Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach.
Behav Res Methods;
56(3): 1994-2012, 2024 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37540470
2.
Type D Personality as a Risk Factor for Adverse Outcome in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Patient-Data Meta-analysis.
Psychosom Med;
85(2): 188-202, 2023.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36640440
3.
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations.
PLoS Biol;
18(12): e3000937, 2020 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33296358
4.
Psychometric evaluation of the computerized battery for neuropsychological evaluation of children (BENCI) among school aged children in the context of HIV in an urban Kenyan setting.
BMC Psychiatry;
23(1): 373, 2023 05 29.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37248481
5.
Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
Behav Res Methods;
2023 Nov 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37950113
6.
Rule out conflicts of interest in psychology awards.
Nature;
572(7769): 312, 2019 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31409933
7.
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.
Nature;
576(7786): 210-212, 2019 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31827288
8.
Modeling Interactions Between Latent Variables in Research on Type D Personality: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Clinical Study of Depression and Anxiety.
Multivariate Behav Res;
54(5): 637-665, 2019.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30977400
9.
THIS (METHOD) IS (NOT) FINE.
J Biosoc Sci;
50(6): 872-874, 2018 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30015605
10.
IGNORING PSYCHOMETRIC PROBLEMS IN THE STUDY OF GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE TEST PERFORMANCE.
J Biosoc Sci;
50(6): 868-869, 2018 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30015606
11.
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating.
Behav Brain Sci;
41: e143, 2018 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31064583
12.
Researchers' Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research.
Psychol Sci;
27(8): 1069-77, 2016 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-27354203
13.
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013).
Behav Res Methods;
48(4): 1205-1226, 2016 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26497820
14.
On the nature and nurture of intelligence and specific cognitive abilities: the more heritable, the more culture dependent.
Psychol Sci;
24(12): 2420-8, 2013 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24104504
15.
Research fraud: Speed up reviews of misconduct.
Nature;
488(7413): 591, 2012 Aug 30.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22932376
16.
The effects of height-for-age and HIV on cognitive development of school-aged children in Nairobi, Kenya: a structural equation modelling analysis.
Front Public Health;
11: 1171851, 2023.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37415707
17.
How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
Psychon Bull Rev;
30(4): 1609-1620, 2023 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36635588
18.
Are Speeded Tests Unfair? Modeling the Impact of Time Limits on the Gender Gap in Mathematics.
Educ Psychol Meas;
83(4): 684-709, 2023 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37398839
19.
The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science.
Psychol Methods;
2023 Dec 25.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38147039
20.
Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report.
R Soc Open Sci;
10(8): 202326, 2023 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37593717