Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with significant potential morbidity and mortality. Substantial gaps have been documented between the development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and their implementation in practice. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component knowledge transfer intervention to implement a CPG for the management of SLE (CPG-SLE). METHODS: The study is an open, multicentre, controlled trial with random allocation by clusters to intervention or control. Clusters are four public university hospitals of the Canary Islands Health Service where rheumatologists are invited to participate. Patients diagnosed with SLE at least one year prior to recruitment are selected. Rheumatologists in intervention group receive a short educational group programme to both update their knowledge about SLE management according to CPG-SLE recommendations and to acquire knowledge and training on use of the patient-centred approach, a decision support tool embedded in the electronic clinical record and a quarterly feedback report containing information on management of SLE patients. Primary endpoint is change in self-perceived disease activity. Secondary endpoints are adherence of professionals to CPG-SLE recommendations, health-related quality of life, patient perception of their participation in decision making, attitudes of professionals towards shared decision making, knowledge of professionals about SLE and use of healthcare resources. Calculated sample size is 412 patients. Data will be collected from questionnaires and clinical records. Length of follow-up will be 18 months. Multilevel mixed models with repeated time measurements will be used to analyze changes in outcomes over time. Cost-effectiveness, from both social and healthcare services perspectives, will be analyzed by measuring effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses are planned. DISCUSSION: Impact of CPGs in clinical practice could be improved by applying proven value interventions to implement them. The results of this ongoing trial are expected to generate important scientifically valid and reproducible information not only on clinical effectiveness but also on cost-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention for implementation of a CPG based on communication technologies for chronic patients in the hospital setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03537638 . Registered on 25 May 2018.

Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness.

PURPOSE: To study the psychometric properties, including reliability, validity and responsiveness, of the Spanish EQ-5D-5L questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We included 758 patients with hip or knee OA who completed the EQ-5D-5L and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline, of whom 644 also did 6 months later. The EQ-5D-5L contains five questions from which a utility index is derived. The WOMAC covers three dimensions: pain, stiffness and physical function. Floor and ceiling effects were calculated. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Convergent validity was tested using the Spearman correlation coefficient between EQ-5D-5L and WOMAC. We examined known-groups validity by comparing the EQ-5D-5L between subgroups defined by WOMAC scores using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Effect sizes were calculated to assess responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was estimated. RESULTS: The EQ-5D-5L showed minimal floor and ceiling effects (< 3%). Cronbach's alpha was 0.86. The EQ-5D-5L index was strongly correlated with WOMAC pain and function scores (- 0.688 and - 0.782). Patients with higher WOMAC scores had significantly (p < 0.0001) lower EQ-5D-5L index. The 20.19% had hip or knee replacement during the follow-up. Effect sizes were small among non-surgical patients, but > 0.80 among "improved" surgical patients, being the MCID for improvement 0.32 points. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, overcoming the limitations of the EQ-5D-3L in these patients. Therefore, the EQ-5D-5L could be very useful as an outcome measure, at least in patients with hip or knee OA.

The Association of Desert Dust with the Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Subjects of a Younger Age.

Objectives: Recently, desert dust in Europe has been recognized as a cardiovascular health problem. In Spain, desert dust inflows in recent years have been associated with worsening air quality. The present study examines whether desert dust events are related to the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients under 55 years of age. Methods: Data from 2416 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary hospital due to ACS were prospectively analyzed. A case-crossover time-stratified design using Poisson conditional regression models was applied to estimate the impact of desert dust events involving particulate matter concentrations of an aerodynamic diameter <10 µm (PM10) on the incidence of ACS in patients under 55 years of age. Results: Desert dust intrusion on days 0 to 5 before ACS onset showed no significant association with the incidence of ACS in patients under 55 years of age. The incidence rate ratios of PM10 concentrations 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, and 5 days before ACS onset (for changes of 10 µg/m3) were 1.02 (95% CI 0.97-1.1; p = 0.41), 1.01 (95% CI 0.96-1.07; p = 0.66), 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.05; p = 0.78), 0.96 (95% CI 0.9-1.02; p = 0.18), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.04; p = 0.41). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that desert dust is unlikely to be related to the incidence of ACS in patients under 55 years of age.

Nursing Recommendations in the Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Delphi Consensus.

Introduction: Nurses' role in the management of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is essential. Specific guidelines for nurses have not been previously developed in Spain. This project aimed to try to develop comprehensive and validated recommendations for nurses regarding the management of people with SLE. Method: A Delphi questionnaire with 90 general and specific recommendations was designed by the scientific committee and underwent two rounds of participation. Results: Panellists reached a consensus on "agreement" for 85 recommendations during the first round and for 87 recommendations after the second and final rounds. Panellists agreed that people with SLE should be managed within a multidisciplinary team, and that this team should include specialized nurses. Panellists stated that most of the services lack specialized nurses. Experts identified lack of specific training programs targeted to nurses as the main barrier for application of recommendations. Panellists recommended an extended role for nurses in the management of people with SLE, including diagnosis, patient education, treatment monitoring and administration, and follow-up. Conclusions: This study is the first consensus that provides nursing recommendations from experts on the management of people with SLE in Europe. Design of standardized training programs targeted to nurses would facilitate the application of the recommendations.

Validation of screening criteria for spondyloarthritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is one of the most common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Diagnostic delay must be avoided. AIMS: We assessed the validity of SpA screening criteria (any of the following characteristics: chronic low back pain with onset before 45 years of age; inflammatory lower back pain or alternating buttock pain; arthritis; heel enthesitis; dacylitis; HLA-B27 positivity; sacroiliitis on imaging). METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional observational study in IBD patients aged ≥18 years. After evaluating the SpA screening criteria, the gastroenterologists referred the participants to the rheumatologists, who determined whether the patient fulfilled the screening criteria and carried out the necessary tests for SpA diagnosis. RESULTS: 35 (11.7%) out of 300 patients were diagnosed with SpA. The combination with the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (91.4% and 72.1%, respectively, when applied by the rheumatologists; 80% and 78.9%, when applied by the gastroenterologists) for SpA screening, was fulfillment of any of the following: chronic low back pain with onset before age 45 years, inflammatory low back pain or alternating buttock pain, arthritis, or dactylitis. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies to validate SpA screening criteria in IBD patients in routine clinical practice.