Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(4): 583-594, 2020 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949690

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has emerged as a useful diagnostic tool for suspected infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with prosthetic valves or implantable devices. However, there is limited evidence regarding use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of native valve endocarditis (NVE). METHODS: Between 2014 and 2017, 303 episodes of left-sided suspected IE (188 prosthetic valves/ascending aortic prosthesis and 115 native valves) were studied. 18F-FDG-PET/CT accuracy was determined in the subgroups of patients with NVE and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE)/ascending aortic prosthesis infection (AAPI). Associations between inflammatory infiltrate patterns and 18F-FDG-PET/CT uptake were investigated in an exploratory ad hoc histological analysis. RESULTS: Among 188 patients with PVE/AAPI, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 18F-FDG-PET/CT focal uptake were 93%, 90%, 89%, and 94%, respectively, while among 115 patients with NVE, the corresponding values were 22%, 100%, 100%, and 66%. The inclusion of abnormal 18F-FDG cardiac uptake as a major criterion at admission enabled a recategorization of 76% (47/62) of PVE/AAPI cases initially classified as "possible" to "definite" IE. In the histopathological analysis, a predominance of polymorphonuclear cell inflammatory infiltrate and a reduced extent of fibrosis were observed in the PVE group only. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT at the initial presentation of patients with suspected PVE increases the diagnostic capability of the modified Duke criteria. In patients who present with suspected NVE, the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT is less accurate and could only be considered a complementary diagnostic tool for a specific population of patients with NVE.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Endocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos
2.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 66(4): 199-203, Abr. 1996. ilus, tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-319293

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyse prevalence, clinical features and organ involvement in viral infections occuring after heart transplantation. METHODS: One hundred consecutive heart transplantation patients were studied. The follow-up was three to 90 (mean 23.32 +/- 25.97) months. Viral infections were diagnosed using the Center for Disease Control criteria. RESULTS: Viral infections were responsible for 51 infections, 19.6 of all infections in this patient population. Herpesvirus infection was the most common etiology: 32 (59.25) of all viral infections were caused by reactivation of or reinfection by cytomegalovirus. Of those infections 27 (84.37) occurred in the first three weeks following surgery. Only 4 (12.50) of those showed clinical signs of cytomegalovirus disease. Other herpesvirus causing infections were herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus. CONCLUSION: Infections are common after heart transplantation and viral infections of herpesviridae family are important causes of those infections; usually as reactivation in an immune suppressed patient. The most important viral infections were caused by reactivation of or reinfection by cytomegalovirus.


Purpose - To analyse prevalence, clinical features and organ involvement in viral infections occuring after heart transplantation. Methods - One hundred consecutive heart transplatation patients were studied. The follow-up was three to 90 (mean 23.32 ± 25.97) months. Viral infections were diagnosed using the Center for Disease Control criteria. Results - Viral infections were responsible for 51 infections, 19.6% of all infections in this patient population. Herpesvirus infections was the most common etiology: 32 (59.25%) of all viral infections were caused by reactivation of or reinfection by cytomegalovirus. Of those infections 27 (84.37%) occurred in the first three weeks following surgery. Only 4 (12.50%) of those showed clinical signs of cytomegalovirus disease. Other herpesvirus causing infections were herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus. Conclusion - Infections are common after heart transplantation and viral infections of herpesviridae family are important causes of those infections; usually as reactivation in an immune suppressed patient. The most important viral infections were caused by reactivation of or reinfection by cytomegalovirus


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Viroses , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , Análise Atuarial , Infecções por Herpesviridae/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA