Enhancing Quality in Psychiatry with Psychiatrists (EQUIPP)--results from a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To pilot a pharmacist-led, patient centered medication management program. DESIGN: Prospective, single arm trial. SETTING: Academic geriatric psychiatry outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients at least 65 years old, proxy available if demented, and on two or more psychiatric medications. INTERVENTION: A clinical pharmacist completed a baseline medication review and made evidence-based recommendations that were implemented by the pharmacist after discussion with the physician. The pharmacist made a minimum of monthly contact for 6 months to review medications and related issues. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the change in number of medication related problems over time (3 and 6 months) as defined by a predetermined classification system. RESULTS: The mean age of the 27 patients was 75 years, 10 of whom required a proxy to participate. On average, patients had nine chronic conditions and were taking 14 medications. The mean number (SD; range) of medication related problems at baseline was 4.1 (2.2; 0-8) and at 3 and 6 months were 3.6 (2.4, 0-9) and 3.4 (2.1; 0-8), respectively. Most follow-up problems were new (80% and 89% at 3 and 6 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using a pharmacist to deliver a medication management program was feasible and addressed existing problems. New problems, however, developed over a short interval (3-6 months), suggesting that ongoing intervention is required.

Performance of Medometer visual tool for measuring medication adherence and comparison with other measures.

OBJECTIVES: To measure adherence in older adults with the use of a novel visual scale screening tool and to compare this adherence measurement with other adherence measures. DESIGN: Noncontrolled prospective intervention trial. SETTING: Geriatric psychiatry clinic in North Carolina between February 2008 and July 2009. PARTICIPANTS: 27 geriatric psychiatry clinic patients were identified as meeting eligibility criteria, and 26 of these participants completed the baseline and 3- and 6-month visits. INTERVENTION: Pharmacist-provided medication management program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A novel visual scale, the Medometer, assessed patient adherence to individual medications and aggregate medication regimen. The Medometer was compared with pharmacist subjective adherence assessment and the four-item Morisky scale. RESULTS: Aggregate regimen adherence based on the Morisky scale was 44%, 50%, and 38% at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. Similarly it was 48%, 50%, and 46%, respectively, for the aggregate Medometer measurement. Measured individually by drug, average adherence at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months was 44%, 50%, and 35%, respectively, with the Medometer and 74%, 65%, and 50%, respectively, for the pharmacist's subjective assessment. Less stringent definitions for categorizing adherence identified a higher proportion of patients as adherent, with similar trends across measures. Individual medication and aggregate regimen adherence estimates provided face validity for the Medometer, with moderate agreement with other measures. CONCLUSION: The Medometer is a visual scale that can assess individual medication and overall medication regimen adherence. It performed well in this pilot study, but additional research is needed to assess the reliability and validity of this tool in larger, diverse populations and to test the effectiveness of this tool in guiding pharmacists' efforts to improve medication outcomes.

Perceptions of depression among dementia caregivers: findings from the CATIE-AD trial.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with Alzheimer's disease complicated by behavioral disturbances, to use single questions about perceived depression and assess patient and caregiver accuracy in recognizing patient depression. METHODS: Cross-sectional interviews from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness-Alzheimer's Disease (CATIE-AD). Patients were asked 'Do you believe you are depressed?' Caregivers were asked 'Do you believe the patient is depressed?' and 'Do you believe you (caregiver) are depressed?' These responses were compared to the patient's score on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), and to the caregiver's score on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) using screening test characteristics. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven total patient/caregiver pairs were evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 78 years, were mainly female, white, and had a mean Mini-Mental State Examination Score of 15. Caregivers were on average 63 years old, and were mostly spouses or children. 37% of patients had depression (CSDD ≥ 12). Patients recognized their own depression with a sensitivity of 0.26 (CI: 0.18, 0.37) and specificity of 0.85 (0.79, 0.90). Caregivers' accuracy in recognizing depression in the patient revealed a sensitivity of 0.65 (C.I.: 0.55, 0.75) and specificity of 0.58 (CI: 0.50, 0.66). Twelve per cent of caregivers were depressed, and caregiver burden was associated with patient depression. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant depression was common, and asking a single question to the patient about depression failed to detect most cases. Caregivers identified two-thirds of patient depression when asked this one question. Caregiver depression and perceived burden were associated with patient depression.

Practical depression screening in residential care/assisted living: five methods compared with gold standard diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: To test the accuracy of five practical depression screening strategies in older adults residing in residential care/assisted living (RC/AL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional screening study. SETTING: Four RC/AL communities in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 112 residents aged > or =65 and 27 staff members involved in their care. MEASUREMENTS: Direct care staff was trained in and completed the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, modified for use by long-term care staff (CSDD-M-LTCS). They additionally responded to a one-item question "Do you believe the resident is often sad or depressed?" and the Minimum Data Set Depression Rating Scale (DRS). Residents responded directly to the Geriatric Depression Scale (15-item version; GDS-15) and the Patient Health Questionnaire, 2-item version (PHQ-2). A geriatric psychiatrist performed gold standard diagnostic interviews using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for all instruments at predetermined cutpoints. RESULTS: Gold standard diagnoses yielded 14% prevalence of major or minor depression. The CSDD-M-LTCS and one-item screen completed by caregivers failed to significantly discriminate depressed cases. The DRS yielded high specificity (0.85) but low sensitivity (0.47). For the two resident reported measures, the PHQ-2 had a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.71, and the GDS-15, 0.60 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measures completed by caregivers failed to adequately detect depression. Of the measures completed directly by residents, the PHQ-2 seems to have the best mix of brevity, sensitivity, and ease of administration.

Older adults' attitudes about continuing cancer screening later in life: a pilot study interviewing residents of two continuing care communities.

BACKGROUND: Individualized decision making has been recommended for cancer screening decisions in older adults. Because older adults' preferences are central to individualized decisions, we assessed older adults' perspectives about continuing cancer screening later in life. METHODS: Face to face interviews with 116 residents age 70 or over from two long-term care retirement communities. Interview content included questions about whether participants had discussed cancer screening with their physicians since turning age 70, their attitudes about information important for individualized decisions, and their attitudes about continuing cancer screening later in life. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of participants reported that they had an opportunity to discuss cancer screening with their physician since turning age 70; 89% would have preferred to have had these discussions. Sixty-two percent believed their own life expectancy was not important for decision making, and 48% preferred not to discuss life expectancy. Attitudes about continuing cancer screening were favorable. Most participants reported that they would continue screening throughout their lives and 43% would consider getting screened even if their doctors recommended against it. Only 13% thought that they would not live long enough to benefit from cancer screening tests. Factors important to consider stopping include: age, deteriorating or poor health, concerns about the effectiveness of the tests, and doctors recommendations. CONCLUSION: This select group of older adults held positive attitudes about continuing cancer screening later in life, and many may have had unrealistic expectations. Individualized decision making could help clarify how life expectancy affects the potential survival benefits of cancer screening. Future research is needed to determine whether educating older adults about the importance of longevity in screening decisions would be acceptable, affect older adults' attitudes about screening, or change their screening behavior.

Older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of life expectancy assist physicians and patients in medical decision-making. The time-delayed benefits for many medical treatments make an older adult's life expectancy estimate particularly important for physicians. The purpose of this study is to assess older adults' beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy. METHODS: We performed a mixed qualitative-quantitative cross-sectional study in which 116 healthy adults aged 70+ were recruited from two local retirement communities. We interviewed them regarding their beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy in the context of a larger study on cancer screening beliefs. Semi-structured interviews of 80 minutes average duration were performed in private locations convenient to participants. Demographic characteristics as well as cancer screening beliefs and beliefs about life expectancy were measured. Two independent researchers reviewed the open-ended responses and recorded the most common themes. The research team resolved disagreements by consensus. RESULTS: This article reports the life-expectancy results portion of the larger study. The study group (n = 116) was comprised of healthy, well-educated older adults, with almost a third over 85 years old, and none meeting criteria for dementia. Sixty-four percent (n = 73) felt that their physicians could not correctly estimate their life expectancy. Sixty-six percent (n = 75) wanted their physicians to talk with them about their life expectancy. The themes that emerged from our study indicate that discussions of life expectancy could help older adults plan for the future, maintain open communication with their physicians, and provide them knowledge about their medical conditions. CONCLUSION: The majority of the healthy older adults in this study were open to discussions about life expectancy in the context of discussing cancer screening tests, despite awareness that their physicians' estimates could be inaccurate. Since about a third of participants perceived these discussions as not useful or even harmful, physicians should first ascertain patients' preferences before discussing their life expectancies.

Asking family about memory loss. Is it helpful?

OBJECTIVE: To compare a family informant's report of memory loss in an older family member to standardized clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment. SETTING: Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE), a 10-year longitudinal study of community dwellers aged 65 and greater in five counties of North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of potentially demented participants was selected from the second wave of the Duke EPESE using responses to a brief cognitive screen. A neuropsychological battery was administered to these participants, and their family informants were asked whether they recognized memory loss in the participant. One hundred fifty-seven participants completed the full evaluation and also had an available family informant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Family informant's report of memory loss (yes, no, sometimes) compared to expert consensus diagnosis of cognitive impairment or dementia. RESULTS: There was poor concordance between the clinical diagnoses of cognitive impairment or dementia and the family informant's recognition of memory loss (kappa=-0.05; P=.74). When informants reported memory loss, 30% of participants were found not to have a cognitive loss. Among participants in whom family informants reported no memory loss, 75% were diagnosed with dementia or cognitive impairment (sensitivity, 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.78; specificity, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.40; positive predictive value, 70%; negative predictive value, 25%). CONCLUSIONS: Asking family members about memory loss in a patient may be an unreliable strategy to detect dementia.

Characteristics associated with depression in long-term care residents with dementia.

We describe the prevalence, assessment, and treatment of, as well as characteristics associated with, depression in residential care/assisted living and nursing home residents with dementia. Overall, 25% of the participants were depressed. Depression was related to severe cognitive impairment, behavioral symptoms, pain, and for-profit nursing home residence.

Factors associated with potentially inappropriate drug utilization in a sample of rural community-dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: Many medications present special risks when used by older adults (ie, those aged > or = 65 years) and are considered potentially inappropriate for this population. The Beers criteria are often used to identify such medications. Past research has documented that use of Beers drugs is common among older adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to examine factors associated with potentially inappropriate drug use among rural community-dwelling older adults using a conceptual framework adapted from the Andersen-Newman behavioral model of health service use. METHODS: This was a population-based, cross-sectional survey. Data were collected via face-to-face home interviews between 2002 and 2004. Rural community-dwelling older adults residing in a single county in North Carolina were eligible. Potentially inappropriate drug use was operationalized using the Beers criteria. Data concerning predisposing (ie, age, sex, race, education, and marital status), enabling (ie, social support and insurance status), need (ie, disability and history of major depression, hypertension, osteoarthritis, back problems, or other comorbidities), and utilization factors (ie, number of medications used) were collected. RESULTS: Data were gathered from 892 people, with information on medication use available for 800. Two hundred thirteen of these 800 participants (26.6%) used > or = 1 Beers drug. Compared with individuals who used no Beers drugs, those who used > or = 1 Beers drug reported lower levels of social support (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) and higher levels of disability (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11-1.97), used more medications (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13), and were more likely to have a history of major depression (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.05-2.66), hypertension (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.33), osteoarthritis (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09-2.29), and back problems (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.19-2.47). CONCLUSION: As suggested by the Andersen-Newman model, the risk of potentially inappropriate drug use is highest among those with the greatest medication needs, as evidenced by poorer health status in this sample of rural community-dwelling older patients.

Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of depression screening instruments for older adults in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO (search dates 1966 to January 2002), and the Cochrane database on depression, anxiety and neurosis. We also searched the second Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, the 1993 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline on Depression, and recent systematic reviews. Hand-checking of bibliographies and extensive peer review were also used to identify potential articles. OUTCOMES MEASURED: A predefined search strategy targeted only studies of adults aged 65 years or older in primary care or community settings, including long-term care. Articles were included in this review if they reported original data and tested depression screening instruments against a criterion standard, yielding sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Eighteen articles met criteria and are included in this review, representing 9 different screening instruments. The most commonly evaluated were the Geriatric Depression Scale (30- and 15-item versions), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the SelfCARE(D). Differences in the performance of these 3 instruments were minimal; sensitivities ranged from 74% to 100% and specificities ranged from 53% to 98%. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and feasible screening instruments are available for detecting late-life depression in primary care. More research is needed to determine the accuracy of depression screening instruments for demented individuals, and for those with subthreshold depressive disorders.

Practice-based interventions addressing concomitant depression and chronic medical conditions in the primary care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Depression concomitant with chronic medical conditions is common and burdensome in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of practice-based interventions for improving depression and chronic medical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to June 11, 2012. STUDY SELECTION, APPRAISAL, AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently selected, extracted data from, and rated the quality of trials and systematic reviews. Strength of evidence (SOE) was graded using established criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four published articles reported data from 12 studies, all at least 6 months long. All studies compared a form of collaborative care with usual or enhanced usual care. Studies evaluated adults with arthritis, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, or multiple medical conditions. Meta-analyses found that intervention recipients achieved greater improvement than controls in depression symptoms, response, remission, and depression-free days (moderate SOE); satisfaction with care (moderate SOE); and quality of life (moderate SOE). Few data were available on outcomes for chronic medical conditions. Meta-analyses revealed that patients with diabetes receiving collaborative care exhibited no difference in diabetes control compared with control groups (change in HbA1c: weighted mean difference 0.13, 95% confidence interval = -0.22 to 0.48 at 6 months; 0.24, 95% confidence interval = -0.14 to 0.62 at 12 months; low SOE). The only study to use HbA1c as a predefined outcome measure and a "treat-to-target" intervention for diabetes as well as depression, TEAMcare, reported significant reductions in HbA1c (7.42 vs 7.87 at 6 months; 7.33 vs 7.81 at 12 months; overall P < .001). LIMITATIONS: Few relevant trials reported on medical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care interventions improved outcomes for depression and quality of life in primary care patients with varying medical conditions. Few data were available on medical outcomes. Future studies of concomitant depression and chronic medical conditions should consider measures of medical outcomes as primary outcomes.

Systematic review: Effective characteristics of nursing homes and other residential long-term care settings for people with dementia.

OBJECTIVES: In response to the need for an evidence-based review of factors within long-term care settings that affect the quality of care, this review compared characteristics of nursing homes and other residential long-term care settings for people with dementia and their informal family caregivers with respect to health and psychosocial outcomes. DESIGN: Databases were searched for literature published between 1990 and March 2012 that met review criteria, including that at least 80% of the subject population had dementia. RESULTS: Fourteen articles meeting review criteria that were of at least fair quality were found: four prospective cohort studies, nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and one nonrandomized controlled trial. Overall, low or insufficient strength of evidence was found regarding the effect of most organizational characteristics, structures, and processes of care on health and psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia and no evidence for informal caregivers. Findings of moderate strength of evidence indicate that pleasant sensory stimulation reduces agitation for people with dementia. Also, although the strength of evidence is low, protocols for individualized care and to improve function result in better outcomes for these individuals. Finally, outcomes do not differ between nursing homes and residential care or assisted living settings for people with dementia except when medical care is indicated. CONCLUSION: Given the paucity of high-quality studies in this area, additional research is needed to develop a sufficient evidence base to support consumer selection, practice, and policy regarding the best settings and characteristics of settings for residential long-term care of people with dementia.

Identifying priorities for patient-centered outcomes research for serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to engage a diverse group of stakeholders (N=38) to help establish priorities to guide patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) in serious mental illness. METHODS: Three meetings, two Web-based and one on site, were held to generate and prioritize an initial list of topics. Topics were then sorted and organized into common themes. RESULTS: About 140 topics were identified and sorted into 21 main themes, ranked by priority. Three of the top four themes focused on how research was conducted, particularly the need to develop consensus measurement and outcomes definitions; improving infrastructure for research, longitudinal studies, and new data sets and investigators; and developing PCOR methodology. Stakeholders also identified a need to focus on service delivery, treatment settings, and structure of the delivery of care. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement by a broad group of stakeholders in a transparent process resulted in the identification of priority areas for PCOR. Stakeholders clearly indicated a need to fundamentally change how research on serious mental illness is conducted and a critical need for the development of methodology and infrastructure. Most current PCOR has been focused on relatively short-term outcomes, but real world, long-term studies providing guidance for treatment over the lifetime of a serious mental illness are needed.

Methodology of a pilot study to improve the quality of medication use in older adults: Enhancing Quality in Psychiatry Using Pharmacists (EQUIPP).

BACKGROUND: Medication-related problems are prevalent in older adults, contributing to increased harm and health care costs and negatively impacting quality of care. Older adults with psychiatric disease are at an increased risk because of their underlying disease and types of medications prescribed. Efforts to improve the quality of medication use often focus on select medication-related problems, select diagnoses, or predefined quality indicators; however, such an approach fails to consider the potential for multiple coexisting problems within individuals. OBJECTIVE: A pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility of a medication management program designed to improve the quality of medication use in older adults with underlying psychiatric disease. This article describes the methodology of the study and details of the intervention, and presents baseline characteristics of the study population. METHODS: English-speaking psychiatry outpatients aged > or = 65 years taking > or = 2 drugs that are active in the central nervous system were enrolled into a medication management program, in which medication management was provided by a clinical pharmacist for 6 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Data were collected on the patients' demographic characteristics, health and medications, health literacy, functional status, symptoms of depression, health services utilization, quality of medication use, adherence, and patient satisfaction with the program. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three older adults were assessed for inclusion; 146 were not eligible, not reachable, or not interested in participating. Twenty-seven older adults were enrolled in the study, all but one of whom completed the 3- and 6-month visits. The mean (SD) age of the 27 participants was 74.7 (8.1) years; 63% were female, 74% were white, and 70% had no cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study tested the feasibility of a medication management program designed to improve the quality of medication use in older adults with underlying psychiatric disease. Findings from this study, which will be reported at a later date, will help to refine the program and subsequent testing, with the overall goal of improving the quality of medication use and health outcomes in older adults.

Depression in assisted living is common and related to physical burden.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to obtain a direct estimate of the prevalence of depression, its associated factors, and rates of treatment among residents of assisted living (AL) facilities in central Maryland. METHOD: One hundred ninety-six AL residents were recruited from 22 (10 large and 12 small) randomly selected AL facilities in the city of Baltimore and seven Maryland counties. Chart review, staff and family history, comprehensive in-person resident evaluation, and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) were administered by an experienced team of geriatric psychiatry clinicians. Those scoring >7 on the CSDD, a cut point repeatedly associated with poor outcomes, were considered clinically depressed. RESULTS: Participants had an average age of 86 years, most were female and widowed, and 68% met consensus criteria for dementia. Twenty-four percent (47 of 196) of the sample was depressed. In bivariate analyses, depression was significantly related to medical comorbidity, need for activities of daily living (ADLs) assistance, more days spent in bed, and less participation in organized activities. After controlling for pertinent covariates in a regression model, only need for ADL assistance remained significantly associated with depression. Forty-three percent of those currently depressed were receiving antidepressants and were more likely to receive them if they lived in a large AL facility. Sixty percent of depressed residents had no regular source of psychiatric care. CONCLUSIONS: In the first clinical study implemented by geriatric psychiatry professionals in AL, depression was found to be common, undertreated, and related to physical burden. AL is a rapidly growing segment of long-term care and represents an important setting in which to find and treat serious depression.

New onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms in the elderly: possible primary hyperparathyroidism.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a disorder of calcium homeostasis that occurs most commonly in older adults. Resultant hypercalcemia may be accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms, ranging from mild depression and cognitive changes to extreme agitation and psychosis. Surgical intervention almost invariably reverses these symptoms. The authors reviewed the importance of considering this diagnosis in the setting of neuropsychiatric symptoms in the elderly and reported on a 63-year-old man with mild hypercalcemia and a new onset of psychosis.

Can we trust depression screening instruments in healthy 'old-old' adults?

OBJECTIVE: Despite a growing understanding of late-life depression, few studies focus on the old-old, those 75 years and over. We wished to characterize depressive symptoms and determine the accuracy of two common screening instruments for major and minor depression in a population of old-old retirees. METHODS: Participants lived independently in one of two Continuing Care Retirement Communities and volunteered for an in-home interview about cancer screening attitudes. As part of this baseline interview, they were screened with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Those agreeing to a second interview received an evaluation using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV), performed by a geriatric psychiatrist within two weeks of the initial interview. RESULTS: In an educated and cognitively intact group of retirees averaging 80 years of age, the GDS and CES-D performed poorly using standard cutpoints in detecting both major (sensitivity 60% for both) and minor (sensitivity 33% and 50%, respectively) depression. One in five participants had significant depression as confirmed by SCID-IV evaluation. Twelve percent had major depression and 7% had minor depression. Most participants had their first episode of either after age 60. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to most studies evaluating the GDS and CES-D for accuracy in detecting late-life depression, these instruments at standard cutpoints performed poorly in this group of healthy older adults. The healthy old-old may require novel screening interventions to detect clinically significant depression.

Depression in assisted living: results from a four-state study.

OBJECTIVE: Assisted living is a rapidly-growing sector of long-term care, but little research has been done on depression in this setting. Using data from a large sample of assisted-living residents, the authors sought to 1) describe the prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms; 2) identify resident characteristics associated with depression; and 3) examine the relationship between depression and the rate of nursing home placement and mortality. METHODS: A group of 2,078 residents age 65 and older were enrolled from 193 assisted-living facilities across four states (Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and North Carolina). Residents were classified as depressed if their score on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) exceeded 7. RESULTS: Using this criterion, 13% were depressed, and only 18% of those were on antidepressants. Over one-third of residents had symptoms of depression, such as anxious expression, rumination, or worrying, and 25% displayed sad voice, sad expression, or tearfulness. Depression was significantly associated with medical comorbidity, social withdrawal, psychosis, agitation, and length of residence in the facility. Depressed residents were discharged to nursing homes at 1.5 times the rate of nondepressed residents. Rates of mortality were also higher for depressed residents, but only those with severe depression (CSDD >12) had a statistically significant increased rate of death. CONCLUSION: The mission of assisted living is to help older adults retain autonomy, privacy, and quality of life in a personalized environment. Greater effort should be made to detect and treat depression in this setting, both to reduce suffering and prolong the resident's ability to remain in their preferred environment.