The relationship between antenatal indomethacin as a tocolytic drug and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Tocolytic drugs, such as indomethacin, are often used to postpone preterm delivery. Indomethacin has been proven to be more effective than other tocolytic agents in terms of delaying birth but is often prescribed with caution because of its potential association with adverse neonatal outcomes. We aim to study the effects of antenatal indomethacin on neonatal outcomes after controlling for potential confounders, as compared to nifedipine and/or atosiban. METHODS: In this cohort study, we performed a retrospective analysis of maternal and neonatal data. Women were included if they received indomethacin, nifedipine or atosiban as a tocolytic drug for imminent preterm labor and gave birth at a gestational age (GA) between 235/7 and 320/7 weeks, between 2010 and 2015. Main outcome measures were: neonatal death, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and its treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-four women, delivering 610 infants were investigated. The incidence of the following adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher after indomethacin use: neonatal death (p = .017), NEC (p = .026), SIP (p = .008), PDA (p = .000) and PDA ligation (p = .000). However, these associations showed to be nonsignificant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio neonatal mortality 1.6 (0.7-3.8)), NEC 1.6 (0.6-4.4), SIP 2.8 (0.3-30.0), PDA 1.1 (0.6-2.2) and PDA ligation 2.2 (0.7-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: The presumed association between antenatal indomethacin exposure and several adverse neonatal outcomes may be based upon indication bias. Taking important confounding factors, such as GA at birth and neonatal birth weight into account, antenatal indomethacin exposure does not result in a higher incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. However, there may be a higher risk for spontaneous intestinal perforation.

[Unexplained cyanosis in two newborns: neonatal methemoglobinemia after maternal perineal infiltration of prilocaine]. / Onbegrepen cyanose bij twee neonaten.

BACKGROUND: Methemoglobinemia is a rare cause of neonatal cyanosis in the newborn. It is considered a medical emergency. Failure of recognition or appropriated treatment could result in serious disease and neonatal death. Neonatal methemoglobinemia can be caused by both hereditary and acquired factors. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present two cases of newborns who developed severe cyanosis a few hours after birth due to methemoglobinemia. This was thought to be related to the local maternal perineal infiltration of prilocaine during childbirth. Though rare, prilocaine is the most potent agent to induce methemoglobinemia compared to other local aneasthetics. After intravenous administration of methylene blue, both newborns fully recovered. CONCLUSION: Neonatal methemoglobinemia is a rare and potentially fatal complication of local anesthetics, particularly prilocaine, administered to the mother during childbirth. Midwives, obstetricians, gynecologists and pediatricians should be aware of this complication. The use of other local anesthetics, including lidocaine, should be considered.