Emraclidine, a novel positive allosteric modulator of cholinergic M4 receptors, for the treatment of schizophrenia: a two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b trial.

BACKGROUND: Emraclidine is a novel, brain-penetrant, highly selective M4 receptor positive allosteric modulator in development for the treatment of schizophrenia. We aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of emraclidine in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We conducted a two-part, randomised, phase 1b trial in the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18-50 years (part A) or 18-55 years (part B) with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition, as confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and extrapyramidal symptom assessments indicating normal to mild symptoms at screening. Part A evaluated the safety and tolerability of emraclidine in five cohorts of participants with stable schizophrenia who received ascending oral doses of emraclidine 5-40 mg (40 mg was administered as 20 mg twice daily) or placebo at a single US site. Part B was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study that enrolled adults with acute schizophrenia across five US sites; participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive emraclidine 30 mg once daily, emraclidine 20 mg twice daily, or placebo for 6 weeks (doses established in part A). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, assessed in the safety population (participants who received at least one dose of emraclidine or placebo). This trial is now complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04136873. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2019, and Sept 17, 2020, 118 patients were assessed for eligibility and 49 were randomly assigned across five cohorts in part A. 44 participants completed the study, with 36 participants receiving emraclidine and eight receiving placebo. The two highest doses tested were selected for part B. Between Oct 12, 2020, and May 7, 2021, 148 patients were assessed for eligibility and 81 were randomly assigned to emraclidine 30 mg once daily (n=27), emraclidine 20 mg twice daily (n=27), or placebo (n=27) in part B. Incidence of adverse events (14 [52%] of 27 participants in the emraclidine 30 mg once daily group, 15 [56%] of 27 in the emraclidine 20 mg twice daily group, and 14 [52%] of 27 in the placebo group), clinical assessments, and weight changes were similar across groups. The most common adverse event was headache (15 [28%] of 54 participants in the emraclidine groups, seven [26%] of 27 in the placebo group). Modest, transient increases in blood pressure and heart rate in emraclidine groups observed at treatment initiation diminished over time and were not considered clinically meaningful by week 6. INTERPRETATION: These data support further investigation of emraclidine as a once-daily treatment for schizophrenia without need for titration and with a potentially favourable side-effect profile. FUNDING: Cerevel Therapeutics.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Noninferiority Study Comparing Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Month Versus the 3-Month Long-Acting Injectable in Patients With Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind (DB), randomized, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) formulation relative to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Following screening, patients entered an open-label (OL) maintenance phase and received 1 injection cycle of paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M; 100 or 150 mg eq.) or PP3M (350 or 525 mg eq.). Clinically stable patients were randomized (2:1) to receive PP6M (700 or 1000 mg eq., gluteal injections) or PP3M (350 or 525 mg eq.) in a 12-month DB phase; 2 doses of PP6M (corresponding to doses of PP1M and PP3M) were chosen. RESULTS: Overall, 1036 patients were screened, 838 entered the OL phase, and 702 (mean age: 40.8 years) were randomized (PP6M: 478; PP3M: 224); 618 (88.0%) patients completed the DB phase (PP6M: 416 [87.0%]; PP3M: 202 [90.2%]). Relapse rates were PP6M, 7.5% (n = 36) and PP3M, 4.9% (n = 11). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the difference (95% CI) between treatment groups (PP6M - PP3M) in the percentages of patients who remained relapse free was -2.9% (-6.8%, 1.1%), thus meeting noninferiority criteria (95% CI lower bound is larger than the pre-specified noninferiority margin of -10%). Secondary efficacy endpoints corroborated the primary analysis. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between PP6M (62.1%) and PP3M (58.5%). No new safety concerns emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of a twice-yearly dosing regimen of PP6M was noninferior to that of PP3M in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia adequately treated with PP1M or PP3M. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT03345342.

Aripiprazole lauroxil 2-month formulation with 1-day initiation in patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: exploratory efficacy and patient-reported outcomes in the randomized controlled ALPINE study.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled, phase 3b study (ALPINE) evaluated efficacy and safety of a 2-month formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) using a 1-day initiation regimen in patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) was used as an active control. Exploratory endpoint assessments included severity of illness, positive and negative symptoms, quality of life, caregiver burden, and satisfaction with medication. METHODS: Adults were randomly assigned to AL 1064 mg q8wk or PP 156 mg q4wk as inpatients, discharged after 2 weeks, and followed through week 25. Exploratory efficacy measures included the 3 original PANSS subscales, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) subscale, and caregiver Burden Assessment Scale. Exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) and the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire. Within-group changes from baseline through week 25 were analyzed for AL and PP separately. PROs were summarized based on observed data. RESULTS: Of 200 patients randomized (AL, n = 99; PP, n = 101), 99 completed the study (AL, n = 56; PP, n = 43). For AL, PANSS subscale and CGI-S scores improved from baseline through week 25 (mean [SE] change from baseline at week 25: Positive, -7.5 [0.70]; Negative, -3.9 [0.46]; General, -11.8 [0.83]; CGI-S, -1.3 [0.12]). Caregiver burden also improved (mean [SD] changes from baseline at week 9: -8.4 [10.15]; week 25: -8.9 [12.36]). Most AL patients were somewhat/very satisfied with treatment at each timepoint (70.8%-74.7%); mean Q-LES-Q-SF total scores were stable in the outpatient period. For PP, results were similar: PANSS Positive, -7.3 (0.67); Negative, -3.6 (0.69); General, -10.9 (1.22); CGI-S, -1.4 (0.16); caregiver burden, week 9: -8.8 (11.89) and week 25: -9.2 (14.55); satisfaction with treatment, 64.7%-69.3%; and stable Q-LES-Q-SF scores. CONCLUSIONS: ALPINE patients initiating the 2-month AL formulation using the 1-day initiation regimen as inpatients and continuing outpatient care experienced schizophrenia symptom improvement, sustained patient satisfaction with medication, stable quality of life, and reduced caregiver burden. A similar benefit pattern was observed for PP. These results support the feasibility of starting either long-acting injectable in the hospital and transitioning to outpatient treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345979 [trial registration date: 15/11/2017].

Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibitor Monotherapy Is Not an Effective Treatment of Acute Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for psychotic symptoms associated with schizophrenia often provide inadequate efficacy with unacceptable adverse effects. Improved therapeutics have long been a goal of research. Preclinical testing suggests that phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors may provide a novel approach to treating psychosis associated with schizophrenia. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of a highly selective PDE10A inhibitor, PF-02545920, was evaluated in a phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Eligible patients (18-65 years) with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized 2:2:1:2 to PF-02545920 (5 or 15 mg every 12 hours [Q12H] titrated), risperidone (3 mg Q12H), or placebo for 28 days (n = 74:74:37:74). The primary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy of PF-02545920 using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANNS) and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At day 28, PF-02545920 (either dose) was not significantly different from placebo for mean change from baseline in the PANNS total score (primary end point) or most other end points. Pharmacokinetics exposures seemed adequate for binding/inhibiting PDE10A enzyme. Risperidone was statistically different from placebo for the PANNS total score, demonstrating study sensitivity. Incidence rates for adverse events were similar among the groups. Both doses of PF-02545920 were generally well tolerated. Dystonia occurred in 1, 6, 0, and 3 patients in the PF-02545920 5 mg Q12H, PF-02545920 15 mg Q12H, risperidone, and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither dose of PF-02545920 was superior to placebo for the primary and most secondary end points. This indicates that PDE10A inhibition does not produce an antipsychotic effect in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.

A Proof-of-Concept Study Evaluating the Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibitor PF-02545920 in the Adjunctive Treatment of Suboptimally Controlled Symptoms of Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments for managing suboptimal clinical responses to current therapy for schizophrenia remain a critical unmet need. Phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibition represents a mechanistically novel approach to the treatment of schizophrenia, with preclinical studies suggesting improvements in partially responsive symptoms could be achieved via adjunctive use of the PDE10A inhibitor PF-02545920. Therefore, the adjunctive safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of multiple repeat doses of PF-02545920 were investigated in a phase 1b study and subsequent phase 2 study. METHODS: The phase 1b study randomized 37 adult patients with stable symptomatology and stable antipsychotic regimens within 3 cohorts. Study participants received ascending doses of PF-02545920 or placebo for 10 to 18 days. The phase 2 study randomized 240 outpatients with stable symptomatology but suboptimal response to current antipsychotic regimens 1:1:1 to PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 15 mg, or placebo every 12 hours for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point of the phase 2 study was change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score from baseline to week 12, with changes in other clinical assessments as secondary end points. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated, and observed PF-02545920 exposures were within the range predicted to be adequate for demonstrating efficacy. However, no significant differences in the prespecified efficacy end points between the 2 PF-02545920 treatment arms and placebo were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Current data and results of a prior monotherapy study in which PF-02545920 failed to differentiate from placebo refute the hypothesis that PDE10A inhibitors have use as antipsychotic agents for schizophrenia.

An Open-Label Study to Assess Monthly Risperidone Injections (180 mg) Following Switch from Daily Oral Risperidone (6 mg) in Stable Schizophrenic Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics have shown benefits over oral medications with reduced hospitalization rates and improved health-related quality of life. RBP-7000 (PERSERIS®) is a monthly risperidone formulation (90 or 120 mg) for the treatment of schizophrenia administered by subcutaneous abdominal injection. The objective of this study was to assess a higher dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 and an alternate injection site. METHODS: Following stabilization on 6 mg/day (3 mg twice daily) oral risperidone, clinically stable schizophrenic participants received 3 monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the abdomen followed by a fourth monthly dose of 180 mg RBP-7000 in the upper arm (each dose administered as two 90-mg injections). The primary endpoint was the steady-state average plasma concentration (Cavg(ss)) of risperidone and total active moiety after oral and RBP-7000 administration. Secondary endpoints included measures of clinical efficacy (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity of Illness), safety, and local injection-site tolerability to assess the switch from oral risperidone and compare injection sites. RESULTS: In all, 23 participants received at least one dose of RBP-7000, 16 received all four doses, and 15 completed the study. Monthly doses of 180 mg RBP-7000 provided similar Cavg(ss) of total active moiety compared with 6 mg/day oral risperidone. The pharmacokinetics of RBP-7000 were similar after injection in the abdomen versus upper arm. Clinical efficacy measures remained stable throughout the study. All RBP-7000 injections were well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of 180 mg RBP-7000 in schizophrenic patients stable on 6 mg/day oral risperidone and a second injection site in the upper arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03978832.

Effects of the selective AMPA modulator NBI-1065845 on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel in healthy adults.

This parallel-arm, phase I study investigated the potential cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A induction effect of NBI-1065845 (TAK-653), an investigational α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor potentiator in phase II development for major depressive disorder. The midazolam treatment arm received the sensitive CYP3A substrate midazolam on Day 1, followed by NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with midazolam, then NBI-1065845 alone on Day 15. The oral contraceptive treatment arm received ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel on Day 1, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 5-13; on Day 14, NBI-1065845 was administered with ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel, then NBI-1065845 alone on Days 15-17. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. The midazolam treatment arm comprised 14 men and 4 women, of whom 16 completed the study. Sixteen of the 17 healthy women completed the oral contraceptive treatment arm. After multiple daily doses of NBI-1065845, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval) for maximum observed concentration were: midazolam, 0.94 (0.79-1.13); ethinyl estradiol, 1.00 (0.87-1.15); and levonorgestrel, 0.99 (0.87-1.13). For area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity, the GMRs were as follows: midazolam, 0.88 (0.78-0.98); and ethinyl estradiol, 1.01 (0.88-1.15). For levonorgestrel, the GMR for AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was 0.87 (0.78-0.96). These findings indicate that NBI-1065845 is not a CYP3A inducer and support its administration with CYP3A substrates. NBI-1065845 was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observed after coadministration of midazolam, ethinyl estradiol, or levonorgestrel.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Support and Facilitate Switching from Risperidone Formulations to Rykindo in Patients with Schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: RYKINDO® (Rykindo) is a novel, long-acting injectable risperidone formulation administered biweekly (Q2W) through intramuscular gluteal injection for the treatment of schizophrenia in adult patients. This analysis was conducted to demonstrate that the clinical outcomes of Rykindo are equivalent to those of RISPERDAL CONSTA® (Consta; Q2W), and to establish a dosing methodology to switch from Consta to Rykindo, as well as to introduce Rykindo to patients who are currently on oral RISPERDAL® (Risperdal). METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for Rykindo and Consta were developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model with the data from phase 1 studies. A model-based simulation was also conducted using NONMEM. RESULTS: The PK profiles of Rykindo and Consta were adequately represented by a one-compartment model with an immediate release followed by an intermediate and third main release. Drug release of Rykindo was faster than for Consta, reaching steady state approximately 2-3 weeks earlier. The exposures of the active moiety of Rykindo and Consta were comparable at steady state. Model-based simulation indicated that switching from Consta to Rykindo requires administration of the first Rykindo injection within 4-5 weeks following the last Consta injection. For patients taking Risperdal, introducing Rykindo with 1 week of Risperdal supplemental for once-daily dosing (QD) can achieve comparable or superior exposure to that of Consta with 3 weeks of oral QD supplements. A dosing window of ± 3 days for Rykindo was recommended. CONCLUSIONS: This established approach provides guidance to physicians to initiate Rykindo therapy in adult patients with schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02055287, NCT02186769 and NCT02091388.

Efficacy and Safety of Xanomeline-Trospium Chloride in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: A significant need exists for new antipsychotic medications with different mechanisms of action, greater efficacy, and better tolerability than existing agents. Xanomeline is a dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist with no direct D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. KarXT combines xanomeline with the peripheral muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride with the goal of reducing adverse events due to xanomeline-related peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. In prior trials, xanomeline-trospium chloride was effective in reducing symptoms of psychosis and generally well tolerated in people with schizophrenia. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium vs placebo in adults with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of xanomeline-trospium in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis, conducted between April 1, 2021, and December 7, 2022, at 30 inpatient sites in the US and Ukraine. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive xanomeline-trospium chloride (maximum dose xanomeline 125 mg/trospium 30 mg) or placebo for 5 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary end point was change from baseline to week 5 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Secondary outcome measures were change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS Marder negative factor score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, and proportion of participants with at least a 30% reduction in PANSS total score. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: A total of 256 participants (mean [SD] age, 43.1 [11.8] years; 191 men [74.6%]; 156 of 256 participants [60.9%] were Black or African American, 98 [38.3%] were White, and 1 [0.4%] was Asian) were randomized (125 in xanomeline-trospium group and 131 in placebo group). At week 5, xanomeline-trospium significantly reduced PANSS total score compared with placebo (xanomeline-trospium , -20.6; placebo, -12.2; least squares mean difference, -8.4; 95% CI, -12.4 to -4.3; P < .001; Cohen d effect size, 0.60). Discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the xanomeline-trospium (8 participants [6.4%]) and placebo (7 participants [5.5%]) groups. The most common TEAEs in the xanomeline-trospium vs placebo group were nausea (24 participants [19.2%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), dyspepsia (20 participants [16.0%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), vomiting (20 participants [16.0%] vs 1 participant [0.8%]), and constipation (16 participants [12.8%] vs 5 participants [3.9%]). Measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, and somnolence were similar between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Xanomeline-trospium was efficacious and well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. These findings, together with the previously reported and consistent results from the EMERGENT-1 and EMERGENT-2 trials, support the potential of xanomeline-trospium to be the first in a putative new class of antipsychotic medications without D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04738123.

A long-term, phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative safety study of pomaglumetad methionil (LY2140023 monohydrate) versus atypical antipsychotic standard of care in patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: We compared the time to discontinuation due to lack of tolerability over 24 weeks in patients suffering from schizophrenia treated with pomaglumetad methionil (LY2140023 monohydrate, the prodrug of metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist, LY404039) or standard of care (SOC: olanzapine, risperidone, or aripiprazole). METHODS: Study HBBR was a multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the long-term safety and tolerability of LY2140023 with SOC for schizophrenia. Patients had moderate symptomatology with prominent negative symptoms and evidence of functional impairment. Those who met entry criteria were randomized to open-label treatment with either LY2140023 (target dose: 40 mg twice daily [BID]; n = 130) or SOC (n = 131). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between LY2140023 and SOC for time to discontinuation due to lack of tolerability (primary objective; P = .184). The Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed comparable time to event profiles. Only 27% of LY2140023 and 45% of SOC patients completed the 24-week open-label, active treatment phase. Twenty-seven patients (20.8%) in the LY2140023 group and 15 patients (11.5%) in the SOC group discontinued due to lack of efficacy (P = .044). Twenty-three patients (17.7%) in the LY2140023 group and 19 patients (14.5%) in the SOC group discontinued due to adverse events (physician and subject decision combined, P = .505). The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable between groups. LY2140023-treated patients reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events of vomiting, agitation, and dyspepsia, while SOC-treated patients reported significantly more akathisia and weight gain. The incidence of treatment-emergent parkinsonism (P = .011) and akathisia (P = .029) was significantly greater in SOC group. Improvement in PANSS total score over the initial 6 to 8 weeks of treatment was similar between groups, but improvement was significantly greater in the SOC group at 24-week endpoint (P = .004). LY2140023 and SOC groups had comparable negative symptom improvement at 24-week endpoint (P = .444). CONCLUSION: These data provide further evidence that the potential antipsychotic LY2140023 monohydrate, with a glutamatergic mechanism of action, may have a unique tolerability profile characterized by a low association with some adverse events such as extrapyramidal symptoms and weight gain that may characterize currently available dopaminergic antipsychotics. TRIALS REGISTRATION: A Long-term, Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Safety Study of LY2140023 Versus Atypical Antipsychotic Standard of Care in Patients with DSM-IV-TR Schizophrenia.

A structured interview guide for global impressions: increasing reliability and scoring accuracy for CNS trials.

BACKGROUND: The clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) scale is a frequently used rating instrument for the assessment of global severity of illness in Central Nervous System (CNS) trials. Although scoring guidelines have been proposed to anchor these scores, the collection of sufficient documentation to support the derived score is not part of any standardized interview procedure. It is self evident that the absence of a standardized, documentary format can affect inter-rater reliability and may adversely affect the accuracy of the resulting data. METHOD: We developed a structured interview guide for global impressions (SIGGI) and evaluated the instrument in a 2-visit study of ambulatory patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or schizophrenia. Blinded, site-independent raters listened to audio recorded SIGGI interviews administered by site-based CGI raters. We compared SIGGI-derived CGI-S scores between the two separate site-based raters and the site-independent raters. RESULTS: We found significant intraclass correlations (p = 0.001) on all SIGGI-derived CGI-S scores between two separate site-based CGI raters with each other (r = 0.768) and with a blinded, site-independent rater (r = 0.748 and r = 0.706 respectively) and significant Pearson's correlations between CGI-S scores with all MADRS validity comparisons for MDD and PANSS comparisons for schizophrenia (p- 0.001 in all cases). Compared to site-based raters, the site-independent raters gave identical "dual" CGI-S scores to 67.6% and 68.2% of subjects at visit 1 and 77.1% at visit 2. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the SIGGI may improve the inter-rater reliability and scoring precision of the CGI-S and have broad applicability in CNS clinical trials.

The Steady-State Comparative Bioavailability of Intramuscular Risperidone ISM and Oral Risperidone: An Open-Label, One-Sequence Study.

INTRODUCTION: This open-label, one-sequence study evaluated the steady-state comparative bioavailability of risperidone in situ microimplants (ISM®) and oral risperidone in patients stabilized on oral risperidone treatment. METHODS: Repeat oral administration of once daily 4 mg risperidone for 7 days was followed by 4 monthly (once every four weeks) intramuscular (IM) doses of risperidone ISM 100 mg. Mean steady-state concentration versus time profiles for risperidone, 9-OH risperidone, and risperidone active moiety was characterized. RESULTS: A total of 104 subjects were enrolled, 81 were included in the safety population and 58 completed the study. Intersubject variability for the steady-state concentrations versus time profiles for risperidone active moiety presented a greater variability range for oral risperidone versus risperidone ISM (% coefficient of variation [CV] range: 40-65% and 38-52%, respectively). Minimum plasma concentration at steady-state (Cmin, ss) and fluctuation in plasma concentrations (Fluc) of risperidone active moiety after risperidone ISM administration met bioequivalence criteria compared to the reference oral risperidone (geometric mean ratio [GMR] = 1.09 and 0.96, respectively; both 90% CIs were within 0.80-1.25). Area under the curve during the dosing interval (AUCtau), maximum plasma concentration at steady-state (Cmax, ss) and average plasma concentration (Cave) were only slightly higher (GMR [90% CI] = 1.25 [1.16-1.34], 1.17 [1.08-1.27], and 1.25 [1.16-1.34], respectively). Overall, once daily oral risperidone 4 mg and once monthly IM risperidone ISM 100 mg were generally safe and well tolerated in the participating subjects with schizophrenia previously stabilized with oral risperidone. CONCLUSION: The rapid release of risperidone ISM allows the achievement of the desired levels similar to those observed at the steady-state after oral risperidone treatment. Therefore, direct switch after 24 hours from the last oral risperidone dose to risperidone ISM treatment can be done in schizophrenia patients with no time lag, maintaining steady-state levels of the active moiety throughout treatment and without the need for oral risperidone supplementation or loading doses.

PANSS Individual Item and Marder Dimension Analyses From a Pivotal Trial of RBP-7000 (Monthly Extended-Release Risperidone) in Schizophrenia Patients.

Background: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) data from a pivotal phase 3 study in participants with schizophrenia of RBP-7000, a recently marketed long-acting subcutaneous injectable risperidone formulation, were examined to determine if dose-response relationships existed for different items of the PANSS.Methods: Changes in the 30 PANSS items were analyzed individually and using the 5 factor-analysis-derived dimensions defined by Marder and colleagues. Subgroups of patients who could benefit from the RBP-7000 120 mg dose were investigated.Results: 337 participants were randomized and received study medication (RBP-7000 90 mg n = 111, RBP-7000 120 mg n = 114, placebo n = 112). Dose-dependent responses were observed in items from the study-specified PANSS positive and general psychopathology exploratory subscales. Dose-dependent responses were observed across all 5 Marder dimensions, with the largest effect sizes observed with the 120 mg dose in the uncontrolled hostility/excitement (UHE) and anxiety/depression dimensions. Participants with baseline UHE dimension scores ≥ 9 demonstrated greater improvement in PANSS total score at the 120 mg dose compared to the 90 mg dose.Conclusions: RBP-7000 demonstrated efficacy across both the primary and exploratory PANSS study endpoints and the post hoc Marder dimensions. Schizophrenia patients with higher baseline Marder UHE scores may benefit from initiation of treatment at the 120 mg dose.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02109562.

Proof-of-Mechanism Study of the Phosphodiesterase 10 Inhibitor RG7203 in Patients With Schizophrenia and Negative Symptoms.

Background: Reduced activation of dopamine D1 receptor signaling may be implicated in reward functioning as a potential driver of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A), an enzyme that is highly expressed in the striatum, modulates both dopamine D2- and D1-dependent signaling. Methods: We assessed whether augmentation of D1 signaling by the PDE10 inhibitor RG7203 enhances imaging and behavioral markers of reward functions in patients with schizophrenia and negative symptoms. In a 3-period, double-blind, crossover study, we investigated the effects of RG7203 (5 mg and 15 mg doses) and placebo as adjunctive treatment to stable background antipsychotic treatment in patients with chronic schizophrenia with moderate levels of negative symptoms. Effects on reward functioning and reward-based effortful behavior were evaluated using the monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging and the effort-cost-benefit and working memory reinforcement learning tasks. Results: Patients (N = 33; 30 male, mean age ± SD 36.6 ± 7.0 years; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom factor score 23.0 ± 3.5 at screening) were assessed at three study centers in the United States; 24 patients completed the study. RG7203 at 5 mg significantly increased reward expectation-related activity in the monetary incentive delay task, but in the context of significantly decreased overall activity across all task conditions. Conclusions: In contrast to our expectations, RG7203 significantly worsened reward-based effortful behavior and indices of reward learning. The results do not support the utility of RG7203 as adjunctive treatment for negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Efficacy and safety of the novel glycine transporter inhibitor BI 425809 once daily in patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia predicts poor functional outcomes, but currently no approved pharmacotherapy is available. This study investigated whether the glycine transporter-1 inhibitor BI 425809 improves cognition in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (81 centres, 11 countries), randomly assigned outpatients (aged 18-50 years) with schizophrenia on stable treatment to add-on once-daily oral BI 425809 2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, or 25 mg or placebo (1:1:1:1:2) for 12 weeks. Treatment was assigned in blocks using interactive response technology; patients, investigators, and all trial personnel were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) overall composite T-score at week 12. Six predefined dose-response models were evaluated using a multiple comparison procedure and modelling approach with mixed model repeated measures to assess evidence for a non-flat dose-response relationship for cognitive improvements with BI 425809. Adverse events were monitored. Safety analyses included all randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of trial medication; efficacy analyses included patients from this set who also had available baseline data and at least one post-baseline on-treatment measurement for the primary or secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02832037. FINDINGS: 509 patients were randomly assigned between April 25, 2018, and Oct 4, 2019 (BI 425809 2 mg, n=85; 5 mg, n=84; 10 mg, n=85; 25 mg, n=85; placebo, n=170 444 (87%) completed the 12-week treatment. Five of six dose-response models showed a statistically significant benefit of BI 425809 over placebo (linear [t=2·55, p=0·015], linear in log [t=2·56, p=0·015]; Emax [t=2·75, p=0·0089], sigmoid Emax [t=2·98, p=0·0038], logistic [t=2·77, p=0·0085]). Pairwise comparisons showed greater mean improvement from baseline in MCCB overall composite T-score at week 12 with BI 425809 10 mg and 25 mg versus placebo (adjusted mean difference 1·98 [95% CI 0·43-3·53] for 10 mg and 1·73 [0·18-3·28] for 25 mg; standardised effect size 0·34 for 10 mg and 0·30 for 25 mg). Adverse events were balanced across groups, reported in 50 (59%) of 85 patients on BI 425809 2 mg, 44 (52%) of 84 on 5 mg, 35 (41%) of 85 on 10 mg, 36 (42%) of 85 on 25 mg, and 74 (44%) of 170 on placebo. INTERPRETATION: BI 425809 improved cognition after 12 weeks in patients with schizophrenia; doses of 10 mg and 25 mg showed the largest separation from placebo. If these encouraging results are confirmed in phase 3 trials, BI 425809 could provide an effective treatment for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Placebo response mitigation with a participant-focused psychoeducational procedure: a randomized, single-blind, all placebo study in major depressive and psychotic disorders.

The remarkably high and growing placebo response rates in clinical trials for CNS indications, such as depression and schizophrenia, constitute a major challenge for the drug development enterprise. Despite extensive literature on participant expectancies and other potent psychosocial factors that perpetuate placebo response, no empirically validated participant-focused strategies to mitigate this phenomenon have been available. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Placebo-Control Reminder Script (PCRS), a brief interactive procedure that educates participants about factors known to cause placebo response, which was administered prior to the primary outcome assessments to subjects with major depressive or psychotic disorders who had at least moderate depression. Participants were informed they would participate in a 2-week randomized clinical trial with a 50% chance of receiving either an experimental antidepressant medication or placebo. In actuality, all participants received placebo. Participants randomly assigned to receive the PCRS (n = 70) reported significantly smaller reductions (i.e., less placebo response) in depression than those who did not receive the PCRS (n = 67). The magnitude of this effect was medium (Cohen's d = 0.40) and was not significantly impacted by diagnostic status. The number of adverse events (i.e., nocebo effect) was also lower in the PCRS group, particularly in the first week of the study. These findings suggest that briefly educating participants about placebo response factors can help mitigate the large placebo response rates that are increasingly seen in failed CNS drug development programs.

PTSD and dopaminergic genes, DRD2 and DAT, in multigenerational families exposed to the Spitak earthquake.

The objective of this study was to assess the generality of the association of DRD2 and DAT genes and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis/symptom severity. Two hundred ethnic Armenians from 12 multigenerational families exposed to the catastrophic 1988 Spitak earthquake were studied. Common polymorphisms A1/A2 alleles of the DRD2 and '9' repeat allele of DAT gene were genotyped. Heritability, association and linkage were assessed using variance component genetic analyses. After adjusting for the covariates, the heritabilities of PTSD diagnosis and B and C category symptoms were: 0.37, 0.75 and 0.39 respectively. Category D symptoms were not heritable. Neither the DRD2 nor the DAT polymorphisms explained the variation seen in PTSD diagnosis, total PTSD symptom severity, and categories B and C symptom severities. These findings contradict prior reports of positive associations between both DRD2 and DAT, and PTSD.

Efficacy and Safety of HP-3070, an Asenapine Transdermal System, in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Asenapine is a second-generation antipsychotic used to treat individuals with schizophrenia. This phase 3 study assessed efficacy and safety of HP-3070, an asenapine transdermal system (patch), in adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this inpatient study, a 3- to 14-day screening/single-blind run-in washout period was followed by a 6-week double-blind period wherein patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia (DSM-5 criteria) were randomized 1:1:1 and received HP-3070 7.6 mg/24 h (n = 204), HP-3070 3.8 mg/24 h (n = 204), or placebo (n = 206). Primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in week 6 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score versus placebo; key secondary endpoint was CFB in week 6 Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness score versus placebo. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal assessments. RESULTS: Each of the HP-3070 doses demonstrated significant improvement versus placebo at week 6 for the primary and key secondary endpoints. Differences in the least-squares mean (LSM) (95% CI; adjusted P) of CFB for PANSS total scores were -4.8 (-8.06 to -1.64; adjusted P = .003) and -6.6 (-9.81 to -3.40; adjusted P < .001) for 7.6 mg/24 h and 3.8 mg/24 h, respectively. HP-3070 was well tolerated, with a systemic safety profile consistent with sublingual asenapine. Incidence of application site TEAEs was higher for HP-3070 (14.2%, 7.6 mg/24 h; 15.2%, 3.8 mg/24 h) versus placebo (4.4%). Discontinuations due to application site reactions or skin disorders (urticaria, pruritus) were infrequent (≤ 0.5% per treatment group). CONCLUSIONS: HP-3070 7.6 mg/24 h and 3.8 mg/24 h doses were efficacious and well tolerated. As the first transdermal antipsychotic patch available in the US, HP-3070 offers a novel treatment option for people with schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02876900; EudraCT number: 2015-005134-21.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a 2-Month Dose Interval Regimen of the Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Aripiprazole Lauroxil: Results From a 44-Week Phase I Study.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Approved AL doses and dosing regimens include 441 mg monthly, 662 mg monthly, and 882 mg monthly or every 6 weeks (q6wk), as well as the most recently approved dose, 1064 mg, administered every 2 months. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an AL regimen with a dose interval of every 2 months (1064 mg) were compared with two other regimens available as monthly and q6wk options. METHODS: This study evaluated pharmacokinetics of AL given at a higher dosage strength (1064 mg) and at a longer dose interval (every 8 weeks [q8wk]) than previously studied. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entering this 44-week, phase I, open-label, multicenter study had no recent exposure to aripiprazole and were maintained on other oral antipsychotics throughout the study. Patients were randomized to one of three AL dose regimens for 24 weeks (four 1064-mg injections [q8wk], five 882-mg injections [q6wk], or seven 441-mg injections [q4wk], with the last AL exposure at week 24). Oral aripiprazole was prohibited. Patients were followed for an additional 20 weeks to assess terminal aripiprazole plasma concentrations and ongoing safety. Plasma concentration samples were obtained at regular intervals to provide pharmacokinetic data for the duration of AL exposure and to measure persistence of plasma aripiprazole concentrations after AL discontinuation. RESULTS: Eligible patients received AL 1064 mg q8wk (n = 35), 882 mg q6wk (n = 34), or 441 mg q4wk (n = 35). Overall, 103/104 (99.0%) patients were taking concomitant non-aripiprazole oral antipsychotic medications during the study. All three AL dose regimens provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole. Mean aripiprazole concentrations from the 1064-mg q8wk regimen were comparable to the 882-mg q6wk regimen and higher than the 441-mg q4wk regimen. Overall incidence by group of any adverse events (AEs) throughout the study was 68.6% (1064 mg q8wk), 50.0% (882 mg q6wk), and 65.7% (441 mg q4wk). The most common AE across regimens was injection-site pain (range 8.6%-11.4%). Serious AEs were reported by eight patients (all but one [increased psychosis in one patient, 441-mg q4wk group] considered unrelated to study drug). Discontinuations due to AEs were reported for 2.9%, 11.8%, and 5.7% of patients receiving the 8-, 6-, and 4-week regimens, respectively. AEs of akathisia, dyskinesia, and dystonia occurred in 2.9%, 8.6%, and 5.7% of patients in the 1064-mg q8wk group, 8.8%, 0%, and 2.9% in the 882-mg q6wk group, and 8.6%, 0%, and 0% in the 441-mg q4wk group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AL 1064 mg q8wk provided continuous exposure to aripiprazole throughout the 8-week dosing interval and had a safety profile consistent with the 4- and 6-week regimens. These findings were used to support FDA approval of the 1064-mg dose administered every 2 months. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02320032.

Efficacy and Safety of a 2-Month Formulation of Aripiprazole Lauroxil With 1-Day Initiation in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Schizophrenia Transitioned to Outpatient Care: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control ALPINE Study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate efficacy and safety of a 2-month formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) with 1-day initiation during hospitalization for acute exacerbation of schizophrenia followed by transition to outpatient care. METHODS: The phase 3b double-blind Aripiprazole Lauroxil and Paliperidone palmitate: INitiation Effectiveness (ALPINE) study was conducted from November 2017 to March 2019. Adults with acute schizophrenia according to DSM-5 criteria were randomized (1:1) to AL (AL NanoCrystal Dispersion + oral aripiprazole 30 mg, day 1; AL 1,064 mg, day 8 and every 8 weeks [q8wk]) or paliperidone palmitate (PP 234 mg, day 1; PP 156 mg, day 8 and then q4wk) for 25 weeks. Patients remained hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks after randomization per protocol. Primary endpoint was within-group change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (PANSST) from baseline to week 4. Secondary analyses included within- and between-group changes from baseline at various time points. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data were monitored. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were randomized (AL, n = 99; PP, n = 101); 56.6% and 42.6%, respectively, completed the study. For AL, the mean baseline PANSST was 94.1; scores were significantly reduced from baseline at week 4 (-17.4; P < .001) and were also reduced at weeks 9 (-19.8) and 25 (-23.3). With PP, PANSST also improved significantly from baseline (94.6) at week 4 (-20.1; P < .001) and also improved at weeks 9 (-22.5) and 25 (-21.7). The 3 most common AEs over 25 weeks in the AL group were injection site pain (17.2%), increased weight (9.1%), and akathisia (9.1%). The same AEs were the most common in the PP group (injection site pain [24.8%], increased weight [16.8%], and akathisia [10.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: AL and PP were efficacious and well-tolerated for initiating treatment of schizophrenia in the hospital and continuing outpatient treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345979.