Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Z Gastroenterol ; 54(9): 1061-8, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27612219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptoms suspicious of extraesophageal reflux (SSEER) include globus, chronic cough, mucous obstruction and hoarseness. Reports of conventional esophageal function tests and measurement of extraesophageal reflux (EER) in these patients are spare providing conflicting results. METHODS: In a prospective study we evaluated 60 patients with SSEER by esophageal function tests (esophageal manometry, combined 24 h pH - metry - impedance and oropharyngeal pH measurement, Dx - pH measurement) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The patients were stratified into 2 groups according to their accompanying reflux symptoms. Group 1, n = 23, comprised patients with SSEER solely and group 2, n = 37 patients with SSEER and reflux symptoms. The patients were compared to patients with reflux symptoms solely (group 3, n = 14). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups according to age, sex and BMI. Patients with SSEER and reflux symptoms (group 2) showed significantly increased proportion of pathological acid reflux, de Meester Score, pH < 4 overall and in upright positon and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure compared to patients with SSEER solely (group 1) but no significant difference to patients with reflux symptoms solely (group 3). All the other parameters of esophageal testing including non-acid reflux and EER were not significantly different between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study do not support a causal link between SSEER and esophageal motility disorders, acid or non-acid reflux and EER as measured by conventional esophageal function tests and oropharyngeal pH measurement.


Assuntos
Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico/estatística & dados numéricos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Manometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo
2.
Z Gastroenterol ; 53(2): 101-7, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25668711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Globus, chronic cough, mucous obstruction and hoarseness are frequently interpreted and classified as manifestation of extraesophageal reflux (EER) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Recent studies have indicated that ablation of heterotopic gastric mucosa of the proximal esophagus (HGMPE) by argon plasma coagulation (APC) significantly reduces EER/LPR symptoms. METHODS: In a prospective study we evaluated 14 patients with HGMPE and EER/LPR symptoms by esophageal function testing (esophageal manometry, combined 24 h-pH-metry-impedance - oropharyngeal-pH measurement), standardized symptom questionnaire (visual analogue scales), and esophagealgastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The patients were stratified into 3 groups: GERD (n = 5), functional heartburn (n = 5) and non-GERD-non-functional heartburn (n = 4). Patients (n = 12) received endoscopic ablation of HGMPE by APC. RESULTS: 73 % of the patients responded to APC with a reduction of frequency and intensity of their EER/LPR symptoms. The response to APC varied between the quality of symptoms and was most frequently seen in globus, swallowing difficulty and mucous obstruction. The magnitude of symptom reduction was highest in heartburn, sore throat, and globus. The response to APC was comparable between the three groups of patients irrespective of GERD and the presence or absence of reflux symptoms. Although 50 % of the patients showed an increased Ryan Score as measured by acid reflux in the posterior oropharynx, comparison between responders and non-responders to APC showed no significant differences with regard to symptom quality, acid and non-acid reflux, LES resting pressure, esophageal motility and Ryan Score. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that a large proportion of patients with HGMPE and EER/LPR symptoms responded to APC. However, we could not demonstrate a clinical or functional parameter that differentiated between responders and non-responders to APC or could predict the response to APC.


Assuntos
Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio/métodos , Coristoma/cirurgia , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Azia/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Coristoma/diagnóstico , Feminino , Azia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA