'I Didn't Know What Was Going to Happen': Children's and Young People's Experiences and Their Involvement Before and After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy.

AIMS: To explore experiences, expectations, and involvement of children and young people (CYP) in decision-making for selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) surgery, post-operative physiotherapy treatment and outcomes. METHODS: A qualitative study design using one to one interviews. Five CYP (2 girls and 3 boys) participated, and interviews lasted between 45 min and 2 h. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Children and young people are reliant on their parents to make decisions and inform them of the SDR process. Experiences of living with cerebral palsy and its management are centered on their routine social, psychological, and physiological challenges. Individual characteristics and attributes of CYP have an impact on how they cope with the rehabilitation burden and adjust to their changing levels of function and participation. CONCLUSIONS: Although CYP reported that SDR offers them a greater 'freedom to choose' in how they participate in daily life, further consideration is required to meet their psychosocial needs, particularly in preparing for SDR and adjusting afterwards.

'Wanting no regrets': Parental decision making around selective dorsal rhizotomy.

BACKGROUND: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is an irreversible neurosurgical procedure used to reduce spasticity while aiming to improve gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Little research has explored the complexity of parental decision-making experiences surrounding SDR surgery and required rehabilitation. The aim was to explore parental experiences and expectation in the decision-making process around the SDR operation, physiotherapy treatment and outcomes. METHOD: Qualitative methods using in-depth, semi-structured interviews were used. Eighteen parents (11 mothers and 7 fathers) participated whose child had SDR and completed 2-year post-operative rehabilitation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Decision making involved an interacting process between the 'parental information seeking experience', 'influence of professional encounters and relationships' and 'emotional and social aspects'. Despite underlying uncertainties about outcomes, parental drivers of expectations and aspirations for their child preceded and sustained this decision-making process. A foundational narrative of 'wanting no regrets' resolved their decision to undertake SDR. Outcomes did not always match expectations, and parents moved away from a position of idealism, which was driven in part by parental information seeking including overly optimistic media representation. CONCLUSION: Universally, parents expressed they had 'no regrets' on their decision, yet many felt a mismatch between expectation and outcomes of SDR surgery. A greater understanding of the complex nature of SDR decision making is required to help improve family preparedness and provide support from clinicians to enable balanced discussions in parental decision-making.