Safety, feasibility and patient reported outcome measures of outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence on safe and feasible outpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the majority of patients is still treated in an inpatient setting. This is probably due to a lack of clear guidelines on this subject. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and patient reported outcome measures (PROM) on outpatient treatment of acute PE. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study. 250 patients presenting with acute PE and Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class I or II were enrolled. Safety of outpatient treatment was assessed by measuring all-cause mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and episodes of relevant bleeding, with a follow-up period of four weeks and six months. Additionally, PROM's on outpatient treatment were evaluated by repeatedly measuring VAS-scores for pain and dyspnea during the recovery, and by assessing the improvement in SF-36 scores between admission and after six months. RESULTS: We found an all-cause mortality rate of 0.4% (95% CI 0.07-2.23), rate of recurrent VTE of 0% (95% CI 0-1.51) and rate of relevant bleeding episodes of 6.4% (95% CI 3.98-10.14). VAS-scores improved significantly during the first 24-h after admission, and continued to improve significantly after five days of home treatment. SF-36 scores on 6 out of 8 domains improved significantly between admission and after six months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that outpatient treatment is safe in selected low-risk patients based on their PESI score. Additionally, our data on patient reported outcome measures support the presumption of a good course of recovery during outpatient treatment.

Diagnostic delay of pulmonary embolism in primary and secondary care: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is common because symptoms can be non-specific. The few studies that have investigated diagnostic delay have not taken into account the role of primary care physicians in the diagnostic process. AIM: To document and quantify the stages of diagnostic delay of PE and to identify clinical factors associated with this delay. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study conducted in Zwolle and its surroundings in the Netherlands. METHOD: Primary and secondary care records of all patients diagnosed with PE between January 2008 and December 2009 were reviewed for dates of symptom onset, date of presentation and diagnosis, and for clinical findings. Relationships between delay and clinical parameters were tested using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: The 261 patients enrolled in the study had an average total delay of 8.6 days. Patient delay (4.2 days average) and delay in primary care (3.9 days) were the major contributors to this delay. Chest pain (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28 to 0.92, P = 0.03) and symptoms of deep venous thrombosis (calf pain) (OR 0.49, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.98, P = 0.05) were associated with an early diagnosis. Patient delay was shorter in patients with chest pain (OR 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.95, P = 0.03) and longer in patients with dyspnoea (OR 2.95, 95% CI = 0.99 to 8.85, P = 0.05). In primary care, chest pain (OR 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.84, P = 0.02) and rales (OR 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.83, P = 0.03) were associated with an early referral, whereas comorbidity led to a delayed referral. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the diagnostic delay of PE is substantial, especially patient delay and delay in primary care. There is room to reduce this delay by increasing the awareness of both patients and GPs. Further research is needed on clinical factors that raise suspicion of PE in primary care.

Mandatory adherence to diagnostic protocol increases the yield of CTPA for pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if mandatory adherence to a diagnostic protocol increases the rate of computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (CTPAs) positive for pulmonary embolism (PE)-the so-called diagnostic yield. Further, we aim to identify factors associated with this diagnostic yield. METHODS: We included all patients with suspected PE requiring CTPA from 9 January 2014 t0 3 June 2014. The requesting physicians were forced to follow diagnostic workup for PE by calculating a Wells score and, if necessary, determining D-dimer level. The percentage of positive CTPA scans was calculated and compared with our previous cohort (Walen et al. Insights Imaging 2014;5(2):231-236). Odds ratios were calculated as a measure of association between dichotomous variables and CTPA findings. RESULTS: Of 250 scans, 74 were positive (29.6 % [95 % CI, 24.3-35.5 %]) and 175 were negative (70 %). The percentage positive scans increased with 6.6 % and the percentage negative scans decreased with 3.1 %. This change was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Independent clinical predictors of diagnostic yield were previous deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR, 3.22; p = 0.013) and clinical signs of DVT (OR, 2.71; p = 0.012). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was negatively associated with PE (OR, 0.33; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that mandatory adherence to a diagnostic protocol increases the yield of CTPA for PE in our centre. MAIN MESSAGES: • Mandatory adherence to diagnostic protocol increases the yield of CTPA for PE • Previous DVT and signs of DVT were associated with a higher yield • No patients with a low Wells score and a low D-dimer had PE.

Diagnostic yield of CT thorax angiography in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: independent predictors and protocol adherence.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic yield of computed tomography scanning of the pulmonary arteries (CTPA) in our centre and factors associated with it. Differences between specialties as well as adherence to protocol were investigated. METHODS: All patients receiving a first CTPA for pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2010 were included. Data about relevant clinical information and the requesting specialty were retrospectively obtained. Differences in diagnostic yield were tested using a chi-squared test. Independent predictors were identified with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: PE on CTPA was found in 224 of the 974 patients (23 %). Between specialties, diagnostic yield varied from 19.5 to 23.9 % (p = 0.20). Independent predictors of diagnostic yield were: age, sex, D-dimer, cough, dyspnea, cardiac history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atelectasis/consolidation, intrapulmonary mass and/or interstitial pulmonary disease on CT. Wells scores were poorly documented (n = 127, 13.0 %). Poor adherence to protocol was also shown by a high amount of unnecessary D-dimer values with a high Wells-score (35 of 58; 58.6 %). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of CTPA in this study was relatively high in comparison with other studies (6.7-31 %). Better adherence to protocol might improve the diagnostic yield further. A prospective study could confirm the independent predictors found in this study. TEACHING POINTS: • Pulmonary embolism is potentially life-threatening and requires quick and reliable diagnosis. • Computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (CTPA) provides this reliable diagnosis. • Several independent predictors of diagnostic yield of CTPA for pulmonary embolism were identified. • Diagnostic yield of CTPA did not differ between requesting specialties in our Hospital. • Better protocol adherence could improve the diagnostic yield of CTPA for pulmonary embolism.