RESUMO
AIMS: The aim of the study was to examine perceived stress as a mediator of the association between weight-related discrimination and physical and psychological well-being among persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Data were obtained from 5104 persons with self-reported T2D participating in the All of Us research programme in the United States. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and PROMIS Global Health Scale were used to measure weight-related discrimination, perceived stress and health outcomes (physical and psychological), respectively. Mediation effects of PSS were tested by bootstrapping with 5000 random samples. RESULTS: Participants were, on average, 63.62 (SD 11.38) years old. Majority of them were female (55.53%), non-Hispanic White (72.61%), married or living with a partner (56.92%), had a household income of <$35,000 (31.99%) and had some college education (33.54%). We found that approximately 18% of study participants reported having experienced weight-related discrimination. We also found that weight-related discrimination was independently associated with poor physical and psychological well-being. These associations were partially mediated by perceived stress such that weight-related discrimination was associated with greater perceived stress, which was in turn associated with poorer physical and psychological well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Given that weight-related discrimination is associated with poor outcomes through elevated stress, interventions that target stress may disrupt this pathway thereby helping to reduce the health impact of weight-related discrimination. This assertion should, however, be tested in future studies.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Análise de Mediação , Estresse Psicológico , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Preconceito de Peso/psicologia , Nível de SaúdeRESUMO
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common toxicity that may impair the quality of life of patients with various malignancies ranging from early to end stages. In light of frequent changes to the guidelines for optimal management of CINV, we undertook this narrative review to compare the most recent guidelines published by ASCO (2020), NCCN (2023), MASCC/ESMO (2023), and CCO (2019). The processes undertaken by each organization to evaluate existing literature were also described. Although ASCO, NCCN, MASCC/ESMO, and CCO guidelines for the treatment and prevention of CINV share many fundamental similarities, the literature surrounding low and minimal emetic risk regimens is lacking. Current data regarding adherence to these guidelines is poor and warrants further investigation to improve care.
Assuntos
Antieméticos , Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antieméticos/farmacologia , Qualidade de Vida , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/prevenção & controle , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The population of women aged 50 years and older living with HIV is increasing. Older women face unique challenges in the prevention and management of HIV; however, they are often under engaged in HIV/AIDS research. One such challenge is gender-based stigma, which can be manifested through harmful gendered stereotypes, discrimination, prejudice, and sexism that could potentially hinder HIV care engagement among this population. We propose a scoping review to identify and synthesize evidence pertaining to how experiences of gender-based stigma impacts HIV prevention and care among older women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We will use the framework by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to conduct this scoping review. We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus for empirical literature published between January 1981 and the date of search commencement. Supplementary screening will be conducted using backwards citation chaining of the final list of included full-text articles. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles and abstracts for articles that meet the predetermined inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will also screen full-text articles and chart data using a standardized data collection form. RESULTS: We will synthesize the findings through tables, charts, and narrative summaries. We will also identify gaps in the current literature and provide recommendations for future research. Findings will be shared at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed publication. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to examine gender-based stigma in relation to HIV prevention and care among older women. We anticipate that our results will be of interest to older women living with HIV, healthcare providers, policy makers, and community activists working to improve quality of life and care experiences for older women living with HIV.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Literatura de Revisão como AssuntoRESUMO
Background The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of this diagnosis amidst technological progress. It compared clinical diagnosis to radiology-aided diagnostic outcomes and negative appendicectomy rates (NAR). Methodology This study conducted a single-center retrospective and prospective cohort observational study on all adult patients presenting with suspected AA in 2018 at a major tertiary teaching hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Key demographics, clinicopathological, radiology, and operative reports were reviewed. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.27. Results Of 418 patients with suspected AA, 234 (56%) were in the retrospective group. The median age was 35 (IQR=26), and 224 (54%) were female. The overall NAR was 18.6% (95% CI (14.8-22.4)) and 20.8% for clinical diagnosis. Notably, the NAR for ultrasound (USS)-reported AA (false positive) was 17.6% (95% CI (10.6-27.4)). Three-quarters of the patients, 298 (71.3%), had radiological imaging. The most common modality was CT 176 (59.1%), and 33 (7.9%) had both CT and USS imaging performed. Compared with final histopathology, no significant difference was found in the accuracy of clinically diagnosed and USS-diagnosed cases, with rates of 83.5% and 82.5%, respectively (p=0.230). CT had the best positive predictive value at 82.1%. Single-modality imaging did not cause a significant surgical delay (p=0.914), but multi-modal imaging showed a non-significant trend toward delay (p=0.065). When surgeons assessed an appendix as normal, 54 (12.9%), the histopathological assessment revealed pathology in 28 (51.9%). The inter-observer agreement was only fair to moderate, Kappa=0.46 (95% CI (0.33-0.58); p<0.001). The intraoperative identification of a normal appendix inversely correlated to the grade of the primary surgeon, which was likely related to the number of surgical personnel in the theater (p<0.001). Conclusion This study showed that clinical diagnosis matches the diagnostic accuracy of imaging technologies. Utilizing diagnostic imaging methods promptly and appropriately did not lead to considerable delays in surgery. Surgeons' capability to diagnose appendicitis during surgery is moderately accurate. Most patients underwent imaging, with CT scans being the most common. Moving forward, practitioners must minimize excessive reliance on imaging techniques as this can be resource-intensive, especially in developing countries. Future clinical practice should balance embracing technological advancements and preserving essential clinical diagnostic expertise, for medicine is both a science and an art.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical outpatient clinics continuously face challenges in delivering efficient and effective care. An expanding population and chronic staff shortages makes sustainability critical. The primary objective of this study was to identify modifiable factors contributing to longer wait times in an orthopaedic outpatient clinic. METHODS: A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was conducted at Western Australia's state trauma centre. Over a four-week period, clinicians completed forms identifying delays in clinic, and clinic numbers were captured through an electronic booking system. Data was analysed using SPSS v27. RESULTS: Face-to-face (FTF) and telehealth (TH) clinic volumes grew by 18.9% and 361.1% respectively between 2018 and 2022. For the study period, 754 forms were completed for attending clinic patients. This captured 42.4% and 96.8% of FTF and TH actual attendance. The average wait time for doctor consultation was 63.9 min. Wait times significantly reduced when x-rays were performed prior to clinic (P < 0.001), and when an unaccredited registrar held the on-call phone (P < 0.001). Trauma clinics ran overtime in 95% of cases compared to elective clinics in which 25% ran overtime. The golden staffing ratio was one doctor for 13 patients. TH experienced few delays related to technological fault. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that clinic volume continues to rise. It highlights the demand for adequate staffing and identifies several modifiable factors that influence clinic efficiency. It demonstrates the growth of TH as an alternative modality for outpatient surgical services and its potential for future expansion.
Assuntos
Ortopedia , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Assistência AmbulatorialRESUMO
Stigma and discrimination create barriers to care among people receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We report qualitative findings from a mixed methods study guided by three aims: to explore (1) intersecting identities of people receiving MOUD (2) how individuals experience stigma and discrimination and (3) helpful resources in addressing cumulative experiences of multiple forms of disadvantage. We conducted interviews with 25 individuals in three treatment centers in the Northeast United States and identified six themes: (1) Living with multiple socially marginalized identities and addiction; (2) Loss; (3) "It's everywhere": Discrimination and stigma; (4) A "damaged" identity, (5) Positive responses to negative experiences: Facing reality and becoming accountable, and (6) Experiencing treatment and identifying supportive interventions. Findings highlight the complexity of intersecting, marginalized social positions. Future work should look beyond one-size-fits-all approaches to care and recognize individual vulnerabilities and strengths for improving outcomes among those experiencing OUD.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Estigma Social , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/psicologia , New England , Discriminação Social , Entrevistas como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Autologous tenocyte implantation (OrthoATI™) therapy has demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with tendinopathy at various anatomical sites. This study evaluates the effect of patient age, gender, and tendon biopsy site on morphology, growth, and gene expression of autologous tendon cells used to treat chronic tendinopathy. METHODS: Patients undergoing OrthoATI™ for tendinopathies between 2020 and 2022 were initially treated by biopsies taken from patella tendon (PT) or palmaris longus tendon (PL). The biopsies were sent to a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) cell laboratory where tendon cells were isolated, cultured, and expanded for four to six weeks. Cell morphology was assessed using phase contrast microscopy. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was utilized for gene expression analysis. Dichotomous results were compared between groups using x2 or Fisher's exact tests with no adjustment for multiple comparisons. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were utilized for the sex and age (<35y, 35-44y, 45-54y, >55y) analyses, respectively. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS v27, and a two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the analysis. The PT was biopsied in 63 patients, and PL in 86 patients. There were no observer effects for age and gender between the PT and PL groups. There was no statistical significance between the PT and PL tendons for cell morphology, average cell population doubling time (PDT) (PT 83.9 vs PL 82.7 âh, p â= â0.482), cellular yield (PT 16.2 vs PL 15.2 â× â106, p â= â0.099), and cell viability (PT 98.7 vs PL 99.0%, p â= â0.277). Additionally, ddPCR analyses showed no statistical significance found in tenogenic gene expression, including collagen type I (COL1, p â= â0.86), tenomodulin (TNMD, p â= â0.837) and scleraxis (SCX, p â= â0.331) between PT- and PL-derived tendon cells. An age stratification analysis found no effect on growth and gene expression. COL1 was found to be higher in males when compared to females (P â< â0.001), but otherwise no difference was seen in growth and gene expression in the gender analysis. No postbiopsy clinical complications were reported for either group. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that the growth and bioactivities of tendon cells from tendon biopsies for OrthoATI™ are not affected by tendon donor site and age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Assuntos
Tendinopatia , Tenócitos , Transplante Autólogo , Humanos , Tendinopatia/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Tenócitos/metabolismo , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica , Tendões , Sítio Doador de Transplante , Biópsia/métodos , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
Background: Stigma exacerbates power imbalances and societal disparities, significantly impacting diverse identities and health conditions, particularly for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Though crucial for dismantling harmful stereotypes, and enhancing healthcare utilisation, existing research on anti-stigma interventions is limited with its condition-focused approach. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature for a comprehensive review of anti-stigma interventions for diverse identities and all health conditions in LMICs. Methods: This review systematically explored peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, in ten electronic databases up to January 30, 2024, covering all anti-stigma interventions across various stigmatised identities and health conditions in LMICs. Quality assessment for this systematic review was conducted as per Cochrane Collaboration's suggested inclusions. The review was registered with PROSPERO (Registration: 2017 CRD42017064283). Findings: Systematic synthesis of the 192 included studies highlights regional imbalances, while providing valuable insights on robustness and reliability of anti-stigma research. Most studies used quasi-experimental design, and most centred on HIV/AIDS or mental health related stigma, with very little work on other issues. Certain high-population LMICs had no/little representation. Interpretation: The interventions targeted diverse segments of populations and consequently yielded a multitude of stigma-related outcomes. However, despite the heterogeneity of studies, most reported positive outcomes underscoring the effectiveness of existing interventions to reduce stigma. Funding: This study is supported by the UK Medical Research Council Indigo Partnership (MR/R023697/1) award.