94, 95â%CI 2.85â-â3.04; Pâ<â0.001), older age (>â83 years, OR 6.50, 95â%CI 6.09â-â6.94; Pâ<â0.001), variceal bleeding (OR 2.03, 95â%CI 1.89â-â2.18; Pâ<â0.001), and a weekend admission (Sunday, OR 1.18, 95â%CI 1.12â-â1.23; Pâ<â0.001) were associated with 30-day mortality. Of deaths at 30 days, 8.9â% were from ischemic heart disease (IHD) and the cardiovascular age-standardized mortality rate following UGIB was high (IHD deaths within 1 year, 1188.4 [95â%CI 1036.8â-â1353.8] per 100 000 men in 2003). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2003 and 2015, 30-day mortality among emergency admissions with non-malignant UGIB fell by 0.5â% to 7.0â%. Mortality was higher among UGIB admissions at the weekend, with important implications for service provision. Patients with UGIB had a much greater risk of subsequently dying from cardiovascular disease and addressing this risk is a key management step in UGIB.
Assuntos
Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas , Idoso , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To consider the provision of post-radical prostatectomy (RP) continence surgery in England. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an Office of Population Census and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures, version 4 code for an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) or male sling between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018 were searched for within the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset. Those without previous RP were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions for repeat AUS and sling procedures were built in stata. Further descriptive analysis of provision of procedures was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1414 patients had received index AUS, 10.3% of whom had undergone prior radiotherapy; their median follow-up was 3.55 years. The sling cohort contained 816 patients; 6.7% of these had received prior radiotherapy and the median follow-up was 3.23 years. Whilst the number of AUS devices implanted had increased each year, male slings peaked in 2014/2015. AUS redo/removal was performed in 11.2% of patients. Patients in low-volume centres were more likely to require redo/removal (odds ratio [OR] 2.23 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.86; P = 0.045). A total of 12.0% patients with a sling progressed to AUS implantation and 1.3% had a second sling. Patients with previous radiotherapy were more likely to require a second operation (OR 2.03 95% CI 1.01-4.06; P = 0.046). Emergency re-admissions within 30 days of index operation were 3.9% and 3.6% fewer in high-volume centres, for AUS and slings respectively. The median time to initial continence surgery from RP was 2.8 years. Increased time from RP conferred no reduced risk of redo surgery for either procedure. CONCLUSION: There is a volume effect for outcomes of AUS procedures, suggesting that they should only be performed in high-volume centres. Given the known impact of incontinence on quality of life, patients should be referred sooner for post-prostatectomy continence surgery.
Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Prostatectomia , Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inglaterra , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is common in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Preoperative traditional techniques such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) or barium swallow/esophagram do not always correlate with intraoperative findings. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has shown a higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional techniques in non-obese patients in the HH diagnosis, whereas there is a lack of data in the morbidly obese population. We aimed to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRM in HH detection, in comparison with barium swallow and UGIE, assuming intraoperative diagnosis as a standard of reference. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive morbidly obese patients prospectively recruited from a tertiary-care referral hospital devoted to bariatric and metabolic surgery underwent a preoperative evaluation including standardized GERD questionnaires, barium swallow, UGIE, and HRM. The surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the results of other investigations. RESULTS: HH was intraoperatively diagnosed in 11/41 patients (26.8%). In 10/11 patients, the preoperative HRM showed an esophagogastric junction suggestive of HH. When compared to intraoperative evaluation, the sensitivity of the HRM was 90.9% and the specificity 63.3%, with a positive predictive value of 47.6% and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. HRM showed a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to barium swallow and UGIE. CONCLUSIONS: HRM has a high accuracy of HH detection in morbidly obese patients assuming an intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard. It could therefore be a very useful tool in the preoperative work-up of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Hérnia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Manometria , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Junção Esofagogástrica , Feminino , Hérnia Hiatal/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Valores de Referência , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is a disorder characterised by failed relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter. The aim of this study was to examine, at a national level, the long-term outcomes of achalasia therapies. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics include diagnostic and procedural data for all English National Health Service-funded hospital admissions. Subjects with a code for achalasia who had their initial treatment between January 2006 and December 2015 were grouped by treatment; pneumatic dilatation (PD) or surgical Heller's myotomy (HM). Procedural failure was defined as time to a further episode of the same therapy or a change to a different therapy. Up to three PDs were permitted without being considered a therapy failure. RESULTS: 6938 subjects were included; 3619 (52.2%) were men and median age at diagnosis was 59 (IQR 43-75) years. 4748 (68.4%) initially received PD and 2190 (31.6%) HM. The perforation rate following PD was 1.6%. Mortality at 30 days was 0.0% for HM and 1.9% for PD, and <8% after perforation following PD. Factors associated with increased mortality after PD included age quintile 66-77 (OR 4.55 (95% CI 2.00 to 10.38), p<0.001), >77 (9.78 (4.33 to 22.06), p<0.001); Charlson comorbidity score >4 (2.87 (2.08 to 3.95), p<0.001); previous HM (2.47 (1.33 to 4.62), p<0.001); and repeat PD 1-3 (1.58 (1.15 to 2.16), p=0.005), >3 (1.97 (1.21 to 3.19), p=0.006). Durability of up to 3 PD and HM over 10 years of follow-up was 86.2% and 81.9%, respectively (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: The efficacy of PD for achalasia appears to be greater than HM over 10 years. There was no mortality associated with HM, but 1.9% of subjects died within 30 days of PD. Mortality was associated with increasing age, comorbidity, previous HM and repeat PD.
Assuntos
Dilatação/estatística & dados numéricos , Acalasia Esofágica/cirurgia , Miotomia de Heller/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Acalasia Esofágica/etiologia , Acalasia Esofágica/mortalidade , Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior , Feminino , Miotomia de Heller/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Achalasia is an uncommon condition characterised by failed lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. Data regarding its incidence, prevalence, disease associations and long-term outcomes are very limited. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) include demographic and diagnostic data for all English hospital attendances. The Health Improvement Network (THIN) includes the primary care records of 4.5 million UK subjects, representative of national demographics. Both were searched for incident cases between 2006 and 2016 and THIN for prevalent cases. Subjects with achalasia in THIN were compared with age, sex, deprivation tand smoking status matched controls for important comorbidities and mortality. RESULTS: There were 10 509 and 711 new achalasia diagnoses identified in HES and THIN, respectively. The mean incidence per 100 000 people in HES was 1.99 (95% CI 1.87 to 2.11) and 1.53 (1.42 to 1.64) per 100 000 person-years in THIN. The prevalence in THIN was 27.1 (25.4 to 28.9) per 100 000 population. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were significantly higher in subjects with achalasia (n=2369) compared with controls (n=3865) for: oesophageal cancer (IRR 5.22 (95% CI: 1.88 to 14.45), p<0.001), aspiration pneumonia (13.38 (1.66 to 107.79), p=0.015), lower respiratory tract infection (1.33 (1.05 to 1.70), p=0.02) and mortality (1.33 (1.17 to 1.51), p<0.001). The median time from achalasia diagnosis to oesophageal cancer diagnosis was 15.5 (IQR 20.4) years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of achalasia is 1.99 per 100 000 population in secondary care data and 1.53 per 100 000 person-years in primary care data. Subjects with achalasia have an increased incidence of oesophageal cancer, aspiration pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infections and higher mortality. Clinicians treating patients with achalasia should be made aware of these associated morbidities and its increased mortality.