Continuation of Oral Antidiabetic Medications Was Associated With Better Early Postoperative Blood Glucose Control Compared to Sliding Scale Insulin After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated blood glucose (BG), creatinine levels, metabolic issues, length of stay (LOS), and early postoperative complications in diabetic primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. It examined those who continued home oral antidiabetic medications and those who switched to insulin postoperatively. The hypothesis was that continuing home medications would lead to lower BG levels without metabolic abnormalities. METHODS: Patients who had diabetes who underwent primary TKA from 2013 to 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Diabetic patients who were not on home oral antidiabetic medications or who were not managed as an inpatient postoperatively were excluded. Patient demographics and laboratory tests collected preoperatively and postoperatively as well as 90-day emergency department visits and 90-day readmissions, were pulled from electronic records. Patients were grouped based on inpatient diabetes management: continuation of home medications versus new insulin coverage. Acute postoperative BG control, creatinine levels, metabolic abnormalities, LOS, and early postoperative complications were compared between groups. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to measure associations. RESULTS: A total of 867 primary TKAs were assessed; 703 (81.1%) patients continued their home oral antidiabetic medications. Continuing home antidiabetic medications demonstrated lower median maximum inpatient BG (180.0 mg/dL versus 250.0 mg/dL; P < .001) and median average inpatient BG (136.7 mg/dL versus 173.7 mg/dL; P < .001). Logistic regression analyses supported the presence of an association (odds ratio = 17.88 [8.66, 43.43]; P < .001). Proportions of acute kidney injury (13.5 versus 26.7%; P < .001) were also lower. There was no difference in relative proportions of metabolic acidosis (4.4 versus 3.7%; P = .831), LOS (2.0 versus 2.0 days; P = .259), or early postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing home oral antidiabetic medications after primary TKA was associated with lower BG levels without an associated worsening creatinine or increase in metabolic acidosis. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Unsuspected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management and outcomes of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (arTKA) with unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) compared to those with sterile cultures. METHODS: The institutional database at a single tertiary center was retrospectively reviewed for arTKA from January 2013 to October 2023. Patients who met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on available preoperative infectious workup, received antibiotic spacers, or did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patients were stratified based on intraoperative cultures into 4 cohorts: sterile cultures, 1 UPC, ≥ 2 UPCs with different organisms, and ≥ 2 UPCs with the same organism. Univariable analyses were used to compare these groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis assessed infection-free survival at 5 years, and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate factors that influence infection-free survival. A total of 691 arTKAs at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years were included in the study. Of these, 49 (7.1%) had 1 UPC with a new organism, 10 (1.4%) had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism, and 2 (0.2%) had ≥2 UPCs with different organisms. RESULTS: Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed to 114 (16.5%) patients-13 (26.5%) with 1 UPC, 6 (60.0%) with ≥2 UPCs of the same organism, and 0 (0.0%) of patients who had ≥2 UPCs of different organisms. There were no differences in infection-free survival at 5 years between patients who had sterile cultures and 1 UPC (96 versus 89%; P = .39) nor between sterile cultures and ≥2 UPCs of different organisms (96 versus 100%; P < .72). However, patients who had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at 5 years compared to patients who had sterile cultures (58 versus 96%; P < .001). Cox proportional hazards regression suggested that when adjusting for covariates, an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of ≥3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1; P = .007), ≥2 UPCs of the same organism (HR = 11.0; P < .001), 1 UPC (HR = 4.2; P = .018), and arTKA with hinge constructs (HR = 4.1; P = .008) were associated with increased risk of rerevision for PJI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had 1 UPC or ≥2 UPCs with different organisms had similar infection-free survival at 5 years as patients who had sterile cultures. However, patients who had ≥2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at 5 years. Overall, 1 UPC or ≥2 UPCs of the same organism at the time of arTKA may suggest the patient is at higher risk of rerevision for PJI. More studies are needed to determine what interventions can be implemented to mitigate this risk.

The Posterior Approach is Associated With Lower Total Encounter and 90-Day Costs When Compared to the Direct Anterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of the surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been widely reviewed. This study evaluated the total encounter and 90-day costs of THA for 2 surgical approaches (posterior [P] and direct anterior [DA]) in 1 tertiary health system. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 2,101 THAs (1,092 P and 1,009 DA) by 4 surgeons (2 with the highest volume of DA and P, respectively) from 2017 to 2022 at 1 academic center. Demographics, comorbidities, operative time, length of hospital stay, 90-day hospital returns, and complications were compared. The total encounter cost and 90-day postoperative cost were itemized. Multivariable regression analyses evaluated associations with increased cost at each time point. RESULTS: The DA cohort had a higher median encounter cost ($8,348.66 versus 7,332.42, P < .01), resulting from higher intraoperative (P < .01) and radiology (P < .01) expenses. Regression analyses demonstrated the DA was independently associated with increased encounter costs (odds ratio 1.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.1; P < .01). There was a higher incidence of 90-day emergency department visits in the DA cohort (16 versus 12%, P = .02), with a trend toward increased readmissions. There was no difference in 90-day reoperations. Median 90-day cost was higher in the DA cohort ($126.99 versus 0.00, P < .01), and regression analyses demonstrated the DA had an association with increased 90-day cost (odds ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 3.0; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a younger patient population, the DA was independently associated with increased encounter and 90-day costs in a single academic hospital system. This study may underestimate the cost difference, as capital costs such as specialized tables were not analyzed.

Ultracongruent Polyethylene Liners Do Not Affect Survival of Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Valgus knee deformity is observed in nearly 10% of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The degree of polyethylene constraint required to balance a valgus knee remains controversial, and historically, posterior-stabilized (PS) designs have been favored. This study evaluated the survivorship of TKA done in valgus knees based on implant design and specifically compared posterior-stabilized (PS) and ultracongruent (UC) liners. METHODS: A total of 549 primary TKAs performed on valgus knees by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, degrees of preoperative deformity, implants used, and all-cause revisions until final follow-up were recorded. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revision in each cohort. The mean follow-up was 4.9 years (range, 2 to 9). RESULTS: There were 403 UC liners compared to 146 PS liners. There was no difference in patient age (68 versus 67 years; P = .30), body mass index (30.9 versus 30.4; P = .36), or degree of deformity (8.6 versus 8.8 degrees; P = .75) between the cohorts. At final follow-up, there were 5 revisions in the PS cohort (3.4%) versus 11 revisions in the UC cohort (2.7%) (P = .90). The most common reason for revision in both cohorts was periprosthetic joint infection (4 PS; 8 UC). Multivariable regression analyses controlling for age, body mass index, Elixhauser comorbidity score, sex, and degree of deformity demonstrated UC polyethylene liners were not associated with revision (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 2.21; P = .62). There was no difference in eight-year survivorship to all-cause revision, including aseptic and septic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative polyethylene liners from the historically utilized PS liners for TKA for valgus deformity did not reduce survivorship. With modern polyethylene designs, UC inserts can be utilized for this deformity without increasing the risk of failure.

Accelerated Discharge After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Does Not Predict Inferior 30-Day Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative advancements have made outpatient primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) a viable option for patients. This study evaluated the feasibility of expedited discharge after revision THA and compared 30-day outcomes to patients who had prolonged inpatient hospitalizations. The authors hypothesized that expedited discharge would not result in inferior 30-day outcomes. METHODS: Aseptic revision THAs in a national database were reviewed from 2013 to 2020. THAs were stratified by hospital length of stay (LOS) more or less than 24 hours. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, operative times, components revised, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations were compared. Multivariable analyses evaluated predictors of discharge prior to 24 hours, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations. Of 17,044 aseptic revision THAs, 211 were discharged within 24 hours. RESULTS: Accelerated discharge patients were younger, mean age 63 years (range, 20-92) versus 66 years (range, 18-94) (P < .01) had lower body mass index, mean 28.7 (range, 18.3-46.4) versus 29.9 (range, 17.3-52.5) (P = .01), and ASA scores (ASA, 1-2; 40.4-57.8%) (P < .01). Components revised had no association with LOS (P = .39); however, operative times were shorter and mean 100 minutes (range, 35-369) versus 139 minutes (range, 24-962) (P < .01) in accelerated discharge patients. Accelerated discharge patients had lower readmission rates (P < .01) but no difference in reoperation rates (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Discharge less than 24 hours after revision THA is a feasible option for the correct patient and further efforts to decrease LOS should be evaluated.

The Removal of Total Hip Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List has Improved Patient Selection and Expanded Optimization Efforts.

BACKGROUND: On January 1, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list. This study evaluated patient demographics and comorbidities, preoperative optimization efforts, and 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient THA before and after IPO removal. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing THA post-IPO removal would have improved optimization of modifiable risk factors and equivalent 30-day outcomes. METHODS: There were 17,063 outpatient THAs in a national database stratified by surgery performed before (2015 to 2019: 5,239 patients) and after IPO (2020: 11,824 patients) removal. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Preoperative optimization thresholds were established for the following modifiable risk factors: albumin, creatinine, hematocrit, smoking history, and body mass index. The percentage of patients who fell outside the thresholds in each cohort were compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing outpatient THA post-IPO removal were significantly older; mean age 65 years (range, 18 to 92) versus 62 (range, 18 to 90) years (P < .01), with a higher percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 3 and 4 (P < .01). There was no difference in 30-day readmissions (P = .57) or reoperations (P = 1.00). A significantly lower percentage of patients fell outside the established threshold for albumin (P < .01) post-IPO removal, and trended towards lower percentages for hematocrit and smoking status. CONCLUSION: The removal of THA from the IPO list expanded patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. Preoperative optimization is critical to minimize postoperative complications, and the current study demonstrates that 30-day outcomes have not worsened post-IPO removal.

A Permanent Articulating Spacer Versus Two-Stage Exchange for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: Although 2-stage revision has been proposed as gold standard for periprosthetic joint infection treatment, limited evidence exists for the role of articulating spacers as definitive management. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and costs associated with articulating spacers (1.5-stage) and a matched 2-stage cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients who had chronic periprosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and were matched via propensity score matching using cumulative Musculoskeletal Infection Society scores and a comorbidity index. Patients who maintained an articulating spacer (cemented cobalt-chrome femoral component and all-poly tibia) were included in the 1.5-stage cohort. Patients who underwent a 2-stage reimplantation procedure were included in the 2-stage cohort. Outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores, 90-day emergency department visits, 90-day readmission, unplanned reoperation, reinfection, as well as cost at 1 and 2-year intervals. A total of 116 patients were included for analyses. RESULTS: The 90-day pain scores were lower in the 1.5-stage cohort compared to the 2-stage cohort (2.9 versus 4.6, P = .0001). There were no significant differences between readmission and reoperation rates. Infection clearance was equivalent at 79.3% for both groups. Two-stage exchange demonstrated an increased cost difference of $26,346 compared to 1.5-stage through 2 years (P = .0001). Regression analyses found 2 culture-positive results with the same organism decreased the risk for reinfection [odds ratio: 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.8, P = .03]. CONCLUSION: For high-risk candidates, articulating spacers can preserve knee function, reduce morbidity from second-stage surgery, and lower the costs with similar rates of infection clearance as 2-stage exchange. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Does Order of Operation Matter in Patients Who Have Concomitant Hip and Spine Pathology?

BACKGROUND: In patients, who have coexisting lumbar spine and degenerative hip disease, there remains uncertainty regarding whether hip or spine surgery should be performed first. We hypothesized that undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) would protect against subsequent lumbar spine surgery (LSS) in patients who have 'hip-spine syndrome.' METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2013 to 2021 on patients who had radiographically-confirmed hip osteoarthritis and degenerative lumbar spine pathology, evaluated separately in spine and arthroplasty clinics prior to surgical intervention. Included patients ultimately underwent THA and/or LSS. The primary outcome was survivorship free of LSS or THA after the other was initially performed. RESULTS: Of 256 patients, 206 (80.5%) underwent THA first. Only 14 of 206 (6.8%) who underwent THA required subsequent LSS, while 31 of 50 (62%) who underwent LSS required subsequent THA, (P < .001). At 5 years, there was 93.9% survivorship-free of LSS in the THA first group, compared to 44.7% survivorship-free of subsequent THA in the LSS group. Multivariate analyses showed that patients who had THA first had lower odds of undergoing subsequent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, CI: 0.52-0.70, P < .001) compared to those who underwent LSS first. Additionally, those who have higher initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade hip osteoarthritis had lower odds (OR: 0.94, CI: 0.89-0.99, P = .04), and those who have progressive neurologic deficits (OR: 2.64, CI: 1.89-3.7, P < .001) and neurogenic claudication (OR: 1.15, CI: 1.06-1.24, P = .001) had increased odds of undergoing subsequent LSS. CONCLUSION: Patients with 'hip-spine syndrome' may receive more initial benefit from undergoing THA, potentially reducing the subsequent need for LSS. The exceptions were those patients who had lower-severity hip osteoarthritis and symptoms of major spinal stenosis.

Early Infection After Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence and Predisposing Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Although patient factors have been associated with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee arthroplasty, there are insufficient data on the relationship of patient and technical factors with early PJI after aseptic revision. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 157 aseptic revisions performed by 2 surgeons at 1 academic center. A negative intraoperative culture during revision surgery was required for inclusion. Mean follow-up time was 3.8 years (standard deviation 2.8). PJI was defined by positive aspiration or draining wound, and an additional operation within 1 year of aseptic revision. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and technical factors were reviewed. Data points were evaluated with univariate and adjusted multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of PJI after aseptic revision was 9% (14/157). The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Initial treatment included debridement and liner exchange (11) and antibiotic spacer (3). Two patients ultimately had an above-knee amputation. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in preoperative anemia (P < .01), transfusion (P < .01), and diabetes (P = .05) between cohorts. There was no association among the length of surgery, use of a metaphyseal cone, or the number of components revised and PJI. Adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that preoperative anemia (P < .01) was a significant risk factor for PJI. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of early PJI was similar to other studies in the literature. Anemia was an independent predictor of PJI, while technical factors did not have an association. Medical optimization of patients should be considered prior to revision surgery.

Clinical Outcomes After Stage-One Antibiotic Coated Molded Hip Spacer.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard for managing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with a specific molded articulating antibiotic hip spacer for PJI at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: An institutional database was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent implantation of spacer between 2009-2019. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: We identified 88 patients at an average age of 60.4 years who received a spacer implant, with an average of 4.2 years follow-up (standard deviation [SD] 2.5 years). A total of 34 patients (38.6%) had a "clean" two-stage course with successful reimplantation and no evidence of infection at 1-year follow-up. The remaining patients (61.4%) required 3.67 (±0.52) additional surgeries. Overall reimplantation rate was 72%. Causative bacterial agents included MSSA (n = 22), MRSA (n = 16), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 14), and polymicrobial (n = 12). Regarding complications, there were 13 (15%) dislocations, 16 (18%) periprosthetic fractures, 8 (9%) bent/fractured stems, and 16 (18%) patients had clinically significant subsidence. Patients with previous extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) experienced higher rates of bent/broken spacer stems (25% vs 3.1%; P = .006) periprosthetic fractures (37.5% vs 10.9%; P = .010), and dislocations (37.5% vs 6.2%; P = .001). The rate of infection clearance was lower in the prior ETO cohort (26.6% vs 54.2%; P = .029). CONCLUSION: We report outcomes in patients who underwent implantation of a specific molded articulating hip spacer at our institution. Infection eradication was roughly in line with published series of hip PJI treatment. There was a high rate of mechanical complications, especially in those patients who required an ETO.

Preoperative Weight Loss and Postoperative Weight Gain Independently Increase Risk for Revision After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The current American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) guidelines recommend preoperative weight loss before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2. However, there is a paucity of evidence on TKA outcomes after preoperative weight loss. This study therefore evaluated predictors of preoperative and postoperative BMI changes and their impact on outcomes after TKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 3058 primary TKAs at an academic institution from 2015 to 2019. BMI was collected on the day of surgery. Preoperative and postoperative BMI at 6 months and 1 year were also obtained. BMI change of ≥5% was considered clinically significant. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. Patient demographics, acute postoperative outcomes, and all-cause revisions were compared between patients who gained, lost, or maintained weight using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Preoperative weight loss was predictive of postoperative weight gain (P < .001), and preoperative weight gain was predictive of postoperative weight loss (P < .001). Cox regression analysis revealed that ≥5% BMI loss preoperatively increased risk for all-cause revisions (P = .030), while ≥5% BMI gain postoperatively increased risk for prosthetic joint infections (P = .016). Patients who lost significant weight both before and after surgery had the highest risk for all-cause revisions (P = .022). CONCLUSION: Weight gain postoperatively was associated with inferior outcomes. Significant weight loss before surgery led to a "rebound" in weight gain, and independently increased risk for all-cause revision. Therefore, current recommendations for weight loss before TKA in morbidly obese patients should be re-evaluated.

Short-Stay Arthroplasty is Not Associated With Increased Risk of 90-Day Hospital Returns.

BACKGROUND: With the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only list, medical centers are faced with challenging transitions to outpatient surgery. We investigated if short-stay arthroplasty, defined as length of stay (LOS) <24 hours, would influence 90-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary TKAs and THAs from July 2015 to January 2018, resulting in 2,217 patients (1,361 TKA and 856 THA). Patient demographics, including age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were collected. LOS, disposition, cost of care, 90-day ED visits, and readmissions were identified through the institutional database using electronic medical record data. Univariable and multivariable models were used to evaluate rates of 90-day readmissions and ED visits based on LOS <24 hours vs ≥24 hours. RESULTS: LOS <24 h was associated with significant decreases in 90-day ED visits (P = .003) and readmissions (P = .002). After controlling for potential confounding variables with a multivariable model, a significant decrease in ED visits (P = .034) remained in the THA cohort alone. Within TKA and THA cohorts, LOS <24 h was associated with lower costs (P < .001). Eighteen percent of patients with ≥24 h LOS were discharged to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facilities. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, LOS <24 hours was associated with decreased 90-day readmissions, ED visits, and costs. With the goal of minimizing costs and maintaining patient safety while efficiently using resources, outpatient and short-stay arthroplasty are valuable, feasible options in tertiary academic centers.

Cost of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves varying levels of case complexity and costs depending on the following: (1) number of components revised, (2) duration of operating room time, and (3) length of hospital stay. However, the cost associated with different types of aseptic TKA revisions, based on number and type of components revised, is not well described. We sought to determine differences in cost associated with different revision types, and to correlate this with average national hospital and surgeon reimbursement based on current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of aseptic revision TKAs performed at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2018. Patient demographic data, operating room time, and direct surgery and total hospital costs obtained from an internal accounting database (Enterprise Performance Systems, Inc) were collected. Patients were stratified by the components revised (polyethylene liner only, tibia only, femur only, or both femur and tibia). We hypothesized that direct surgery and total hospital costs would increase as case complexity increased from poly exchange to single-component revisions and both-component revisions. RESULTS: In total, 106 patients were included (19 poly exchanges, 10 tibia-only revisions, 13 femur-only revisions, and 64 both-component revisions). Operating room time was significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001). Direct surgery and total hospital costs were significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001), and were significantly lower for tibia-only and femur-only revisions compared to both-component revisions (P < .001). Average national surgeon reimbursement by Medicare decreased as a percentage of direct surgery cost as case complexity increased from poly exchange to tibia-only, femur-only, and both-component revisions. Total hospital cost per average Diagnosis Related Group weight was lowest for single-component revisions and highest for both-component revision. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in cost associated with aseptic TKA revisions based on number and type of components revised. These differences may not be accurately reflected in reimbursement, and often represent a burden to those who treat complex revisions.

Varus-Valgus Constrained Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Clinical Follow-Up of Six Years.

BACKGROUND: There is scant literature evaluating varus-valgus constrained (VVC) prostheses in contemporary revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the durability of VVC revision TKA with selective use of cones. METHODS: A retrospective review of 194 revision TKAs with VVC was performed from August 2005 through February 2018 at a single institution. The final cohort consisted of 168 TKAs with a mean follow-up of 6 years. Stems were used in all but 1 TKA, tibial cones in 48%, and femoral cones in 19%. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification in femurs was 1 in 57, 2A in 33, 2B in 62, 3 in 16, and in tibias, 1 in 42, 2A in 29, 2B in 81, and 3 in 16. RESULTS: Survival analysis showed that 93% were free of revision for aseptic component loosening, 76% were free of revision for any reason, and 74% were free of reoperation at 6 years. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute 3 femur or tibia, age <65 years, and progressive radiographic changes were associated with an increased risk of revision for aseptic loosening (P < .05). Progressive radiographic changes were seen in 19% of femoral and 16% of tibial constructs. The most common reason for re-revision was periprosthetic joint infection (65%). CONCLUSION: VVC revision TKA with selective use of cones provided a reasonable outcome as 93% were free of revision for aseptic loosening at 6 years. However, given the rate of patients with progressive radiographic changes and survivorship free of reoperation of 74% at 6 years, long-term follow-up will help assess the durability of these constructs.

1.5-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem. The purpose of this study was to outline a novel technique to treat TKA PJI. We define 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty as placing an articulating spacer with the intent to last for a prolonged time. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 2007 to 2019 to evaluate patients treated with 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for TKA PJI. Inclusion criteria included: articulating knee spacer(s) remaining in situ for 12 months and the patient deferring a second-stage reimplantation because the patient had acceptable function with the spacer (28 knees) or not being a surgical candidate (three knees). Thirty-one knees were included with a mean age of 63 years, mean BMI 34.4 kg/m2, 12 were female, with a mean clinical follow-up of 2.7 years. Cobalt-chrome femoral and polyethylene tibial components were used. We evaluated progression to second-stage reimplantation, reinfection, and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, 25 initial spacers were in situ (81%). Five knees retained their spacer(s) for some time (mean 1.5 years) and then underwent a second-stage reimplantation; one of the five had progressive radiolucent lines but no evidence of component migration. Three knees (10%) had PJI reoccurrence. Four had progressive radiolucent lines, but there was no evidence of component migration in any knees. CONCLUSIONS: 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty may be a reasonable method to treat TKA PJI. At a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, there was an acceptable rate of infection recurrence and implant durability.

The Calpain Gene is Correlated With Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement Failures.

BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty is associated with unacceptable failure rates secondary to metal ion reactions. Efforts to identify which patients will go on to failure have been limited; recently, there has been a suggestion for a potential genetic basis for the increased risk of revision in MOM hip replacements (MOMHRs). The purpose of this study is to determine whether certain immunologic genotypes are predictive of the need for revision in patients with MOM total hip implants. METHODS: This is a case-control study of all patients undergoing primary MOMHR between September 2002 and January 2012 with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Our investigational "case" cohort was comprised of patients who underwent revision for MOMHR for a reason other than infection. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was performed to identify a potential genetic basis for failure. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (15 case and 17 control) were included in our analysis. All patients in the revision group had a chief complain of pain; revision patients were more likely to have a posterior approach (P = .01) and larger head size (P = .04) than nonrevision patients. No patient or implant characteristics were independently associated with revision in a multivariate analysis. Patients with SNP kgp9316441 were identified as having an increased odds of revision for MOM failure (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study identified an SNP, kgp9316441, encoding proteins associated with inflammation and macrophage activation. This SNP was associated with significantly increased odds of revision for MOMHR. Future studies are warranted to validate this gene target both in vitro and in vivo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgeon-Performed High-Dose Bupivacaine Periarticular Injection With Intra-Articular Saphenous Nerve Block Is Not Inferior to Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periarticular injection or anesthesiologist-performed adductor canal block are commonly used for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. A surgeon-performed, intra-articular saphenous nerve block has been recently described. There is insufficient data comparing the efficacy and safety of these methods. METHODS: This is a retrospective two-surgeon cohort study comparing short-term perioperative outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty, in 50 consecutive patients with surgeon-performed high-dose periarticular injection and intra-articular saphenous nerve block (60 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, 30 mL saline, 30mg ketorolac) and 50 consecutive patients with anesthesiologist-performed adductor canal catheter (0.25% bupivacaine 6 mL/h infusion pump placed postoperatively with ultrasound guidance). Chart review assessed pain scores through POD #1, opioid use, length of stay, and short-term complications, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Statistical analysis was performed with two-tailed Student's T-test. RESULTS: The high-dose periarticular injection cohort had significantly lower pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit (mean difference 1.4, P = .035), on arrival to the inpatient ward (mean difference 1.7, P = .013), and required less IV narcotics on the day of surgery (mean difference 6.5 MME, P = .0004). There was no significant difference in pain scores on POD #1, total opioid use, day of discharge, or short-term complications. There were no adverse events related to the high dose of bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: Compared with postoperative adductor canal block catheter, an intraoperative high-dose periarticular block demonstrated lower pain scores and less IV narcotic use on the day of surgery. No difference was noted in pain scores on POD #1, time to discharge, or complications. There were no cardiovascular complications (local anesthetic systemic toxicity) despite the high dose of bupivacaine injected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Recurrent Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Controversies and Solutions.

Instability remains one of the most common complications after total hip arthroplasty and a notable cause of patient morbidity as well as patient and surgeon dissatisfaction. Isolated dislocations can often be managed successfully with closed reduction; however, recurrent instability poses a substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The causes are varied and may be related to patient, surgical, and implant factors. A thorough evaluation is important in determining the cause of instability and effectively managing this difficult problem. Management options include component revision for malposition, modular exchange, or revision to specialized components, such as larger femoral heads, constrained liners, or dual-mobility articulations.

Donning Gloves Before Surgical Gown Eliminates Sleeve Contamination.

BACKGROUND: There are numerous studies in the literature that have recognized the importance of the glove-gown interface as a potential source of intraoperative bacterial contamination. It has been demonstrated that the methods with which one dons their surgical gown and gloves can alter the level of gown contamination. We hypothesize that donning undergloves before the surgical gown will decrease if not eliminate sleeve contamination. METHODS: We performed a comparative study to assess the differences in gown contamination between three different gown and glove donning techniques. Participants ranged in experience level from intern to attending. Each participant covered their hands with ultraviolet light disclosing lotion and then donned surgical gown and gloves with their preferred technique and with the proposed technique in a randomly assigned order. The gowns were then removed and analyzed under ultraviolet light for distance and quantity of sleeve contamination. RESULTS: The gloves-first technique demonstrated zero contamination in all samples. This is significantly less than both closed and open staff-assisted techniques (P < .0001). All samples of closed and open techniques demonstrated some level of contamination. The distance of contamination on the right sleeve is significantly greater than the left sleeve (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: The gloves-first technique demonstrates zero sleeve contamination throughout all samples, regardless of the experience level. We strongly recommend considering the use of this glove and gown donning technique as opposed to the currently accepted closed and open techniques in an effort to reduce gown contamination.

Polymicrobial Infections in Hip Arthroplasty: Lower Treatment Success Rate, Increased Surgery, and Longer Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Polymicrobial hip arthroplasty infections are a subset of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with distinct challenges representing 10%-47% of PJI. METHODS: Records were reviewed from all PJIs involving partial or total hip arthroplasty with positive hip cultures between 2005 and 2015 in order to determine baseline characteristics and outcomes including treatment success, surgeries for infection, and days in hospital for infection. Analysis was restricted to patients who had at least 2 years of follow-up after their final surgery or hospitalization for infection. Factors with P-value less than .05 in univariate outcomes analysis were included in multivariable models. RESULTS: After multivariable analysis, 28 of 95 hip arthroplasty PJIs which were polymicrobial were associated with significantly lower treatment success, more surgery, and longer hospitalizations compared to PJIs which were not polymicrobial. Patients diagnosed with polymicrobial infection later in treatment (4 of 28) had the lowest treatment success rate, underwent the most surgery, and spent the longest time in hospital. CONCLUSION: Polymicrobial periprosthetic hip infection is a particularly devastating complication of hip arthroplasty associated with decreased likelihood of treatment success, increased surgery for infection, and greater time in hospital. Patients with late polymicrobial infection had the worst outcomes. This investigation further characterizes the natural history of periprosthetic hip infections with more than one infectious organism. Patients who present with a subsequent polymicrobial infection should be educated that they have a particularly difficult treatment course and treatment success may not be possible.