Barriers and facilitators to routine revaccination among adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivorship care includes recommendations for post-HCT revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). However, not all survivors agree to be vaccinated. No existing studies have comprehensively reported barriers and facilitators to adult HCT survivors completing revaccination. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 194 adult HCT survivors was analyzed using convergent mixed methods. The analysis used various statistical methods to determine the prevalence of barriers and facilitators and the association between revaccination and the number and specific type of barriers and facilitators. Content analysis was applied to open-ended item responses. Integrated analysis merged quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: The most frequent barriers included the inability to receive live vaccines because of immunosuppression, identifying a suitable community location for administering childhood vaccines to adults, and delayed immune recovery. The most frequent facilitators were having healthcare insurance and a clear calendar of the revaccination schedule. Complete revaccination rates were lower with each additional reported barrier (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722) and higher with each additional reported facilitator (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63). Content analysis suggested that most barriers were practical issues. One significant facilitator highlighted by respondents was for the transplant center to coordinate and serve as the vaccination location for revaccination services. Merged analysis indicated convergence between quantitative and qualitative data. CONCLUSION: Practical barriers and facilitators played a consequential role in revaccination uptake, and survivors would like to be revaccinated at the transplant center.

Usability and acceptability of the electronic self-assessment and care (eSAC) program in advanced ovarian cancer: A mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine usability and acceptability of the electronic self-assessment and care (eSAC) web-based, patient reported outcome (PRO) program for people with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patient participants recruited from a single ambulatory site were prompted by email to answer symptom/quality of life items prior to each clinic visit. Patient participant acceptability was measured with the Acceptability E-Scale Score (AES). Usability was measured among a subset of patient participants using semi-structured interviews. Clinician participant acceptability and usability were measured via survey and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. A mixed methods analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 163 eligible patients approached, 143 (87.7%) provided written consent. Patient participants (n = 71) who created an eSAC report prior to at least 3 clinic visits, rated eSAC as acceptable with a mean AES score of 26.19 ± 3.36 (out of 30). Interview data from patient participants (n = 33) revealed that eSAC was easy to use and important to the clinic visit conversation. Data from clinician surveys (n = 8) and focus groups (n = 3) revealed that the eSAC program was acceptable and useful for clinicians. Qualitative analysis suggested process improvements from patients and clinicians for effectiveness in the advanced ovarian cancer setting. Mixed methods analysis demonstrated no major discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative findings, with the qualitative data broadening understanding of quantitative ratings. CONCLUSION: eSAC was useful and acceptable in this setting. This PRO is a promising strategy for enhancing patient-centered care for people with advanced ovarian cancer.

Facilitators and Barriers to Successful Revaccination after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation among Adult Survivors: A Scoping Review.

Post-transplantation revaccination uptake of childhood vaccines in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors is suboptimal, increasing the risk of infectious morbidity and mortality within this population. We systematically reviewed the literature for factors related to revaccination uptake, as well as the barriers and facilitators that affect successful revaccination. We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science in March 2023. Two independent reviewers performed study selection using the complete dual review process. Data were extracted using a standard form. Factors were characterized as demographic, clinical, or social determinants of health that affected revaccination uptake. Barriers and facilitators were categorized using the constructs from the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers Framework. Our searches yielded 914 sources, from which 15 publications were selected (5 original research and 10 quality improvement initiatives). More than one-half of the reports listed factors associated with poorer uptake, predominately clinical factors, followed by social determinants of health, then demographic factors. Nearly all the reports described barriers to successful revaccination uptake, with most of these falling into the "practical issues" construct. Most of the reports described facilitators, nearly all related to health care system improvements associated with improved revaccination uptake. Although this review provides a good starting point for understanding impediments to successful revaccination after HSCT, this review reveals that we lack sufficient evidence to drive targeted interventions to improve uptake. More research is needed, focusing on survivors' voices to inform our knowledge of barriers and facilitators to complete revaccination after HSCT, exploring behavioral and social drivers within this population, and examining the care delivery models that may complicate vaccine delivery in this population.

Associations Between Demographic Factors, Clinical Variables, Social Determinants of Health, Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Behavior, and Revaccination Status: A Survey of Adult HCT Survivors in the United States.

Comprehensive survivorship care after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) includes revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). There is complexity to revaccination in this setting, and revaccination rates are sub-optimal. HCT survivors are at high-risk for morbidity and mortality from infections including VPDs, underscoring the importance of interventions to improve revaccination rates among survivors. Determining associations between survivor characteristics and revaccination uptake may guide interventions. The overall study objective was to advance our understanding of factors influencing revaccination uptake among adult HCT survivors living in the United States The specific study aims were to: (1) determine the prevalence of adult survivors who are completely, partially, or not revaccinated at 2 to 8 years after HCT and (2) examine associations between demographic variables, social determinants of health, clinical variables, past vaccination behaviors, vaccine hesitancy (Vaccination Confidence Scale), and revaccination status in adult HCT survivors. This study employed a one-time cross-sectional revaccination survey of adults who were surviving 2 to 8 years after HCT and living in the United States. The survey was sent to eligible survivors in the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Long-term Follow-up research cohort. The point prevalence of revaccination outcomes was determined from all the respondents (n = 338), differences in intent to revaccinate for people not yet fully revaccinated were explored using Fisher's exact test (n = 126), and associations were examined between revaccination outcomes and predictors using multivariable logistic regression (n = 292). Survey response rate was 30%. Among respondents, 62% were completely revaccinated, 33% were partially revaccinated, and 4% were not revaccinated. Most respondents (77%) who were not yet fully revaccinated planned to complete the revaccination protocol. However, fewer not-revaccinated respondents than partially revaccinated respondents planned to complete revaccination (50% versus 80%, P = .032). Factors associated with incomplete revaccination were shorter time from HCT, inadequate immune reconstitution, and not having received all childhood vaccines as a child. Our analysis has identified multiple variables associated with revaccination outcomes, indicating the potential for interventions to enhance post-HCT revaccination rates. Since many survivors cannot be revaccinated promptly due to delayed immune recovery, clinicians should iteratively re-evaluate for revaccination readiness as long as it takes to ensure eventual revaccination. Broader efforts by the healthcare community to increase childhood vaccine uptake might eventually support revaccination uptake. Future research that builds on these findings should focus on intervention testing.

Vaccine hesitancy and routine revaccination among adult HCT survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis.

Revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) is essential risk mitigation in the prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, revaccination rates have been shown to be insufficient and to what extent vaccine hesitancy contributes to survivors not becoming fully revaccinated is unknown. We performed a cross-sectional, mixed methods survey-based study to explore how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination among US adult HCT survivors who were 2 to 8 years after transplant. Participants were asked to complete the Vaccination Confidence Scale (VCS) and open-ended survey items regarding vaccine confidence. The survey response rate was 30 %; among 332 respondents, vaccine confidence was high in 69 %, medium in 20 %, and low in 11 %. On multivariable analysis, four factors associated with high vaccine confidence were: predominantly Democrat zip codes (per 2020 election results), ability to pay for revaccination out of pocket, receipt of pre-HCT adult vaccines, and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. From 189 participants who also answered open-ended items, 14 themes associated with vaccine confidence were identified and collapsed into 4 categories based on the VCS: Benefits, Harms, Trust, and Other. Merged analysis showed congruence between VCS scores and open-ended survey responses and created a narrative about the relative importance of the constructs when approaching revaccination by vaccine confidence level. These findings significantly expand our knowledge of how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination uptake among US adult HCT survivors. Population-specific interventions to approach vaccine-hesitant survivors should be developed and tested.