Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(12): 1696-1699, 2023 12 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531616

RESUMO

We reviewed hospital-onset respiratory viral infections, 2015-2023, in one hospital to determine whether Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission prevention measures prevented non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral infections. Masking, employee symptom attestations, and screening patients and visitors for symptoms were associated with a 44%-53% reduction in hospital-onset influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), accounting for changes in community incidence.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Influenza Humana , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Incidência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(6): 1097-1100, 2022 03 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34145449

RESUMO

We assessed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission between patients in shared rooms in an academic hospital between September 2020 and April 2021. In total, 11 290 patients were admitted to shared rooms, of whom 25 tested positive. Among 31 exposed roommates, 12 (39%) tested positive within 14 days. Transmission was associated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle thresholds ≤21.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(12): 2230-2233, 2022 07 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599821

RESUMO

We compared healthcare worker severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates between March and August 2020 in 2 similar hospitals with high vs low airborne infection isolation room utilization rates but otherwise identical infection control policies. We found no difference in healthcare worker infection rates between the 2 hospitals, nor between patient-facing vs non-patient-facing providers.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Controle de Infecções
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(10): 1838-1840, 2022 11 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594555

RESUMO

We report on probable factory-based contamination of portable water heaters with waterborne pathogens and 2 bloodstream infections potentially attributable to off-label use of these water heaters to warm extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits. Great caution is warranted when using water-based devices to care for critically ill patients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Ralstonia pickettii , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Água
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e296-e299, 2022 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137035

RESUMO

The highly contagious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant increases risk for nosocomial transmission despite universal masking, admission testing, and symptom screening. We report large increases in hospital-onset infections and 2 unit-based clusters. The clusters rapidly abated after instituting universal N95 respirators and daily testing. Broader use of these strategies may prevent nosocomial transmissions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Respiradores N95 , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(9): 1610-1617, 2022 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Burkholderia cepacia complex is a group of potential nosocomial pathogens often linked to contaminated water. We report on a cluster of 8 B. cepacia complex infections in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients, which were attributed to contaminated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) water heaters. METHODS: In December 2020, we identified an increase in B. cepacia complex infections in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital. We sought commonalities, sequenced isolates, obtained environmental specimens, and enacted mitigation measures. RESULTS: Whole-genome sequencing of 13 B. cepacia complex clinical specimens between November 2020 and February 2021 identified 6 clonally related isolates, speciated as Burkholderia contaminans. All 6 occurred in patients on ECMO. Microbiology review identified 2 additional B. contaminans cases from June 2020 that may have also been cluster related, including 1 in a patient receiving ECMO. All 8 definite or probable cluster cases required treatment; 3 patients died, and 3 experienced recurrent infections. After ECMO was identified as the major commonality, all 9 of the hospital's ECMO water heaters were cultured, and B. contaminans grew in all cultures. Cultures from air sampled adjacent to the water heaters were negative. Water heater touch screens were culture positive for B. contaminans, and the sink drain in the ECMO heater reprocessing room also grew clonal B. contaminans. Observations of reprocessing revealed opportunities for cross-contamination between devices through splashing from the contaminated sink. The cluster was aborted by removing all water heaters from clinical service. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a cluster of 8 B. cepacia complex infections associated with contaminated ECMO water heaters. This cluster underscores the potential risks associated with water-based ECMO heaters and, more broadly, water-based care for vulnerable patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Burkholderia , Complexo Burkholderia cepacia , Burkholderia cepacia , Infecção Hospitalar , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Feminino , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Água , Infecções por Burkholderia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Burkholderia/microbiologia , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças
7.
Psychosomatics ; 60(3): 263-270, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30166118

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that proactive psychiatric consultation reduces hospital length of stay (LOS) in the general medical setting; however this model has not been studied in the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between a conventional consultation model and a proactive psychiatric consultation model. METHODS: Two medical ICUs (MICUs) were randomized to proactive psychiatric consultation vs conventional consultation psychiatric models. Proactive consultation included embedding a psychiatrist into daily MICU team rounds on all patients. In the conventional consultation MICU, psychiatric consultations were activated when deemed necessary. Primary outcomes were hospital LOS and MICU LOS. Secondary outcomes included delirium-coma-free hours and ventilator-free hours. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were admitted to the proactive consultation MICU; 393 patients were admitted to the conventional consultation MICU. The consultation rate for the intervention group was 24.2% vs 6.1% in the control group (p < 0.001). Time to psychiatric consultation was shorter in the intervention group. Median hospital LOS was 6.92 days, interquartile range 3.70-14.31 in the intervention group vs 7.69 days, interquartile range 3.95-16.21 in the control group (p = 0.113). MICU LOS, delirium-coma-free hours, and ventilator-free hours were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Among the respiratory failure subgroup, hospital LOS was shorter in the intervention vs control group (median 9.46 days, interquartile range 4.95-17.56 vs 12.29 days, interquartile range 6.58-21.10, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Proactive psychiatric consultation in a MICU was associated with decreased time to consultation among all patients and shorter hospital LOS among patients with respiratory failure.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Delírio/diagnóstico , Delírio/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Respiratória/psicologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia
8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab194, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316502

RESUMO

We prospectively assessed 536 hospitalized patients with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction tests for infectiousness based on symptoms, cycle thresholds, and SARS-CoV-2 history, with repeat testing and serologies in select cases. One hundred forty-eight (28%) patients were deemed noninfectious, most with evidence of prior infection, and managed on standard precautions without evidence of transmission.

9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(9): e2020498, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902653

RESUMO

Importance: Some patients are avoiding essential care for fear of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitals. There are few data, however, on the risk of acquiring COVID-19 in US hospitals. Objective: To assess the incidence of COVID-19 among patients hospitalized at a large US academic medical center in the 12 weeks after the first inpatient case was identified. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all patients admitted to Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Massachusetts) between March 7 and May 30, 2020. Follow-up occurred through June 17, 2020. Medical records for all patients who first tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on hospital day 3 or later or within 14 days of discharge were reviewed. Exposures: A comprehensive infection control program was implemented that included dedicated COVID-19 units with airborne infection isolation rooms, personal protective equipment in accordance with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, personal protective equipment donning and doffing monitors, universal masking, restriction of visitors, and liberal RT-PCR testing of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether infection was community or hospital acquired based on timing of tests, clinical course, and exposures. Results: Over the 12-week period, 9149 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [26.4] years; median [IQR] age, 51 years [30-67 years]; 5243 female [57.3%]) were admitted to the hospital, for whom 7394 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests were performed; 697 COVID-19 cases were confirmed, translating into 8656 days of COVID-19-related care. Twelve of the 697 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (1.7%) first tested positive on hospital day 3 or later (median, 4 days; range, 3-15 days). Of these, only 1 case was deemed to be hospital acquired, most likely from a presymptomatic spouse who was visiting daily and diagnosed with COVID-19 before visitor restrictions and masking were implemented. Among 8370 patients with non-COVID-19-related hospitalizations discharged through June 17, 11 (0.1%) tested positive within 14 days (median time to diagnosis, 6 days; range, 1-14 days). Only 1 case was deemed likely to be hospital acquired, albeit with no known exposures. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients in a large academic medical center with rigorous infection control measures, nosocomial COVID-19 was rare during the height of the pandemic in the region. These findings may inform practices in other institutions and provide reassurance to patients concerned about contracting COVID-19 in hospitals.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus , Boston/epidemiologia , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/etiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Infecção Hospitalar/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Viral/etiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Visitas a Pacientes , Adulto Jovem
10.
Am J Manag Care ; 23(12): 762-766, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29261242

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a pilot quality improvement intervention implemented in an urban academic medical center emergency department (ED) to improve care coordination and reduce ED visits and hospitalizations among frequent ED users. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We identified the most frequent ED users in both the 30 days prior to the intervention and the 12 months prior to the intervention. We randomized the top 72 patients to receive either our pilot intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of a community health worker who assisted patients with navigating care and identifying unmet social needs and an ED-based clinical team that developed interdisciplinary acute care plans for eligible patients. After 7 months, we analyzed ED visits, hospitalizations, and costs for the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: We randomized 72 patients to the intervention (n = 36) and control (n = 36) groups. Patients randomized to the intervention group had 35% fewer ED visits (P = .10) and 31% fewer admissions from the ED (P = .20) compared with the control group. Average ED direct costs per patient were 15% lower and average inpatient direct costs per patient were 8% lower for intervention patients compared with control patients. CONCLUSIONS: ED-based care coordination is a promising approach to reduce ED use and hospitalizations among frequent ED users. Our program also demonstrated a decrease in costs per patient. Future efforts to promote population health and control costs may benefit from incorporating similar programs into acute care delivery systems.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistentes Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Controle de Custos , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Projetos Piloto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA