Use of the HPRT gene to study nuclease-induced DNA double-strand break repair.

Understanding the mechanisms of chromosomal double-strand break repair (DSBR) provides insight into genome instability, oncogenesis and genome engineering, including disease gene correction. Research into DSBR exploits rare-cutting endonucleases to cleave exogenous reporter constructs integrated into the genome. Multiple reporter constructs have been developed to detect various DSBR pathways. Here, using a single endogenous reporter gene, the X-chromosomal disease gene encoding hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT), we monitor the relative utilization of three DSBR pathways following cleavage by I-SceI or CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases. For I-SceI, our estimated frequencies of accurate or mutagenic non-homologous end-joining and gene correction by homologous recombination are 4.1, 1.5 and 0.16%, respectively. Unexpectedly, I-SceI and Cas9 induced markedly different DSBR profiles. Also, using an I-SceI-sensitive HPRT minigene, we show that gene correction is more efficient when using long double-stranded DNA than single- or double-stranded oligonucleotides. Finally, using both endogenous HPRT and exogenous reporters, we validate novel cell cycle phase-specific I-SceI derivatives for investigating cell cycle variations in DSBR. The results obtained using these novel approaches provide new insights into template design for gene correction and the relationships between multiple DSBR pathways at a single endogenous disease gene.

Elevated c-Jun expression in acute myeloid leukemias inhibits C/EBPalpha DNA binding via leucine zipper domain interaction.

Transcription factor C/EBPalpha induces normal myeloid differentiation, inactivation of C/EBPalpha leads to a differentiation block in acute myeloid leukemias (AML), and overexpression of C/EBPalpha results in AML growth arrest and differentiation. Recent reports suggest that C/EBPalpha is activated or inactivated via protein-protein interactions. We previously reported that C/EBPalpha needs to inactivate the proto-oncogene c-Jun via leucine zipper domain interaction in order to induce granulocytic differentiation. We, therefore, hypothesized that c-Jun expression might be elevated in AML and subsequently inactivate C/EBPalpha. In fact, compared to normal bone marrow mononuclear cells, c-Jun expression is increased in AML patient samples (Affymetrix expression microarray analysis, n=166). c-Jun binds to C/EBPalpha via the leucine zipper domains and prevents C/EBPalpha from DNA binding. Inactivation of C/EBPalpha by c-Jun is necessary for c-Jun to induce proliferation because c-Jun-induced proliferation can be prevented by ectopic overexpression of C/EBPalpha. The dominant-negative 30-kDa C/EBPalpha protein, found in AML, fails to downregulate c-Jun mRNA expression in AML patient samples. Thus, our data suggest a model for AML in which c-Jun promotes proliferation and prevents differentiation by inhibiting C/EBPalpha DNA binding via leucine zipper domain interaction. It might depend on the expression levels of C/EBPalpha and c-Jun, if inhibition of C/EBPalpha by c-Jun or if inhibition of c-Jun by C/EBPalpha is more predominant: proliferation versus differentiation; AML versus normal myeloid development.

The myeloid master regulator transcription factor PU.1 is inactivated by AML1-ETO in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia.

The transcription factor PU.1 plays a pivotal role in normal myeloid differentiation. PU.1(-/-) mice exhibit a complete block in myeloid differentiation. Heterozygous PU.1 mutations were reported in some patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but not in AML with translocation t(8;21), which gives rise to the fusion gene AML1-ETO. Here we report a negative functional impact of AML1-ETO on the transcriptional activity of PU.1. AML1-ETO physically binds to PU.1 in t(8;21)(+) Kasumi-1 cells. AML1-ETO binds to the beta(3)beta(4) region in the DNA-binding domain of PU.1 and displaces the coactivator c-Jun from PU.1, thus down-regulating the transcriptional activity of PU.1. This physical interaction of AML1-ETO and PU.1 did not abolish the DNA-binding capacity of PU.1. AML1-ETO down-regulates the transactivation capacity of PU.1 in myeloid U937 cells, and the expression levels of PU.1 target genes in AML French-American-British (FAB) subtype M2 patients with t(8;21) were lower than in patients without t(8;21). Conditional expression of AML1-ETO causes proliferation in mouse bone marrow cells and inhibits antiproliferative function of PU.1. Overexpression of PU.1, however, differentiates AML1-ETO-expressing Kasumi-1 cells to the monocytic lineage. Thus, the function of PU.1 is down-regulated by AML1-ETO in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia, whereas overexpression of PU.1 restores normal differentiation.

Granulocyte inducer C/EBPalpha inactivates the myeloid master regulator PU.1: possible role in lineage commitment decisions.

Several transcription factors have been implicated as playing a role in myelopoiesis. PU.1, an ets-family transcription factor, is required for the development of myeloid and lymphoid lineages, whereas the transcription factor CCAAT-enhancer binding protein family member C/EBPalpha is essential for granulocyte development. We present here the first evidence that C/EBPalpha blocks the function of PU.1. PU.1 and C/EBPalpha interact physically and colocalize in myeloid cells. As a consequence of this interaction, C/EBPalpha can inhibit the function of PU.1 to activate a minimal promoter containing only PU.1 DNA-binding sites. We further demonstrate that the leucine zipper in the DNA-binding domain of C/EBPalpha interacts with the beta3/beta4 region in the DNA-binding domain of PU.1 and as a result displaces the PU.1 coactivator c-Jun. Finally, C/EBPalpha blocks PU.1-induced dendritic cell development from CD34+ human cord blood cells. The functional blocking of PU.1 by C/EBPalpha could be the mechanism by which C/EBPalpha inhibits cell fates specified by PU.1 and directs cell development to the granulocyte lineage.