Clinical evaluation of a cutaneous zero-heat-flux thermometer during cardiac surgery.

We evaluated the disposable non-invasive SpotOn™ thermometer relying on the zero-heat-flux technology. We tested the hypothesis that this technology may accurately estimate the core temperature. The primary objective was to compare cutaneous temperature measurements from this device with blood temperatures measured with the pulmonary artery catheter. Secondary objective was to compare measurements from the zero-heat-flux thermometer indirectly with other routinely used thermometers (nasopharyngeal, bladder, rectal). We included 40 patients electively scheduled for either off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Temperatures were measured using zero-heat-flux (SpotOn™), pulmonary artery catheter, nasopharyngeal, rectal, and bladder thermometers. Agreement was assessed using the Bland and Altman random effects method for repeated measures data, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Accuracy was estimated (defined as <0.5° difference with the gold standard), with a 95% confidence interval considering the multiple pairs of measurements per patient. 17 850 sets of temperature measurements were analyzed from 40 patients. The mean overall difference between zero-heat-flux and pulmonary artery catheter thermometer was -0.06 °C (95% limits of agreement of ± 0.89 °C). In addition, 14 968 sets of temperature measurements were analyzed from 34 patients with all thermometers in situ. Results from the zero-heat-flux thermometer showed better agreement with the pulmonary artery catheter than the other secondary core thermometers assessed. In conclusion, the SpotOn™ thermometer reliably assessed core temperature during cardiac surgery. It could be considered an alternative for other secondary thermometers in the assessment of core temperature during general anesthesia.

Simulation in obstetric anesthesia: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Simulation training (crew resource management training and scenario training) has become an important tool in the education of anesthesiologists. This review summarizes recent research performed in this area, focusing more specifically on obstetric anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Simulation training is becoming more integrated in the modern education of anesthesiologists. Research regarding the most effective way to perform simulation training in terms of learning outcomes and long-term skill retention has started to appear. Scenarios which are played independently and that allow for simulated mortality, as well as relaxation techniques before debriefing might have positive effects in this regard. Furthermore, simulation has been investigated as a tool to improve patient safety in low-resource settings. In addition, simulation training in the domain of obstetrics has been rapidly expanding and has an important role in this field of medicine as well. SUMMARY: Simulation training has acquired a central role in modern education of anesthesiologists. Further research regarding elements to optimize simulation training in terms of learning outcomes and long-term skill retention is desirable. In addition, little data exist concerning the effect of simulation training on possible improvement of patient outcomes in anesthesia.

Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knee arthroscopy is a well-established procedure in day-case surgery, which is frequently performed under spinal anesthesia. It is, however, controversial whether the choice for a specific local anesthetic translates into relevant outcomes. We hypothesized that the use of 2-chloroprocaine would be associated with a faster recovery from sensorimotor block. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients were included in this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial and randomly allocated to receive either 40 mg 2-chloroprocaine, 40 mg lidocaine, or 7.5 mg bupivacaine. The primary endpoint was the time until complete recovery of sensory block. Secondary endpoints included time to recovery from motor block, failure rates, incidence of hypotension/bradycardia, postoperative pain, first mobilization, voiding and discharge times, and the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms. This clinical trial was registered prior to patient enrollment (EudraCT 2011-003675-11). RESULTS: Patients in the chloroprocaine group had a significantly shorter time until recovery from sensory block (median, 2.6 hours; interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-2.9 hours) than patients in the lidocaine group (3.1 hours; IQR, 2.7-3.6 hours; P < 0.006) and in the bupivacaine group (6.1 hours; IQR, 5.5 hours to undefined hours; P < 0.0001). Chloroprocaine was associated with a significantly faster recovery from motor block than lidocaine and bupivacaine. Times to first mobilization, voiding, and discharge were significantly shorter for chloroprocaine when compared with bupivacaine, but not with lidocaine. In the bupivacaine group, patients needed significantly less rescue medication for postoperative pain when compared with lidocaine and chloroprocaine. Groups did not differ with respect to patient satisfaction, incidence of bradycardia/hypotension, and transient neurologic symptom rate. CONCLUSIONS: For spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy, chloroprocaine has the shortest time to complete recovery of sensory and motor block compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine.

Active perioperative patient warming using a self-warming blanket (BARRIER EasyWarm) is superior to passive thermal insulation: a multinational, multicenter, randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is still high; therefore, present guidelines advocate "prewarming" for its prevention. Prewarming means preoperative patient skin warming, which minimizes redistribution hypothermia caused by induction of anesthesia. In this study, we compared the new self-warming BARRIER EasyWarm blanket with passive thermal insulation regarding mean perioperative patient core body temperature. DESIGN: Multinational, multicenter randomized prospective open-label controlled trial. SETTING: Surgical ward, operation room, postanesthesia care unit at 4 European hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 246 adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I to III undergoing elective orthopedic; gynecologic; or ear, nose, and throat surgery scheduled for 30 to 120 minutes under general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received warmed hospital cotton blankets (passive thermal insulation, control group) or BARRIER EasyWarm blanket at least 30 minutes before induction of general anesthesia and throughout the perioperative period (intervention group). MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy outcome was the perioperative mean core body temperature measured by a tympanic infrared thermometer. Secondary outcomes were hypothermia incidence, change in core body temperature, length of stay in postanesthesia care unit, thermal comfort, patient satisfaction, ease of use, and adverse events related to the BARRIER EasyWarm blanket. MAIN RESULTS: The BARRIER EasyWarm blanket significantly improved perioperative core body temperature compared with standard hospital blankets (36.5°C, SD 0.4°C, vs 36.3, SD 0.3°C; P<.001). Intraoperatively, in the intervention group, hypothermia incidence was 38% compared with 60% in the control group (P=.001). Postoperatively, the figures were 24% vs 49%, respectively (P=.001). Patients in the intervention group had significantly higher thermal comfort scores, preoperatively and postoperatively. No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of the new self-warming blanket improves mean perioperative core body temperature, reduces the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, and improves patients' thermal comfort during elective adult surgery.